Where do I start with this silly room?

Posted by: Mike Hanson on 12 June 2001

Ok, I'm slowly getting settled in my room, and I'm starting to realize that speaker positioning is going to be a royal PITA. With my big bay window, equipment closet taking a good chunk of space, big metal door on one wall, (always open) French doors behind, it's going to be a challenge. Here's a drawing of my room, with a couple of possible speaker positions:

I would prefer to use some derivation of the first configuration, since the speakers will be pointing out the double doors (and into the rest of the house), and I can lean back in my chair without bumping into the wall. smile Also, the second configuration is pretty much plagued with corner positioning for the speakers, while the first has a fair bit of flexibility for moving the speakers away from the walls.

Ignoring the bay window, the closet, and the always open French doors, the basic dimensions are 12'L x 8.5'W x 8'H. I may have room resonance problems with the 8' width being so close to the 8.5' height, but I'm hoping not. If I treat the ceiling, it will make the difference between dimensions more pronounced, so this may not be a problem.

The main problems with the first approach are the bay windows behind the speakers, which can produce a number of interesting effects from a phaser to a honk. I'll add some curtains, but I like looking out the window too. Also, the position of the chair is rather close to the closet door, which makes it a little difficult to change CDs and such.

There's also the issue of room reflections, standing waves, flutter echo, etc. I've got some software from ETF Acoustics that does real-time measurements of a room's acoustic properties, but it doesn't give any hints of good starting positions. You just keep trying different spots until you find the best measurements. Also, it's designed for a symmetrical room, and mine isn't. (You're supposed to measure just one speaker, and set up the other as a mirror image.) Therefore, I may be forced to test both speakers at the same time or separately, in an attempt to get the best positions. All the other software that I've seen also assumes that your room is a perfect rectangle.

Then there's the concept of the listener being in an equilateral triangle with the speakers. Right now I have them about 18" off each side wall, which puts the centres approximately 5' apart. If I sit with my head 5' from the speakers, this seems rather confined (only slightly bigger than my office system, which is around 4').

As far as room treatments go, I mentioned earlier that I'm going to put curtains on the windows. I may even install an additional roll-down tapestry to completely block the bay window for those intense listening sessions at night, when there's nothing to see out the window. I will also lay an area rug of some type. I'm not sure whether it should run the length of the room, just down at one end, across the front of the speakers, or what.

I appreciate any help or suggestions that you can throw my way. With all of the fiddling with Mana, etc., my wife is getting sick of me tweaking my stereo. (At least when I'm listening to music I can interact with her, but when I'm doing set up stuff, I'm indisposed.) I also don't enjoy fiddling, as listening to music is much more fun. Thanks guys.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 12 June 2001 by Tuan
I go for the first option since it gives more space between you and the 2 speakers. Also, the first option provides more space behind you and behind the speakers, which reduce reflection (bouncing) of sound due to wall effect. Most of people dont have a listen room to evote to hifi like you. I dont think you need anything else.
Posted on: 12 June 2001 by JeremyB
I go for option 2.

1. It's tempting to theorise about the best sound. But the most important thing IMHO is to have a practical arrangement. Then keep moving speakers and listening position until it sounds right.

2. Whatever probs you get with option 2 can probably be solved with RPG foam panels or similar behind the speakers and/or the listening position.

3. Flat wall behind may provide a better "load" for lf enhancement and you can easily tune out any peaks and nulls (moving few inches or even fraction of inch forward or backwards - seriously!).

4. Early reflections from "side" walls (there aren't any) are not an issue.

5. A rectangular rug (damp early reflections from the floor) looks much better in 2

I'd go for practicality and no "tension" with the arrangement.

Just an opinion. BTW, wouldn't it be better to change the "ME" to "WE"?!

Jerem

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Mick P
Mike

If you go for option 2, you will be far to close to your speakers, so option 1 seems the best bet.

I sit 11 ft from my speakers and I would love to add another 5 or 6 ft in between. The greater the distance the better the sound.

Just get yourself a few rugs and pot plants etc to difuse the sound. I think you are really going to have to concentrate on what speakers you use so be prepared to audition some that are recommended for small rooms.

