Goldring 1042 tracking force and anti-skate

Posted by: Markus on 06 December 2001

Any advice from experienced users of the goldring 1042 about the tracking force? Mine probably has fewer than 20 hrs on it so is probably not broken in yet. It came from the dealer set up at about 1.8/1.8 but seemed to have some sibilance on some records. Puzzled, I increased the tracking force but am not yet satisfied. BTW this is on an LP12 w/ittok.

Any experience about how long the cartridge will take to break in?

Markus

Posted on: 06 December 2001 by JWinston
Hi,

I've run an Audionote IQ-1, which is a Goldring-made cart of the same family as yours. In my LP12/Ittok it did best at 1.75g, anti-skate the same, with the arm down ever so slightly in back.
I'm currently playing with some MC carts but frankly I liked the IQ1 so much I may end up voluntarily downgrading back.
Run-in times are generally 50hrs+, Audionote claims 100 for theirs, the 1042 may be the same. Why not just let it sit in a run-out groove for a few days -- it's worked for me, don't think there's any real risk. Someone else feel free to correct me if this is dangerous -- and soon -- as I will no doubt do just that with my next incoming.

regards

John

Posted on: 07 December 2001 by Tony L
quote:
Why not just let it sit in a run-out groove for a few days -- it's worked for me, don't think there's any real risk. Someone else feel free to correct me if this is dangerous -- and soon -- as I will no doubt do just that with my next incoming.

I have always done this too. Some cartridges seem to take ages to break in, and others are fine pretty much from the word go. My current MC25FL took ages before it really started to work, and its still improving now (I guess its had about 100 hours now, much of that in the run-off groove). I would advise using an old or unloved record, as the cartridge does carve the run-off groove a little, and I would be a little concerned about where the vinyl deposits ended up if I had not got a record cleaner.

I would guess that sibilance is not really something that will be massively cured by cartridge burn in, for me what improves is openness, clarity, groove, and feel. New cartridges often sound small and really uninvolving. Sibilance is usually a factor of misalignment, incorrect tracking weight, VTA or anti-skate. I would check all these parameters carefully. IIRC the Ittok aligns correctly with a standard two point protractor with the null points at 66 and 121mm. Linn make a protractor. I hate to say this, but don't assume that your dealer has got things right, I have come across many turntables where the dealer fitted cartridge is way out of alignment. It certainly does no harm to double check things anyway.

Tony.

Posted on: 07 December 2001 by P
I recently installed a 1042 in my TD318 and have been knocked out at how good it sounds, even straight out of the box.

I've heard that the Gyger S is a little bit sensitive to VTA and the 1000 series cartridges in general suffer compliance and resonance issues.
I have no idea if the 1042 is illmatched in an Ittok though I couldn't imagine a dealer would install one for you if it wasn't.

BTW
Goldring are doing a great exchange deal on these little beauties at the mo. They will accept any old cartridge, in any condition, and let you have the new one at stylus cost - and thats saving almost a third on RRP.
Less than a hundred quid for something as sweet sounding as this has to be one of the deals of the year! Better hurry though - ends soon apparently.

I love this cartridge.

P.