European J***, what makes it special?
Posted by: mikeeschman on 24 May 2010
Don't really want to argue, would prefer to read and consider.
Please educate me :-)
Thank you.
Please educate me :-)
Thank you.
Posted on: 24 May 2010 by irwan shah
1. Partially due to fantastic recording and mastering by ECM?
2. Very talented Scandinavians?
2. Very talented Scandinavians?
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
Well, this is a tad disappointing.
No one has addressed this question on the forum to date, and I had hoped for some honest answers.
So it goes.
No one has addressed this question on the forum to date, and I had hoped for some honest answers.
So it goes.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by Colin Lorenson
Mike,
Slightly strange opening post. Saying "dont want to argue" seems to set yourself up for an arguement based on an apparent indifference to Euro Jazz.
At least thats the way I read it, rightly or wrongly.
Slightly strange opening post. Saying "dont want to argue" seems to set yourself up for an arguement based on an apparent indifference to Euro Jazz.
At least thats the way I read it, rightly or wrongly.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by Colin Lorenson:
Mike,
Slightly strange opening post. Saying "dont want to argue" seems to set yourself up for an arguement based on an apparent indifference to Euro Jazz.
At least thats the way I read it, rightly or wrongly.
I really just want some straight answers.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by gypsykirk
European Jazz?????
Try Selmer #607.....(not the live download)
Both first and second album.
http://www.selmer607.com/
Try Selmer #607.....(not the live download)
Both first and second album.
http://www.selmer607.com/
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
Not yet.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by vlada
So please define "Jazz" and also what you mean by "European Jazz" and what by "US Jazz" or whatever Jazz ? I really do not get the question.
ECM has indeed some great records, but do we consider all of them Jazz ? Improvisation ? You can have improvisation in every kind of music. Polyrhythms ? East European Folk Music has it as well. Syncopation ? Scottish traditional music has also syncopation.
So please be more precise.
ECM has indeed some great records, but do we consider all of them Jazz ? Improvisation ? You can have improvisation in every kind of music. Polyrhythms ? East European Folk Music has it as well. Syncopation ? Scottish traditional music has also syncopation.
So please be more precise.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by vlada:
So please define "Jazz" and also what you mean by "European Jazz" and what by "US Jazz" or whatever Jazz ? I really do not get the question.
ECM has indeed some great records, but do we consider all of them Jazz ? Improvisation ? You can have improvisation in every kind of music. Polyrhythms ? East European Folk Music has it as well. Syncopation ? Scottish traditional music has also syncopation.
So please be more precise.
Focus on ECM. What makes ECM special?
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by vlada
Well ECM has excellent recordings in terms of Sound Quality and some interesting music as well,
but the music on most of their productions I would not call jazz. It is contemporary music but not Jazz in what I understand as Jazz.
Let me quote here Art Blakey: "No America, No Jazz"
but the music on most of their productions I would not call jazz. It is contemporary music but not Jazz in what I understand as Jazz.
Let me quote here Art Blakey: "No America, No Jazz"
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by vlada:
Well ECM has excellent recordings in terms of Sound Quality and some interesting music as well,
but the music on most of their productions I would not call jazz. It is contemporary music but not Jazz in what I understand as Jazz.
Let me quote here Art Blakey: "No America, No Jazz"
I didn't think ECM were playing jazz, and could hear it was contemporary, like American "New Age" music.
That answers a lot of my original query.
Thank you.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by Guido Fawkes
Barbara Thompson.quote:European Jazz, what makes it special?
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by ROTF:Barbara Thompson.quote:European Jazz, what makes it special?
This one's new to me?
Any particular CD?
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by nicnaim
Mike,
We seem to have gone over a lot of this ground before.
There is a lot of really good European jazz, particularly on ECM. I do not feel the need to analyze it it quite the same way as you do. To me it is just good music. Varied, intricate, interesting, thoughtful, moving, uplifting. Just good tunes.
I saw Nik Barstch for the second time recently and took a mate along who is not really a jazz fan as such, but he was totally blown away by the live experience. I've also seen Tomasz Stanko recently and I am seeing the Marcin Wasilewski trio for the second time in a few weeks. Unfortunately I could not go to the Andy Sheppard gig that I had tickets for as we ended up going on an unplanned skiing holiday.
Just returned from seeing Natalie Merchant tonight, not jazz, but boy she can sing. You need to see some of these bands live to get your juices going I think.
Probably not answered your question though.
Regards
Nic
We seem to have gone over a lot of this ground before.
There is a lot of really good European jazz, particularly on ECM. I do not feel the need to analyze it it quite the same way as you do. To me it is just good music. Varied, intricate, interesting, thoughtful, moving, uplifting. Just good tunes.
I saw Nik Barstch for the second time recently and took a mate along who is not really a jazz fan as such, but he was totally blown away by the live experience. I've also seen Tomasz Stanko recently and I am seeing the Marcin Wasilewski trio for the second time in a few weeks. Unfortunately I could not go to the Andy Sheppard gig that I had tickets for as we ended up going on an unplanned skiing holiday.
Just returned from seeing Natalie Merchant tonight, not jazz, but boy she can sing. You need to see some of these bands live to get your juices going I think.
Probably not answered your question though.
Regards
Nic
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:quote:Originally posted by vlada:
Well ECM has excellent recordings in terms of Sound Quality and some interesting music as well,
but the music on most of their productions I would not call jazz. It is contemporary music but not Jazz in what I understand as Jazz.
I didn't think ECM were playing jazz, and could hear it was contemporary, like American "New Age" music.
