XS Streamer options - dealer comments.

Posted by: Jasonf on 17 August 2012

Chaps,

 

I am still investigating a streaming route and have recently been enquiring on the XS route and after receiving this feedback from a dealer in Sweden, I wanted to get the forums expert advice.

 

I enquired on these three configurations:

 

1. ND5 XS - NAC 152 XS - NAP 155 XS - UServe.

2. ND5 XS - NAIT XS - UServe.

 

3. NAC-N 172 XS - NAP 155 XS - UServe.

 

This is the dealers response.

 
The short answer is that alternative "1" is the best by far by far. The second best would be "2". "3" is a nice system. It's the least expensive alternative of the three, but can't really compete with the two better alternatives.
 
Here is why
 
Alternative 1 and 2 has a superior source component. ND5 XS is a better source component than NAC N172XS.
NAC152XS/NAP155XS is a much better amplifier than NAIT XS. The main reason for this is that the delicate pre amp section has it's own box and is well protected from power supplies and the power amp section, which result in better performance.
 
I just wanted to see if the forum concur with the above dealers comments.
 
Many thanks in advance.
 
Jason.
Posted on: 19 August 2012 by totemphile
Originally Posted by Jasonf:
@Dan,  well covered indeed and very concise.

 

- US provides Internet radio and nServe is still the better UI when compared to nStream. Combine US and ND5XS and there's redundancy there.

- if you really wanted to go for a US, and there are some valid arguments for it, my choice would be to parner it with the Naim DAC though, connected via Naim DC1 BNC coax cable. It will provide better SQ and let you take full advantage of nServe functionality.


This sounds like a very good route for me, I was also not aware of the UI of the nServe being better than the nStream or that the UServe could stream radio, until Clause mentioned that in an earlier post. In many ways that increases the value of the product for me even further.

 

So basically what I am thinking is: UServe + Naim Dac + NAC 152 XS + NAP 155 XS

 

That would be a very good system indeed. The US is in many ways a very beautiful product, very nice UI, interactive album art, lovely. But it comes at a pretty hefty price, all relative, I know. If you are allready invested in Macs anyway, you could get a current Mac Mini, rip all your CDs with your MBP in iTunes, store in AIFF or ALAC, transfer the files to the Mac Mini and run it headless as a server into the nDAC. Pretty much the same sound as using a US at 1/5 of the price of a US. Your money. I have to admit though, i do like the US, have refrained from purchasing one though because everything it does can be had for a fraction of what it costs. You will need to get an iPad either way, best way to operate the US and a must for running a Mac Mini headless, if you do not want to mess around with your MBP. Otherwise, since you already own a MBP you could have it sat next to your hifi and select your music files directly from it out of iTuens, same SQ, at no extra cost, other than an optical cable. I have noticed that it's actually quite nice to have that screen when going through iTunes. Personally, I think iTunes is a lovely interface, does everything I want and has a good look and feel to it. Plus if you have iPods in the house, going the Mac route makes even more sense. You will need a PC to update the US, although Naim is apparently working on a Mac based desk top controller (DTC).

 

Either way, your system will sound great. I would probably go for a Nait XS though, just to save one box. You'll want that Flatcap XS at some stage, ups, sorry ;-))

 

 

Posted on: 19 August 2012 by totemphile
Originally Posted by Guido Fawke:
 
I'm mystified why anybody buys the NDX when you can play from a computer through the Naim DAC, but of course they do .. and if they're happy then that's great.
 
That's why I never considered the NDX and sold my ND5XS, because a clean bitstream into nDAC tops them both... Still using my modded Dr. Gert Sonos ZP90, just a good to my ears, love the Sonos UI, doesn't do hires but I don't care...
 
TP ... why AIFF? The PCM that reaches the DAC from the Mac Mini is the same ... the extraction takes place in the computer and the DAC care not one jot about the computer as long as it gets it nice buffer full of bytes. Is it a question of why not AIFF if you have the space ... in which case probably yes, but AIFF requires more disk access ..... can you hear the difference? AIFF is absolutely fine, but I've stopped worrying about formats. 
 
