swap from stereo to n-Vi, good or bad?

Posted by: Robbert on 14 August 2006

Who swap from his stereo setup to the n-Vi box.

for example; who had a 5 serie ( like mine:112x/150x/CD5x/FC2/Headline ) and found it a good choice or a bad choice?

Yes i know you must listen/demo the n-Vi bud that's for a moment ( one or two days )

Is it the same? or where you disapointed or happy?

And tel me what's good or bad.

Posted on: 27 August 2006 by Hardy

Oh boy,

what a bad english!
Looking after a reply to my last post above, I see that I wrote "know" instead of "now" twice a time.
Realy ashamed I am. Think that my brain was still lying in bed when I wrote the post this morning.

Hope it doesn´t stop anyone writing a reply.

Posted on: 23 September 2006 by Robbert

Who have the experiënts now between the n-Vi and the NAC202/150x

I'm a proud owner of a NAC202/CD5x/HC2/NAP150x

Before the NAC202 i had a 112x. The 202 is far better than the 112x. So the n-Vi is no comp to the NAC202??

Posted on: 26 September 2006 by Mike1380

Well, I've got a 112x/150x (hicap'd) and my plan is for an n-Vi to run WITH this kit, NOT instead of it - if you've got a 202 then I'd certainly suggest the same thing - let the n-Vi deal with pictures, DTS/DD and driving the centre, rears and sub.... but run it unity gain into your 202 - then when you listen in 2 channel you're not involving the n-Vi and thus not losing anything

Posted on: 05 November 2006 by PJT

I recently heard an n-Vi demo, and although darn good, it wasn't until the 202/200 was plugged in that it really came to life.
Also, the wee Intro speakers were seriously struggling with the n-Vi. Allae's certainly fixed that tho.