That answers a lot of my original query.
Thank you.
Except that it "answers" your query with serious misinformation. Or, to put it in more earthy words, it doesn't answer shit.

ECM is a record label, but it's more than that ... it's a rich, multifaceted aesthetic developed over decades by some of the greatest musicians in the world.
The viewpoint Vlada expresses is limited, narrow, and exclusionary ... jazz, if nothing else, is the opposite of exclusionary. Jazz has always been a hybrid music, a fusion of many cultures, extremely flexible and adaptive. The idea that the jazz music on ECM isn't really jazz is frankly absurd.
ECM (Editions of Contemporary Music) surely produces contemporary music, but since when does contemporary music exclude jazz? Unless one erroneously thinks that jazz is a dead language.
And it has nothing in common with most "New Age" music, except to undiscerning and/or inexperienced ears.
I'd urge anyone who thinks ECM somehow isn't jazz, or is bland, or is akin to "New Age," to really listen to the title track of Keith Jarrett's album Personal Mountains. You may like it, you may not. But you will not be able to substantiate the claim that it isn't jazz, or that it's bland, or that it's akin to "New Age" music.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:quote:Originally posted by vlada:
Well ECM has excellent recordings in terms of Sound Quality and some interesting music as well,
but the music on most of their productions I would not call jazz. It is contemporary music but not Jazz in what I understand as Jazz.
I didn't think ECM were playing jazz, and could hear it was contemporary, like American "New Age" music.
That answers a lot of my original query.
Thank you.
Except that it "answers" your query with serious misinformation. Or, to put it in more earthy words, it doesn't answer shit.![]()
ECM is a record label, but it's more than that ... it's a rich, multifaceted aesthetic developed over decades by some of the greatest musicians in the world.
The viewpoint Vlada expresses is limited, narrow, and exclusionary ... jazz, if nothing else, is the opposite of exclusionary. Jazz has always been a hybrid music, a fusion of many cultures, extremely flexible and adaptive. The idea that the jazz music on ECM isn't really jazz is frankly absurd.
ECM (Editions of Contemporary Music) surely produces contemporary music, but since when does contemporary music exclude jazz? Unless one erroneously thinks that jazz is a dead language.
And it has nothing in common with most "New Age" music, except to undiscerning and/or inexperienced ears.
I'd urge anyone who thinks ECM somehow isn't jazz, or is bland, or is akin to "New Age," to really listen to the title track of Keith Jarrett's album Personal Mountains. You may like it, you may not. But you will not be able to substantiate the claim that it isn't jazz, or that it's bland, or that it's akin to "New Age" music.
I listened to quite a bit of ECM (10 discs) a few months back. That is concluded and will not be re-visited.
I said I wasn't here to argue, and I won't.
Fred, you and I want utterly different things from the music we listen to. It has been interesting to learn your views. They are not mine.
I started this thread as a post-script to an exploration of European Jazz, hoping some one would sum it up in a way that would leave me with a memorable quote favorable to this music.
No such luck.
And for the record, jazz is exceptionally exclusionary, as is all music worth investing any attention into.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:
I listened to quite a bit of ECM (10 discs) a few months back. That is concluded and will not be re-visited.
That seems closed-minded. But, wait ... didn't you just post this: "Focus on ECM. What makes ECM special?" How is anyone supposed to answer that if, as you say, it "will not be revisited"?
quote:I said I wasn't here to argue, and I won't.
The only way to completely avoid an argument is to avoid making outrageous provocative and self-contradicting statements. Pandora's box is already open.
quote:Fred, you and I want utterly different things from the music we listen to.
No, I don't think that's the case at all. How so?
quote:I started this thread as a post-script to an exploration of European Jazz, hoping some one would sum it up in a way that would leave me with a memorable quote favorable to this music.
No such luck.
If you are indeed genuinely interested in exploring the ECM aesthetic, if you truly want to know "what makes ECM special," there's a wide range of materials I can suggest. After all, you did request: "Please educate me."
But if you just want a "memorable quote," a pithy soundbite, you've apparently already got one (Blakey), albeit an inaccurate one that only serves to confirm your misconceptions.
quote:And for the record, jazz is exceptionally exclusionary, as is all music worth investing any attention into.
I'm not sure what sense of "exclusionary" you mean, but what I meant was that historically jazz has been an extraordinarily inclusive music ... its origins are inclusive by definition!
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by Colin Lorenson:
Slightly strange opening post. Saying "dont want to argue" seems to set yourself up for an arguement based on an apparent indifference to Euro Jazz.
Exactly my point!
quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:
I had hoped for some honest answers ...
I really just want some straight answers.
I've given you totally straight, perhaps even brutally honest answers, Mike. But you don't like the answers.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:
Focus on ECM. What makes ECM special?
Certainly nowhere near exhaustive, but not a bad place to start, is this 1999 article from a French magazine, Home Studio. It focuses more on the sonic qualities of ECM recordings, but then the sound itself is a huge part of the ECM aesthetic, it's an equal partner in the music.
The ECM Sound: Beyond Silence, transparence by Franck Ernould & Bruno Heuzé.
An atypical producer, world-wide known for his work, Manfred Eicher has created a new kind of jazz sound, then allowed the public to discover a series of non-academic contemporary music. Behind this inimitable ECM sound, theres’s more than an esthetic choice : what can be called real production ethics.
