A sistem, a plan, an up/side/down -grade
Posted by: JeremyD on 02 March 2003
The sistem: LP12/Lingo/Ekos/Super Elys; Rotel RCD965BX; 102/90; Kans. [Please keep this thread a stands-free zone - you know it makes sense].
The plan: sell the Super Elys, Lingo, RCD965BX, 102, 90 and Kans, and buy a LingoII, Adikt, cheap amp (with an MM input and a headphone socket) and possibly a new pair of headphones. I've been thinking of doing this for months but I've finally decided to do it, if possible. (I haven't heard a LingoII yet, so it will also be dependent on my finding it as good as others have reported).
The rationale:
1) I am dissatisfied with my system* for two reasons:
1a) My Super Elys turned out to be a case of poverty-induced self deception. Unlike my previous K9, which responded well to the upgrade from Ittok to Ekos, the Super Elys is not good enough to benefit (musically rather than sonically) from an Ekos.
1b) My hi-fi keeps reminding me how much better it could be. My Kans say, "Please, get us a 140, get us a 140." My 90 says, "How do you expect me to sound great when I spend all my time powering your 102?" And, of course, my 102 says, "I'm soooo thirsty, listen to my hoarse voice, get me a Hi-Cap and NAPSC before I dehydrate."
2) I'm tired of having furniture distributed between my two rooms in such a way as to suit my hi-fi's needs rather than mine.
3) I'm tired of having to undertake a procedure reminiscent of a Thunderbirds launch sequence every time I listen to a record. [It involves moving my bed into a corner, putting one table onto my bed, collecting all exposed transducers and placing them somewhere they won't affect the sound (not that I can hear their effect much, if at all, these days), rotating a desk through 180 degrees and pushing it so that the desk-top covers the bed, wheeling a portable radiator across the room and wheeling my listening chair across the room. If you found that boring to read, imagine what it's like to do!]
4) All changes must be paid for by the sale of existing components.
5) I can do without a CD player for a few months - I can still listen to CDs on my PC or my DVD player.
6) There's probably going to be a limited market for s/h Lingos - best sell mine now rather than in a few years time.
7) My 90 is old and probably due for a service. I could envisage a 140 as being my final power amp but not a 90. Spending money on it would do little for its resale value.
8) I love the sound of the new generation of Naim amps. I haven't heard a 202 or 282 but judging by the NAIT5, 112 and 552 I expect to prefer them to the 102 and 82 by a considerable margin - hence it makes sense to sell my 102 while there's no downward pressure on the price due to wealthy people selling 202s and 282s atlow prices.
I've no time to write, now, but that seems to be everything. Any comments, attempts to talk me out of it etc. are welcome (I think).
*So disappointed, in fact, that I couldn't bring myself to spell system with an "i".
--J
Posted on: 02 March 2003 by Markus
What I would do:
You have some components that play music, others that are "stopgap". Your overall objective is to get a system that doesn't scream for upgrades and allows you to relax, no? Very much a matter of remedying the weakest link...IMHO.
If it were me I'd sell the Ekos w/ super elys and replace it with an ittok/dynavector 10x4 mk II. Yes the ekos is loads better but you need money, man, and you should be able to get some good money for the ekos, no? I'd also sell off the 90. Keep the 965 bx, you won't get much for it and it will allow you to listen to cd's. with the funds freed up from the ekos and 90 you should be able to find a used hicap and 140. Many parts of your system should then start to sing and quit complaining.
Yes I know source first. but weakest link and balance is also important.
OK, re-reading your post I see the logic of selling the lingo and 965. You can listen to cd's on teh dvd for a while. I think you've got to get a cartridge you can get on with. how much do you reckon you can get for the lingo?
Interesting, the 90 is basically the amplifier portion of a nait 2. People with nait II's seem to love them. You have a much better preamp than the preamp section of the nait II....
Hmmmm. you've got me thinking about your logic here. I wonder how it would be to sell off the 102 and 90 and look for a vintage Luxman integrated? Or some vintage Macintosh gear? Or an old luxman pre/power combo (i'm thinking early 80's here so it should be cheap).
I've bounced around a LOT on my response here. I guess I think the weakest link is the 90 and thats the bottleneck I'm trying to get rid of. I don't really think I've been any help. good luck.
