Alcina : Handel

Posted by: throbnorth on 02 May 2003

A big thumbs up for the current ENO production [about seven performances left - see : www.eno.org] Every Handel opera I've seen [ i.e.four] has been wonderful in its own way, and it makes me wonder what the fifty odd we don't get to see are like.

This is particularly beguiling - a spectacular production in a manner which although not exactly heritage would offend nobody [dazzling gilded set, which twirls and cavorts in a satisfying manner, sumptuous costumes by Sue Blane, who did both the Rocky Horror Show and Draughtsman's Contract [visible in equal measure - the dancers even do the Time Warp at one point]] and top class singing all round.

Nobody could pretend it's not a long evening, and that sometimes the fifth repetition of a da capo aria doesn't make you wish they'd just get on with it [no matter how inventive the reasons they come up with singing it just that one more time] but sometimes the music is just so blissful you want it to be repeated forever and ever.

It seems to have an odd structure - Alcina [sorceress ruling an island and turning lovers into rocks, lions etc. - the usual stuff] is vanquished by the end of Act 2, but after an interval, astonishingly it goes on and on, with the most stunning procession of exquisite and elegaic soprano arias you could possibly imagine. After a bit you just don't think your spine can do any more tingling, it gets quite worn out. It's more what you expect from Strauss than Handel.

I would reckon that this is the perfect production to see for somebody to see who is new to opera. People always think the right thing to do is to start with the corny old stuff like Carmen [lovely as it is], but something like this doesn't condescend - opera requires a bit of work on your part, and this is not exactly easy. In return, you get a clearly articulated [if daft] plot, an intelligent and superlatively pretty production which makes much play of the concept that the age of enlightenment might snuff out romance, drama and the things that make life worth living [a bit spurious, I think - Handel compsed these things at such a rate that any such idea seems tenouous, given the 18th century general worldview, although I will admit that the music bears it out] and operatic spectacle that would make any west end musical that you care to name look a bit feeble. To give you an example, the ENO chorus [40, 50 or so] come on for a brief number at the start, then are content to remain backstage quaffing gin and sandwiches for three hours , then re-appear for another number at the end. Ten mins of their time in total, and all at Equity basic rates.

As an added bonus, Alcina [ the statuesque Lisa Milne] has the most remarkable bosom I've ever seen. I don't necessarily mean this in any erotic way, it's just a gravity defying wonder and my opera glasses were rarely off it. Worth the price of admission alone.

throb
Posted on: 02 May 2003 by Phil Barry
Agree on the praise for Handel's operas. Did he write anything else? :-)

My wife and I heard most of Alcina with the stunning (vocally and visually - at least from the farthest tier from the stage) Natalie Dessay (sp?) a few years ago.

We had to leave before the last act since we were falling asleep, despite the super production.

Although I was generally disappointed with the Lyric Opera (in Chicago), Xerxes and the partial Alcina were real standouts, almost making the whole series worth the cost.

Dessay is just magnificent. If you have a chance to hear her live, do so. You'll thank me if you do.

Funds are low right now, but even so I think we'll stand in line for rush tickets to Aggrippina, noe playing in Chicago.

Regards.

Phil
Posted on: 03 May 2003 by throbnorth
Nick, that is indeed lovely, - just the sort of stuff that Handel seems to be able to knock off effortlessly. I'm sure there must be some good recital discs around somewhere. I've got one of La Belle Natalie, Phil - different repertoire though - French opera - and she does have a beautiful voice. From the cover I can imagine that in person she would be an audio visual treat. I suppose the problem with 18thc opera is that a contemporary audience would have been wandering round chatting and eating during any slow bits in the story, which isn't generally encouraged nowadays. In fact it's hard enough to eat a toffee without grimaces from three adjacent rows. Perhaps this is why modern productions always give you a lot to look at.

What wretched stuff did I drag you to see, Nick - was it Montiverdi? From what I remember there were bag ladies and swings in an attempt to give it a bit of oomph, but they probably did face a losing battle. After hearing that Cecelia Bartoli disc, I'm keen to give a Vivaldi opera a go, but I expect it would be similarly disappointing in terms of drama and excitement.

I've seen a couple of rave reviews for the Chicago Agrippina [http://www.theoperacritic.com/], and would definitely give it a go.

throb
Posted on: 03 May 2003 by David Hobbs-Mallyon
Rather suprised Nick. Not heard Return of Ulysses, but The Coronation of Poppea was my highlight of the year at ENO a couple of years ago.

David
Posted on: 10 May 2003 by --duncan--
I saw this last night and would echo almost everything throb has to say. It’s a spectacular setting, an intelligent production and has a pretty high standard of singing. The plot is, of course, gratifyingly bonkers. The 'spirits' get a big part to play in the action so if you tire of the fifth repetition you can always watch the ballet (The Time Warp is spot-on for the end of the first act!).

I'm not sure if I'd take a complete Opera beginner to this though, it is quite a long evening. Late last year I did take a friend to The Barber of Seville, a predictable choice perhaps but it was great as even as Pantomime. She absolutely loved it despite having no experience of opera and little of classical music.

If you can't make it to London, last night's performance will be broadcast on Radio 3 on the 31st May. Alternatively, the William Christie/Les Arts Florissants set has Renee Fleming sounding absolutely glorious, if not quite as characterful as Lisa Milne last night.

Ms Milne's décolletage was indeed spectacular, even from the balcony and without magnification. Would it be ungentlemanly to suggest however that rather than defying gravity it relied on corsetry for structural support? Authentic eighteenth century I’m sure.

duncan

Email: djcritchley at hotmail.com
Posted on: 10 May 2003 by throbnorth
Thanks for the radio reminder Duncan, I like it when you can get a souvenir.

Yes, I imagine that heavy engineering was responsible for most of Ms Milne's bounty. I kept thinking of the jellies that you used to get at childhood parties, but without the bread and butter that mothers unaccountably made you eat at the same time.....

throb