Are SBL`s Bass LIght?

Posted by: Big Ears on 22 November 2001

Hi,
I want to change my speakers which are currently B&W Cdm 7se and would value your expert opinions on what to listen to. My amps are 72+Hicap(soon to be upgraded to 52/supercap) 135`s. I know that a lot of people have SBL`s but some say that they are bass light and others disagree. I go to a lot of live concerts and own over 100 live dvd shows and i want to feel as if i am there so do SBL`s rock with Bass that i will be able to feel as well as hear and what is their loudness capability?
Are there other speakers that i should consider up to a max of £4000/ or would going active give me the results that i crave? roll eyes
Posted on: 22 November 2001 by ken c
i have owned sbl's for more than 7 years. i dont find them bass light. i wouldnt want any more bass from them.

however, you should know that speaker performance is very room dependent. its therefore dangerous to simply extrapolate from someone else's experience. this explains partly the disparity of opinions on the sbl's (and of course, on other speakers).

ideally, you should demo a few at home and tell us what you think.

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 22 November 2001 by Vik
Agree with Ken.

You should get a home demo.

many speakers outdo the SBLs for quantity, few outdo them in overall quality, hardly any i've heard outdo them in bass speed.

LF alignment in time to upper range frequencies in the SBL, especially in Active mode, is startling. Very very coherent.

If you cant do Active, look at the Allae instead.

vikk

Posted on: 22 November 2001 by jpk73
Don't need any more bass from my SBLs!!

Very satisfied,
Jun

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Bosh
In full agreement. Movinghouse recently confirmed this.

SBLs 6 foot apart as in old room - very heavy in the bass, moving away from the wall killed the PRAT. 8 foot apart resolved this but bass is still heavier in the new room and any further apart and a hole appears in the soundstage

Still sounds superb and in no way bass light

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Steve Catterall
Those that say that SBL are not Bass Light are deluded smile

If you like REAL bass (not that very(politically) 'correct' very tight respectable polite Bass that Naim speakers do) then you don't want SBLs cool

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by NigelP
At the risk of upsetting SBL owners I would like to give a contrasting view. I have a pair of Nautilus 804's and find them very exciting especially when run in. They are diffuclt to drive, however, despite what some dealers thinks and need serious amounts of current to make them do what they are supposed to. I recently installed a all Naim system, however, and I found the SBL to be a very fast and accurate speaker. My friend was lucky enough to pick these up for a mere £800 (with new bass/mid drivers) and, for this money, they are excellent value. You seem not to be bound by budget and think that you should try several alternatives.
Although the SBLs are fast, accurate and, quite frankly, a lot of fun. I do find them bass light and very ugly. In contrast the NBL is better in every respect. Although I did not feel they were as fast (the SBL really is quick) I found the bass to more accurate to the point where I really felt that I was listening to a bass guitar there in front of me.
The SBL is a great loudspeaker, nevertheless, and you should give it a try.
Posted on: 23 November 2001 by woodface
For their size they are not bass light! I replaced keilidhs with sbl's and do not feel i am missing any LF extention. Jason Hector point about NBL/DBL strikes me as absurd! The larger speakers are designed to drive larger rooms, people with big houses are generally those in the market for bigger more expensive speakers! Sbl's produce the correct level of basss for their size, the reason they are so fast is that they do not use ports etc to give more perceived extension. I believe they are the perfect real world speaker for those who live in average sized homes, ie me!
Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Claus
In a way I agree with the generel opinion that SBL's are not bass light.

They do lower bass quite nicely, fast, well integrated and controlled.

However, I feel that they are a bit missing out in upper bass / lowest midrange. To illustrate: Male voices and pianos feel too "thin", lacking some natural warmth.

For me, this is the weakest point of these otherwise fine speakers.

Claus

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by P
FWIW

My Sybilles are certainly not shy in the Bass dept either. I wouldn't want more bass than they can produce (unless I moved to a larger house)

I agree with Woodface on Jason Hectors ridiculous statement too. SBLs cost £2k - NBLs - £6k and DBLs £10k!! Might this possibly be the reason they have a tad more hardware onboard?

