'Kontak' electrical contact cleaner

Posted by: Andrew L. Weekes on 29 March 2001

I don't know if anyone has ever used this stuff before, but having read of excellent results from people whose opinion I trust, and the fact that the main point about this solution is that it is designed to clean and not leave any residue (the reason Naim do not recommend contact cleaners / enhancers) I decided to give it a go.

It's apparently a contact cleaner developed for military applications, and does not leave any residue on the surfaces once cleaned. It will remove all traces of oxidization and contamination from the cleaned surface.

I'm a very strong believer in system contact cleanliness, and every part of my system, from the fuse in the consumer unit, through to the connections in the cartridge usually gets a thorough clean with duraglit / isopropyl alcohol as applicable every 3-6 months.

Interim husbandry usually involves the unplugging and remaking of connections and a quick polish of mains plugs. There is always a noticeable improvment as a result of this, and the instigating reason for an hour of uncomfortable scrabbling on hands and knees is usually because the system is not quite 'right'.

Anyway, having received my bottle of Kontak last night, I set about cleaning the system from head to toe.

Several mains plugs, fuses, interconnects, speaker plugs / sockets and cartridge connections (followed by an hour warmup) later I settled down for a listen. This stuff really works, if the disgusting amounts of grime left on several pipe cleaners and cotton buds is anything to go by.

The sound of the system is noticeably cleaner, and subtle rythmic elements and low level detail are better portrayed. It has a similar effect to the normal housekeeping, whereby a veil or grainy layer to the sound seems to disappear, but it takes it to a much higher level. The improvements are definitely musical, not just Hi-Fi.

All in all not bad for £15, and judging by the amount I used (very little), it should give me a couple of years cleaning.

The solution is now in a single bottle (the previous incarnation was a two part solution, supplied in seperate bottles) and is far less volatile than the previously available versions, so evaporation is less of an issue.

Anyone else have any views?

Andy.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Andrew L. Weekes
Paul,

I bought mine from the HFN/RR Accessories club online: -

http://www.hi-fi-accessories-club.mcmail.com/

Tel: 01234 741152

It seems to be the same price as everyone else, and delivery was free within the UK.

Andy.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Top Cat
Had a read of the blurb from the link above, but the description of its application seems to whisper 'Brasso under any other name' to me - having never bothered much about contact cleaning, I'm sure that my contacts are probably fairly mucky (although they look ok) so what benefits would Contak (at ~£15) have over Brasso (at ~£2)????

John the cynic

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Matthew T
Just a word of warning.

An number of chemicals will act as oxidising agents and will actually, on contact, cause oxidation, these chemicals normally keep the oxide in solution so on wiping you are left with a chemically clean surface with a thin layer of oxide, this is good. The oxide looks gray and dirty so just because it looks as if the contacts were dirty they may have been relatively clean. The problem can arise because if you have plated contacts the plating will get thinner and can eventually expose the base metal.

With gold contacts a simple organic slovent is all that is required as gold does not oxidise and for silver a hot salt solution with aluminium foil in the solution will reverse any oxidation and turn it back to metal, works well on silver cutlery too!

Not sure for other coatings but suggestions welcome.

Matthew

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Peter Stockwell
I've a bottle of Kontakt for 5 years now that I use every 6 months or so. I clean all the sysyem contacts with it, and can report the same 'cleaning up' of the sound. For the mains plugs, I've made sure mine were as shiny clean as possible. I use Schuko style plugs, in France, and I started by using emery paper on the pins to make them smooth, they were slightly ridged, then a brasso style cleaner (it's slightly abrassive, I think) to get a mirror finish. Now I use the Kontakt on these pins too.