Life is full of problems......you solve one and another appears.

Good luck

Regards

Mick

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Steve G
Your room is quite similar to my own listening room - it's similar in size (my room is a bit wider and longer) and also has a bay window at one end. The configuration I ended up with is much the same as your option 1, although the position of the door on the back wall allows me to sit further back (I have a small sofa near the back wall) and I have racks all down the left hand wall for CD's/LP's etc. Practicality also dictates that there is a computer desk against the right hand wall and a synthesiser sitting between the speakers - life is all about compromise...

My system (CD3.5/32.5/SNAPS/110/Credos) sounds pretty good like this - I didn't consider the across the room option as I feel the speakers would just be far too close.

Regards
Steve

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Stephen Bennett
Steve

I was worred too about by speakers being to close (I have a 10 foot wide room) but my system (My system (Arcam Alpha/LINN LP12/32.5/110/INTRO IIs') sounds wonderful in this configuration. I'd try both ways!

Regards

Stephen

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Tony L
quote:
Ok, I'm slowly getting settled in my room, and I'm starting to realize that speaker positioning is going to be a royal PITA.

Just try both. Theorising about rooms in my opinion is worth very little, it is very possible to do a load of weird calculations, think you understand acoustics, and ultimately get a really crap sound.

My gut feeling is that of your choices option two might work better, it would definitely give you more speaker options later on as you would not be forced to use a free space speaker (which almost always means putting up with a ported design).

Option two should work with DBL / SBL / IBL / Kan type designs, where as with option one you are in ProAc / Dynaudio / Sonus Faber territory due to the necessity of free space. As I understand it your Royds are designed to be used closer to boundaries than the latter, though are not a true wall proximity job like the former. My guess is that they would prefer the more even wall.

Option three would be the mirror image of option two, in other words the speakers would be on the same wall as the door. This should let you get the speakers a little further from wall boundaries, and would probably be the best option of all.

You still need to try all options, one will just sound far better.

Tony.

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Rico
Tony has hit the nail absolutley square on the head.

I have exprience with room containing bay window of proportions you mention (although a bit wider), and found that the approximation of your option 2 way, way better ("why the hell didn't I try that 9 months ago!!") - the bay window can really screw up your bottom end. I was running Epos ES11's at the time.

Still, theorising is worth little - you really have to suck it and see, as every room is different. Nice pics, Mike!

Remember: There is no ideal installation. Enjoy the journey. smile

Rico - all your base are belong to us.

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Mike Cole
I think number two is a better bet. I used to have a couple of bookshelves on either side of my listening chair and found out that they influenced the sound quite a bit. This would seem to be the case with your equipment closet and wall in number 1. Sitting close to the speakers isn't bad either, it kind of attenuates the room influences on the sound.

Mike

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
I just did a quick count, and the votes are roughly even for the two options. However, most of you urged that I try both, and a couple of you offered alternatives. BTW, the speakers are currently sitting on MDF slabs, so I can move them around to my heart's content, with no spike marks to show for it. The cables are probably too short to do a mirror image of #2, though.

Another thing I like about option 1 is that there is no wall behind me, so the speakers can "see" a room length of almost 50' (the full length of the house). If I put them as option #2, long wavelengths will have difficulty forming, so I might end up with poor bass extension.

quote:
you will be far to close to your speakers

The absolute minimum distance that I'm willing to be to my speakers is 5'. There are a few schools of thought for listener/speaker relative positioning. Some say that you should form an equilateral triangle with the speakers. Others say that the distance between the two speakers should equal the distance from the listener to a point between the speakers.

I generally prefer the second. If you get too far away, then you lose too much of the soundstage (the good soundstage, not the silly, artificial, pinpoint imaging, blah, blah, blah...). If you get too close, then it feels like your sitting inside a pair of headphones, and that's just weird. smile Also, in #2, I'm quite close to the wall behind me, which might screw with the bass.

quote:
wouldn't it be better to change the "ME" to "WE"?!