Time to cancel the HiFiplus subscription methinks!

P.

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by count.d
Hi Big Ears,

You could give the Shahinian range a listen.

I like listening to live music aswell and these were definately the best at reproducing that feeling.
The Obelisks would be in your price range.

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Andrew Randle
Bass-light? No! Bass-medium (but just a bit heavier) - YES!

For many rooms, they will be "baby bear's porridge" - just right!

Andrew

P.S. for £4000, the other louspeakers to try are the Living Voice OBX-R.

Andrew Randle
2B || !2B;
4 ^ = ?;

[This message was edited by Andrew Randle on FRIDAY 23 November 2001 at 12:18.]

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by woodface
The DBL goes deeper I agree, I never said it didin't. But lets be honest it is not suited to small rooms - speakers that prodiuce lots of bass seldom are. I still maintain that for there size they produce good accurate bass! They may well not be for everyone but I have yet to hear a side to them that so divides opinion.
Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Pete, Mad Bad and Dangerous to Know
Hi,Big Ears

You should listen to some Arcs if you want bass.

pete

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Pete, Mad Bad and Dangerous to Know
Hi,Big Ears

You should listen to some Arcs if you want bass.

pete

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Allan Probin
Big Ears,

This really is going to depend on the size of your room and your opinion of what constitues 'light bass'. In my opinion its far more important to get the bass *right* rather than get it in large quantities. I could sit you in front of a pair of Kans that are oh-so right in the bass they do that you'll be so happy listening to the music you'll forget all about not being able to hear that last octive or so.

If its any help, I'm only about 20 miles or so away from you, you could listen to SBLs over here where I think you'll find no perceived lack of bass in my 14ft x 11ft room. Okay, it doesn't have that chest-crushing deep bass that DBLs have, and I've tried DBLs here, but I don't really miss that. It's all down to personal preferences really.

If youre going to be using 52/135s and appropriate sources then you really don't want to be looking at Shahinians, certainly not at the level of Arcs or Compass' anyway. IMO the Shahinians are an extreme bottleneck to anything above about a mid-range Naim system. They are more suited to a mullet-type system where their bloaty-bass and smeared detail mask some of the deficiencies of the upstream components that more expensive equipment quite-rightly corrects.

Allan

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by count.d
Allan,

Have you heard the Shahinian Obelisks as apposed to Arcs?

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Pete, Mad Bad and Dangerous to Know
Hi, Allan

So my speakers are crap then!!! can't say I agree with you. Mine just sound better and better and reveal any changes that I do with non of that bloaty-bass and smeared detail.


pete

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by ken c
what i find "lacking" with sbl's (and the reason why i will be keen to see how the replacement will fare) is the sense of "scale". isobariks have a trememndous sense of scale. i suspect that NBL's and DBL's scale very well too -- i havent heard them properly.

fwiw, i don't find that my Kans are bass light at all.

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Goose
Definition of 'right' bass..We all have a completely different definition of this, how much, how fast, texture, rhythmn etc ( we could all go on!)

Personally, my 2 Lp's worth about SBL's is that they're not bass light and give a great accurate hifi bass, that when sets up well feels and sounds great. The bass 'fits' in balance with the rest of the speaker, but I do personally want for slightly more extension in bass and midrange. I do love their open and transparent presentation though. Room and contents are so important to achieving the overall sound you hear.

I agree and disagree with Mr Probin that with 52/135 you can't use Shahinian Compass, Arc is a minimum, and the higher ranges sound good with them, but to say

"They are more suited to a mullet-type system where their bloaty-bass and smeared detail mask some of the deficiencies of the upstream components that more expensive equipment quite-rightly corrects." is NOT true IMHO. ( I detect infuriation!)

IMO I have never heard other speakers retrieve decaying symbals so finely without that artificial edge/glare that is 'heard' or 'seen' as true/natural decay in worse speakers/ancilliaries..

I think Allan has heard Obelisks...Strangely I never got on with these at first...