I chose AIFF early on cause I didn't want a compressed file format, have not compared it to ALAC though, quite a few here have reported to prefer AIFF though. All system dependent and not everyone hears a difference I guess. Plus I never worried about disc space, so AIFF was my prefered choice. The nDAC is a great leveler though, in many respects. Often times even a 320kbps file sounds rather good to my ears.
 
I guess the only real way for somebody to choose is have a play and have a listen - what does worry me is the mythology about magic software, as I sometimes think folks pay over the top for some of it ... not a problem if they have the cash. 
 
I agree, don't get hung up in details, it's minor in the grand scheme of things...
 
Moving the speakers a few centimetres back or forth can affect the sound far more than any difference between iTunes playing AIFF and Decibel playing FLAC ... in my humble opinion, of course. 
 
I don't care much about speaker placement, I mostly walk around the house when listening to music. Anyone who feels the need to move their speakers two millimeters to one or the other side, toe in or whatever is nuts im my view - even though it can make a difference, still nuts 
 
Best
tp
Posted on: 19 August 2012 by mipi
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:
Originally Posted by mipi:
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:

...
I could have ripped with the Mac Mini by plugging in an external CD drive from Samsung (avoid Apple one like the plague, the add-on SuperDrive is very poor: Apple know it is too so they really should fix it). My Mac Mini is connected to a Naim DAC/555PS with a Wireworld Supernova 6 optical cable.

...

Hi Guy,
does the optical out of your mac mini support sample rates above 96 kHz?
Thanks, mipi
No Mipi, it doesn't ... 24/96 is the highest, but I can't tell the difference between different sample rates, but if you can and want to go to 192 then you need a hiFace 2 or equivalent.

All the best, Guy

No, I can't either. Was just curious because according to Apples spec the optical out of the Mac Mini should be capable to deliver sample rates up to 192 kHz.

Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:
... Internet radio on a mac is very easy to do and you can play from YouTube and Spotify and lots of things ...


How do you do internet radio? I do it via iTunes (adding URL's of radio streams and combining them in a dedicated play list). Is there a more convenient possibility?

 

Problem is that Audirvana (which I use to play music on my MAc Mini into the nDac) is not capable to play MP3 streams. Therefore I need a second connection from the Mac to the Dac specifically for internet radio.

 

Internet radio would be a lot easier with a dedicated streamer. But the ND5 costs around 2000 EUR more than the Mac solution. Maybe I will try out a cheaper non-Naim streamer into the nDac. Heard that the Pro-ject stream box isn't bad. Will have to listen to its against the ND5 into the nDac.

 

Thanks, mipi

Posted on: 19 August 2012 by Russ

Jason:UServe + Naim Dac + NAC 152 XS + NAP 155 XS  However, in my own case, I don't even have speakers (which I believe will provide the most bang for the buck) and budget will prevent my doing something like that all at once.  So my thinking is along these lines:

 

1.  Start out with UServe+UQute+Speakers (Probably the Gurus).  Then I can bypass the CDP entirely and thus poke my head out into the Twenty-First Century--and immediately have a way to seamlessly rip my relatively small CD collection. 

 

2.  The first upgrade would be to add the Naim DAC--assuming it is possible to input from the Naim DAC directly into the preamp stage of the UQ, bypassing its internal DAC?????

 

3.  The second, and probably last, upgrade would be to relegate the UQ to duty elsewhere, and add separate Pre and Power amps--the best the future allows me to afford.

 

A new way to look at things.  Please feel free to comment.

 

Russ

 

Posted on: 19 August 2012 by Russ

Somehow, in my last post, I truncated the first part of it, in which I thanked you, Jason for telling me about this thread and the assistance from Bart, Guido, and all the rest. 

 

Russ

Posted on: 19 August 2012 by MangoMonkey

If budget is an issue, consider getting the Synology NAS instead of the UnitiServ.

