The new Naim DAC

Posted by: rupert bear on 21 February 2009

The 10th floor of the Marriott hosts Doug G's demo of the new DAC. I was lucky to get the last ticket for the last show.

Demo used the HDX, 552/500, and SL2/n-sub. There was a little Mac sitting sweetly on its own bit of Fraim. First the HDX was played, then the HDX with 555PS (obvious vast improvement, as noted here before).

The new DAC was then fitted to the HDX, with the 555PS attached to the DAC instead. MASSIVE improvement, really quite exciting!

Finally the MACbook was introduced and plugged into the DAC/555PS. Also fantastic sound, which does rather make you think of the options - and the ramifications! The HDX/DAC did sound better, of course.

The DAC is in a 5-series case and has an internal p/s (not used at the show if I remember correctly). 5 buttons on the front a locking light (?).

Many thanks to Doug and Jason for the demo.

I'm first on the waiting list.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by pcstockton
Dont forget the hairs being split, pot calling kettles black, mountains out of mole hills, grains of salts, and my personal favorite, adding insults to injury.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Adam Meredith
quote:
Originally posted by jazzfan:
This will be my last word on the subject - ...

my opinion is that only an idiot would believe that there is no connection between the Lavry's popularity and this development. But, as I say, it's of little importance to me personally, one way or another.


Excellent - I was (according to you) insulting the intelligence of those who read (what I actually said) and now - you insult my intelligence.

"No connection" from "this product is not a response to the surge in interest in the Lavry and other DACs". The Lavry IS a DAC. I have conceded (claimed) that Naim developed this DAC in response to an increasing market for and use of DACs.

If you weasel one more step - you will be within a gnat's crochet of agreeing with what I originally said.

... and then you will be nearly as complete an "idiot" as I. Or am I being obtuse?
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by pcstockton
Good luck jazzfan, you are dealing with W.V.O. Quine reincarnate. (the late GREAT Robert Quine's uncle... talented family eh?)
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by jazzfan:
This will be my last word on the subject - ...


For some reason I doubt it.

PLEASE prove me wrong.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by garyi
For all my disagreements with PCS, its nice to see someone actually excited about the musical possibilities being offered by this device.

To much politics going on me thinks.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by garyi:
For all my disagreements with PCS, its nice to see someone actually excited about the musical possibilities being offered by this device.

To much politics going on me thinks.


We've disagreed? When? Winker
Mostly only when I mistook you for AmeriGary... or of course when you were wrong Winker

Its been a year waiting for me.... I am so jazzed. Cant wait.

i LOVE my Naims.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Graham Russell
quote:
Originally posted by garyi:

To much politics going on me thinks.


I totally agree Gary. Lots of bollocks. Points trying to be scored all over the place.

Just how many people contributing to this debate/argument have actually heard the new DAC? I'm guessing two or three.

If the new DAC sounds like a £2k product then great I'll buy one. If it doesn't then hey guess what? I'll stick with the Lavry which I believe needs a CD555 to better it.

Keep massaging your egos boys if that works for you.

Me, I'll just let my ears decide when I get to hear a production example. At least we won't get tangled up in service pack nonsense with the DAC Smile
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by Graham Russell:
Points trying to be scored all over the place...

Keep massaging your egos boys if that works for you.


Not trying to be a dick.... just curious what you mean by the above?
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by js
LOL. Another Lavry thread. Red Face Roll Eyes Winker Cool Big Grin Confused Frown Eek Razz Smile should about cover it.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Graham Russell
Listen to it then decide. Otherwise it's just pure speculation and emotion.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Exiled Highlander
Graham

I was speed reading this thread and for a moment I thought you said ejaculation rather than speculation...then it dawned on me that you meant ejaculation and just spelled it wrong! Smile

Cheers

Jim
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Graham Russell
quote:
Originally posted by Exiled Highlander:
Graham

I was speed reading this thread and for a moment I thought you said ejaculation rather than speculation...then it dawned on me that you meant ejaculation and just spelled it wrong! Smile

Cheers

Jim


Pass the Kleenex Smile
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by BigH47
I thought it was Dr Jonathan Miller that spoke bollocks.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Graham Russell
quote:
Originally posted by munch:
quote:
Originally posted by gary1 (US):
Adam,

My impression is that Naim did not look seriously at producing a DAC until I demoed the Lavry at Promusica with Scott, JS, KC, and Mark and posted my thoughts on performance, or am I missing something here?? Big Grin
THIS IS THE POST OF THE YEAR.
History being made. Winker

QED
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by DeltaSigma
quote:
Originally posted by goldfinch:
I would be happy enough with let's say CDS3 performance potential, I mean with the best possible audio streaming.


I would not - it would have to be well ahead of the CDS3, as that is where my Lavry has been especially since I started using the Canare cable. To my mind, replacing the DA10 with a DAC that only provides CDS3 performance and costs 3 times as much would be a definite step backward.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by DeltaSigma
I will give it a go but it is only honest to point out that the last 6 months I have spent with the Lavry have really raised my point of reference as far as digital sound quality (and VFM) is concerned. Just having the Naim logo (and future upgradability via power supplies) won't cut it any more as far as I'm concerned. I'm prepared to pay a premium for improved sound quality (I know and accept the issue of diminishing returns after a certain price point) but it has got to offer a step forward from where I am now, not where I was a year ago.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by spacey
you seam to have your mind up so why bother commenting? it highly disrespectful to knock something you or 99% of the people on here no nothing about - yet
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by DeltaSigma
quote:
Originally posted by r-tee:
you seam to have your mind up so why bother commenting? it highly disrespectful to knock something you or 99% of the people on here no nothing about - yet