I'm the only person who'll be sitting in there regularly. Occasionally I have various individuals over for listening sessions. I usually give them the hot seat, while I move around the room picking out music, changing CDs, and gesticulating madly. wink When it's larger groups of people, we might be:


  • doing dinner, which is beside the listening room, via the French doors.
  • in the sitting room, which is all the way to the front of the house (that big 50' distance), then a right turn into the living room. The sound should travel "ok" this way, or we could open another set of French doors between the dinning room and sitting room, which makes the path much more direct.
  • in the back yard, which is accessible to the listening room via the two side windows of the bay window.
  • in the basement, watching movies in the "home theatre".

If I use option #1, then a bigger chair is not possible. If it's #2, then I could fit a love seat or 3-seater couch. For now, I have a wingback chair arriving on Saturday.

quote:
is there no way of removing the wall which makes up the cupboard?

Anything is possible, although this wall is quite substantial (lots of studs and drywall). Also, the hardwood floor would need to be patched and matched, which might not look good. If I decided to move the gear to a different room at some point in the future, then the closet might be needed again. Finally, it hides all of that ugly Mana, muffles any transformer buzz from the Naim gear, and keeps my two cats off the turntable.

quote:
Being as you are on that side of the pond, shouldn't you have a choice of a couple of giant rooms for the system?

My house actually does have a bunch of big rooms, but it comes down to practicality and compromise.


  • I've got my secondary system in my office upstairs. Considering how much time I spend there, I was considering putting the good system there instead. However, it would involve positioning the speakers in an inconvenient location (making entering the room a bit of an obtacle course), and the great music might distract me from work. wink
  • We have a spare bedroom upstairs, but it's full of bedroom stuff. smile The room is also close to square (13'x14').
  • We've got the home theatre in the basement. I could have created another hybrid system there like in my apartment, but I prefer listening to music with daylight streaming in the windows.
  • I would love to put the system in my sitting room (a.k.a. living room), which is about 22'L x 13'W x 8'H. However my wife wants to keep it "formal", and she doesn't really like the look of stereo gear, speakers that look like "speakers" (in-wall might be ok), bulky cables, etc. It's also got the piano in there, which is supposed to kill stereos (although it wasn't a problem in my apartment). I must admit, I like the look of the room as it is now. My system might eventually end up in there, but it would take a lot of fighting to make it happen. Besides, in my stereo room my wife has given me "permission" to diddle with it as much as necessary. Although she would like it to look good too, I can do anything I want to make it sound good. This includes ugly foam panels, tube traps, and whatever else I might require to make it all work.

Therefore, the most "practical" room for the stereo is where it is right now. It also means that music flows through the main floor of the house, making kitchen duties a pleasure, and adding music to all of those special occasions. This is much better than hiding it in my office, a spare bedroom, or the basement. Only the living room could compare, in this respect.

BTW, I did the drawings with a shareware program called SmartDraw. It's essentially the same as CorelDraw or Visio for this type of thing.

Thanks again for your feedback. It looks like there's now "best" way to start, other than just tweaking until it's "right".

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

[This message was edited by Mike Hanson on WEDNESDAY 13 June 2001 at 13:24.]

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Joe Petrik
Mike,

I think the first configuration would work better, but suggest you make a few modifications to get the most out of the room.

See the attached picture for the tweaks.

Joe

P.S. I have an old blanket I used to hang over my window when I lived in London. Vuk thought it made at least a Super-Cap's worth of improvement. I'll swap it for your 82.

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Steve G
Joe,

I'm not convinced about the positioning of the hot-tub off centre to the right. Surely it should be off centre to the left to balance the effect of the wall? wink

As for the Cher CD's shouldn't they be in the fireplace...

Regards
Steve

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by MarkEJ
...often isn't as bad as it could be. I manage to get away with this (see attached), but this is probably because our bay is deeper, and has straight bits before the angled bits...

I agree with Rico that ported speakers can be a disaster with bays, but it's a lot easier to optimise if the ports are on the front.

Best;

Mark

(an imperfect
forum environment is
better than none)

Posted on: 13 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
The hot tub idea is nice, but that one looks like it's about as big as a wash tub. Maybe it would seem bigger if I put it on a custom Sound Stage. wink

Coincidentally, I just rescued Jill's Cher disc this morning. "Someone" had "misplaced" it deep in my office closet amongst a bunch of boxes. I'm not sure whether I did the right thing (latter or former).

