My New Replay Set.

Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 04 August 2009

I realise that it is unconventional to post about one's replay in the Music Room, but as you may note what I am using is so distilled that it barely counts as a replay set at all, but merely a music box.

I have even made arrangements to part with my Lavry DA10, so all that is left is a computer with Windows XP [service pack three] running iTunes feeding a nice pair of Sennheiser HD 415 headphones straight off the sound-card.

So how is it possible that this can be a satisfactory method of playing music. I do not know, but in gradually ripping about an eighth or tenth of my CDs, I have realised that they have never yielded so much music as in this arrangement, whatever set I was running. It may not be the ultimate in computer audio, but it is a musical upgrade in every sense from any conventional CD player running through loudspeakers, that I have ever been able to afford.

If I spent loads more on it, then no doubt it could be even finer, but it does not need to be.

I still have the old Naim set and Royds, but can no longer see a reason to set them up again. I am curiously relaxed about the thought that I could not possibly vex anyone with my music using this arrangement!

Some pictures:



I had just listened to the Italian Symphony of Mendelsohnn, and was also copying some Beethoven to HD, when I took this.



My CRT melted down, so this new LG 18 inch model does very nicely for good visibility of the iTunes, as well as DVDs. I do not have a Television.



Copying some Beethoven to PC HD. I cannot think that I require [or would find other than bothersome] any further assistance than a list and search engine to optimise my listening experience in the sense of selecting the very music to listen to!

Shortly I shall use a NAS with two SATA Drives in RAID configuration to increase the capacity of the system to encompass my remaining 400 or so CDs.

I hope to also get the files onto a completely portable HD so as to be useful when travelling.

ATB from George
Posted on: 26 August 2009 by pcstockton
I understand Fixie, but why not correct them when initially ripping them? I ask only because i haven't ripped a disc in iTunes in years and years, and surely didn't care about tags then.

iTunes can do this right? You load the CD (actually if on a Mac, the CD magically puts itself in the drive), and it searches online for the tags. Then you make sure they are right and change anything not correct, right? You check the name of the artist, album, year etc....

I've always tried to avoid re-tagging after a rip because I would then have to edit the cue file should I want to recreate a copy of the CD at some point.

-p
Posted on: 26 August 2009 by u5227470736789439
quote:
Originally posted by pcstockton:

I've always tried to avoid re-tagging after a rip because I would then have to edit the cue file should I want to recreate a copy of the CD at some point.

-p


On the point about correcting while the disc is copied to HD, I did try this, and once or twice it did not take. I therefore started to do it immediately afterwards [for the first third of the job] and gave up after a while leaving the CDs where they would remind me to return to the tagging ay the end.

I take the point about editing tags making it potentially difficult to remake a CD at a later date. On the other hand, it is true that most classical albums comtain two or three works which often are not intended to be played one after the other. It is not usual to progamme two symphonies in the same concert and obviously a set of symphonies on CDs often means that two are on the same disc, though mostly that is an unlikely way to listen to them for the best. In these cases, I am making new "phantom albums" - one per complete work - which makes searching very much better, though recreation of the original CD becomes next to impossible, unless I had a phenomenal memory for album compilations of convenience ...

Recreating the original CDs is not something I would ever want to do now, and the originals still exist and are not going anywhere. If I really wanted a copy then I would start afresh - ripping the WAV and burning the files immediately without going through iTunes at all.

ATB from George
Posted on: 26 August 2009 by Earwicker
quote:
Originally posted by pcstockton:
I've always tried to avoid re-tagging after a rip because I would then have to edit the cue file should I want to recreate a copy of the CD at some point.

Why does tagging affect that? Provided you've preserved gap information and track order you're home and dry.
Posted on: 26 August 2009 by pcstockton
Ear,

Good point. I hadn't really thought about it. But you are right, retagging doesn't change the filename.

-patrick
Posted on: 26 August 2009 by u5227470736789439
This is so fine.

Tonight I listened to the wonderful Reginald Jacques [premiere 1947/8 complete recording] of Bach's Saint Matthew Passion [in the gloriously modern and correctly HIP edtiion made by Elgar, allowing for the language to be English] all in a go without pause [except for the interval] of more than three hours of music.

To be honest this is often a trial for me in concerts, because I tend to listen as if a caveman finding a comfortable position on the floor without a bed or chair, given the choice!

The searchword in iTunes [as being fixed in the tagging by me] is "Jacques."

You may see where I am going with this, and iTunes allows for this way of working, whilst also giving a splendid replay ...

ATb from George
Posted on: 27 August 2009 by pcstockton
George,
No one will stop you if you decide to stretch out on the balcony aisle. They might think you are strange but F them.

-p
Posted on: 13 September 2009 by girlfriend in a coma
George

Thanks for this thread, which I have enjoyed following.
I have a question, but if you don't mind I would prefer to ask you offline.
My email addy is in profile, so please drop me a line if you wish.
Posted on: 17 September 2009 by mudwolf
George it is a great thread, your first pics is great, I like neatness but often find myself in that state.

so whom are you going to will your Elgar Edition?

our local night classical DJ loves Elgar, I"ve learned a lot from him, Jim Sjveda on KUSC in LA. He often promotes all the British composers.
Posted on: 17 September 2009 by u5227470736789439
Dear mudwolf - Glenn, [isn't it from the olden days?]

The Elgar Edition CDs must be worth a lot of money and yet I got them for nothing!

They are pre-issue pressings with gold backing and not the usual alluminium.

A unique short run done for critics and people of importance associated with the project to publish the recordings on CD and for some rason me as well!

Except that I may count myself among the people reponsible in a a way.

I wrote to the Elgar Foundation, to Wulstan Atkins, to Lady Hull [to get her to join in] to EMI, and in the case of EMI it was not only the once. I canvased as only the convinced can canvase!

Thus when the CDs came out I was deemed a person to whom a set of these early pressings should also be sent.

Of course they are not for sale! One day I will give them away, when i am too deaf to enjoy the music anymore!

Actually you make a point for among my CDs are indeed some valuable and very rare issues, and thus the iTunes is crucial in archiving them and saving them from further damage and use. I would love to think that such a careful selection of recordings - all of them working at a high octane musically - might find a home where they would be used rather than simply put away when I die ...

ATB from George

\

Posted on: 18 September 2009 by u5227470736789439
Well I close this with the happy thought that the external USB drive on the Dell laptop is actually not different in any significant way from the big PC as an iTunes source. Still very enjoyable.

But it has one massive advantage in that the laptop runs silently!

So here is a final picture of my set.

A Miniature Music Replay Set:



ATB from George
Posted on: 18 September 2009 by pcstockton
George,

Maybe I missed something along the way.... Did you get rid of the Lavry? If so what is DACing for you?

-patrick
Posted on: 18 September 2009 by u5227470736789439
Dear Patrick,

The computer sound card in both cases.

I sold the Laxry because there is no particualer amount of spare money floating round!

ATB from George
Posted on: 18 September 2009 by pcstockton
George maybe a Beresford could improve on that for 100 of your pounds.

Is there a chance of demo-ing one? Also a decent enough headphone pre....

I imagine though you are fine as is.

Cheers,
Patrick
Posted on: 18 September 2009 by u5227470736789439
Dear Pareick,

I have no doubt that I could improve the replay tomorrow, but probably I will leave it alone for a long time now! Not a CD in sight, which is a blessing!

The first thing is to service the Hi-cap, which is very old and ... probably ... has never ... beem done! It's also probably 25 years old!!!

And I want to get the 72 done as well. That is about 20 years old as well, so probably ripe for the TLC of Sheila! The 140 was done two years ago.

ATB from George