Your Preferred Ninth? Four Seasons?
Posted by: Russ on 30 September 2012
Now that I have decided to move gradually streaming only, I intend to be very careful of my music purchases in general and my hidef downloads in particular. I have decided my first download will be Kleiber's Fifth and Seventh in 24 x 88. Since I already own the CD, it will be a great test of whether my ear is capable of distinguishing between this level and 16 x 44.
After that, my next two acquisitions will be LVB's Ninth and Vivaldi's "Four Seasons". Somehow, I came out of a long-ago divorce owning neither. I will, of course, engage in much listening prior to purchase, but I would like to pose the following questions to the house:
1. What is your favorite recording of Beethoven's Ninth? I am interested in your opinions, not only of the best performance ever recorded--but as a budding audiophile still obsessed with hearing the best possible sounds from my equipment, I would also like your assessment of the production values of the recording(s).
2. Same question for the Vivaldi's Four Seasons Concertos. I am leaning toward Linn's 24 x 192 Avison Ensemble download, just to get the feel of that level of SQ and whether, again, I am capable of discerning the difference. Also, having listened to the trailers on their site, I like their rendition, but I would be very interested in your opinions.
3. I know about the folks at Linn Music, but is it acceptable on this forum to ask members' opinions about the integrity and product value of other specific download providers?
Thanks,
Russ
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by winkyincanada
Our Beethoven symphonies are Immerseel
Bought them on the recommendation of this forum. Very happy with them, too.
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by winkyincanada
Our Four Seaons are from Hogwood and the Academy of Ancient Music.
We enjoy these, too.
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by DrMark
Hogwood and the AAM is always a good choice. I have enjoyed this one:
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by DrMark
And for the Beethoven:
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by Russ
Winky: Thanks very much. If you can, would you break down your opinion of the Immerseel and Hogwood albums respectively as to your enjoyment of a) the performance and b) the sound quality?
DrMark: Funny. I said I did not have the Vivaldi at present--but when I saw those five fellows really seeming to yuk it up during the photo session for the album art, it jarred my memory--that I had seen it back in one of our strorage units (we are temporarily living in an apartment about the size of an old fashioned outhouse). So tomorrow I will go fetch and play it. And yes, Von Karajan may know a thing or two about Ludwig. I will listen to these and Winky's recommendations--and any others that pop up, on a popular listening site. Thanks!
Russ
Posted on: 30 September 2012 by EJS
The big band string quartet version of the Vivaldi looks intriguing. Do these fellows share the movements between them?
EJ
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by Russ:
Winky: Thanks very much. If you can, would you break down your opinion of the Immerseel and Hogwood albums respectively as to your enjoyment of a) the performance and b) the sound quality?
I'm perhaps not really the guy to do this. I don't know enough about what I'm listening too, really. Having said that, we go to the VSO quite often. Each of these records passes the test of being a reasonable facsimile of the live instruments (to my ears).
The Immerseel is well balanced and rich sounding, capturing the harmonics of the instruments well.
The Vivaldi can be a bit "sharp" or bright due to the traditional instruments, perhaps. We saw a traditional instrument performance last year and that too was a different sound to mainstream classical music. Still very listenable on our current rig. On a previous set-up it was a little bit "brittle" sounding.
In terms of performance, well they both seem great to me. Each seems well regarded by others.
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by Russ
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by EJS
Some time ago there was a thread on the Beethoven symphonies. It made me dig up the various recordings I have, and - slightly to my surprise - found that Bernstein's Vienna set was a clear favorite. It's not recorded especially well (live, but no audience interaction), and it's firmly in the traditional camp. Modern recordings tend to be lighter and faster, which especially hurts this symphony IMO. However, if you prefer a leaner sound, Immerseel is very good, as is Norrington (another surprise to me).
EJ
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by Wugged Woy
This will blow yer socks off :
Absolutely brilliant................. if a bit unconventional !
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by Wugged Woy
And this is interesting.........
..... and excellently recorded
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by DrMark
Originally Posted by EJS:
The big band string quartet version of the Vivaldi looks intriguing. Do these fellows share the movements between them?
EJ
Each "season" was performed by a different soloist.