Let me know specifically where I have "knocked" it and I will withdraw the comment and apologize (I mean this). I have only set out my criteria for evaluating it - what is wrong with that? Or should I only choose the point of reference after I have heard it?
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by js
Quote: "Me willy be bigger than your'n"

Too expensive, should be in a big case because of the cable you use? Roll Eyes, won't sound good with it's own supply Confused. What a load of crap. It will be as good as it sounds and be for all those that like it and not for those that don't. Simple as that and regardless of how much you wax on about how your favorite DAC must be better than the original performance, Winker none of the postulating make any of this so except for maybe you. Personally, I never felt that any $1k DAC was a viable target to shoot for though some are interesting. I understand that some will disagree but I'm hoping for something significantly better and I wont know either until I hear it.

Listen to Munch and audition before you pigeon hole the thing. They had a good reason for how it turned out. You don't need to agree with the marketing strategy but they've thought about it long and hard yet on the day it shows up, we know better. Give it a listen in any way that you like and then decide. Give the rest, well, a rest.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by JYOW
Yes Naim, keep showing us more. This is getting better.

Now what I really wanted is a DAC with a LAN based client, or an HDX without the hard disks, at a GP2000 price point ...

From my limited experience with having bought and tried 3 different DACs (Benchmark, Lavry, Beresford), separate DACs are more difficult to sound good than a single box with built in DAC done right. I think Naim was right in its old insistent on built in DAC.

And I hope Adam is right that this DAC is not a response to the Lavry commotion, they should have aimed a lot higher IMHO
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by JYOW
I have read a couple of pages of this thread, but have yet to find any technical details like types and numbers inputs, clock inputs/outputs, or any specifications on the DAC. But yet people are already making comments on what Naim "level" it is at and whether or not it should be in a reference case?

I sense a bit of blind faith here. Stick it in a black case and people will come.

I am guilty of the same of course.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
Crikey !

Second morning in a row I get up in presumed expectation of reading loads of info on the DAC....and STILL nowt !? I've just trawled through 4-5 pages of bickering, and I'm still none the wiser at what Naim are proposing to release here...??

Perhaps it's the journalist in me, but do we actually have ANY facts, spec or detailed overview of this secretive box on the 10th floor yet..??

Amazing that after 2 full days, no forum member who has got up close and personal with the 'work in progress' has reported back with some basic overview - practical stuff like connections, file formats, compatible OS platforms as well as any snippets of Naim's 'philosophy' and direction with this..... Are Official Secrets Act signatures being required for the ticketed entry...?!

I'm even more amazed about Naim's approach with this release......

I'm thrilled this is coming from Naim, really am. Smile Whether this is the route I go, integrating my HiFi with my Mac network or ATV, or whether I stick to the previously planned HDX approach, at least I now HAVE the choice, which is what was nagging me previously....or even a combination of both....

My two pence on some of the observations so far -

As I've said previously, for £2k, IMHO I feel it should be in a full height case, although it's not the end of the world if not. I guess the AV2 never was. I just think it looks odd having the 2 case heights in a rack.....

Perhaps related to that point is my next opinion, based on what little is known and also keeping Paul Stephenson's pre-Bristol statement in mind, that I don't believe this is the 500 Reference DAC, should that indeed be coming...To be basic about it, this is at a different price point.

Apparently the Bristol demo is consisting of playback from a Mac(?), then playback from a connected HDX. I totally find it confusing why it is being shown in conjunction with a HDX, especially initially. Surely this is making an instant negative comment on the HDX - that indeed, the internal DAC can be bettered - and also flies in the face of all the PR that came with the HDX...? Sure, if the new box can be used as an optional external upgrade DAC (again, something of a turnaround for Naim here) then great, for those that have the funds and the desire to do so, I just wouldn't have thought it is a priority to be demonstrating now.... Surely, the main raison d’ être of this DAC, or any other, is to aid in incorporating all the other mixed forms and platforms of digital media that 'now' exist and are in use "in the general market trend" into the main Naim rig in the living room...?

Lastly, I'm really scratching my head on Naim's approach to this 'launch'...They know best of course, fair enough, but it seems, well, a bit strange....Whilst Cyrus and others are downstairs shouting to the world about some new this or that, the new Naim baby is kept upstairs shrouded in mystery Confused ......Someone earlier mentioned Apple - well, Steve Jobs this is not ! Talk about dipping your toe in the water ! IMHO, the way this DAC has 'arrived', comes across as a nervous, tentative step...almost coy.....Which is a shame, as I feel Naim are above that, both as a brand and what I see of them as a company......

Anyway.....Real good news something is coming. Really good. Overdue, but good nonetheless. As long as no 'deal-breaker' issue surfaces re file formats or something, then I'm putting money aside for one now..... Winker Smile

Steve.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
One more thing. Fleetwood Mac's Rumours was being used..? Excellent choice Doug ! Cool
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
JYOW - As they say here, "SameSame" ! Big Grin
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Naijeru
This is exciting news! We just need details: input types and number, bitrates, supported encoding etc. The price point does leave me with a dilemma. At nearly $3,000 I fear its projected performance may unbalance my 5i-2 based system. Does my current system have enough depth and wit to make use of such a component? Does Naim "system synergy" apply to all their products or just the higher end equipment? The only way to judge naturally would be to demo it, but home demos aren't exactly done in these parts. I guess I'll have to drag my ATV and current DAC down to my local dealer. I hope dealers are preparing for the scenarios potential DAC customers will bring.