Three get surrounded in South London - Martians return armed with oranges

Posted by: David Hobbs-Mallyon on 27 October 2003

The promise of wine, super-heated chicken wings and song was enough to galvanise the Riders minus vegetarian Dave J back into action last week for a trip to revisit Alex S's system. Having been a good six months since the last visit, the 'usual' major changes and audio exotica were expected - we were not to be disappointed.

For those that can't remember the details of Alex's old system, have a look here. For those that can't be bothered, think Huge South London workshop, Austrian furniture, temperamental Danish CD player, LP12 with Japanese cartridge, powerful Antipodean amps and unique Martian speakers.

As before, Alex was quick to get us in the mood with the bottles of bubbly - very much appreciated - however at the last minute the chicken wings cancelled. Fortunately in their place up popped Goose, Jason Hector and 'Seventh Veil' Steve. Quite an interesting mix for the evening, which I would classify as in the glowing green corner Nick and Tom, in the glowing red corner Goose and Jason, sitting on the fence myself and Steve - so I expect there will be some differences of opinion.

So to a description of Alex's sistem in the latest guise:

Room - no change

Sources: Big change here - out goes the LP12 - in with a Well Tempered deck and cartridge - Alex will have to give details of the specific model. P100 Phono Stage

For CDs, Alex has stuck with the Densen Beat B-400 XS CD player

Amplification: Still the Dynavector L100 /HX1.2 pre/power combination. Now with the option of Japanese Dynavector surround processor with the option of extra grunt from a Naim NAP110.

Speakers: Yes still the O'Heochas, which certainly got the attention of resident speaker manufacturer Steve - out has gone the subwoofer, and in has come some satellite Gallo speakers, not unlike a pair of oranges - these are in use when the surround processor is on. I can't remember if the Mana was under the speakers or not.

Stands: Amazingly still Hutter - stand makers out there just can't be trying hard enough.

Cables: Mains - some design that screens out RFI - Alex? Interconnects - out goes the DNM, in comes cheapo microphone cables with Eichmann bullet plugs. Speaker cables, still Townshend Isolda.

On to the some listening, and first off we started with some nerdy A-B comparisons of the system with and without the surround processor. First thing to note is that the satellite speakers are placed just in front of the listener, and if you get up close to them, they make a surprising amount of sound - I guess I expected that they would just have a small amount of ambience going through them. Apparently they work on some time delay related to frequency. I'd had a sneak preview of the surround processor a couple of weeks earlier, and initial impressions were that the processor was adding some weight and scale that had previously been missing from the system, along with some presence, with none of the adverse effects that Alex had found with the subwoofer. As can be typical for these evenings, sometimes, the system doesn't quite behave as expected, and on the night for whatever reason, the processor was giving a boxy and grainy quality to the mid-range and general consensus seemed to prefer the processor off. What can be added in that in the meantime, Alex seems to have solved the scale issue anyway which he's put down to the last minute addition of the RFI screening mains cables to the system. Certainly the system gave a suitably impressive Rammstein performance of Herzelied but the surround processor looked like it didn't want to be there. A sadomasochistic request for more Rammstein from Goose led to the surround processor being retired for the evening, allowing for us to turn the wick up on the HX1.2 even more - the system put in a top performance, possibly given room conditions, the best yet.

On to the Well Tempered - although my experience with vinyl is limited, I'm certainly impressed. I'll leave it to other to provide more detail. For me I'm coming to the conclusion that the well Tempered really is well matched with the Dynavector Amps, and certainly it performed far more consistently than the LP12 did on the previous visit. In fact, for me it's the most persuasive case I've heard for vinyl so far. I'd also add that I'm not convinced that the WT would really gel with a Naim system. Sonically, the Densen performed as admirably as last time - given some software tweaks the machine was far less temperamental, although track information is left to the imagination. Alex assures me that they have now solved this issue - either way the player sounds like a bargain choice to me.

