naim 3.5 v avi s2000 reference cd
Posted by: minime on 05 March 2003
any opinions on which sounds best
Posted on: 05 March 2003 by minime
anyone know what model's and how many versions of the avi 2000 they were
Posted on: 05 March 2003 by hi fi fo fum
Oh no more def people the AVI sucks...
Posted on: 05 March 2003 by Lightkeeper
minime !
A friend of mine have Diapason Adamantes, Audio Note OTO SE and player you mention.
The player is fine, involving, concrete and detailed, it is very nice to listen that system, but on the other side, this is not a sIstem which means listened to all Naim gear.
I have bring my CD5 to the friend and it was clearly better than AVI and that was very audible in just a few seconds. I believe that 3.5 is anytime better than any AVI player, maybe is better to say that these two players are totally different worlds, but in a relaxed typical Hi-Fi sYstem like my friend have, it is very fun listen with AVI.
If you already have other Naim components, than than 3.5 is very welcome.
BTW, 3.5 is better than Genki to me.
Good Luck,
Ozren
A friend of mine have Diapason Adamantes, Audio Note OTO SE and player you mention.
The player is fine, involving, concrete and detailed, it is very nice to listen that system, but on the other side, this is not a sIstem which means listened to all Naim gear.
I have bring my CD5 to the friend and it was clearly better than AVI and that was very audible in just a few seconds. I believe that 3.5 is anytime better than any AVI player, maybe is better to say that these two players are totally different worlds, but in a relaxed typical Hi-Fi sYstem like my friend have, it is very fun listen with AVI.
If you already have other Naim components, than than 3.5 is very welcome.
BTW, 3.5 is better than Genki to me.
Good Luck,
Ozren