Posted on: 19 August 2012 by Guido Fawkes

MM ... Jason/Russ are looking for a simple route and to avoid the complexities of NAS and UPnP and transcoding FLAC to WAV, the metadata saga and .... well, I agree with you that the Synology NAS is a fine bit of kit, but it is more complex than plugging a Mac Mini into the Naim DAC or UQ which will work as easily as a CDP and give the same or better SQ. [IMHO a Synology/Denon Music Server into a Naim DAC would give stunning sound from FLAC]. 

 

Hi Russ/Jason ... to me the US looks more like a traditional computer than the Mac Mini. Things I would check out with your dealer.  Will he do a complete install for you and a full home demo? Will he pop around from time to time and do any updates .. if not ask him to show you keep the Naim kit up to date with the latest firmware (My UQ is till not updated because I don't think it fair to drag my dealer across country and I do not have the wherewithal to update it - the Mac Mini & Naim DAC are trivial to update)? If you are happy with both answers then go for the US as the level of support is worth the premium. 

 

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Russ

OK, Guido, you are starting to convince me--so put on your best "I am talking to a simpleton" hat and don't assume anything!    And Jason, let me know if I am hijacking your thread.  (You may have noticed that I am very good at hijacking my own.)

 

For what it is worth, Because I want to start with a turnkey solution and work onward and upward from there, I am leaning heavily toward this as a starting configuration:

 

Naimuniti2 ----> Guru QM10 two s

 

Then, at some point, I will need to add some sort of server.  Let's assume that I go with Apple instead of Userve, but in lieu of the Mini, I choose one of the less expensive Macbook pro laptops with say, 750 gig of storage (which will hold way more CD s than I have currently, probably by a factor of 5. 

 

OK, onward: The NU2 is already connected to the ISP router via Cat6 cable.  I know (basically) how to rip a CD on a PC and I suspect it won't be that different with a Mac.  So I set up a file structure of some sort, (don't need to worry about that yet, I assume). 

 

I hook the Macbook Pro up to the internet by Cat 6 cable into a second ISP router port.

 

Now, I assume I have to load some kind of music server software on the Mac?

 

Now, I make sure that the settings on my iphone (onto which I have downloaded the nstream app) is set to default to WiFi to the same network to which my fancy new Apple is attached.

 

If I go to the "Inputs" screen and touch UPnP, can I now expect, without further computer hocus pocus on my part, for the nstream/NU2 to see the "server" set up on my Steve Jobs Special?  Or is there more?

 

So let's assume that I have been able to get the infernal machine set up and running.  Somewhere along the way, I will run out of storage--can I then connect Seagate 1TB GoFlex Portable for Mac Thunderbolt Hard Drive  and use that for additional storage and will the NU2 "see" what I rip to that as well?

 

Finally, is backing the whole shmear up as simple as hooking it up some way to a Time Capsule and setting it up to back up every week? month? when something changes?

 

Regards and thanks,

 

Russ



Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Tog

You can use a Mac but UPnP is crude to say the least running on OSX.

 

Macs do make good servers when running audiophile grade players like Decibel or using iTunes; directly attached to a good Dac and using Apple's Remote software or screen share as a method of control.

 

Either use your Macbook (Mini would be cheaper) into a Dac or use Vortexbox on a bespoke PC to serve up UPnP (+itunes, Sonos or Squeezebox) properly on your network.

 

Router - Switch - Vortexbox / NU2

 

Job done.

 

Tog

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by dis

Jason

I have UServe>nDac>152>155. It is brilliant !!

I arrived at this combo for similar reasons to the ones you talk about. I can't be bothered mucking around with different software and computers. I just wanted to keep in the Naim family, and was prepared to pay more for the priviledge. For me everything now is easy and seamless.

Demoed UServe>nd5xs but quickly rejected due to inferior SQ than above. No drama not having a screen on Userve - iPad control is great. Also nServe supposedly better than NStream.

Stand alone nDac follows the Naim separates philosophy  along with 152+155. You can upgrade these with power supplies if required. I've got a HiCap which I can keep if I upgrade the pre, and the nDac can also accompany an upgrade.