About the MDF Board for the plug block, I bought one of the HiFi news acc. club blocks and it has a couple of holes at each end for screw fixing, so I could give this a shot. What thicknes MDF are we taliking here 10mm ... 22mm ? should it be as heavy, or as light, as possible

Peter

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Rockingdoc
I have used Kontak for many years and believe it to be the safest contact cleaner for HiFi connections. I wouldn't put Duraglit near anything carrying less current than a mains plug.
Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Top Cat
You're totally right - I was just playing Devil's Advocate. I've never really been into contact cleanliness (ooh er, matron!) and therefore view this from the same cynical angle I adopted when told that angle iron and glass could sound better than my beloved QS rack. Ah, how wrong I was! So, on that basis, I'm prepared to be open minded, but my overriding scepticism stands, i.e. if all you are doing is cleaning the contacts, and Brasso cleans brass, then what makes the Contak stuff special...

Just poking around, looking for some justification to trying the stuff... also very intrigued about this demagnetism stuff as well!

John

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Andrew L. Weekes
quote:
I'm prepared to be open minded, but my overriding scepticism stands, i.e. if all you are doing is cleaning the contacts, and Brasso cleans brass, then what makes the Contak stuff special...

John,

I'd agree with Malcolm's comment above, that I'd never use Brasso / Duraglit on anything less substantial than a mains plug. On plated contacts the abrasive action will remove the protective plating (as Matthew has commented) which may sound better in the short term, but will degrade more quickly over time.

I'd still use metal polish as the initial cleaning routine for a mains plug, but I'm certain it will leave behind some residue, and Kontak will, I'm sure remove that (isopropyl also remove a certain amount).

For delicate signal connectors though one does not want to remove the plating, so a non-abrasive cleaner is required, and the Kontak solution is definitely more effective than the only other 'safe' solution I'd use, Isopropanol.

I used to be very sceptical of how important relatively small levels of contamination could have, I'd have laughed at anyone who told me to polish my mains plugs - until I tried it for myself.

Believe me - I have much better things to do with my time than cleaning interconnects etc., but the audible differences make it to impossible to avoid.

If you haven't done this sort of procedure on your system, then try the following, when you get a spare hour or so, and if you cannot hear the difference, buy some cotton buds [for your ears wink].

Polish system mains plugs with Duraglit (all of them).

Remove fuses from mains plugs, retension fuse holder and clean with isopropanol, if available, then refit.

Clean all interconnect contact areas (don't forget speaker plugs and SNAIC's to PSU's) with a pipe cleaner dipped in isopropanol, or just unplug and remate if you don't have any.

Sit down and enjoy - I know you'll be pleasantly surprised.

quote:
With gold contacts a simple organic solvent is all that is required as gold does not oxidise and for silver a hot salt solution with aluminium foil in the solution will reverse any oxidation and turn it back to metal, works well on silver cutlery too!

I'm not sure that I'd like to dip the silver plated connectors of my SNAIC's into such a solution though, with the associated risk of capillary attraction, and salt residue left on the surfaces!

I'm confident that there is no significant material removal with the Kontak solution and that there is no residue either, the audible results speak for themselves.

Andy.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by hobiecat
Hi all guys

What you report about contact cleaning is very interesting to me, although all of the exotic products I've used in the past (isoprophanol, Caig DeoxIt and Progold) have brought improvements only in the very short term.

In my experience the system sound different - often overly detailed but also mechanical - after chemical-based contact cleaning, then returns to the previous state in a couple of days. So, i've decided to clean contacts just by unplugging and replugging the connectors. It remains a safe and valid method IMO, and I guess it is the one suggested by both Naim and Linn.

Cheers,
Paolo

P.S.
Anybody of you have experienced Caig's Deoxit and Progold, and compared them with Kontact or other products?

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Andrew L. Weekes
quote:
Anybody of you have experienced Caig's Deoxit and Progold, and compared them with Kontact or other products?

I've never tried either of these, and am unlikely to do so since they leave a film on the connectors (by design).

Andy.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Chris Brandon
There is certainly a residual film left on.

This is a complete an utter pain to completely remove (barring using a grinder ! smile

In the end,after numerous attempts to get the plugs sounding as they did prior to the treatment,I ended up replacing with new

Regards

Chris

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Matthew T
quote:
In my experience the system sound different - often overly detailed but also mechanical - after chemical-based contact cleaning, then returns to the previous state in a couple of days.

