Naim DAC with Supernait/Hicap2

Posted by: kifco on 28 August 2010

Anyone here using a Naim DAC with the SN/HC2 combination. If so, did it bring about a huge improvements over the SN onboard dac?
Posted on: 03 September 2010 by irwan shah
quote:
Originally posted by Stoik:
I don't know much about the sound of the Supernait's DAC, as I heard it only fed by analog sources, but I know how a nDAC sounds when coupled to a Nait XS: Fabulous! Smile

Thorsten_Lux pointed something interesting in his interventions; He's able to appreciate a clear difference between the SN's DAC and the nDAC. That difference seems to matter a lot to him, enough to justify the extra outlay for the nDAC.

The popular saying state this as "diminishing return", I rather call that a personal saturation point. Where you have enough to be happy, and where another difference (better or worse) can't change anything about this feeling, as you are "saturated".

Let's take an example to explain this better; When I had my CD5i, the Hi-Line had a dramatic effect on it, and to go back with Naim standard interconnect was a simple no-no. Now with the Naim DAC, the Hi-Line effect is still there, but I could perfectly live happy with the standard interconnect.

The Naim DAC allowed me to reach my saturation point in my system. Another person could reach his own saturation point with the Supernait's DAC, and even if he's trying a Naim DAC maxed out with a 555PS, won't be able to appreciate the difference at a level convincing enough to him as essential to his happiness state.

My belief is that saturation point is not static, and will evolve with the listening experience gained over time, leading to what we usualy call an "upgraditis" condition. Big Grin

So by all means, have a listen to the Naim DAC to hear what the fuzz's about. We never know, you may like it enough to bring it home to stay. No one could answer better to that question than yourself. Cool

Bye.


For Naim fans, in addition to death and taxes, the only other certainty in life is 'upgradetitis'. It is not a question of 'if', but rather 'when' someone would eventually fall prey to the disease.

I am using the Supernait's DAC at the moment and I am very happy with it. I have also heard the nDAC combination with the Nait XS, but still prefer the Supernait DAC.

I suspect that it is the different presentation of the systems that divide the fans. Those who love the Nait XS, will usually also love the 202/200. Whereas, Supernait fans are more likely to gravitate towards the 282/250 combination when infected with 'upgradetitis'. I do not believe that this is a question of which on is 'better', but rather which one would a listener 'prefer'.

I just wish board members could be more civil to one another. If only both sides of the divide could see that there are valid view on both sides. If agreement is not forthcoming, then just agree to disagree.

I have not heard the Supernait / nDAC combination yet. I am afraid that if I do take the nDAC back home for an audition, it is not going to leave my room. Although I preferred the Supernait DAC, the nDAC / Nait XS combination is still very good and 'about' (used liberally) in the same price range. Anyway, next on the list is a Hi-Cap 2.
Posted on: 03 September 2010 by winkyincanada
quote:
Originally posted by irwan shah:
Anyway, next on the list is a Hi-Cap 2.


You won't regret that.
Posted on: 03 September 2010 by irwan shah
quote:
Originally posted by winkyincanada:
quote:
Originally posted by irwan shah:
Anyway, next on the list is a Hi-Cap 2.


You won't regret that.


Noted! Thanks Winky ... here comes 'upgradetitis'. Big Grin
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by AbsoluteMusic
quote:
Originally posted by Thorsten_Lux:

@Absolute

I understand your findings.
But in my system, the difference with a SB Touch as source into the nDAC and then into the SN-DAC represented a huge margin...

Maybe because my SN, nDAC and HiCap are Powerline´d...anyhow, the diff was really amazingly big.


Powerline...hummm never tried...i will do it soon ;-)

After testing the nDac pairing my SN-Hicap with SB3 as "digital source", in regard of the SQ (SB3 is good as starter but honestly not on the level i'm looking for...Prat not at an a CD5x level for example.) and the other choice (HDX : goshhh the cost of this nice pieces of HW / UQ,NDX: Hum nice pieces too, but right in the middle solution ) i decided to go back to the Vinyl route ;-) and i'm very happy with it. (On LP I know that the standard will not change every 6 month ;-) )

PS : In my case having for example 3 dac (one on the SN, one on the source "NDX,HDX" + the nDac) is not the most optimized solution. Nevertheless i'm a but curious about UnitiServe result in them of Prat/SQ if compared to my actual SB3...and my LP ;-) .. but not part of the "classic" serie :-(
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by Thorsten_L
quote:
Originally posted by AbsoluteMusic:
quote:
Originally posted by Thorsten_Lux:

@Absolute

I understand your findings.
But in my system, the difference with a SB Touch as source into the nDAC and then into the SN-DAC represented a huge margin...

Maybe because my SN, nDAC and HiCap are Powerline´d...anyhow, the diff was really amazingly big.