ECM : three mythical letters, for Editions of Contemporary Music. This independant record company, based in Munich and distributed in France by PolyGram, was founded by Manfred Eicher in 1969. A former classical and jazz bass player and jazz fan, Eicher invested DM 16.000 to express his musical tastes and desires. An ‘amateur’, according to the real meaning of this word : a man who loves. Not a naive, an idealist, but a wise producer, a lucid and realistic record company boss, an often just musical intuition and a very sharp ear ! "My choices have never been influenced by the record market evolution. I keep on choosing very intuitively the artists I want to produce, mainly because their music appeals to me, touches me, and that I feel it should be in our ECM catalog. If I have enough money in the bank, I produce the record !"
The first ECM record is a Mal Waldron’s Trio recording, made in Germany, entitled “Free at last”. A kind of manifest ! Thirty years later (happy birthday !), the ECM catalog contains 700 references, has opened to written music (from Middle Age to contemporary) via its New Series releases, and Manfred Eicher has become one of the most respected and most sollicitated record producers in the world…
Faithful musicians
For his first productions, Manfred Eicher chose American, English then European artists. He allowed two bass players or a free guitarist and a cellist improvise on a whole album. He goes where the musicians are, booking studios in London, New York or Francfort, and gives their chances to quasi-unknown musicians : Corea or Jarrett were among the first, but years later in 1976, Eicher produced the very first record of a very young guitarist he had heard on a former ECM Gary Burton record. His name was Pat Metheny, then 21 years old. Birth of a star !
After being signed that way, many artists stay faithful to ECM, even if Manfred Eicher only signs artists on a per-album basis. For his seventh production, he goes to Oslo, hometown of a young saxophonist he met a few years before at a jazz festival in Bologne, Jan Garbarek. Jan, then a member of George Russell’s band, records his first LP as leader. His 23rd (double) CD has been released on ECM a few months ago &endash; in between, hundreds of thousands of copies sold. It is on this ECM 1007 that the name of Jan Erik Kongshaug appears for the first time &endash; but not the last ! This Norvegian sound engineer had an atypical career (see box) before becoming a sound engineer. He’s a major contributor to what has been called the “ECM sound”.
"It is a coincidence if Manfred Eicher met me in the Arne Bendiksen studio. He had come to Oslo to record “Afric Pepperbird”, the first Garbarek solo album. He had tried to record the quartet in the Hall of the Art Museum, but it didn't work very well, because the acoustic was much too live for this kind of recording. So they called me at Arne's place, asking me if they could try to redo this recording in regular studio conditions... a coincidence, I tell you !". Jan Erik is then a beginner, as was Eicher. They are both former musicians, and the studio’s Steinway sounds wonderful. Eicher will come back very soon to Oslo, recording with JEK Paul Bley’s “Open, to love”, Corea’s “Improvisations”, and a pianist named Keith Jarrett…
Light
Manfred Eicher asked him for a traditional “trio recording”, but Jarrett, then a member of Miles Davis’s band, replied he would prefer a “solo piano” session. Agreed ! As Miles Davis European Tour goes to Norway, Keith Jarrett comes to Arne Bendiksen Studio and records, in a few hours, a series of improvisations on the Steinway. “Facing you”, ECM 1017, will sell hundreds of thousands of copies, as will “Return to forever”, the eponymous record from the band including Corea, Stanley Clarke and Airto Moreira. This means money at the bank for the young record company…
ECM has become famous in the United States, and many American musicians want to record for Eicher. Names ? Abercrombie, DeJohnette, Connors, Burton, Motian, Phillips, and many others… Eicher welcomes them, but keeps a large part of his catalog to European musicians, coming from scandinavian countries (Rypdal, Andersen, Garbarek), from England (John Surman), from Germany (Weber). He also tries astonishing cocktails (a duet Garbarek/Jarrett, or Phillips/Surman…) : it definitely works ! He relies on his instinct, and gives their chance to apparently “crazy” projects or musicians.
Eicher doesn’t go as often as before to USA to record American musicians : they come to Oslo ! When the recording must take place in NYC, he hires Tony May, and JEK mixes the tapes. There’s another recording engineer in Europe who works extensively (a huendred records in all) for ECM : Martin Wieland, who succeeded to Kurt Rapp in Tonstudio Bauer in Ludwigsburg, Germany, but JEK gets the lion’s share. "I love to record in Olso, mainly because of the light, and the atmosphere inspired by this light", Eicher explains. The world-wide success of the “Köln Concert” by Keith Jarrett (over two million and a half copies until today !) lets him do what he wants and give his label “the most beautiful sound after silence” &endash; his main concern.
Evolution
As we listened back to the first ECM releases, we felt a little strange. Stereo placement like ping-pong (piano at the right, drums at the left, bass in the center in Mal Waldron’s Trio), sometimes aggressive sounds (Dollar Brand), perfectible sound balances… No surprise : recording and mixing in one or two days inevitably leads to compromises, even if the music itself is astonishing. But very soon, Manfred Eicher refines this sound which will become his trademark : very precisely recorded instruments, a very homogeneous stereo image, and many levels of depth in the mix, thanks to electronic reverberation units, setup for long decays (this was unusual at the time). He already loves to melt unusual timbres : orchestral strings and electric piano melt with Eberhard Weber’s bass in “Following Morning” (ECM 1084).
"I think I put in practice what I had learnt during my sessions as an assistant producer for some chamber music recording sessions. I listened to a lot of jazz records, mainly Impulse! Or ESP releases ; I found the music very interesting, but I didn’t like the way it was produced, mainly because I felt something was lacking, a part of the message had disappeared. My main concern, when I founded ECM, was to respect every aspect of the music. That meant be able to hear every nuance of the instrument, every colour, and respect the dynamics of sound, as given by the musician. This was quite a different way of recording jazz, and public was sensible to it".
