Tenth Planet Found
Posted by: Stephen B on 29 July 2005
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by HTK
When did Pluto get reinstated?
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by Aiken Drum
So Holst did lay down an additional track
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by BigH47
Rupert?
H
H
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by JamieWednesday
I thought the 'discovery' of Sedna a few years back had called into question whether there are in fact nine planets in the Solar System or just 8, with everything else being large lumps of ice/rock.
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by Martin D
this is even more amazing
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4727847.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4727847.stm
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by Stephen B
I didn't think any official decision had been made regarding Pluto's proposed religation.
Anyway, I reckon a simple solution could be:
If it's round and mainly composed of rock it's a planet.
If it's shaped like a potato and mostly rock it's an asteroid.
If it's made mostly of ice then it's a comet.
Anyway, I reckon a simple solution could be:
If it's round and mainly composed of rock it's a planet.
If it's shaped like a potato and mostly rock it's an asteroid.
If it's made mostly of ice then it's a comet.
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by JeremyD
I suggest adding that a planet should be Pluto's size or larger - leaving smaller ones to be called planetoidsquote:Originally posted by Stephen B:
If it's round and mainly composed of rock it's a planet.
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by Not For Me
If it made mainly of iron will it be a Hemorrhoid?
DS
DS
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by MichaelC
It has to be
Planet
"Mildred"
Planet
"Mildred"
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by TomK
That picture of the ice lake on Mars is one of the most awe inspiring things I've ever seen. Implications for the future are just mind boggling.
Posted on: 30 July 2005 by Nime
quote:Originally posted by TomK:
That picture of the ice lake on Mars is one of the most awe inspiring things I've ever seen. Implications for the future are just mind boggling.
Exclusive ice skating rink for celebs?
Posted on: 31 July 2005 by Tam
If you read the bit in new scientist (and the related article about another such object):
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7763&feedId=online-news_rss20
http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn4776
it is clear that if you start to could all these Kuiper-Belt objects as planets you are looking at a 20 or so planet solar system. Personally, I don't think you should count any of them, their orbits being so radically different from all the others, they're basically just big comets.
regards,
Tam
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7763&feedId=online-news_rss20
http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn4776
it is clear that if you start to could all these Kuiper-Belt objects as planets you are looking at a 20 or so planet solar system. Personally, I don't think you should count any of them, their orbits being so radically different from all the others, they're basically just big comets.
regards,
Tam