Was Michael Jackson really innocent? Read this.....

Oh well, that definitely proves his "guilt"

I believe everything I read in the papers.

Sister xx

This will never end.

of course it won't. Hardly anyone knows what he got up to in bed, fewer of us even care. The Michael Jackson industry will roll on for years as long as there's money to be made.

Sister xx

You read the Mirror ?

I don't read the Mirror!!!

I'm more of a Daily Star reader. It keeps me up to date with all the important current affairs.

Jon

No 'innocent' man would ever have paid off the family of the principal witness in that first criminal trial, as Jackson did. He wouldn't have needed to.

But, then, he wasn't found Guilty in that criminal case, nor found liable in the later civil suit.

So, a man without a stain on his character? We can all make up our own minds, based upon what we know.

Mind you, Jackson did develop a reputation for suing newspapers who said nasty things about him, but then withdrawing his complaint before the case got to court. (In a former capacity, I used to defend some of the large national newspapers in libel actions and corporate litigation: two have been named here.)

My personal view? Jackson was a nasty, predatory paedophile, without whom the world is a better place. But that's just my view, of course.

G

Can we start the jokes again now?

I share Graham's view.

I share nap-ster's view!