82 VS 52
Posted by: Sean P on 16 January 2002
Present setup
CDI and Rega planar 2 with rb300
Stageline + flatcap
82 + supercap
135s
Regards Sean
My opinion would be that your 82/Super is already revealing the limitations of your source. If you can live with those limitations I do not believe that the 52 will make them sound worse.
Paul
I agree with the previous comments though - I chose to pay a bit more & get a recent model.
Jeff
regards
Dev
If the 52 is one of the old one's ie pre supercap I think I'll leave it for a later model.
Should find out tomorrow if work doesn't get in the way.
Regards Sean
Will just have to wait to see if new preamp creates a better secondhand market for 52s.
Regards Sean
Immediately somthing is upgraded by the amnufacturers, in whatever peripheral way, the old immediately becomes obsolete, redundant and not worth listening to? I found it very, very difficult to sell some SBLs with 'old drivers' despite the very low asking price - must have the new drivers mate! Didn't stop them sounding great speakers for 400 quid! Granted the 52PS has been very significantly upgraded to Supercap (which you have). The 52 head has seen far less change.
I've been comparing an old (10 years) 52 with a new 82 for the past few weeks, both with supercap. The 52, IMHO, is far better (given that we are at the rarified end of the market here). Most importantly it completely ameliorates the rather harsh tendency of the 82 (which the Scap also tames to some extent) whilst being significantly more musically involving. Oh, and Ive been using a CDI and CDS. Sure the CDS is better but the 52 with CDI sounds enthralling as well, just a bit less so.
Given you already have the Scap, I reckon youve just missed a bargain mate!
Steve