In many pieces, Eicher asks the musicians to play quietly, and the tempos are often moderate. And the labels fall : “fjord music”, “Great Northern Sound” for some critics, “icy aesthetics”, “cold sound”, “jazz planant” for others. Manfred Eicher simply doesn’t care, and follows his own way. He is aware to the tiniest details : weight of the paper and fidelity of reproduction for the superb pictures which illustrate his record sleeves (often real art works - cf. the book “ECM, Sleeves of Desire”). To ensure the best possible reproduction on the listener’s turntable, he cuts and presses his records at the Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft, a famous classical music label known world-wide for the quality of its discs. "We searched for high-quality vinyl, we changed the head of the cutting machine for every new record, we drove as quickly as we could to the galvanization plant, to obtain a good mould. This was like a funny ritual… Nowadays, vinyls are still pressed, but quality is not the word here !".
Sound and technique
The Arne Bendiksen studio closed at the end of 1975. Jan Erik Kongshaug went to work as a salaree at Talent Studios, in Oslo. Manfred Eicher follows him, and a beautiful era begins for ECM Records. ECM 1100 is a 10-LP set, including five recordings of the Keith Jarrett solo tour in Japan. Following albums build the legend of ECM : Ralph Towner, Codona, Kenny Wheeler, David Darling, John Surman in solo, or, more ‘free’, AEOC or Enrico Rava. The unanimous opinion is then that all these musicians, who all had a career on their own before appearing on ECM Records, have never sounded better ! Manfred Eicher seeks for the beauty of the sound, but is not a technology addict : "We should never forget that music appeared well before the microphone was invented ! Today, producing a record means getting the music through a technologic chain made by the microphone, the wires, the console and the tape recorder. Nevertheless, I think my role is not only to handle all those parameters, but begins well before the microphone and the recording process. That’s why I think the phase of preparation of a recording, together with the musicians themselves, is so important : phrasing and timbres, reading the scores (if there are any), esthetic choices to establish for the music itself, and of course, the mood in the recording studio, the ambience which mainly determins what will come through the sessions. For all these reasons, I consider myself as the first listener of the music, before it is even recorded. That’s why musicians consider me as a partner, not as a technician".
"As soon as the music hits the microphone, then my role is to get the sound the best I can, as natural and direct as the musicians offer it to us. The job of the producer is, very simply, to receive in the best conditions what he is given, and to give it back with the most transparency possible".
The ECM sound
Very early, in 1981, Manfred Eicher publishes the first digitally recorded ECM - soon followed by many others, proudly announcing “Digital Recording” on the front sleeve. Asked why he adopted this new technology so soon, Eicher answers : "Right, Cellorganics was recorded digitally, but as we have no analog comparison, it would be unwise to make a mystery out of this". If you listen carefully, on a very good stereo, to the digitally recorded ECM from the 1200’s series, some cymbals seem a little more acid, some instruments become a bit harsh, and the long reverberations sometimes lose the “analog” feeling. By the way, “El Corazon” (ECM 1230) - a duet with Ed Blackwell on drums and Don Cherry on trumpet - is one of the most beautifully (and digitally !) recorded ECM’s of all times - thanks to Martin Wieland. But that’s technology : it evolves rapidly, and the transparency of the “Rainbow-era” recordings is now obvious.
As Manfred Eicher points out, the notion of “ECM sound” can be deceptive : all ECM records don’t have the same sound ! "Recorded sound is the result of a very personal way of hearing music. The realization of a score or the documentation of a spontaneous jazz improvisation requires an act of precise reflection from a sound engineer and a producer. The role of a producer, the way I see it, could be compared with the collaboration of a director in a movie and his director of photography. However, this only can be a vague comparison. For instance, Jean-Luc Godard will always be JLG, whoever his director of photography is. Bergman worked with many different directors of photography, but we always speak about a film by Ingmar Bergman. And this is true for Truffaut, Rivette, to name just a few. If you compare different recordings on ECM by the Art Ensemble of Chicago, Jan Garbarek or Don Cherry, you might hear different sounds depending on the given musical concept. Similarly, if you listen to recordings on the New Series, from Arvo Pärt to Johannes Brahms, you may find different engineers in the recording block and hopefully a different sound, according to the musical score. But you may also recognize a sound direction and concept which originate from the players and the producers".
[To appreciate this comparison, let us recall that Manfred Eicher directed himself a movie, Holozän, and that he has very close relationship with French director Jean-Luc Godard, from whom he published recently on ECM New Series the soundtrack of his 1990 movie “Nouvelle Vague” (without picture), and, very soon, the soundtrack of his “Histoire(s) du Cinéma” (a 5-CD set !). He also released on ECM many records of Eleni Karaindrou, Theo Angelopoulos’ favourite composer]
The ECM sound (foll.)
When you ask Jan Erik Kongshaug what the ECM sound secret is, he answers "It’s a whole… At the beginning, it’s Manfred and I who choose this or this type of sound, we try some reverbs : as we know perfectly each other, we know how to get this particular sound ! But we couldn't do anything without the musicians themselves, who listen to Manfred's indications (or mine), and their contribution to the ECM sound is not to be neglected !"
