The new Naim DAC
Posted by: rupert bear on 21 February 2009
The 10th floor of the Marriott hosts Doug G's demo of the new DAC. I was lucky to get the last ticket for the last show.
Demo used the HDX, 552/500, and SL2/n-sub. There was a little Mac sitting sweetly on its own bit of Fraim. First the HDX was played, then the HDX with 555PS (obvious vast improvement, as noted here before).
The new DAC was then fitted to the HDX, with the 555PS attached to the DAC instead. MASSIVE improvement, really quite exciting!
Finally the MACbook was introduced and plugged into the DAC/555PS. Also fantastic sound, which does rather make you think of the options - and the ramifications! The HDX/DAC did sound better, of course.
The DAC is in a 5-series case and has an internal p/s (not used at the show if I remember correctly). 5 buttons on the front a locking light (?).
Many thanks to Doug and Jason for the demo.
I'm first on the waiting list.
Demo used the HDX, 552/500, and SL2/n-sub. There was a little Mac sitting sweetly on its own bit of Fraim. First the HDX was played, then the HDX with 555PS (obvious vast improvement, as noted here before).
The new DAC was then fitted to the HDX, with the 555PS attached to the DAC instead. MASSIVE improvement, really quite exciting!
Finally the MACbook was introduced and plugged into the DAC/555PS. Also fantastic sound, which does rather make you think of the options - and the ramifications! The HDX/DAC did sound better, of course.
The DAC is in a 5-series case and has an internal p/s (not used at the show if I remember correctly). 5 buttons on the front a locking light (?).
Many thanks to Doug and Jason for the demo.
I'm first on the waiting list.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by DeltaSigma
I will give it a go but it is only honest to point out that the last 6 months I have spent with the Lavry have really raised my point of reference as far as digital sound quality (and VFM) is concerned. Just having the Naim logo (and future upgradability via power supplies) won't cut it any more as far as I'm concerned. I'm prepared to pay a premium for improved sound quality (I know and accept the issue of diminishing returns after a certain price point) but it has got to offer a step forward from where I am now, not where I was a year ago.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by spacey
you seam to have your mind up so why bother commenting? it highly disrespectful to knock something you or 99% of the people on here no nothing about - yet
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by DeltaSigma
quote:Originally posted by r-tee:
you seam to have your mind up so why bother commenting? it highly disrespectful to knock something you or 99% of the people on here no nothing about - yet
Let me know specifically where I have "knocked" it and I will withdraw the comment and apologize (I mean this). I have only set out my criteria for evaluating it - what is wrong with that? Or should I only choose the point of reference after I have heard it?
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by js
Quote: "Me willy be bigger than your'n"
Too expensive, should be in a big case because of the cable you use?
, won't sound good with it's own supply
. What a load of crap. It will be as good as it sounds and be for all those that like it and not for those that don't. Simple as that and regardless of how much you wax on about how your favorite DAC must be better than the original performance,
none of the postulating make any of this so except for maybe you. Personally, I never felt that any $1k DAC was a viable target to shoot for though some are interesting. I understand that some will disagree but I'm hoping for something significantly better and I wont know either until I hear it.
Listen to Munch and audition before you pigeon hole the thing. They had a good reason for how it turned out. You don't need to agree with the marketing strategy but they've thought about it long and hard yet on the day it shows up, we know better. Give it a listen in any way that you like and then decide. Give the rest, well, a rest.
Too expensive, should be in a big case because of the cable you use?
Listen to Munch and audition before you pigeon hole the thing. They had a good reason for how it turned out. You don't need to agree with the marketing strategy but they've thought about it long and hard yet on the day it shows up, we know better. Give it a listen in any way that you like and then decide. Give the rest, well, a rest.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by JYOW
Yes Naim, keep showing us more. This is getting better.
Now what I really wanted is a DAC with a LAN based client, or an HDX without the hard disks, at a GP2000 price point ...
From my limited experience with having bought and tried 3 different DACs (Benchmark, Lavry, Beresford), separate DACs are more difficult to sound good than a single box with built in DAC done right. I think Naim was right in its old insistent on built in DAC.
And I hope Adam is right that this DAC is not a response to the Lavry commotion, they should have aimed a lot higher IMHO
Now what I really wanted is a DAC with a LAN based client, or an HDX without the hard disks, at a GP2000 price point ...
From my limited experience with having bought and tried 3 different DACs (Benchmark, Lavry, Beresford), separate DACs are more difficult to sound good than a single box with built in DAC done right. I think Naim was right in its old insistent on built in DAC.
And I hope Adam is right that this DAC is not a response to the Lavry commotion, they should have aimed a lot higher IMHO
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by JYOW
I have read a couple of pages of this thread, but have yet to find any technical details like types and numbers inputs, clock inputs/outputs, or any specifications on the DAC. But yet people are already making comments on what Naim "level" it is at and whether or not it should be in a reference case?