Powerline...hummm never tried...i will do it soon ;-)

After testing the nDac pairing my SN-Hicap with SB3 as "digital source", in regard of the SQ (SB3 is good as starter but honestly not on the level i'm looking for...Prat not at an a CD5x level for example.) and the other choice (HDX : goshhh the cost of this nice pieces of HW / UQ,NDX: Hum nice pieces too, but right in the middle solution ) i decided to go back to the Vinyl route ;-) and i'm very happy with it. (On LP I know that the standard will not change every 6 month ;-) )

PS : In my case having for example 3 dac (one on the SN, one on the source "NDX,HDX" + the nDac) is not the most optimized solution. Nevertheless i'm a but curious about UnitiServe result in them of Prat/SQ if compared to my actual SB3...and my LP ;-) .. but not part of the "classic" serie :-(


Hey Absolute, so did I...just bought the Superline...boy, vinyl really rocks!!!!
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by kifco
irwan shah wrote:

[quote] Anyway, next on the list is a Hi-Cap 2

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A great SN upgrade - get ready for real surprise !
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by Richard Dane
quote:
Originally posted by Thorsten_Lux:
Dear Moderators, someone with such a source should not be allowed to state expert findings, IMHO.

quote:
B&W 805S Naim 202/200 PS3/Ipod/Laptop with external soundcard Burwen bobcat software


Everyone is entitled to express an opinion here. I don't think that anyone is putting themselves forward as an "expert". Not even me... Winker

Of course, there's that wonderful saying that opinions are like xxxholes - everyone's got one... Whether you agree with them or not is the basis for the discussion. Argue robustly, by all means, but try to keep things from getting personal.
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by Thorsten_L
Richard, thank you, humbly accepted.

I will be very careful from now.
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by frs74
quote:
Originally posted by irwan shah:

Those who love the Nait XS, will usually also love the 202/200. Whereas, Supernait fans are more likely to gravitate towards the 282/250.
....
Anyway, next on the list is a Hi-Cap


Wholehartedly quote both statements. Go straight with Hi-Cap: I just added it to my CDX2/SN and actually it worth each penny.
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by Thorsten_L
HiCap on the SN...fantastic upgrade and great VFM.
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by Thorsten_L
quote:
Thorsten_Lux pointed something interesting in his interventions; He's able to appreciate a clear difference between the SN's DAC and the nDAC. That difference seems to matter a lot to him, enough to justify the extra outlay for the nDAC.


Not only this...

I intended to trade in my nDAC for the Superline, so I really checked out if I could live with SB Touch SN-DAC/HC instead of SB Touch/nDAC/SN/HC...and I boy did I want the Superline bad, but in no way could I have done that deal...the nDAC is too good, even with a 300€ source as the SB Touch.
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by matpip
Thorsten,
did you connected the SB to the SN with a DC1?
I guess so cause you have one, anyway my 50 cents advise is to give some time to the SNDac to burn in, and to use a good coax cable (as you are probably already doing)...in few weeks you might decide to live with SB/SN combo for background listening, and get a superline for serious vinyl rock sessions!
Posted on: 04 September 2010 by alidubai
c
quote:
Originally posted by totemphile:
Btw. the NDAC makes a huge difference and it is probably the cheapest upgrade you can get in terms of vfm, even if you already own a SNAIT & HC. Source 1st, without a doubt. No matter what ears you have. Unless deaf of course.


The powerline is actually the cheaper upgrade in terms of VFM and takes the SN to another level altogether.
Posted on: 05 September 2010 by Thorsten_L
The best upgrade IMHO for the Supernait is the HC2.

The Powerline too.
Posted on: 06 September 2010 by totemphile
My apologies, I should have said that IMHO the NDAC is the best upgrade starting from a CDX2.2/HL/SN/FCXS/Fraim combo as it offers the biggest step forward in terms of yet more resolution and timbre. To say it is the cheapest was wrong. The NDAC is not cheap. I guess it helps to avoid big statements and be as precise in ones description as possible. When I auditioned the DAC on this combo the difference was just so pronounced. It was a major leap forward. The only other time I experienced a similar wow factor in my current set up was when I used a HiLine on the CDX2.2 for the first time. Of course the HL is a much cheaper upgrade and, therefore, represents better vfm. I cannot comment on the effect of Powerlines.

With regards to a HC2 on the SN, I am not sure what to make of it yet. I am currently demoing one at home and I am comparing the result to that of a Flatcap XS. I have not made up my mind yet whether I actually like the HC2 better or not. As it stands I have a feeling that it adds too much power and bass pronunciation for my liking. Other effects such as the opening up of the overall sound stage seem to be quite similar than when connected to a FCXS. This is with the speakers I have of course, so experiences may differ. It would be interesting to know if the effect that I seem to perceive as “too much power and bass pronunciation” is levelled off when introducing a NDAC. I have a feeling that it might just be right then. But as said these are just initial observations.

I have not heard a SB or Sonos through the SNDac or NDAC, so I don’t know what results either are able to produce given such sources. There is a very interesting thread though on Sonos into NDAC from a 500 owner where the result of a Sonos ZP90 into a NDAC is compared to that produced by his CD555. It can be found here: https://forums.naimaudio.com/ev...417/m/7062992617/p/1
Posted on: 08 September 2010 by totemphile
I just noticed that the link did not work properly. The threat can be found here:
https://forums.naimaudio.com/ev...417/m/7062992617/p/1