Rubicon-bands that started well and then...

Posted by: Voltaire on 01 June 2009

Recently I have been enjoying lots of lovely vinyl from car boot's and I have gotten to thinking about bands that, despite their early brillance, have gone on to be a watchword for middle of the road dross and I'm trying to determine the rubicon, the point where they passed from good to bad?

I'll start with the easy ones...

Genesis- before 'And then there where three' good, after bad?

Queen-before 'News of the world' good, after bad?

Meatloaf-before 'Bat out of hell II' good, after bad?
Any to add?
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by 555
Pink Floyd after The Piper at the Gates of Dawn. Big Grin
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by saxondale
Simple Minds ~ superb up to New Gold Dream ~ everything thereafter (in the 80's at least) which includes Sparkle In The Rain , Once Upon A Time , Street Fighting Years ... was quite simply dross
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Voltaire
quote:
Originally posted by 555:
Pink Floyd after The Piper at the Gates of Dawn. Big Grin


absit invidia?

Smile
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Guido Fawkes
quote:
Genesis- before 'And then there where three' good, after bad?
Genesis - before and including 'Trespass' good, after PC?
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Ghettoyout
First three Roxy Music albums were very good, then it all went down hill after that.

Pixies were very good up to and including Doolittle, but then went off the boil a bit(but were still fine).

Lonnie Donegan started off excellently but then lost it with the popular stuff (My Old Man's a Dustman etc.).

Generally with most bands I like, the early stuff is where it's at. The exception is the Fall who keep knocking out good material.
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by 555
quote:
absit invidia?

Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Voltaire
Big Grin
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by John M
Kinks before muswell hillbillies, some of the best of all time...after ZZZZZZZ
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by JamieL
Tangerine Dream, 1968-1987 good, after that awful (after Chris Franke left).

Agree with the Genesis, up to Hackett leaving good, and also Duke, after 1980, terrible.

Yes 1970(The Yes Album)-1980(Drama) excellent, 1980s awful, not bad live once they got rid of Trevor Rabin, and especially once Rick Wakeman came back.

Many 70's bands became dull in the studio once they bought drum machines and their own studios. They stopped being band with carefully arranged music, and just churned out songs without a band fell, Jethro Tull comes to mind. 'Stormwatch' is the last great album, after that it was mostly Ian Anderson, with some nice Martin Barre guitar and the rest of the band used as session musicians, or just session musicians.

Mostly the change come with a member leaving, it is also hard for musicians to maintain a golden period, they either become a caricature of themselves, or they change from what made them good. Either way the freshness goes.
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by AS332
Fleetwood Mac - Tusk onwards ?
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Guido Fawkes
quote:
Originally posted by AS332:
Fleetwood Mac - Tusk onwards ?
Fleetwood Mac - Bare Trees onward?
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Guido Fawkes
quote:
Originally posted by John M:
Kinks before muswell hillbillies, some of the best of all time...after ZZZZZZZ
Still no joy with Preservation Act 1 and 2, Soap Opera or Schoolboys then, John? Not even Sleepwalker's wonderful track Life Goes On with the lyric

My bank went broke and my well ran dry
It was almost enough to contemplate suicide
I turned on the gas, but I soon realised
I hadn't settled my bill so they cut off my supply
Not matter how I try
It seems I too young to die


Well, it's not Waterloo Sunset, but I still like it.

ATB Rotf
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Kevin-W
New Order - up to and including "Republic", undistinguished to terrible thereafter.

Pink Floyd - anything after "The Final Cut".

The Blue Nile - pretty much everything after "Hats".

Simple Minds - after "New Gold Dream" they were appalling.
Posted on: 01 June 2009 by Guido Fawkes
The Bee Gees after they caught a bad dose of falsetto - before Jive Talking good, afterwards pretty dreadful IMHO.

Of course, they sold zillions of records after I stopped liking them so it is probably me that's got it all wrong again.
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by AS332
I quite like "Sparkle in the rain " . Frown
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by Simon Matthews
Kevin

Regarding Blue Nile, Peace at last was patchy but High is pretty damn good IMO.
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by Richard S
quote:
Originally posted by JamieL:
Tangerine Dream, 1968-1987 good, after that awful (after Chris Franke left).



When I saw Rubicon in the thread title I though that this was a Tangerine Dream topic.......

You are absolutely correct in that without Chris Franke they are an utterly spent force. Which is a great shame, as up to that point I loved them and enjoyed seeing them live immensely.
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by Paper Plane
Marillion post Fish

As for Genesis I would say anything after "Selling England..."

steve
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by John M
quote:
Originally posted by ROTF:
quote:
Originally posted by John M:
Kinks before muswell hillbillies, some of the best of all time...after ZZZZZZZ
Still no joy with Preservation Act 1 and 2, Soap Opera or Schoolboys then, John? Not even Sleepwalker's wonderful track Life Goes On with the lyric

My bank went broke and my well ran dry
It was almost enough to contemplate suicide
I turned on the gas, but I soon realised
I hadn't settled my bill so they cut off my supply
Not matter how I try
It seems I too young to die


Well, it's not Waterloo Sunset, but I still like it.

ATB Rotf


I went out a bought each one of them on s/h vinyl and set about "trying." I just dont rate them next to Something Else, Face to Face, Village Green, Lola vs. Powerman, Arthur...

Soap Opera put me to sleep, Schoolboys seemed like a toss off. Sleepwalkers is pretty good on the songwriting front as you say, but I can get past the empty feeling the playing and production gives me. Thanks for putting me on the listen again. I would still rather listen to them than just about any other current pop crap out there.
Posted on: 02 June 2009 by Pigeon_Fancier
So many! Is it cheating to say the Sex Pistols? It probably is - I'd even argue that they got off to bad start and went downhill from a low point. A live band with no business in the studio.

Leaving that aside - the Police. One great album followed by a world of horror...
Posted on: 07 June 2009 by 555
U2 after War.
Posted on: 07 June 2009 by stephenjohn
Led Zeppelin after Physical Graffiti Frown
Bob Dylan after Desire? ditto?
Posted on: 08 June 2009 by Adam Meredith
quote:
Originally posted by 555:
U2 after War.


U2 after WW2.
Posted on: 08 June 2009 by Jet Johnson
quote:
Originally posted by Pigeon_Fancier:
So many! Is it cheating to say the Sex Pistols? It probably is - I'd even argue that they got off to bad start and went downhill from a low point. A live band with no business in the studio.

Leaving that aside - the Police. One great album followed by a world of horror...


...I know what you mean about the Pistols but surely "Bollocks" is a truly great album? ....more than a few guitar overdubs certainly but a great wall of sound (and so much better sounding than the first Clash album) ....the myth that Pistols couldn't play is just that a myth....Sid Vicious certainly couldn't but Cook Matlock and Jones absolutely could!
Posted on: 08 June 2009 by stephenjohn
Jethro Tull after Minstrel in the Gallery