Paulo, this would be because the growth of the oxide film, low conductivity, for the majority of metals in a household environment it logarythmic (the thicker the film the slower the growth) and so the improvements reaped will quickly be lost. This is of course unless you are using gold plated contacts will not form an oxide at all, thus the use as a contact plating.

Of course you could try keeping your system in an evacuuated environment but then you wouldn't be able to hear anything!

cheers

Matthew

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by hobiecat
Matthew

yes, I agree with you, but what I wanted to hightlight was the fact that I'm not convinced about the effect of chemicals on the contacts.

Infact IMO they have an intrusive effect - expecially in the first days - making the system sound more detailed but also more clinical, grabbing away cohesiveness and flow.
My experience is indeed about mains connections principally - not plated - but I suppose things are not dissimilaron other plugs/sockets.

Cheers,
Paolo

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by David Dever
Be a man--use your hands. cool

Use a paper towel, a little bit of elbow grease, etc.--works wonders, cost nothing and doesn't corrode as quickly. No chemical reactions, either.

This works as well for DIN plugs, even the 15+-year-old interconnects I see through our service department on a daily basis; in some cases, you can even remove the spark frit caused by plugging an IEC-type connector into a (switched-on) component.

If you wish to see the effects of a contact cleaner, try it on glass first. If you can't polish it away into the surface, chances are it will leave a capacitive film on the contact surface.

As I'm sure most of you are aware, most plug / receptacle combinations do not utilise the total surface area in order to make contact, such that some areas of the plug pin contact surface will wear out faster than others.

Alternative? Replacement.

Dave Dever, NANA

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Andrew L. Weekes
quote:
I was told by a friend that silver oxide is more conductive than bright metal. If this is the case then cleaning a silver contact would degrade the quality.
Can anyone confirm this?

I believe that the oxides produced are as conductive as the base material, the downside is that the oxide residue is abrasive and uneven, which could result in reduced contact area and unnecesary connector wear if repeatedly unmated / mated.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Martin Payne
quote:
I'm not sure that I'd like to dip the silver plated connectors of my SNAIC's into such a solution though, with the associated risk of capillary attraction, and salt residue left on the surfaces!

Andrew,

rumour has it the plating on the SNAICs may be Rhodium, but Naim aren't saying (don't blame them).

BTW, when I finally get around to installing a separate spur in this house I'll be using Rhodium-plated round-pin (15Amp) mains plugs & sockets. No fuse holder (or fuse!) to worry about and the Rhodium is reputed not to tarnish (but then I thought that was the point with gold also).

cheers, Martin

Posted on: 29 March 2001 by Paul Stephenson
We have been pretty busy lately and I missed this one, we do not recommend CONTACT cleaners. The only sure way to get rid of them is new plugs and sockets.
Posted on: 30 March 2001 by hobiecat
Hi Paul,

What does Naim recommend to clean contacts apart from unplugging and replugging connectors? Is isopropilic alcohol safe?

All the best,
Paolo

Posted on: 30 March 2001 by Paul Stephenson
We would suggest mechanical cleaning is the best solution, or changing connectors if they are in a bad state. If you have used some non-abrasive cleaner then repeated use of isopropynol to remove the cleaner is the best route.
Posted on: 30 March 2001 by woodface
I honestly don't think I could be bothered! With all these tips and tweaks when do you find time to actually listen to music?
Posted on: 30 March 2001 by hobiecat
Thank you Paul for your reply, your suggestion makes perfeclty sense for me.

All teh best,
Paolo

Posted on: 30 March 2001 by Sproggle
Has anyone - particularly users of NAITs and NAP 90s - tried using gold plated plugs at the speaker end only of Naim cable?

[Since Duraglitting the plugs at the amplifier end of the cable can degrade the sound, I’m assuming that it's best to stick to Naim plugs and mechanical cleaning for the amplifier end].

TIA smile

--Jeremy