True I own Shahinians, ( so I am slightly biased) but I have tried all of them in loads of Naim Combo's and they sound great. I do understand the love or hate them though! I'll stick to my natural 3-D live sound anyway :-)


have fun all

Goose

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Steve Catterall
This question always gets SBL owners on the defensive and out come the excuses. They do bass well 'for that size of speaker' or for the man with the 'smaller room', or they do bass 'correctly'.

Yeah right! If you like your bass nice and polite, with your pipe and slippers and your tinkly jazz, then SBLs are just what you need.

Some people happen to like to listen to Reggae and Dance, where this 'correct' style of bass doesn't work as well as bass that hits you in the chest.

Well maybe that's not 'correct' in some people's view, and SBL owners will come up with words like Bloat and Flabby, but to other people, that's just what they're looking for, and to those people SBLs just don't cut the mustard in the bass department.

Big Ears orginal post asked for 'Bass that i will be able to feel'. SBLs just won't do that - unless you stand right up against them and your a terribly sensitive little soul. (Yes - I know, SBL owners are just that and you all really feel that bass ... or at least feel that it is correct)

wink

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Ade Archer
I've got SBL's and I am curious to know if these observations of them are influenced by what they actually stand on i.e concrete, wood, custom stands e.g Mana. For example, some have stated that putting their SBL's on Mana soundbases tightened up the bass, but does this actually mean that the lower frequencies are more or less prominent afterwards. I tend to think of tightening up the bass in the context of SBLs to suggest that they sound leaner, as I can't imagine them suffering from flabby bass at all in any circumstances, short of wedging them into a corner.
Is there a common theme to what they were placed on in relation to to the quality of their bass response?

Cheers
Ade

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
Being nearly floored by the bass from my Intro IIs on a track from the last Moby CD, I wonder what some of you guys want? Whatever it is, I suggest you insure your house against it!

Regards

Stephen

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Steve Catterall
As if on cue, a fairly typical comment on Naim small speaker bass response

quote:
Being nearly floored by the bass from my Intro IIs on a track from the last Moby CD

Being a delicate little flower living in a paper house this is no doubt quite literally true in this case, but for most normal people speakers that really move some air are required before you can really feel the bass ... and even with DBLs you don't really get the feeling that you're in danger of being knocked over. wink

The Naim bass presentation can be a bit clinical for some lovers of reggae and dance, where a bit more resonance can make a big difference. You can certainly feel the bass on DBLs, but even they don't really play reggae and dance as well as some other speakers (BW801 or ATC150 for instance)

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
I listen to Dance & Reggae - and other stuff too. No need to be so sarky - we're only talking speakers here, after all. The Intros produce bass when it's meant to be there, at a level I'm happy with - and others I assume are happy with their SBL's & PMCs & suchlike. OK, I don't have as much bass as a PA system - but that has bass on everything.

Bass isn't everything - not even in Reggae.

Regards

stephen

Posted on: 23 November 2001 by Thomas K
quote:
sounded dire for most other types of recording (especially heavy metal)

I read comments like that every once in a while here. Never listened to much heavy metal to begin with, but ever since I've had a decent hifi system if find it's actually that type of music that sounds dire. Let's face it: heavy metal is produced mainly for 20-year old testomonsters with subwoofers under the front seats of their car. I recently gave away Van Halen's 1984 (which is an excellent album if you forget about "Jump") because I found it unlistenably thin. Don't wish to sound condescending, but if straight-out rock and metal is your thing, an accurate speaker like the SBL probably won't float your boat - because of the poor engineering and mastering with this type of music (I realize there will be plenty of exceptions). The danger I see is that you go out and get components or speakers (warm and wooly) that make up for the lousy production, and if you then play decent recordings it just doesn't work.

Steve C., just read your "pipe and slippers" rant - did make me laugh, and yes, SBLs won't cut the mustard if you want big, scary gut-pounding bass for dance and reggae. But how could they? They're stand-mounts in disguise.

Thomas

[This message was edited by Thomas K on FRIDAY 23 November 2001 at 16:41.]