Forum
Posted by: SC on 30 April 2009
Did the server crash...again ?
Seems to have taken some posts with it this time....
Steve
Seems to have taken some posts with it this time....
Steve
Posted on: 30 April 2009 by QTT
quote:Originally posted by SC:
Did the server crash...again ?
Seems to have taken some posts with it this time....
Steve
I have been wondering about the same thing. Maybe it is time for Naim to get somebody else who can manage it better?
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by JWM
It is also a rather old-fashioned and inflexible format.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Guido Fawkes
I wrote a very long post last night about how with a couple of inexpensive (less than £5) tweaks you could make a 282/200 sound clearly better than 552/500; unfortunately the post was deleted and I can't remember the tweaks I did so can't re-post. Still at least it improved my system - others will just have to buy the 552/500 I suppose.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by SC
Cracking post ROTF ! 
Just would have been soooooo useful......

Just would have been soooooo useful......
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Adam Meredith
quote:Originally posted by JWM:
It is also a rather old-fashioned and inflexible format.
As one who is occasionally required to read other forums - I am infinitely grateful for that.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Julian H
quote:It is also a rather old-fashioned and inflexible format.
This forum, IMO, is by far and away the best I frequent.
The ONLY improvements I see as necessary are;
a] editing extended beyond the current period
b] posting preview
J
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Adam Meredith
quote:Originally posted by Julian H:
b] posting preview
If you wait until the load bar has run its course then maximise the post box - you get a fairly decent canvas on which to work. Firefox allows for spell check.
Yes - it would be nice to be able to preview and I find myself editing initial posts quite a bit.
I would love to be able to institute 'nested quotes', avatars and signatures for those who want them - so long as I could set them to be ignored by those whose interest is limited to communication.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Julian H
quote:Yes - it would be nice to be able to preview and I find myself editing initial posts quite a bit.
Me too!
quote:I would love to be able to institute 'nested quotes', avatars and signatures for those who want them - so long as I could set them to be ignored by those whose interest is limited to communication.
Simplest is bestist!
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by JWM
quote:Originally posted by Adam Meredith:quote:Originally posted by Julian H:
b] posting preview
If you wait until the load bar has run its course then maximise the post box - you get a fairly decent canvas on which to work. Firefox allows for spell check.
Yes - it would be nice to be able to preview and I find myself editing initial posts quite a bit.
I would love to be able to institute 'nested quotes', avatars and signatures for those who want them - so long as I could set them to be ignored by those whose interest is limited to communication.
That's exactly what I was getting at Adam.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Adam Meredith
quote:Originally posted by JWM:
That's exactly what I was getting at Adam.
Yes - but it wasn't what I was getting at. The glitzy options were by way of a punishment.
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Bob McC
Damn. Last night I posted a proof of Gilbreath's conjecture and now it's gone!
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by u5227470736789439
It has produced a great improvement in my current music thread, deleting away some catty pedantry very nicely!
ATB from George
ATB from George
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by fixedwheel
quote:Originally posted by ROTF:
I wrote a very long post last night about how with a couple of inexpensive (less than £5) tweaks you could make a 282/200 sound clearly better than 552/500; unfortunately the post was deleted and I can't remember the tweaks I did so can't re-post. Still at least it improved my system - others will just have to buy the 552/500 I suppose.
That's OK ROTF. If it was for a 202/200 combo I'd be mighty upset at this point.

TTFN
John
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Guido Fawkes
So does Safari (which incidentally suggests I change Firefox to Firebox).quote:Originally posted by Adam Meredith:
Firefox allows for spell check.
ATB Rotf
Posted on: 01 May 2009 by Sloop John B
quote:Originally posted by ROTF:So does Safari (which incidentally suggests I change Firefox to Firebox).quote:Originally posted by Adam Meredith:
Firefox allows for spell check.
ATB Rotf
don't lets forget Opera's spell check.
SJB