NAIM NAC A5 good deal?
Posted by: mystik on 27 February 2002
Thanks alot
Peter
Peter
Peter
DIY replacement terminals will have to be fitted soon (a real tricky job due to the configuration of the crossover) as some corrosion has set in after 25 years of hard use.
Eddie
quote:
Originally posted by Richard van Laar:
Maybe the used speakers could have something to do with the bi-wire or not to bi-wire question too??....![]()
There are lots of speakers out there that are designed to be bi-wired.
Richard.
Designed ? or marketed ? I bought into the biwire/biamp thing but now I believe it's just a question of fashion and a way to sell more amps and cable.
Peter
What's the longest anyone has continuously used one component in their main system?
"THEY SHOULD BE AT LEAST 3.5 METRES LONG AND OF EQUAL LENGTH."
Its printed in CAPS in the manual too....
Even though 3 metres is almost 'there', I've found longer lengths to result in an improvement as well.
just my $.02 worth.
Enjoy
jim cash
quote:
Originally posted by Barryr:
I Bi-Wire my CDM1se's using Nordost super flatline, and they sound better biwired, no questions answered or asked!
I don't doubt that they sound better biwired, but what did you use for straps between the HF and bass/mid units ? I use a single run of Naca5 on my CDM1se's that effectively connects the hf to the bass/mid, and they sound much better this way than in any biwire/biamp configuration that I had prior. I believe that much of the improvement in biwiring comes from the wire being better quality than the straps that come standard with the speakers.
Peter
quote:
Originally posted by Richard van Laar:
Sonus Faber is a good example of this. You will never achieve the same results when you single-wire SF speakers compared to bi-wiring (with the same cable that is...).Richard.
CDX/02/102/180/SF
Can't argue with your results, but again what do you use for straps in single wire configuration ?
Peter
(Andrew Weekes' pic)
If it's a biwired run, it's (probably) worth less than a single-wired run, if you've got a Naim amp! After all, you'll have to supply the labor to get rid of one of the runs.
Seriously, my speakers (Near 50s, unknown on the forum except for a couple of us) sounded unequivocally better bi-wired from several different amps. They sound unequivocally better singe-wired from a Nap140 or 250 (I've forgotten what state my system was in when I made the change).
I went into the terminal block and attached both sets of wires to one set of terminals, thus solving the strapping problem.
I'm sure there are speakers that sound better when bi-wired even when run by Naim amps, but Naim's recommendations have worked for me and for many others on the forum. Do the potential gains outweigh the costs of obtaining those gains?
Phil
from There's no harm in experimenting, IL, USA
quote:
Date: January 21, 1998 09:44 AM
Author: julian vereker
Subject: cable length
This has been covered before, (try search), but to restate, NACA was
designed for a nominal 10m length so that 5m - 20m would be fine, but
3m is the shortest recommended.
julian
Hope this helps
David
and
Andy's page
best,
mike
quote:
Originally posted by mystik:
So I think I'll invest in 4 metre runs to be safe with extra bits to bridge the bi-wire terminals on my B&W's. I don't know where I am going to put 4 metres of cable in a relatively small room though. The other thing is termination, I expect that will cost some major money!?
I use bare wires into my B+W, there's a hole in each binding post, just thread the cable through and screw down tight. Make sure that there's enough 'tail' to span the two posts ( one above the other).
Peter