Destry rides again!

Posted by: Bob Edwards on 27 June 2003

All--

As some of you know, I recently bought a 52, which has been a revelation (to say the least). To do this, I gutted my office system, which had only recently been turned into a round earth experiment. In any event, as things turned out, I wound up with a office system made up of a Roksan Xerxes, Naim 32.5 and 90/3, and Linn Kans.

The Xerxes represents perhaps the most frustration I've ever had with a single piece of hifi equipment. (Perhaps appropriately, given how much heaven/hell stories I've heard and read about it!) When it arrived, it was in very good condition, as described. Since I did not have an arm, I didn't do anything with it, except to take it out of the box. Once the arm arrived (a SME IV) I mounted an AT OC9 in it, mounted the arm, and tried to play a record. No joy--although the motor would vibrate, it would NOT turn the platter. !%#$ After some inspection, the power supply was identified as the culprit, and returned to the seller for repair. Meanwhile, I thought I would try out the Origin Live supply, having read and heard good things about it. So I ordered one.

This is where the fun really began--the OL motor pulley is MUCH too tall to work with the Xerxes, and washers are required to raise the main bearing sufficiently to clear the motor pulley. As a result of my needing two washers, I acquired a new set of drill bits, a new vise, and a new tap and die set.

Then, once everything was put back together, with the motor pulley now clearing the platter, I put on the Chemical Brothers album Surrender, and was horrified to hear it running at what sounded (and measured) like 25 RPM. It was then I realized the OL instructions said to let it warm up before setting the speed. I also realized that the belt was quite loose--it still went around the motor pulley and inner platter, but still seems awfully loose.

Now, finally, everything is working. And I am pleased as punch to say it sounds absolutely great. So far it is still in tune, separates out rhythms with ease, and is terrifically dynamic. Once I get K boards for my 52 I will try it out upstairs and compare the combo with my LP12--I don't doubt for the LP12 will be better, but it sounds like the Xerxes does things the LP12 doesn't and vice versa.

Finally--have any other Xerxes owners noticed that it sounds better without the outer plinth?

Best,

Bob

[This message was edited by Bob Edwards on FRIDAY 27 June 2003 at 22:36.]
Posted on: 27 June 2003 by davidf
bob, I assume those are my (ex)kans. I hope you are enjoying them! have fun, david
Posted on: 27 June 2003 by bdnyc
Bob-

It has been quite a while since I heard the Roxsan and the Linn head to head, but my memory is that the Linn was a warmer and more textured style of sound, while the Roxsan was more tightly wound, and more extended, certainly in the bass, perhaps up top as well. The Linn was all about the midrange, where the Roxsan seemed more nuetral, or a little drier, or both. I would guess you will extend that tendency even further by removing the outer body. This was prior to the Linn having Lingos and Cirkuses, so a current evaluation would be most welcome.

Enjoy your experiments in the land of vinyl!