So to sum up, having heard the surround processor I have a feeling it may end up in Alex's increasingly complex home AV system. However, I think Alex has now got an extremely listenable system and a very engaging and consistent performer over a wide range of music choices. The system has now really come together in terms of solving the problems that the room throws at it, and it's taken some fairly esoteric choices to get there, but to my ears the system really works.

Once again, many thanks to Alex for the generous hospitality, good to see Jason again (another ride planned soon hopefully), fun catching up with Goose after corresponding for quite some time by email, and always glad to catch up with new friends such as Steve on these evenings. Hopefully time for one last ride before Tom make his way north

David

[This message was edited by David Hobbs-Mallyon on TUESDAY 28 October 2003 at 00:22.]
Posted on: 27 October 2003 by Alex S.
Thanks for the encouragement David.

The WT is the Record Player - the cheapest in a range of 3, the cart the DV XX2.

The Densen, in particular, thrives on the Eupen mains cable @ 50 quid pm. It cancels RFI better than anything else I've tried for reasonable money although the HX1.2 hates it for some reason - a cable for that should arrive today.

The spell Nick cast on the SS processor seems to have worked a treat - it was fairly crap wasn't it. Now Nick's gone its a bit happier but may still end up at home. Of course, the newly serviced 110 still needs three months warm up and the Mana it was sitting on was bound to have been poorly set up. . .

The Rammstein was rather thrilling in a 'is my system about to catch fire' kind of way. One good thing about the system is its even handed - I choose the music I want on the format I want without much disappointment.

The few niggles I have will be sorted by a WT Ref/Dr T, L300, another 1.2 and a pair of MF9s.

It was very good to see everyone!

Alex
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Markus S
So how come there's no pictures?
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Goose
Thanks to Alex S for letting us into his workshop and drinking his coffee!
Like DHM said it was great to meet, after years, people who I had been e-mailing..
(DHM, Jason Disector, DHM, NL, ALex)
What a great bunch of guys.....

I am pretty familiar with the DV stuff, so really could just listen to the speakers,
more than anything else. At the start I thought things were a bit, light and fizzy sounding..(that's the technical term)..But after turning the DV SS down, a better clarity and coherence ensued.

I did enjoy listening to the system, everything started and stopped in the right places, tonality was pretty good indeed, although I suppose that I am used to that kind of tonality...Buckets of power on tap and even with the Ramenstein, it didnt sound under duress..,pretty impressive indeed. The only minus I heard was with some familiar music where the bass was not as tight and textured as I am used to, but still
very listenable..So overall my first exposure to the pods was very good, highly recommended!

I did start the competition to see who could play the best 70's crap and thought that I would win, but Nick beat me hands down :-)

Alex must win a prize of some kind for attention to detail, as the set up is immaculate and everything is very clean indeed..He has done very well to get such a good sound in a big problematic room



Cheers
Goose
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
2 superb, tight subs or MF9s it is then; the SS can go home and annoy Anya, the Pods likewise, to keep and eye on the kids. Except I haven't got 10K.

Alex

PS Goose, I should have warned you that trying to out 70s crap Nick is like trying to out jazz crap DHM or out female vocal crap JH - Futile.
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by 7V
I had a great time and it was good to meet everyone. Thanks Alex.

I agree with the comments that have been made about the processor. I felt the sound was much clearer when it was taken out of the circuit.

I also thought that the Well Tempered was an impressive TT (as far as I could judge with all the other equipment). I shall be adding Well Tempered to my potential upgrade list.

As for the pods (speakers) ...

I loved them. Great fun. The design is way out and I like the space saving made by the isobaric bass cones.

However, I would like to see the tweeters isolated from the vibration of the rest of the enclosure - everything over the crossover point (1kHz-3kHz?) was being shaken to sh*t. If this modification was ever made, I would love to listen again. These are big-hearted speakers with a sense of humour. Nice.