I sense a bit of blind faith here. Stick it in a black case and people will come.
I am guilty of the same of course.
I sense a bit of blind faith here. Stick it in a black case and people will come.
I am guilty of the same of course.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
Crikey !
Second morning in a row I get up in presumed expectation of reading loads of info on the DAC....and STILL nowt !? I've just trawled through 4-5 pages of bickering, and I'm still none the wiser at what Naim are proposing to release here...??
Perhaps it's the journalist in me, but do we actually have ANY facts, spec or detailed overview of this secretive box on the 10th floor yet..??
Amazing that after 2 full days, no forum member who has got up close and personal with the 'work in progress' has reported back with some basic overview - practical stuff like connections, file formats, compatible OS platforms as well as any snippets of Naim's 'philosophy' and direction with this..... Are Official Secrets Act signatures being required for the ticketed entry...?!
I'm even more amazed about Naim's approach with this release......
I'm thrilled this is coming from Naim, really am.
Whether this is the route I go, integrating my HiFi with my Mac network or ATV, or whether I stick to the previously planned HDX approach, at least I now HAVE the choice, which is what was nagging me previously....or even a combination of both....
My two pence on some of the observations so far -
As I've said previously, for £2k, IMHO I feel it should be in a full height case, although it's not the end of the world if not. I guess the AV2 never was. I just think it looks odd having the 2 case heights in a rack.....
Perhaps related to that point is my next opinion, based on what little is known and also keeping Paul Stephenson's pre-Bristol statement in mind, that I don't believe this is the 500 Reference DAC, should that indeed be coming...To be basic about it, this is at a different price point.
Apparently the Bristol demo is consisting of playback from a Mac(?), then playback from a connected HDX. I totally find it confusing why it is being shown in conjunction with a HDX, especially initially. Surely this is making an instant negative comment on the HDX - that indeed, the internal DAC can be bettered - and also flies in the face of all the PR that came with the HDX...? Sure, if the new box can be used as an optional external upgrade DAC (again, something of a turnaround for Naim here) then great, for those that have the funds and the desire to do so, I just wouldn't have thought it is a priority to be demonstrating now.... Surely, the main raison d’ être of this DAC, or any other, is to aid in incorporating all the other mixed forms and platforms of digital media that 'now' exist and are in use "in the general market trend" into the main Naim rig in the living room...?
Lastly, I'm really scratching my head on Naim's approach to this 'launch'...They know best of course, fair enough, but it seems, well, a bit strange....Whilst Cyrus and others are downstairs shouting to the world about some new this or that, the new Naim baby is kept upstairs shrouded in mystery
......Someone earlier mentioned Apple - well, Steve Jobs this is not ! Talk about dipping your toe in the water ! IMHO, the way this DAC has 'arrived', comes across as a nervous, tentative step...almost coy.....Which is a shame, as I feel Naim are above that, both as a brand and what I see of them as a company......
Anyway.....Real good news something is coming. Really good. Overdue, but good nonetheless. As long as no 'deal-breaker' issue surfaces re file formats or something, then I'm putting money aside for one now.....

Steve.
Second morning in a row I get up in presumed expectation of reading loads of info on the DAC....and STILL nowt !? I've just trawled through 4-5 pages of bickering, and I'm still none the wiser at what Naim are proposing to release here...??
Perhaps it's the journalist in me, but do we actually have ANY facts, spec or detailed overview of this secretive box on the 10th floor yet..??
Amazing that after 2 full days, no forum member who has got up close and personal with the 'work in progress' has reported back with some basic overview - practical stuff like connections, file formats, compatible OS platforms as well as any snippets of Naim's 'philosophy' and direction with this..... Are Official Secrets Act signatures being required for the ticketed entry...?!
I'm even more amazed about Naim's approach with this release......
I'm thrilled this is coming from Naim, really am.
My two pence on some of the observations so far -
As I've said previously, for £2k, IMHO I feel it should be in a full height case, although it's not the end of the world if not. I guess the AV2 never was. I just think it looks odd having the 2 case heights in a rack.....
Perhaps related to that point is my next opinion, based on what little is known and also keeping Paul Stephenson's pre-Bristol statement in mind, that I don't believe this is the 500 Reference DAC, should that indeed be coming...To be basic about it, this is at a different price point.
Apparently the Bristol demo is consisting of playback from a Mac(?), then playback from a connected HDX. I totally find it confusing why it is being shown in conjunction with a HDX, especially initially. Surely this is making an instant negative comment on the HDX - that indeed, the internal DAC can be bettered - and also flies in the face of all the PR that came with the HDX...? Sure, if the new box can be used as an optional external upgrade DAC (again, something of a turnaround for Naim here) then great, for those that have the funds and the desire to do so, I just wouldn't have thought it is a priority to be demonstrating now.... Surely, the main raison d’ être of this DAC, or any other, is to aid in incorporating all the other mixed forms and platforms of digital media that 'now' exist and are in use "in the general market trend" into the main Naim rig in the living room...?