[The fact that Eicher and Kongshaug are both former musicians must certainly help them to communicate with the artists they record in the studio]
So can the ECM sound be recreated everywhere in the world ? "Of course, the studio where we record is important too, the acoustic side is not to be neglected... But the most important thing is the musicians, how they play, how they work together with the producer. Another important point for this kind of music is the piano : there are very often problems to get a piano sound right, not so many studios own a very good piano. I am lucky enough to have one, here in Rainbow !".
Technically speaking, Jan Erik Kongshaug uses close miking : "According to the instrument, the microphone is placed at around 10 to 50 cm away (10 for a bass, 50 for a saxophone or a trumpet for example). I like Neumann mikes (U87 or the new M149), and Schoeps are very good too. I don't play much with ambience mikes : I have so many room simulators, reverbs and everything in my racks that I prefer creating the room sound afterwards".
New Series
When CD was commercially launched, presented as a sonic revolution, Manfred Eicher seems to hesitate a little, then, from 1984, he goes in this direction, reissuing a large part of the catalogue in parallel with the new issues. He abandons the LP format around 1990 : "Publishing a digital recording on vinyl is a non-sense &endash; it’s technically incoherent".
1984 is the year of ECM’s 15th birthday. Manfred Eicher, for the occasion, decides to add a new division in his record company, called New Series, for written music, from Middle-age to contemporary music &endash; some older records will be reissued under that label, the Steve Reich records for example. Until then, most of the records he had published found their source in jazz : improvised music played by jazz musicians (even if, for instance, some Oregon pieces can be considered as chamber music…). An anecdote told by a former ECM collaborator : in 1978, Manfred Eicher listens to the tapes of “Music for 18 Musicians”, originally produced by the Deutsche Grammophon. Nobody there is willing to publish this hour of orchestral repetitive music anymore… Eicher publishes it, and sells around 100000 copies of the record, which will help to establish Reich’s fame in Europe.
With the New Series, ECM’s palette of musical styles becomes even wider. Eicher begins to get away from jazz, a style he considers as less creative than it was in the 60’s. But the “Standards” collection, by Jarrett/Peacock/DeJohnette, sell very well, and have certainly helped to produce many ‘difficult’ recordings &endash; let’s quote Skardanelli Zyklus form Heinz Holliger, or Heinz Reber’s ‘Ma’.
The art of melting
ECM New Series reveals in Europe completely unknown composers, like Arvo Pärt (Manfred Eicher firts heard Pärt’s music while he was driving accross Germany, and fell in love with it &endash; it was very hard to get back to the composer himself !), John Adams, Kurtag, Meredith Monk, Kancheli… Some critics say it’s retrograde, new age, tonal, ‘nordic’, ‘musique planante’ (heard that before…). Eicher couldn’t care less, and he publishes splendid recordings of more or less forgotten Middle-Age composers (Pérotin, Frye, Tallis, Gesualdo…), sounding astonishingly modern in their writing.
Among the first ECM New Series issues are five CDs recorded live at Gidon Kremer’s Lockenhaus Festival. For the occasion, Manfred Eicher invites Peter Laenger and Stephan Schellmann, who have just left recording school in Detmold, to record the performances. "Our first encounter, recording chamber music under live conditions, was a very positive experience, and so we continue". Their names regularly appear on ECM New Series productions. This catalogue is rich of more than 100 references, from solo instrument to orchestral, including, as has been said, chamber music. Many of these records call for a reverberant acoustics (including the Chartres cathedral !) &endash; this seems to be a constant factor in ECM productions.
In parallel, Eicher publishes more “electronic-oriented” records : we can hear Simmons drums on ‘Lask 2’, rhythm machines on Shankar/Garbarek’s ‘Who’s to know’, electronically treated instruments on ‘Piano/Harfe’, and synthesizers on Ralph Towner’s, Rainer Brüninghaus or John Surman’s solo records. The multitrack-oriented Steve Tibbetts records at home. Even more, Keith Jarrett uses a 4-track Portastudio to record at home, during a depressive phase, the splendid ‘Spirits’, one of his most touching records. Eicher publishes radio tapes from Heiner Goebbels’ adaptations of Heiner Müller’s dramas, or electroacoustic works from Karlheinz Stockhausen. He then asks Keith Jarrett to ‘go classics’ and record the well-tempered clavier, the Goldberg variations, the Shostakovich Preludes and Fugues, and, more recently, the Mozart Piano concertos. He has the brilliant idea to leave Jan Garbarek improvise live on medieval polyphonies : the ‘Officium’ record is a winner ! (follow-up soon).
Everyone is amazed when Nils Petter Molvaer publishes his electronic, loop, drum&bass oriented ‘Khmer’ : never heard that in ECM before ! This album is excellent, will be air-played on radio stations for whom ECM is unknown, and will even be remixed by famous DJ’s. In the most recent issues, Eicher gives occasions to Michael Cain (heard in Jack DeJohnette’s Oneness), Christian Wallumrod to be heard under their own name : but he still records John Surman’s orchestral and choral ‘Proverbs and Songs’ (but curiously, not under the ECM New Series label), Dave Holland, Stephen Micus or Charles Lloyd. He likes to find ‘weird’ combinations of artists who record for him since years : Anouar Brahem with John Surman and Dave Holland, for instance, or Dino Saluzzi with a classical quartet. And all those records are absolutely brilliant, thanks to his musical intuition.
