Sonus Faber and Naim?

Posted by: Jaybar on 25 August 2001

I have selected Sonus Faber (concertino or Signum) as a replacement for my Dynaudio Contour 1.8's, which put out FAR Too much bass for my room. Ultimately, I will be moving away from my Spectral amp/pre-amp/MIT Cables to a simpler and far cheaper, but I hope highly involving Naim system. I am not looking for equivilent sonic quality to the Spectral, just more of a simple music lover's system than an audiophime system. I Currently have a Linn/Ekos/Lingo/Linto, Naim CD5/highcap. The fewer boxes (that effectively does the job) I end-up with the better. I did not have the opportunity yer to audition the SF with the Naim gear, but I hear good things on this forum.

1)Can a Nait 5 effectively drive either the Concertino Home's or the Signums or will I need a 112/150.

2)Having not a lot of experience with Sonus Faber and being able to hear clear differences between the Concertino and Signums (although the Concertino's did have their unique strengths) are the signums really THAT much better?

TIA


Jay

Posted on: 25 August 2001 by Chris Bell
Jay,

Have you tried a Naim speaker like the Intro or Credo? I thought the Sonus Fabers were really boring when I heard them. You should also seriously consider a flatcap for your Nait 5. Its performance increases substantially.

Chris Bell, Naim Speaker Zealot =

Posted on: 25 August 2001 by Jaybar
Rules out MOST Naim speakers.


Thanks anyway

Jay

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by John C
As I understand it the new Allae can be adapted to work in proximity to the wall or out into the room. This flexibility may be just what you need. I have only heard them very briefly so cant comment on their sound.
John
Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Martin Payne
Jay,

do you actually prefer the SF's, or are you doing this out of desperation? Have you tried your existing speakers with Naim amps?

Could you borrow a well run-in 112/150 to try at home for a few days?

I am not familiar with the Dynaudios, but it seems to be to be worth a try, at least.

cheers, Martin

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Top Cat
...but I thought the Signums driven by ??? amps which I heard a while back easily outclassed the Intros driven by Naim amps, but then the sound was significantly different and probably the preference element had a lot to do with it...

John

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Jaybar
The Dynaudio's are sold. I spent 7 months moving them into evey conceivable position in my room w/o success. They just overwhelmed me with bass.

I was not impressed with the Allae's when I heard them at the hifi show in NYC and the other Naim speakers won't work in my room.

The SF were attractive for a number of reasones. My dealer suggested Naim, but we did not have an opportunity to audition them with any Naim gear, so I was wondering if any forum members has experience with Naim and SF and if so what is the mininum Naim combo that would do the job. Its very simple.

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Martin Payne
quote:
Can we focus on the possibility of SF and Naim?

Oops - 'Nuff said.

cheers, Martin

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Jaybar
James, I can't afford the equipment configuration you suggest-evin with the sale of my Spectral gear. While the sale of the Dynaudio's would handily cover the concertino/better stands, I would be short for the Signums. One of the reasons to scale down was to recoup some cash

Would I be better to forgo the lower-end Naim gear and keep the Spectral which has no problems with 4 ohm loads.? I am worried that it might sound a bit bright though.

Any alternatives to lower-end Naim for less dollars than the configuration you suggest?

Thanks,


Jay

James

[This message was edited by Jaybar on MONDAY 27 August 2001 at 01:48.]

Posted on: 26 August 2001 by Jaybar
found the bass lower with the Concertino's but not as tight, airy and defined. I heard some high frequency roll-off/loss of hall acoustics with the Concertino's relative to the Signums. Was this really lack of resolution on the part of the "Tino's", or lack of the Signum's brightness? Who knows? Some slowness relative to signums. On the plus side, more easy-going tonal balance and less fatigue on less than great sources, with the Concertino Home's. On balance, the signums were a better speaker, but the concertino's acquited themselves nicely.
Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Sidney Overton
Jaybar,

You do seem to be in a bit of a pickle, having sold your speakers I can imagine it must be frustrating, and in the pursuit of replacements we can all get obsessive, sometimes that involves correcting things that ain’t broke.

I currently run a CD5/FC2/112/150/NAC5 into Concertinos here in Belgium and it works – three feet from side-walls and back wall; but I started with a CD5/Nait5/Concertinos and only moved to a pre-power because I suspected that would give me more grip on the undoubted bass from the Concertinos. It does, but with the magic of hindsight, the benefits of the change above the Nait/FC2 are not so great to be considered cost-effective. I appreciate your financial predicament but your Spectral amps and turntable source (and CD5/Hi Cap) would appear to justify Signums. Price apart, I was surprised, given the problems with your room and the Dynaudios, that you don’t consider them the better option sonically and financially if you are going one step at a time. If you are determined to go the less boxes are better route, and you have sufficient self restraint not to start thinking immediately about upgrades, then CD5/Nait5/FC2/Concertino is well balanced and would keep you happy – the Signums need better amps (and possibly a better source than the CD5).

If you take the Concertinos be prepared for more frustration because they take forever (and then several days more) to run-in. No need to bi-wire, jumper leads offer a reasonable compromise with NAC5. Mathijs is correct you need the SF stands, for height as much as anything else.

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Andrew Randle
Jaybar,

Try these freestanding loudspeakers... if the dealers in NY have them. They're made by Living Voice and have a musical, revealing, expansive sound. They're probably one of the few loudspeakers that boogie, provide scale, great bass, pick up on the finest musical nuances and details of playing.

Don't worry about the finish, they come in different woods, and can be made to order in piano black.

SFs are good, but not this good.

Andrew

Andrew Randle
2B || !2B;
4 ^ = ?;

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Jaybar
Both the Signums and the Concertino. I have that option as I have not yet parted with the Spectral. Thanks.

Jay

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Jaybar
In fact, I don't even see any dealers in the NE looking at the normal dealer ads.


Thanks anyway,


Jay

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Jaybar
that I should first try the signums with the Spectral? I am NOT sure what you exactly mean in your post. Thanks.

Jay

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Jaybar
Are you implying to keep the Spectral and mate them with the signums? Can you explain. Thanks. This may be a double post as my posts are now dissapearing

Thanks,


Jay

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Jaybar
The DMA 90. 100 Watts @ 8 ohms, 200 Watts @ 4 ohms. Lots of current.


Thanks,


Jay

Posted on: 27 August 2001 by Sidney Overton
Jaybar,

Sorry old chap,I ramble, but in my defence you were suggesting two (almost mutually exclusive) ways forward.

Yes, try the Signums with your current amplification. This should solve your excessive bass/free standing speaker problem at a reasonable cost outlay.

This may not satisfy your urge, which seems to be fashionable this month, to simplify and downsize -(and to get into naim amplification), but it should sound good.

If you then decide that you like the speakers and they are right for your room, and you still want to use naim amplification then you have a different problem - you will need to spend considerably more than Nait5 money to run Signums.Not to mention cabling etc issues.