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by Mark Packer
Mike,

You really have a lot of options here. Almost everything is up for grabs and so I strongly suggest you don't pre-judge the situation and that you take your time getting it right.

I suspect that you'll find some helpful info at the following two websites:

The WASP method, which does work although it takes a bit of practice to get your ear's tuned in to what's happening.

http://www.tnt-audio.com/casse/waspe.html

and the Acoustica site:

http://www.acoustica.org.uk/index.html

The issue of hearing good music around the house is as much due to clarity, a key feature/benefit of good equipment. Your dealer should be glad to lend you longer cables to try out the mirror image of option 2.

You've also introduced new kit into the equation as well so I suspect that you're going to need to throw it together, let the new gear and your ear's run it and then start playing with the room layout.

I hope you've got your mains and earthing sorted out because it can make a huge difference.

regards,

Mark

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
I have both of those sites in my Favorites list, but I hadn't checked them recently. I'll do that now.

Yes, I've added a bunch of new stuff, with the 52 still on its way. The dedicated circuit isn't coming until late July or early August, and I haven't decided whether I'm going to go for the isolated ground. Last night around 7pm the system was sounding amazing. That was with a still-warming CDS2, and the dishwasher and central air+furnace running. It's got me hopeful.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by Frank Abela
Now I know that you and I disagree on a great many things, smile so I won't be unduly put out if you decide to go with #1.

In the past I would probably have said option 1. I agree that option 2 is less than ideal since you're sitting quite close the the speakers. As the Albions can go quite close to the wall (1 foot) and the chair/love sofa can go against the opposite wall, we're talking about a listening distance of 7 feet. Place the Albions 6 feet apart and you're in business.

If you could remove the closet wall, option 1 would become more interesting. I'm convinced that sidewall reflections are an issue - even in a smallish room like this. The reflections will mean that you will be able to 'hear' the closet wall. Removing it would be very good for both setups, but more for option 1 than 2. To me, the closet wall removes option 1 from the equation - option 3 is of course a good option. I don't see the speakers needing 50' behind you. They'll be more contrained shooting down the narrow path, than breathing into the open one that option 2 provides.

Of course, the best would be to try each for a week or two so you can appreciates the benefits of each solution and which is more important to you.

Regards,
Frank.

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by mykel
I have / had the same issues.
Room is 8.5 x 17. Available room is 8.5x10 ( Other 7 feet taken up with desk / reading nook - No option to move it either. )

I tried the option # 1 ( Complete with Window, not bay tho )first. Did not work - I have Kan's and with the window behind - total crap. Also keeping them away from the side walls left too little space between. I had to move the listening position closer to get some semblance of a soundstage.

With Option # 2, things took a bit to sort out.
I now have 20" from speaker side to wall, and 69" between speaker centers, Listening postion is a small sofa against the opposite wall. The rack sits off to the R side. Distance from me to speakers on the perpendicular is just over 7 feet.

It took a bit to get used to being hard against a wall with no free space around. But overall it works ALOT better than option #1. Counterintuative I know ( except for the Kan/Window thing - I knew that would happen ) I still figured even with the window using the lenght would sound better, especially with the door open so the room does not pressurize.

I was wrong.

Overall I get quite better sound using #2. You will have to try them all, but I'm betting on 2 or 3. 3 will give the speakers even more room to breathe, but be firing into an alcove. Trials will tell.

Just my experiences, adding to the confusion cool

mykel

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
More of you are suggesting that option #2 is better. I'm concerned about option #3, as I would be sitting in the alcove (essentially one big corner) and I'm worried about bass bloom.

As many of you have said, I'm just going to have to suck it and see. Ho hum... I'm getting really tired of all this, all in the name of music. wink

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 14 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
I would be nice to have the whole house for my listening pleasure, but I'm going to be quite pleased with having my own dedicated listening room.

BTW, I just switched the setup from option 1 to option 2, and the initial results are promising. I've got to play with it for a few days, and then I may try option #3 as well. Once I get it "close" by ear, I'll use the ETF Acoustics software to fine tune it. My friend just dropped off my SPL meter, so nothing's holding me back now (except the lack of spare time).