Markus
Posted on: 02 March 2003 by Dan M
Jeremy,
Sounds like space is a major driver in the move to a headphone sistem. If this is your top priority, then I'd suggest the following. Flog the Rotel, 90 and Kans. Depending on cash earned you could get either a used HC/Rega Ear or FC2/Headline or a permutation of both. Keep the 102 - I imagine it w/ a *cap would beat any "cheap amp". Dont be too eager to diss the Super Elys - the improvement of the phono stage in the 102 after using a dedicated psu might surprise you. I'd almost be inclined to store the Kans away and flog the Lingo instead (downgrade to Valhalla). You can always buy a Lingo II later.
cheers
Dan
Posted on: 03 March 2003 by JeremyD
Thanks for the suggestions.

Re Ekos: I could never sell my Ekos (personal reasons).
Re 102: I am very much tempted to keep it. I bought it ex-dem from my dealer, and judging by how much it has improved since I got it I suspect he had hardly used it.
Re Super Elys: I first heard mine through a 552/500/SL2!!! Rega cartridges take a long time to run in and sound awful until they do, so my Super Elys was not at its best. But even with the horribly non-linear sounding dynamics the system was able to get an impressive sound out of it, bringing out its best quality (vivid tonal colour) without exaggerating its faults.
However, the Super Elys doesn't do the things that my system is good at and the failings of it and the system combine to make a sound that's great with a limited range of records but makes a lot my collection less than enjoyable.
--J
Posted on: 04 March 2003 by willem
Jeremy,
Maybe you could sell the Lingo (go back to the basic PSU) and the Rotel and get an ARO and a second hand Hi-Cap for the 102.
willem
Posted on: 17 March 2003 by JeremyD
Last week I went to a local dealer to listen to a Linn Adikt and compare the new and old Lingos.
To cut a long story short:
I soon found I wasn't mentally up to comparing hi-fi equipment. My emotional reactions (which I normally consider to be the most important factor in any equipment decision) were inconsistent, and to make matters worse I often couldn't remember what I had just heard when I came to replay a track after switching Lingos.
My tentative conclusions were:
1) The Adikt is better than the Super Elys but not enough to prompt me to ditch a nearly new Super Elys in order to get one. Like the Super Elys (and unlike the K9) the Adikt's sins seemed essentially to be sins of omission.
2) The Lingo II is better than the Lingo 1 in terms of most identifiable musical parameters, and where it appeared not to be I am prepared to believe the detrimental effect of the Trampolinn was at work. However, one time I switched from Lingo II to Lingo 1 and experienced a huge intensification of emotional effect, which was disquieting. So I'm not prepared to say unequivocally that the Lingo II
is a huge upgrade over the Lingo 1 but I am prepared to say that it might well be...
In case anyone is interested in a more detailed account of my visit:
The dem system started off as LP12/Lingo 1/Trampolinn/Ekos/Adikt; 202/150; Spendor LS3/5A in an asymmetrically shaped room, larger than my room.
I was immediately impressed, sonically. The dem system had a much lighter bass than that of my system but it sounded cleaner, clearer, more open and tonally more vivid than mine. Somehow, however, it took me twenty minutes to tune into the system, musically. It sounded tired [in a way reminiscent of a Valhalla'd LP12 trying to cope with heavy orchetral transients] and a little slow. Had I noticed the Trampolinn at that time I might have attributed the problem to that. However, the sound suddenly snapped into place, which cannot be explained in terms of the Trampolinn. Whatever the reason, at last the system seemed as musical as its sonic superiority had promised.
After listening for another ten minutes or so, I switched to the Lingo II. My first reaction was that it made a great improvement. I seemed to be drawn into the music against my will, and the experience was far more intense and involving than before. Had I stopped listening at that point I would have had to conclude that the new Lingo was unquestionably better. But, wary of my capacity for self deception, I chose to continue listening.
It was clear that some aspects of the Lingo II's performance were being masked by the speakers. I could hear a slight improvement in note shape - getting closer to what the K9 could do with a Lingo 1 - but felt Kans would have been more responsive to this. So we changed to Linn Katans.
