Graham's Hydra

Posted by: fathings cat on 10 May 2005

On reading the threads on Graham's Hydra's I thought for £67 it was worth a punt. Very pleased with the results although quite hard to articulate the benefits but my system (cdx/xps 82/250/hi Allaes) is certainly impoved. I think Grahams must have had a lot of interest as the chap there said he was thinking about putting the price up.
Given the thousands we spend on box's If my system is anything to go by this is a credible upgrade.
Gary
ps Thanks J.N more good advise I must get in contact with you to come and have a listen to your system.
Posted on: 10 May 2005 by Tam
I've considered one at times, but for me one of the issues is that some of my kit (e.g. my flatcap and my nait 3) has captive leads.

Still, glad to hear it's worked out well for you.



regards,

Tam
Posted on: 10 May 2005 by hungryhalibut
Tam

You need one of those maplins 4 way multiplugs, which is not quite as good but will give you a lot of the benefits - especially the star earth. I have one spare if you want it and can pay postage. Drop me a line at street.family@btinternet if you are interested.

Nigel
Posted on: 10 May 2005 by Tam
Nigel,

Thanks for the offer. Certainly sounds interesting. Only trouble - I have just one socket powering 6 things off one stip (I only have 2 sockets on that side of my living room, one goes to the strip for the hi-fi the other to a strip for the tv/vcr etc. It's an absolute ****


regards,

Tam
Posted on: 10 May 2005 by graham55
Tam

Captive leads are not a problem. You simply replace the 13amp plug with a male IEC socket, exactly as I did with my NAT02. Grahams can supply the male IEC socket: it's just like wiring up a 13amp plug.

Go for it, my friend!

G
Posted on: 10 May 2005 by Tam
Graham,

Damn that's obvious, now why didn't I think of that before?


regards,

Tam
Posted on: 12 May 2005 by J.N.
Geoff;

I can attest to the efficacy of the Graham's hydra. Mine cost me £65 (inc p&p) recently, and has proved to be a superbly cost effective upgrade.

On the Graham's web-site, select 'Buying' - 'Accessories' - 'Mains Distribution' and you'll see a picture of their hydra.

This is a bespoke item - unused IEC leads are not recommended.

As a Naim dealer, hopefully Adam won't mind me giving them a plug? (sorry!)

John.
Posted on: 12 May 2005 by MarkyB
I am thinking about a hydra. At present I have CD3.5 NAP 140 and HI CAP also a Lingo. Now, with mucking about I can go with a 4 lead hydra. I take it the Lingo is OK to be powered by the hydra?
Posted on: 12 May 2005 by prowla
I think you have to keep the Lingo well away from the Naim kit, preferably off a completely separate wall socket (or spur!).
Also, doesn't the 3.5 have a captive mains lead? (I can't remember, as mine's in a wardrobe.)
Posted on: 12 May 2005 by Paul B
quote:
think you have to keep the Lingo well away from the Naim kit, preferably off a completely separate wall socket


No. Never use a separate spur with either Lingo I or Lingo II (I have used both and tried both configurations of single and multiple spurs). LP12 performance in the system will be much worse if you put it on a separate spur. The only reason to use a separate spur is if the Lingo causes interference with the performance of your Naim CD player. Some find this to be the case but you will also find performance of your LP12 improves if you unplug your CD player from the mains or put it on a separate spur (but then its performance will be worse).
Posted on: 12 May 2005 by Paul B
Forgot to mention that I also use a Hydra for my Naim gear only. Graham's told me NOT to put my Lingo or Linto on the Hydra when I purchased the Hydra.
Posted on: 13 May 2005 by Tam
Didn't JV always used to say that Lingos did terrible things to naim equipment. I think it was down to the mains filter (but I could be wrong).


regards,

Tam
Posted on: 13 May 2005 by MarkyB
Thanks, will probably wait until I can wangle another hi cap before going for a hydra. My Lingo has been Weekes'd(A filterectomy) and it made a definate improvement.