To be honest, let us say that Manfred Eicher has not produced every ECM record : since 1975, he sometimes lets some other producers at the controls, but it’s rare. For around 10 years, he regularly lets Steve Lake produce some more ‘free music’-oriented projects, like Evan Parker or Joe Maneri…
Rainbow Studios
Since 1984, the words ‘Talent Studio’ has been replaced, on the record sleeves, by ‘Rainbow Studios’. The sound engineer is still Jan Erik Kongshaug ! "I went free-lance in 1979, still working a lot at Talent Studios, but I began to move to New York for ECM (for Pat Metheny, Keith Jarrett…). Then Talent Studio closed at the end of 1983. I had to choose : going, as a free-lancer, here and there, which meant everywhere in Europe or in the USA, or create my own recording studio. That’s what I did ! Rainbow Studios opened in March 1984".
So Jan Erik Kongshaug is a studio owner since 15 years ! He is the main engineer too, helped by a couple of free-lancers. The big studio (around 150 m2), made of wood, is day-lighted (as we saw, Manfred Eicher loves that !), and the control room is pretty big (around 50 m2). Kongshaug went digital as soon as 1986 (Mitsubishi 32-track, replaced by a Sony 48-track in 1991). He also owns a Pro Tools 24 bits 24 tracks system, 3 Apogee AD-8000 converters, his console is a Harrison Series Twelve, and he has racks fulled of outboard gear, like Lexicon 480L, PCM80 and 90, Klark Teknik t.c. electronics M3000 and M5000 digital reverbs, many Yamaha SPX90 and 990, many delays, an EMT 240 plate reverb… "I recently went into the valve microphone thing &endash; I bought a Sony C800G, and I find it wonderful. It’s been a year since I began recording in 24 bit format on the Sony (thanks to the AD-8000’s bit-splitting feature), and I love more and more to record directly on the Pro Tools, in 24 bits too. Even if backup is always kind of a problem, I think that in a few months, I won’t use the 3348 anymore !".
Five-day recordings
On every ECM record sleeve, location, month and year of recording appear. Does that mean that musicians have 30 days of sessions available ? "Not quite… I would say one to three days for the recording, depending mostly on the number of overdubs to make, and two to three days for the mix", says Kongshaug. "So we can’t afford to lose time during the balance before recording. And we don't ! Once the musicians are ready to play (they take usually one hour or so to install themselves), my balance is already on the console ! In the studio, I have built myself monitoring systems for the headphones. Every musician has his own little mixer, he makes his own balance - one fader for our mix in the control room, one fader for drums, one fader for the bass, one for the piano, and so on. Every musician can decide himself what instrument he wants to hear less or more, and doesn't have to ask for it : he just has to play with his faders ! So, he feels immediately comfortable with what he hears in his headphones, and I think his playing can only be better".
"Advantage for us in the control room : we don't spend much time for getting the phones balance right. As I told you, usually one hour after the musicians have arrived, we can begin to record".
If he’s not ill or otherwise disables, Manfred Eicher is always present at the sessions, and takes a very active part in every recording &endash; whether in a two- or three-day recording or a one-night stand at the Grossmünster in Zurich. I like to get options, input or ideas from the musicians or from the sound engineer, I respect and welcome them, but I take the final decision. So far, I am very helpless if it comes to finding the appropriate plus for the socket". Confirms Jan Erik Kongshaug : "I don't think Manfred's technically into the console thing. But he knows exactly what he wants to hear, and asks me to make it work ! During the mixing process, he's actually working with the faders. Manfred is involved in every aspect of the records he produces : from the choice of the musicians themselves, with unusual combinations (remember Codona or Magico !), to the mikes we will use, the balance in the mix... the whole process ! So he's mostly responsible for the final sound".
As we could expect, ECM Records is Rainbow’s main client ! "ECM sessions keep me busy 40 to 50% of the time", Kongshaug confirms. "But we record all kinds of music here : folk music, classical music, pop singers... Jazz music is around 60% : we have customers coming from all over the world, Germany, England, Brazil. Not only record labels, but self-produced musicians or groups too. They finance their sessions, then they go to record companies to distribute their records. You know, the market is very small for this style of music : there are a lot of good jazz bands here in Norway, but very few can make a living from their musical activities...". Kongshaug’s name appeared on many records, including the Ornette Coleman/Metheny’s ‘Song X’, on Geffen Records, or Yellowjackets, ‘Green House’ (JEK went to L.A. for this one) and ‘The Spin’, made at Rainbow in 1989. "I recorded some acts for Blue Note, some others for a Brasilian company, which keeps coming regularly to Rainbow".
Final word
The final word in this article is for Manfred Eicher : "I believe the producer’s role is to capture the music he likes, to present it to those who don’t know it yet. It’s a very important a difficult task, which must be dealt with reponsability and integrity. If you work in that direction, caring for the sound, getting some precise information or inspired sleeve notes in a booklet, working on the pictures for the record cover, then a kind of symbiotic unity is at work, and people feel you have been producing the record for good reasons. So you can touch them, beyond cultural borders, they understand and appreciate what you have to offer them. It’s all about taking risks, but still being generous and rigourous. I sincerely belive these are the reasons why ECM kept running for 30 years now".
"For us, the decision on which score is to be realized or which musician or group of musicians is to be recorded will be the ‘given’ for the direction of the sound. And this varies, greatly. In the past, we have recorded in many different locations, from monasteries to modern studios and with various engineers, using diverse technology &endash; analog, digital, two-track, multitrack… Over the last six or seven years, Steve Lake has also joined the journey as a producer. A lot of factors influence each recording. All that can really be said about “ECM sound” at this point is that the sound that you hear is the sound that we like. What is too often forgotten by occasional critics, none of whom has been at our sessions, is that the musicians are our partners all the way through the mixing or editing process as well. Recording is also teamwork".