At first, the Katans sounded as if their drive units were unmatched both in time and timbre. Then, after about 5 minutes, eveything snapped into place. It's tempting not to report such bizarre observations - especially similar ones - but failure to do so is to deceive the reader into attaching greater value than warranted to the objectivity of my observations. Maybe these sudden changes were something to do with the power supply - more likely they were wholly a product of my own perceptions. Anyway, on the strengths of what I heard (after the first five minutes) I think Katans may well be better than Kans!!!
With the Katans, sonic and musical differences were much easier to identify.
I'm too tired to go into detail with different pieces of music, for the most part, but here are some general observations.
With the Lingo II:
1) Low frequency sounds were much better focused. It took me a while to figure out what was going on here because drums sometimes sounded sort of "rubbery" and unfocused, at first, with the Lingo II. Then I realised, I think, that this was due to there being more low frequency energy in the sound, causing the Trampolinn more distress.
I think I have mentioned before that I had two alternative tables for my LP12 before I got the my Lingo: an Audiotech and a Sound Factory Tripod. Pre-Lingo, the Tripod was better - cleaner, faster, blacker more tuneful and simply more involving. After I got the Lingo, the Audiotech sounded much better! My theory is that the Audiotech's greater rigidity allowed the Lingo to perform at its best, while the thin, relatively floppy top board of the Tripod (which no doubt had contributed to the cleaner sound with Valhalla) introduced too much low frequency vibration into the system. I have the same suspicion about the Trampolinn - I wonder if the difference would be more obvious without a Trampolinn.
2) Background noise was reduced. This was not always evident to me, though.
3) Lines that hadn't seemed to lack clarity before became clearer on the Lingo II. What I found most difficult to accept was the improvement in timing in what might be called the upper mid range. Suddenly, it became clear where vibrato on a violin began - even though, before, I had not been aware of it being unclear.
4) The stereo image became wider, deeper and more focused. Thanks to my deteriorating hearing and the arrangement of furniture in the dem room I hadn't heard much of a stereo image before, so this was interesting...
That may seem pretty conclusive, but the more I listened, the more my emotional reactions became inconsistent. The most extreme example was when I listened to a couple of minutes of Kraftwerk's Computer Love on the Lingo 1. I switched to the Lingo II, and the sound tightened up and seemed a lot better focused. Then I switched back to the Lingo 1 and there was a HUGE increase in emotional intensity.
Also, when comparing the same piece successively on the two Lingos it often seemed as if I had just listened to two different pieces - the presentation seemed incomparably different...
I suppose I should have asked to listen to something unfamiliar - these days I usually don't bother to take my own music to dems, preferring to listen to music that I don't know and/or don't like. But by now I had a splitting headache and was dejected about having such trouble evaluating the difference. I carried on listening for another half hour but just got more and more confused.
I would now be extremely confused about what to do - but for the fact that I have changed my plans completely: I'm going to sell the Lingo and my CD player, downgrade to a respectable integrated amplifer and use the remainder of the money from the sale to buy a new PC, enabling me to make my own music. This means my bedroom will become a hi-fi free zone, my study will become a bedroom-furniture-free zone and my LP12 will be packed away until such time as I buy a Lingo II. And I'll be creating* music again for the first time in about a decade!
*As I always explain, I use the term "creating" rather than composing because I forgot how to read music notation years ago, and somehow feel that therefore I don't have a right to describe it as composing.
--J
Posted on: 18 March 2003 by Scott Naylor
Ross-
That's an impressive list the ES Troika beats! How do you feel it compares with the original Troika? Would you be so kind as to specify exactly what ES did? I've got access to a tired Troika and would like to have them do an identical rebuild as yours, based on your comments.
kind regards,
Scott
Posted on: 18 March 2003 by Rico
Ross' suggestion is indeed a good one!
Richard's idea of a DIY-geddon would certainly allow you to continue enjoying vinyl, and most importantly your vinyl front end (that you have, effectively, a wedge of cash tied up in.