Lastly, I'm really scratching my head on Naim's approach to this 'launch'...They know best of course, fair enough, but it seems, well, a bit strange....Whilst Cyrus and others are downstairs shouting to the world about some new this or that, the new Naim baby is kept upstairs shrouded in mystery
Anyway.....Real good news something is coming. Really good. Overdue, but good nonetheless. As long as no 'deal-breaker' issue surfaces re file formats or something, then I'm putting money aside for one now.....
Steve.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
One more thing. Fleetwood Mac's Rumours was being used..? Excellent choice Doug ! 
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
JYOW - As they say here, "SameSame" ! 
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Naijeru
This is exciting news! We just need details: input types and number, bitrates, supported encoding etc. The price point does leave me with a dilemma. At nearly $3,000 I fear its projected performance may unbalance my 5i-2 based system. Does my current system have enough depth and wit to make use of such a component? Does Naim "system synergy" apply to all their products or just the higher end equipment? The only way to judge naturally would be to demo it, but home demos aren't exactly done in these parts. I guess I'll have to drag my ATV and current DAC down to my local dealer. I hope dealers are preparing for the scenarios potential DAC customers will bring.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by connon price
quote:Originally posted by SC:
Apparently the Bristol demo is consisting of playback from a Mac(?), then playback from a connected HDX. I totally find it confusing why it is being shown in conjunction with a HDX, especially initially. Surely this is making an instant negative comment on the HDX - that indeed, the internal DAC can be bettered - and also flies in the face of all the PR that came with the HDX...? Sure, if the new box can be used as an optional external upgrade DAC (again, something of a turnaround for Naim here) then great, for those that have the funds and the desire to do so, I just wouldn't have thought it is a priority to be demonstrating now.... Surely, the main raison d’ être of this DAC, or any other, is to aid in incorporating all the other mixed forms and platforms of digital media that 'now' exist and are in use "in the general market trend" into the main Naim rig in the living room...?
Steve.
Steve, it doesn't sound like they are comparing the HDX DAC to the new DAC from what I can read. You may have noticed that Naim don't have many sources that output digital signals, so to find one in-house that outputs a nice clean signal to feed to their new mystery DAC, the HDX seems the natural choice. N-Vi or DVD-5 could also be put into service, but neither play from a ripped files. And of course comparing the HDX to a typical Apple iTunes as streamer source and showing a good sized difference between the two puts the HDX in good light and shows people, as ever, that there is no DAC magic and source is still king.
It would be interesting to know if the Apple iTunes was playing a WAV file ripped by the iTunes software and all the settings on the apple as others have queried. Or if it was an HDX rip, transferred into iTunes, then played back through Apple hardware/software. Some differences could also arise from difference between Coax and Optical transmission.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by kuma
quote:Originally posted by Naijeru:
At nearly $3,000 I fear its projected performance may unbalance my 5i-2 based system.
Nah..
A Nait 5i-2 sounds fabulous with a CD555.
Never underestimate your little Nait.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
Good point connon price. And I wasn't meaning that the HDX was being 'compared', just that I didn't see the real point in putting the HDX in line with the new DAC - true, it serves as a good clean source, but at the end of the day, I think this is all about external computer platforms and streamers of various natures....
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by naken janne
quote:Originally posted by jazzfan:quote:Originally posted by Adam Meredith:
While we take the views of forum members seriously there is a bigger world out there. I think the "upsurge in general DAC popularity" might have manifested itself out there for all to see.
There is no concession here - I have CLAIMED it as a factor. It would be a bizarre company that decided to develop a DAC when no popularity existed.
Whatever your choice of words - my point is that you are insulting the intelligence of forum members by claiming that the Lavry's popularity has little or nothing to do with this product. As I say, I don't see why it is so important to you to continue to insist that there is no connection - your determination to continue arguing the point speaks for itself as far as I am concerned.
And as far as I am concerned this is the end of this puerile discussion- I have better things to do with my time. Frankly, I couldn't care less what the reason for development is or was - the quality of the product in both absolute and VFM terms is much more important to me (and should be to you too).
I was reading all Jazzfans answers (although he claims to have better things to do) and I must say that I do not fully understand his logic (not only the paradox of writing an message saying I have more important things than writing messages). But claiming "to continue arguing the point speaks for itself" is quite remarkable. Does that mean for example if I continue to claim something, then I actually mean the opposite? Or if you kid says, "I did not steal cake" it means that he did it?