But for now my system sounds great, and I'm just cranking up the volume at any opportunity - Balkan Gypsy music at 11 on the dial is great for gettting the kids out of bed in the morning, as well as for me the breakfast chef.

Cheers

dis

 

 

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Guido Fawkes

> I have UServe>nDac>152>155. It is brilliant !!

 

Agreed ... 

 

So is a Mac Mini/Naim DAC/Naim amplifier 

 

Two equally good systems ... just get the one that suits best 

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Bart

Russ, if you go the Mac route, (1) use the Mac Mini (cheaper than a Macbook, happier running all of the time, no monitor needed, and I think some say much better optical audio out (but I am not positive of this)), and (2) use it connected directly to the NaimDAC via optical or a USB to SPDIF converter as Stu wrote about earlier.  You will greatly frustrate yourself trying to use a Mac as a uPnP server, and totally frustrate your purpose of trying to keep it simple.

 

Of all the options, running a Mac as a uPnP server to a streamer (NDX, ND5XS) might be the most tweaky option of them all.  You will get yourself into exactly what you're trying to avoid.

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by Russ:
I want to start with a turnkey solution and work onward and upward from there,



If you really want a turnkey solution get a UnitiServe to serve music (key word here, you can't serve anything else) to any of the Naim network players.

 

That takes care of ripping, serving and storage.  No computers needed.

 

Otherwise get a proper DLNA/UPNP server running on a computer and rip, serve, store and backup there.

 

My personal suggestion?  Get an ASRock mini PC (CoreHT is fine) with Sandy Bridge and HD3000 graphics (~$500-$600) and install JRiver ($50).  Connect directly to Naim DAC or serve to Network Player.  Then you can serve and stream full 1080p, pictures, music etc...  AND you can take it all on the road with you via iOS app JRemote.

 

Good Luck and have fun!

Patrick

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Bart

Poor Russ . . . We're not confusing him (I hope) but rather pointing out just how many options are out here.

 

THE most turn-key approach is the UnitiServe.  IMHO, the second most turn-key approach is a Mac Mini directly into the Naim DAC, playing Apple Lossless files via iTunes.  After that . . . the dust really starts to fly!

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by maze
Originally Posted by Jasonf:

Hi Claus, thanks for that.

 

As you are probably aware, did not fancy the nas route, due to my lack of ability to keep calm under tech solving conditions. As an architect I can handle physical tech problems but when it comes to `1` and `0` I always feel like I am wasting my time on issues that should be resolved for me.

 

Its a little like a client commissioning a house and then having to spend a year doing DIY to get it to where he wanted it to be in the first place, lol.

 

Anyway, with regard to the NS01, very interesting just had a quick look on the Naim site, but I have a radio streaming desire to consider, not sure it deals with that????

 

Thanks Anton.

 

Anyone else with any thoughts they would be welcome. 

 

Cheers.

Like you Jason I chose unitiserve as I did not want to cope with techy problems, i am happy with my unitiserve, ndac and nait xs.I will most likely look to inprove my system with a amp upgrade and maybe a hicap.

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Guido Fawkes
Originally Posted by Bart:

Russ, if you go the Mac route, (1) use the Mac Mini (cheaper than a Macbook, happier running all of the time, no monitor needed, and I think some say much better optical audio out (but I am not positive of this)), and (2) use it connected directly to the NaimDAC via optical or a USB to SPDIF converter as Stu wrote about earlier.  You will greatly frustrate yourself trying to use a Mac as a uPnP server, and totally frustrate your purpose of trying to keep it simple.

 

Of all the options, running a Mac as a uPnP server to a streamer (NDX, ND5XS) might be the most tweaky option of them all.  You will get yourself into exactly what you're trying to avoid.

+

 

Yes as James n does you can stream from a Mac with Playback UPnP server, but it would not be my first choice for that kind of streaming.