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by winkyincanada
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
I'd urge anyone who thinks ECM somehow isn't jazz, or is bland, or is akin to "New Age," to really listen to the title track of Keith Jarrett's album Personal Mountains. You may like it, you may not. But you will not be able to substantiate the claim that it isn't jazz, or that it's bland, or that it's akin to "New Age" music.
Full agreement with you Fred. I cannot imagine anyone giving that record a chance, and then concluding that it is not jazz, or claiming that it is bland or "new age".
ECM has been perhaps the revelation of this forum for me. I have bought many ECM CDs "unheard" (but on the basis of recommendations here) and have yet to be disappointed. How else would have I ever experienced the delights of Anouar Brahem, if not for this forum?
Personally, I find the tone of Mike's posts on his listening experiences to be somewhat condescending. Often an expression of alleged "fact" rather than simple preferences or taste. But maybe that's just me.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by vlada
quote:Originally posted by vlada:
[QUOTE]
ECM is a record label, but it's more than that ... it's a rich, multifaceted aesthetic developed over decades by some of the greatest musicians in the world.
I do not remember telling anything contrary to the above statement. They are a great company, they are (more or less) independent, they have great musicians.
Everything is True.
quote:
The viewpoint Vlada expresses is limited, narrow, and exclusionary ... jazz, if nothing else, is the opposite of exclusionary. Jazz has always been a hybrid music, a fusion of many cultures, extremely flexible and adaptive. The idea that the jazz music on ECM isn't really jazz is frankly absurd.
Maybe, BUT it is *my* point of view. And we may discuss over and over what jazz is or not, but that what comes out from EMC, although good music, "does not swing". Of it does not "swing" it "ain't no Jazz" for me. Again my subjective point of view.
quote:
And it has nothing in common with most "New Age" music, except to undiscerning and/or inexperienced ears.
Well I am not sure about their recent releases, but I know i the past they had have Pat Metheny under contract. Although a lot of people call Pat
a Jazz Guitar Player, for me he is a typical New Age Musician.
quote:
I'd urge anyone who thinks ECM somehow isn't jazz, or is bland, or is akin to "New Age," to really listen to the title track of Keith Jarrett's album Personal Mountains. You may like it, you may not. But you will not be able to substantiate the claim that it isn't jazz, or that it's bland, or that it's akin to "New Age" music.
Now this is great! As far I can remember this discussion started about "European Jazz" and here Fred takes Keith Jarrett as example. Last time I an checked Keith Jarrett was (still) an American Musician. (Pls. correct me if I am wrong). Here you have a Full ACK since Keith Jarrett *IS* a Jazz Musician. A great one. but except his record label I do not see any link to "European Jazz here."
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by vlada:quote:
The viewpoint Vlada expresses is limited, narrow, and exclusionary ... jazz, if nothing else, is the opposite of exclusionary. Jazz has always been a hybrid music, a fusion of many cultures, extremely flexible and adaptive. The idea that the jazz music on ECM isn't really jazz is frankly absurd.
Maybe, BUT it is *my* point of view. And we may discuss over and over what jazz is or not, but that what comes out from ECM, although good music, "does not swing". Of it does not "swing" it "ain't no Jazz" for me. Again my subjective point of view.
You're entitled to your own opinions, of course, but not to your own facts. There is plenty of music on the ECM label that swings ... plenty that objectively swings in the literal sense of music terminology, that is, it uses the so-called swing-8th-note feel instead of the straight-8th-note feel ... and plenty that swings in a more general sense, that is, the music dances, it has a fluid propulsive momentum that swings even if the music uses a straight-8th-note feel.
quote:Originally posted by vlada:quote:
And it has nothing in common with most "New Age" music, except to undiscerning and/or inexperienced ears.
Well I am not sure about their recent releases, but I know i the past they had have Pat Metheny under contract. Although a lot of people call Pat a Jazz Guitar Player, for me he is a typical New Age Musician.
"Typical New Age musician"?! Really?! No discernment between Pat Metheny and Yanni?! I'm sorry, if you think Metheny is a New Age musician, I must say that you just don't know what you're talking about. Just because you're entitled to hold your own opinion doesn't automatically mean, therefore, that your opinion is equally valid. You don't dig Pat? Fine! I'll never argue with that ... but to claim he is a New Age musician? Sorry, that's plain incorrect.
quote:Originally posted by vlada:quote:
I'd urge anyone who thinks ECM somehow isn't jazz, or is bland, or is akin to "New Age," to really listen to the title track of Keith Jarrett's album Personal Mountains. You may like it, you may not. But you will not be able to substantiate the claim that it isn't jazz, or that it's bland, or that it's akin to "New Age" music.
Now this is great! As far I can remember this discussion started about "European Jazz" and here Fred takes Keith Jarrett as example. Last time I an checked Keith Jarrett was (still) an American Musician. (Pls. correct me if I am wrong). Here you have a Full ACK since Keith Jarrett *IS* a Jazz Musician. A great one. but except his record label I do not see any link to "European Jazz here."
Vlada, if you actually knew the recording I cited, you'd know that the other three musicians in Jarrett's group are Europeans, and that its music has a pronounced European jazz sensibility. Not to mention that I cited that example in response to the discussion about ECM in particular ... never mind the fact that the ECM label could easily be considered an emblematic paragon of European jazz.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by Mika K
I do not understand this thread at all. Perhaps it is just a slow morning for me or then not but..
ECM is most definately very respected label. It does not have all the trademarks of jazz but why should it have? If you want concentrate only to the ECM, I'm sure that it will divide also jazz listeners very easily as the record label has naturally its own weak points.