Steve Margolis
defy convention - make music
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
Footnote:

You're not going to believe this but:

The SS being the sophisticated kit it is has a 'Rock' and a 'Classical' switch. All night it was on Rock. Today I switched back to Classical and got back what I was missing. This makes some sense since Dr Tominari was a Classical only man and seems only to have got his processor to work properly in this mode. The Rock setting was obviously an afterthought that wasn't terribly well thought out.

Alex
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by David Hobbs-Mallyon
Doh

Not sure whether that explains it or not, but certainly I was scratching my head a bit as to the difference in the sound from the two times I'd heard it. Oh well, maybe you'll have to bring it round to my place for another session...

David
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
<< I still like the Pods and they work remarkably well in this set up, very transparent and unbox like, it's just that the room is too large so Alex needs more of them >> Tom, I'm encouraging them to breed. Any tips (Apart from lick their balls)?
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Andrew L. Weekes
Alex,

How close were the SS speakers to the listeners?

The Dynavector blurb definitely mentions that listening anywhere, except near to a speaker, should work well - just a thought?

"4. The listening point is not limited to a centre "hot spot". Almost any position, except near to any speaker, is enjoyable."

More info here: -

http://www.dynavector.co.jp/english/essp/hi_fidelity.html

Andy.
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by David Hobbs-Mallyon
The speakers were aligned reasonably correctly - at least from my understanding. Certainly when I was round at Alex's previously the effect was quite similar to Shahinians. Something certainly went awry on the night though.

David
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
Andy, I think it was positioned right. It was the Lees curse and the wrong setting which did for it.

I can't tell you how much I'm looking forward to more pictures!
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by garyi
"On to the some listening, and first off we started with some nerdy A-B comparisons of the system with and without the surround processor. First thing to note is that the satellite speakers are placed just in front of the listener, and if you get up close to them, they make a surprising amount of sound - I guess I expected that they would just have a small amount of ambience going through them. Apparently they work on some time delay related to frequency. I'd had a sneak preview of the surround processor a couple of weeks earlier, and initial impressions were that the processor was adding some weight and scale that had previously been missing from the system, "

So the the AV1 then?
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Rico
Tom

your insurer might beg to differ.

Are those the mains input cables running in to the top of the surface boxes in the Alex photo? Seem smaller than the IEC leads, even allowing for flex.

Thanks for another entertaining write-up, chaps. Did somebody say foie gras?

Rico - SM/Mullet Audio
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
Rico, the spurs are either DNM or 6mm T&E - no 10mm for me - yet.

John, don't want to burst your balloon but the Zerogain tweakers think the smaller Eupens are better.

Gary, the DVSS is a similar but more sophisticated principal than the AV1 in that all the different frequency time delays were 10 years in the making. Hence the ultra sophisticated 'Rock' or 'Classical' switches.

Alex
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by garyi
sorry Alex I did not realise it had a rock function, I feel this is where the AV1 failed.
Posted on: 28 October 2003 by Alex S.
John, Big dicks can sometimes be unsubtle. Let me know about the LATs - I wonder if 'Silverfuse' is a better way of using silver than all the others I've tried.

Yes, the SS has an on-off switch at the front and a mode and volume switch at the back - should of course be the other way round.

The pods seem happier on a smaller perch.

Alex
Posted on: 30 October 2003 by David Hobbs-Mallyon
So then Alex, is the Superstereo staying or going?
Posted on: 30 October 2003 by Alex S.
Staying; it works on 'Classical' no matter what Nick thinks.
Posted on: 30 October 2003 by David Hobbs-Mallyon
....in that case you'll have to bring it round then. Unlimited wine and ciggies will be on offer.
Posted on: 30 October 2003 by Alex S.
Nick, no smearing or boxiness, that's the point.

Allow me also to clarify that the Dynavector SS has nothing to do with NZ and the amps, it was Dr Tominari's toy in Japan. Surprisingly, I even knew this before I bought it, although, naturally, having Dynavector written on it was enough for me.