Posted on: 01 October 2012 by Russ
I just listened to the CD, dug out of storage for the occasion, with Stern, Zukerman, Mintz, Perlman--with Zubin Mehta--and I don't know if I listened to anything with better sound quality than that whether my old heart could stand it. As my grandfather would have said: "Those boys can fiddle."
Russ
Posted on: 02 October 2012 by Russ
I very much appreciate everyone's suggestions. I tend not to go for boxed sets--although there are exceptions. I am like a majority of folks, I think, in favoring Kleiber's version of the Fifth, and have settled on that as my "definitive" rendition. I have the CD and will be downloading the 24 x 96 in order to do a listening test to see if my ear can hear any difference. I also very much like the DG of Vivaldi, but will also download the Avison group at 24 x 192, again as a test of my ability, or lack thereof, to distinguish any differences in SQ.
I have not been able to find the exact performance by Von Karajan anywhere on Youtube--but I have heard other performances of his there and like them very much. So I will order that CD.
I have to admit that I tend to be taken by the more spectacular--dare I say bombastic performances--at least with respect to symphonic music and piano concerti.
Best regards,
Russ
Posted on: 03 October 2012 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by winkyincanada:
The Vivaldi can be a bit "sharp" or bright due to the traditional instruments, perhaps. We saw a traditional instrument performance last year and that too was a different sound to mainstream classical music. Still very listenable on our current rig. On a previous set-up it was a little bit "brittle" sounding.
In terms of performance, well they both seem great to me. Each seems well regarded by others.
After listening to it a couple of days ago I'll update this to say the Vivaldi sounds absolutely great through the S600s. Well beyond just "listenable".
Posted on: 03 October 2012 by Russ
From what I hear,I wish I had the S600 s!
Posted on: 03 October 2012 by Russ
From what I hear,I wish I had the S600 s!
Posted on: 03 October 2012 by Blueknowz
This is my copy of Beethoven's Ninth on Vinyl The 8Th is not bad ,but the 9th is not one of the best!
Posted on: 14 October 2012 by Joe071
Some people may disagree, but imo these two are the best, both in terms of sound and performance:
Posted on: 14 October 2012 by Russ
Thanks, Joe. I'll try to give a listen to both if I can.
Russ
Posted on: 14 October 2012 by George Fredrik
John Holloway in the Four Seasons, and Otto Klemperer - the best one is live on Testament about 1960/1 - and neither are great recordings as such, but they do represent peaks of artistic achievement in the music concerned, which is more important ...
ATB from George
Posted on: 14 October 2012 by Russ
George: I agree with you wholeheartedly that the quality of the performance is more important than the quality of the recording--one has only to listen to scratchy recordings of Caruso to agree with that proposition. However, I find myself (at the moment--with the first decent system I have had in over a quarter century--indeed the best I have ever owned) wanting to highlight its capabilites with the best combination of performance AND SQ I can find. This will almost certainly wear off fairly soon!
I am a fairly good judge of the quality of piano solos and concertos--and to a lesser extent, violin (although I have to confess to a certain weakness for flourish and bravado over exact interpretation of the composer's wishes (my teacher used to yell over my shoulder: "Exhaust the printed page!". Symphonic and chamber music, I find more difficult to judge in terms of quality of performance. I almost think one has to have done some conducting to judge well what is going on with that.
Best regards,
Russ
Posted on: 14 October 2012 by George Fredrik
Or playing - with or without a conductor ...
But a truly great reading, such as Klemperer's of the Choral, is apparent to any with ears to listen.
The score will confirm for those with eyes to read the music.
Leave this till later, and you will over-come the narrow mono recording of an unprecedented real performance.
ATB from from George
Posted on: 15 October 2012 by Joe071
You're welcome, Russ. Well, if you guys don't mind good old mono with few clicks and pops here and there, make sure you check this one out:
Some of my favorite Beethoven conductors are Kletzki, Kleiber and Fricsay, and, of course, Toscanini, but this is the only Beethoven I've been listening to since I laid my hands on it. Recorded between '42 and '44. Awesome stuff.
Joe
Posted on: 16 October 2012 by patk
This has been a very helpful thread. With all the albums available for these two titles, it is nice to have some suggestions. I have 2 copies of Ninth Symphony that I am not thrilled with, but I am a bit overwhelmed with the choices. These will make the next selection much easier.
Pat