Advanced search

Return of the King

Posted by: Geoff C on 18 December 2003

Took my son James yesterday (17 Dec) to see ROTK, and we were both pleased that the journey has been completed in such an awesome manner!

If you enjoyed the Fellowship and The Two Towers, you should not be disappointed.

Regards
Geoff
Posted on: 18 December 2003 by Former member
I'm waiting for the Apendices to be filmed or it won't be complete

Tom

Actively enjoying it all
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by matthewr
Be careful. Its a slippery slope to this:



In character as elves, Cam Schroyer, left, 16, of New Market, Md., and his sister Corry Schroyer, 22, of Pikesville, Md., wait with about 800 fans outside Baltimore's Senator Theatre Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 to see all three 'Lord of the Rings' movies in succession. The theater will conclude the Lord of the Rings marathon with the newly released 'The Return of the Rings.' (AP Photo/ Steve Ruark)
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Brian OReilly
Which one are you Matthew ?

Brian OReilly
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by BLT
I though the film was excellent, too. And no - I didn't feel the urge to dress up as an Elf to watch it. I believe that one child in the theatre was wearing a Gollum mask (or he could just have been really ugly..). Dressing up as an Elf in the Glasgow area is only likely to have one consequence - a sore face!
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Rick Weldon
what a fantastic film!
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Steve G
quote:
Originally posted by BLT:
Dressing up as an Elf in the Glasgow area is only likely to have one consequence - a sore face!


And dressing up as an Orc would have people mistaking you for a Celtic fan... Big Grin

Regards
Steve
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Not For Me
I saw it yesterday, and it is good.

I felt it could do with being a bit longer.

The queue for the toilets afterwards was testament to the gripping nature of the story.

DS
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Steve G
quote:
Originally posted by David Slater:
I saw it yesterday, and it is good.

I felt it could do with being a bit longer.



Overall I thought the films did a pretty good job although the extended versions of the first two are much better than the original cinema release. Perhaps they'd have been better doing them in 4 films rather than sticking to the 3 episodes as per the books?

Regards
Steve
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Rick Weldon
i think they should have done it all in elvish with no on screen translation !
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Former member
quote:
Originally posted by David Slater:
The queue for the toilets afterwards was testament to the gripping nature of the story.
Should've taken a bottle in with you Wink

Tom

Actively enjoying it all
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by oldie
I know I'm getting on a bit, and losing it all round
but what the hell is ROTK ???? Confused
oldie.
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Former member
Return of the King. Books 5 & 6 of Lord of the Rings (LoTR) The biggest blockbuster since the last one.

Tom

Actively enjoying it all
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Geoff P
It's allright Oldie
Take it from one who is only 5 months younger than you.
It's just that these young sprats don't know what copperplate and joined up writing is!
Mind you if your profile is correct your only approxm. 15 years old and so have no excuse.

geoff
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Former member
Both of you would have been about 9-10 when the book first came out
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by oldie
Hi Geoff,
you have noticed a bit of a secret that over the years has confused a considerable number of people, I'm very impressed that you noticed. Yes the big 15comes up soon.And now of course the rest of the forum will be saying ,what are those old fools on about.
all the best
oldie.
Posted on: 19 December 2003 by Two-Sheds
A very good film indeed. I did feel it was a bit rushed from the battle outside the white city to the end, hopefully the extended edition will rectify this. Just have to wait another year for that then...
Posted on: 20 December 2003 by Geoff P
quote:
Both of you would have been about 9-10 when the book first came out


Yep
The other interesting thing is to have witnessed the evolution of the LOTR phenomenon which did'nt really take off until son Christopher started to edit and release the unpublished corollary works of his father.
I actually read LOTR first as a "science fiction book club" book of the month, XCPT it was a special price because of it's size.
Boy did those appendicies drive me nuts.
Now that they have got the whole thing going AND we have the digital effects technology at a level where you can't see the join (almost) instead of talking about the Hobbit they ought to take on THE SILMARILLION.
Posted on: 20 December 2003 by Geoff P
quote:
Both of you would have been about 9-10 when the book first came out


Yep
The other interesting thing is to have witnessed the evolution of the LOTR phenomenon which did'nt really take off until son Christopher started to edit and release the unpublished corollary works of his father.
I actually read LOTR first as a "science fiction book club" book of the month, XCPT it was a special price because of it's size.
Boy did those appendicies drive me nuts.
Now that they have got the whole thing going AND we have the digital effects technology at a level where you can't see the join (almost) instead of talking about the Hobbit they ought to take on THE SILMARILLION. That could be quite a film

GEOFF
Posted on: 20 December 2003 by Geoff P
oops finger trouble
Posted on: 20 December 2003 by Rick Weldon
yes that would be amazing ! a bigger more evil spider, a youthfull Gandalf,and even bigger battles i want to see it now!!
Posted on: 20 December 2003 by ejl
quote:
they ought to take on THE SILMARILLION. That could be quite a film


I'm afraid that to the contrary, it would be an excruciating nightmare akin to filming the "begats" of the Bible,* or a telephone book. Watching it probably would be like a bucket of cold water on the current Tolkein fever, however.

* aka the crushingly tedious geneologies in the gospels of Luke, etc.
Posted on: 22 December 2003 by Rick Weldon
i would go and see it ,and i would make my better half go, so thats at least two tickets sold !
Posted on: 22 December 2003 by BLT
I think that "The Hobbit" is likely to be made by Peter Jackson, but the Silmarillion would be commercial suicide.
Posted on: 22 December 2003 by Former member
Saw it last Thursday with my girlfriend.

Yep, a fine conclusion to a great trilogy. In my view the three LOTR films represent arguably the best film translation of any book.

In fact, I think there will be quite a number of people out there who didn't (or don't) like the book(s) but enjoy the films. Normally with film translations of books the exact opposite is the case!

quote:
I felt it could do with being a bit longer.


That's what the extended version on DVD is for!

I have patiently waited the extra few months for the extended version release of each film on DVD, rather than wasting money on the standard theatrical version. The extra footage "completes" the films, in my view.

The extended version of ROTK will probably hit four hours duration...

John.
Posted on: 22 December 2003 by TomK
Make sure you see it in the biggest and best quality cinema you can get to. It's a movie of quite unbelievable scale in spite of a relatively slow (but still enjoyable) first hour or so, and a twee final 20 minutes. Once the action starts though it's staggering though quite dark and gory in places. I expect it pushed the limits of the new 12A category a bit.