But to come back the key issue, I find it rather natural that a large a well organized high tech company has a long term strategy and that this is guiding its decisions (the strategy is of course based on market conditions). This means that the resources of the company are used in such a way that they will long term work towards such goals and market positions. Therefore, I do not believe that Naim one day just stops this long term work and all the R&D to say
"0HHH NOOOO! There are some guys at the forum claiming that Lavry has made a good dac! lets stop everything we are doing for the future and do a better dac"
This is simply not the way a well organized company is managed. But, of course Naim is looking at the competitors and what they are up to, and I would be very surprised if they have not for example looked at what Linn (which has achieved super performance with server technology) is doing and have been speculating what their future plans are and how this will influence how “the future hifi system will look”. In line with this vision of course also building up competence, technology, suppliers, marketing strategies etc to meet this future market.
So I certainly hope (and am convinced) that naim is more long-term oriented and has plans for how the future hifi systems will be like. Not only panic and come up with ad hoc solutions as Jazzman seems to believe.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by connon price
quote:Originally posted by SC:
Good point connon price. And I wasn't meaning that the HDX was being 'compared', just that I didn't see the real point in putting the HDX in line with the new DAC - true, it serves as a good clean source, but at the end of the day, I think this is all about external computer platforms and streamers of various natures....
The HDX is external to the DAC and it is a streamer. You think they should have had an iTransport feeding it? They had the iBook there so I think it surely is a lot about external computer and streaming platforms (I would hazard a guess that it will be used 75% with non naim source. But I think it is very clever of them to show the HDX, which I presume they hope to sell more of, as an option, and a superior sounding one, to a very common external platform, as found in the ubiquitous iTunes.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by aht
Well put, naken janne. The notion that Naim all of a sudden began to develop a DAC because 20 or 30 forum members fell in love with Lavry can be characterized as narcissistic, IMHO.
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by SC
quote:Originally posted by naken janne:
So I certainly hope (and am convinced) that naim is more long-term oriented and has plans for how the future hifi systems will be like.
Could you please post this over in the Home Theatre Room for the attention of AV@Naim !
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by kuma
quote:Originally posted by aht:
The notion that Naim all of a sudden began to develop a DAC because 20 or 30 forum members fell in love with Lavry can be characterized as narcissistic, IMHO.
Or it shows how naive some folks are.
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by Guido Fawkes
Surely the men in white coats will take such people away.quote:Originally posted by pcstockton:
....
There will be plenty of people who either just bought a Lavry, think the Lavry is better VFM, flatout think the Lavry better conveys the music or simply cannot afford the new Naim DAC....
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by Guido Fawkes
Hmmm ... I'd sooner hear a demo with some real music rather than elevator muzakquote:Originally posted by SC:
One more thing. Fleetwood Mac's Rumours was being used..? Excellent choice Doug !![]()
This is my fear for a new hi-res format; it'll the same old junk that DVD-A, SACD and the rest attracted; Brother in Arms will be next ... then ... zzzzzz - I've fallen asleep already. Next it 'll be the bald headed drummer boy ...
How about some music we can get up and go to school with - some guitar solos that make you want to pedestrianise the high street ... I mean get your shoes and socks on people.
At last there is a Naim DAC on the horizon lets forget the L word and lets celebrate.
ATB Rotf
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by u5227470736789454
quote:I sense a bit of blind faith here. Stick it in a black case and people will come.
I think the blind faith is on both sides of this discussion.
Barrie
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by u5227470736789454
Jazzman
What kit do you have at the moment, I couldn't see it in your profile
quote:I will give it a go but it is only honest to point out that the last 6 months I have spent with the Lavry have really raised my point of reference as far as digital sound quality (and VFM) is concerned. Just having the Naim logo (and future upgradability via power supplies) won't cut it any more as far as I'm concerned. I'm prepared to pay a premium for improved sound quality
What kit do you have at the moment, I couldn't see it in your profile
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by u5227470736789454
quote:Whether this is the route I go, integrating my HiFi with my Mac network or ATV, or whether I stick to the previously planned HDX approach, at least I now HAVE the choice, which is what was nagging me previously....or even a combination of both....
I am with you on this Steve, to me this DAC just increases my options tto
Barrie
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by james n
quote:But I think it is very clever of them to show the HDX, which I presume they hope to sell more of, as an option, and a superior sounding one, to a very common external platform, as found in the ubiquitous iTunes.
A very interesting comparison - i must say comparing an HDX and a Sonos, both driving an external DAC - there wasn't really any discernable difference through the 500 series system we were listening to. I look forward to being able to demo the Naim DAC in my own system and make up my own mind.
James
Posted on: 22 February 2009 by u5227470736789454
quote:Try the bloody thing then commmmment on it
I am in complete agreement with Munch and JS, speculation is worthless, until we hear the end product and make up our individual minds its all just hot air.
Barrie