But if you want to discuss about European jazz that is a whole different story and has necessary nothing to do with ECM. Even there are some connections available the field to choose from is so much bigger out there..
ECM is most definately very respected label. It does not have all the trademarks of jazz but why should it have? If you want concentrate only to the ECM, I'm sure that it will divide also jazz listeners very easily as the record label has naturally its own weak points.
But if you want to discuss about European jazz that is a whole different story and has necessary nothing to do with ECM. Even there are some connections available the field to choose from is so much bigger out there..
Posted on: 26 May 2010 by Lontano
quote:Originally posted by mikeeschman:
I listened to quite a bit of ECM (10 discs) a few months back. That is concluded and will not be re-visited.
Mike I find it very strange that you would start a thread on European Jazz when you gave a few European Jazz discs a listen, dismissed them quickly and do not want to revisit them - in great contrast to the way you repetitively listen to the same old piece of classical music over and over again.
Just for the record, these are the ten discs. Six of them are on ECM. Not much new age there in my books - the closest being Jan Garbarek which is influenced by Norwegian folk music.
E.S.T. - From Gagarins Point of View
E.S.T - Seven Days of Falling
Tomasz Stanko - Dark Eyes (ECM)
Tomasz Stanko - Lontano (ECM)
Jan Garbarek - I Took Up The Runes (ECM)
Tord Gustavsen - The Ground (ECM)
Tord Gustavsen - Being There (ECM)
Lars Danielsson - Tarantella
Enrico Rava - Easy Living (ECM)
Benedikt Jahnel - Modular Concepts
I agree with everything Fred has said - he is doing a great job of trying to correct some of the many inaccuracies and misunderstandings in what you write.
I had decided that I could not be bothered to make a reply to this thread as whatever any one writes it is always wrong in the eyes of the OP, but there you go I changed my mind.
Posted on: 26 May 2010 by mikeeschman
Fred, Lontano, this is something we are just not going to ever agree on. The 10 discs Lontano cites all left me utterly and completely cold. The musicianship on these is very poor and the music is dull and boring.
These bands would play to empty clubs in New Orleans. If this was all there was to listen to, frankly, I'd turn my back on music altogether. They are a hallmark of what is bad and wrong with jazz today, at least in my mind.
This ultra-inclusionary view of jazz is what left it dead as a doornail.
When you try to be and do everything, you are left with nothing.
Enough said.
That is my conclusion. I put in the time, listened to the music, was left flat, and am moving on to other things.
I would still like to have some concise, factual statement of what motivates European Jazz today, a tag I can hang on the box of memories as I put them in storage.
This shouldn't be necessary, but I reiterate that these are my personal observations and reactions, and not some catalog of eternal truths. The same is true of every post I have read on the music room.
Clearly a case of "In taste, there can be no dispute ..."
These bands would play to empty clubs in New Orleans. If this was all there was to listen to, frankly, I'd turn my back on music altogether. They are a hallmark of what is bad and wrong with jazz today, at least in my mind.
This ultra-inclusionary view of jazz is what left it dead as a doornail.
When you try to be and do everything, you are left with nothing.
Enough said.
That is my conclusion. I put in the time, listened to the music, was left flat, and am moving on to other things.
I would still like to have some concise, factual statement of what motivates European Jazz today, a tag I can hang on the box of memories as I put them in storage.
This shouldn't be necessary, but I reiterate that these are my personal observations and reactions, and not some catalog of eternal truths. The same is true of every post I have read on the music room.
Clearly a case of "In taste, there can be no dispute ..."
Posted on: 26 May 2010 by Lontano
Mike - your sweeping statements are what get you into so many arguments on this forum unlike any other member in the music room.
To make a statement that the "musicianship is poor and the music is dull and boring" (to many on here in the know), demonstrates your narrow, closed minded and limited view of the musical world.
If you said you did not like it - it is not for me - then that is fine and people would accept that but to say it in the sweeping way you do is inflammatory - you make the kind of statements I would expect from my 9 year old son when I am playing some music in the car he does not enjoy (but he is more intelligent than that).
You are stuck in a musical time warp which is fine if that makes you happy (it will possibly happen to all of us at some stage) but why do you bother starting threads and writing such gibberish about something that does not interest you. I think it is a windup and trolling. Bizarre.
You will notice that I do not start threads about about tempo, meter, rhythm, scores, metronomes as I have NO interest whatsoever in dissecting music (to me unemotionally) like this (like many members here I suspect).
Anyway, I do not mean to be aggressive or rude in any way but your poorly thought through posts deserve pointed replies.
To make a statement that the "musicianship is poor and the music is dull and boring" (to many on here in the know), demonstrates your narrow, closed minded and limited view of the musical world.
If you said you did not like it - it is not for me - then that is fine and people would accept that but to say it in the sweeping way you do is inflammatory - you make the kind of statements I would expect from my 9 year old son when I am playing some music in the car he does not enjoy (but he is more intelligent than that).
You are stuck in a musical time warp which is fine if that makes you happy (it will possibly happen to all of us at some stage) but why do you bother starting threads and writing such gibberish about something that does not interest you. I think it is a windup and trolling. Bizarre.
You will notice that I do not start threads about about tempo, meter, rhythm, scores, metronomes as I have NO interest whatsoever in dissecting music (to me unemotionally) like this (like many members here I suspect).
Anyway, I do not mean to be aggressive or rude in any way but your poorly thought through posts deserve pointed replies.