 

However, just plugging a Mac Mini in to a Naim DAC or UQ using a Wireworld Supernova 6 optical cable just works ... no tweaking or wizardry needed - the Mac will find the network wirelessly for remote control from and iPad/iPhone. 

 

I wouldn't use USB on a Mac Mini ... especially if you plug in a USB external drive or USB CD drive fror ripping, but on a MacBook it is a different matter - this is what Stu uses and why he uses the hiFace. 

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Russ

Bart: Of course you are confusing me--I was born blonde! and now I have gray hair and sometimes forget why I am standing in front of the toilet.   But OK--I don't fully understand why a Macbook Pro would be more problematic than the mini--(I realized it would be cheaper, but figure Hell, I might be needing a new laptop soon anyway, and have been DYING to wean my wife and myself away from Windows and eternally having to reinstall the OS and everything else (don't ask!)  But as you have said before: Horses for Courses.  So I now accept I should not go the Macbook route and will not trouble my pretty little head about it.

 

I would go the Userve-->Naim Dac--->Pre---->Power, if I were one of those rich Americans our President wants to pay his "fair share".    But although I can't afford it now, I may be able to in the future.  So for now, I am increasingly thinking I will go with the Uniti 2 and speakers, next add either a mini or Userve, then in the future, if I want better performance (and I may not)  use the Uniti 2 as a preamp and add power, followed by tacking on the separate DAC and finally a honking preamp.  Then I would have an antique Uniti 2 to donate to the Smithsonian.  NO, what the hell--make that the British Museum!

 

Bart and Guido: So what I am hearing you say--please correct me if I am wrong--is that I can simply buy a Mini (I assume with minimum configuration of 2 GB memory but an upgraded hard drive (from 500 gig to 750) an exteranal CD drive (I hear the Apples are not so good--so say, a Panasonic).  Now I am up to about 850 USD.  Then I buy the optical cable, but no keyboard, mouse, touchpad, or display required.  So, say 900 USD.

 

I then plug the cable from the Mini into the Uniti 2 and it works?  Do I also connect it to the network via Cat cable? 

 

And I guess another conceptual problem I have with headless commputer is: How do I control ripping?

 

Thanks,

 

Russ

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:

Hi Jason

 

I could have ripped with the Mac Mini by plugging in an external CD drive from Samsung (avoid Apple one like the plague, the add-on SuperDrive is very poor: Apple know it is too so they really should fix it). 

 

All the best, Guy 

News to me. Our Apple external superdrive is flawless so far. (Cue complete meltdown of winky's superdrive with 48 hours )

Posted on: 20 August 2012 by Russ

Winky: That is called "painting the devil on the wall!"  One of the reasons I hate computers is that I am sitting here with an ancient laptop, connecting wirelessly to the internet with blazing speed--while my wife is sitting at  a Dell desktop that ran some 5K USD, connected through Cat5 and sitting...and sitting...and sitting....I have no doubt one of you young hotshots who cut your teeth on these miserable things, could figure it out in a jiffy--I just want to take a sledge hammer to all of them. 

 

(I could still code IBM Assembler Language in my sleep.)

 

Regards,

 

Russ

Posted on: 21 August 2012 by AntonD

Hi Russ

If you are interested in the Uniti2 and already have a MacBook, then you can still stream your iTunes library to it.

I think you said you are happy with ripping cd's to MacBook using iTunes. Select aiff for best quality. Then install a UPnP server software on MacBook. I use Playback ( just google it)

all you do is install the software, go through a few settings, that's it! All devices connected to network via cable, Uniti2 will then see your MacBook iTunes library and off you go.

Not sure of you already thought of this.

Anton

Posted on: 23 August 2012 by realhifi

I don't believe I saw an obvious combo recommended which would be the SuperUniti and UServe.

Two simple boxes, superb interface, awesome sound, plenty of power...done. 

 

It's also less in cost than the ND5, 152, 155 UServe combo and actually closer to the 172, 155, UServe cost.

Posted on: 23 August 2012 by rich46

now the app is fit for purpose,at last .now it wants rolling out to andriod asap