I'm a little concerned that you are heading toward a system entirely populated by kit operating on principles of "sins of ommission". My understanding of the Rega carts is that the just don't work in the Linn arms. The 112 skirts around the stauff it can't do, to give the listener a pleasant portrayal of events. It's a good preamp. The 102 makes no appologies for its shortcomings, and tries to clear the bar - letting you know in some areas where it's dragging its ass as it passes over. It's a good preamp, but a little better (IMHO) than the 112. The bonus about the 112 is it has some of that modern Naim magic built in. The 90 is unlikely to be man enough to drive the Kans - unless perhaps you had a 52 betwixt LP12 and 90? A fresh 140 and napsc (you should be able to buy these with careful shopping with funds from the Lingo disposal) should be the shot-in-the-arm your system needs.
Computer for music? Shop the computer fairs, upgrade your existing machine - should cost a lot less. AFter all, where funds are tight, the PC stuff will end up in a skip in 2 years time, whereas the quality Naim and Linn kit will just keep on singing. Just imagine your LP12 sobbing quietly in the attic in its box!
If you must buy "a respectable integrated" - Nait 5 or Nait 2 would have my vote.
My 2p worth, anyway.
Rico - SM/Mullet Audio
Posted on: 18 March 2003 by alex95
Have you tried a CD5 , Nait5 sounds as if it may be up your street
Posted on: 19 March 2003 by JeremyD
quote:
Originally posted by Rico:
I'm a little concerned that you are heading toward a system entirely populated by kit operating on principles of "sins of ommission".
...On the other hand, you're right: a system containing a non functioning LP12 is certainly based on the principles of "sins of omission"!
quote:
My understanding of the Rega carts is that they just don't work in the Linn arms.
Whoever told you that was mistaken: my Super Elys certainly works - in fact on a limited range of records my system sounds better than ever before - it's just that it doesn't major on the things that the LP12 and Ekos are particularly good at, which is inescapable with a lot of music. It's true, though, that Rega turntables, arms and cartridges work well together. A Rega Planar 3 with Super Elys would be great VFM but nowhere near the standard of LP12/Lingo/Ekos/Super Elys.
quote:
The 90 is unlikely to be man enough to drive the Kans - unless perhaps you had a 52 betwixt LP12 and 90?
With Mk1 Kans, a 140 makes a big difference, and I'd recommend that prospective Mk 1 owners get one if they can. However, I've used my Kans for 16+ years first with a NAIT 1 and then with a NAP90, and I don't regret it. Actually, for a decade I attributed some failings of my system to the 90, only to discover, eventually, that they were due mostly to the 32.5 and partly to the Ittok. Upgrades from Valhalla to Lingo, Ittok to Ekos and 32.5 to 102 each dealt with weaknesses in the former components that a 140 could not have solved.
quote:
A fresh 140 and napsc (you should be able to buy these with careful shopping with funds from the Lingo disposal) should be the shot-in-the-arm your system needs.

£Lingo = £NAP140 + £NAPSC? I'd have to be very lucky. Besides, a NAPSC and 140 would not compensate for the loss of the Lingo - I think we must have somewhat different musical priorities. And, of course, I would not be able to get the new PC.
quote:
Computer for music? Shop the computer fairs, upgrade your existing machine - should cost a lot less.

A lot less than what? I'll salvage as much as I can from my existing PC to use in the new one but the case, power supply, motherboard, memory, and CPU will have to be new - there's no way around it. Further, depending on what software I decide on, it will be difficult to get away with using Windows 98 and my existing sound card.
quote:
AFter all, where funds are tight, the PC stuff will end up in a skip in 2 years time,...
You may scrap your two year old PCs, but I wouldn't dream of it. I've had my current one for 7 years [I upgraded the memory from 24MB to 80MB four years ago, and the processor from 100MHz to 166MHz more recently] and expect the new one to last longer, first as my main PC then as my Internet PC.
quote:
If you must buy "a respectable integrated" - Nait 5 or Nait 2 would have my vote.
It's not a must - I could always start off with - gulp - my awful-sounding PC speakers.

--J
Posted on: 19 March 2003 by Mr_Sukebe
Here's another thought.
Dump everything but the LP12.
Buy a decent phono stage (don't ask me for a recommendation, I know bugger all about them).
Find a pair of second hand Stax Lambda pros complete with an energiser module.
What you'll get from that is:
1. No pratting around with moving furniture
2. No need to amp/speakers
3. Possibly the most amazing pair of headphones I've ever had the opportunity to listen to.
More to the point, you can probably achieve it within your budget, and I simply cannot imagine you regretting it