Thanks again for all of your suggestions, guys. It's appreciated.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 18 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
I've currently got the system in configuration #2, but I'm running into problems with bass boom whenever the system is turned up loud. It would be enviable if I were driving down the road listening to hip hop, but that's not quite what I want. smile

I've experimented with moving the speakers out from the walls (about 18" from both side and back at the moment). At that point it's a bit better, but it's still far from acceptable. This is with me sitting with my chair against the wall. If, I lean forward so that my head is about 2 feet away from the wall, then it sounds pretty good.

Unfortunately this puts me about 4 feet away from the speakers, which is just a little too cozy for my tastes. Also, I can't move around much, since the bass is too extreme when I lean back, and it almost disappears when I lean forward more. I've never seem such a pronounced variation with such a small range of motion (except, perhaps, when I listened to Acoustat electrostatics 20 years ago).

I'm going to fiddle with it some more over the next day or so, but it looks like I might have to go back to option #1.

Option #3 (a.k.a. mirror of #2) hasn't been tried yet, and it would mean more distance from the side walls. However, it would also put me in the alcove, and walls and bass just don't mix. Also, I would have to bounce my remote signal off the wall, I couldn't see which track is playing, etc.

Maybe I'll have to rip down that closet wall after all. Or even <GASP!!!> consider a pair of wall proximity speakers like SBLs. <Shudder!> wink

For now I'll continue playing with what I have, and see what I can figure out.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 18 June 2001 by Tony L
quote:
Maybe I'll have to rip down that closet wall after all. Or even <GASP!!!> consider a pair of wall proximity speakers like SBLs.

We all await the eating of words. Actually SBLs will probably work very well indeed in your room, though if they boom there's always Kans...

Tony.

Posted on: 19 June 2001 by Steve G
I was initially concerned about how well my Credos would suit my small (12' by 8') listening room but they work surprisingly well. Mine are setup close to the edges of the bay window about 5 feet apart and my listening position is perhaps 8 feet away - this seems to work fine.
Posted on: 19 June 2001 by Mark Packer
Mike,

As you have bass boom on option 2 but with your head away from the wall it sounds better try with your chair back against the wall with something absorbent behind your head, say a couple of pillows, cushions, or a sleeping bag etc. The larger the better. Also, you might find changing the chair for a 2 seater sofa makes for cosier evenings in listening...

regards,

Mark

Posted on: 19 June 2001 by Mike Hanson
Actually, my chair is a big wingback, so it should do for the moment. smile If I can get option #2 to work, then I might add another, or change it to a sofa at some point in the future. If I have to revert to #1, then it won't work.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

[This message was edited by Mike Hanson on TUESDAY 19 June 2001 at 16:06.]

Posted on: 19 June 2001 by Tony L
Mike,

On second look at your plan I would say that you really need to loose the wall / closet thing. When I first looked at your plan I was just concentrating on the shape, and did not really take in the dimensions. It is very small, even by UK standards.

I would now go for a variation on option two, but with the wall demolished, and with the equipment stands either in the bay window or next to the listening chair. This would leave a nice sized wall for your SBLs (!)or Kans (!!!), and enable you to keep them a good two and a half foot minimum from the side wall so as not to hinder the bass performance.

Your larger wall is about the same size as the one I have my Kans against in my shiny new flat. My room is quite hard to describe as it is open plan to the kitchen - effectively from an acoustic perspective it is a 13' x 18' rectangle, though from a sitting perspective it is about 13' x 12. Works out quite well as I don't have issues with being too close to the back wall. It currently sounds very good, the bass is well behaved, but perhaps just a little too light (probably due to effectively sitting in the middle of the room), and I still need a little more damping in the upper mid, so I need to buy a really big organic acoustic defuser (Swiss cheese plant). Will probably get one on Saturday. I have settled on the speakers being probably a little over 5 foot apart, so nicely away from side wall boundaries, I sit about 11 foot from them, but I will sacrifice stereo image for better music.

Tony.

PS have you tried the bay end yet?