Members AWOL!

Posted by: Dustysox on 08 January 2013

G'day,

 

I've noticed recently a lot of the "ol" crowd seem to have disappeared, or are posting less frequently, eg Dark Bear, Polar Bear, Gale 401 Geoff C and loads more besides.

 

I welcome new members, but I am puzzled by the absence of well respected whose input I very much miss reading about.

 

Evolution? Not sure, but guys...please come back....miss you 

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Cbr600
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Originally Posted by Don Atkinson:

I imigine the frequency with which people post on the forum is more to do with other things in their life (job, holidays etc) than with changing technology. For example, I know I tend to browse here more on Tuesdays and Wednesdays which are my days off.

 

That said, I also imagine that when you've been here a long time, some subjects do get a bit repetitive and you might occasionally give them the miss, resulting in fewer posts.

 

And (on a brighter note for many newcommers) I guess that some of the older menbers have actually popped their cloggs. We don't have an "obituary" column, so I guess we'll never know about them.

 

Cheers

 

Don

 

 

True Don.

 

I don't have regular working hours (I either work when I choose or when deadlines dictate) so my posting tends to be erratic.

 

I tend not to contribute very much to the Streaming forums (streaming doesn't interest me in the slightest), or the Hi Fi ones (I've had the same system for nine years and I'm not in the market for anything new for the foreseeable future due to budget constraints - and those "Shall I get a 202 or 252?" or "DR or not to DR" threads don't hold much interest for me either), but I do like looking at other people's system pics and enjoy reading stuff about turntables.

 

So, mostly Padded Cell, Home Theatre (but mostly for movies or TV shows rather than hardware) and Music Room for me really.

 

Over the past decade the Forum has changed, but isn't better or worse - there used to be some terrible arguments about pointless crap like Mana supports and the like. That said, it would be good to have the likes of Matthew Robinson and Nick Lees back again. Some bemoan an alleged lack of civility these days but AFAICR, the likes of Stallion (remember him?) were not particularly civil.

 

Its always a pleasure looking at your contributions Kevin

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Cbr600:

Its always a pleasure looking at your contributions Kevin

Luv ya Paul

 

xxx

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
 
 Some bemoan an alleged lack of civility these days but AFAICR, the likes of Stallion (remember him?) were not particularly civil.

 

I met him in the flesh and he was a very pleasant, mild mannered person.

 

The "flame-throwing" of 10 years ago was generally done with a touch of tongue-in-cheek and good humour.

 

Cheers

 

Don

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Don Atkinson:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
 
 Some bemoan an alleged lack of civility these days but AFAICR, the likes of Stallion (remember him?) were not particularly civil.

 

I met him in the flesh and he was a very pleasant, mild mannered person.

 

The "flame-throwing" of 10 years ago was generally done with a touch of tongue-in-cheek and good humour.

 

Cheers

 

Don

Such is the nature of the "personalities" people project on internet forums. I occasionally nurture the notion that in the flesh, Parry is a mild-mannered, cuddly sort of chap. Who knows.

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Cbr600
Originally Posted by Don Atkinson:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Some bemoan an alleged lack of civility these days but AFAICR, the likes of Stallion (remember him?) were not particularly civil.

I met him in the flesh and he was a very pleasant, mild mannered person.

The "flame-throwing" of 10 years ago was generally done with a touch of tongue-in-cheek and good humour.

Cheers

Don


Before my time on the forum, but words like "flesh" , "stallion" and "flame throwing" sound like the basis for a good porn movie !
Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Originally Posted by Don Atkinson:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
 
 Some bemoan an alleged lack of civility these days but AFAICR, the likes of Stallion (remember him?) were not particularly civil.

 

I met him in the flesh and he was a very pleasant, mild mannered person.

 

The "flame-throwing" of 10 years ago was generally done with a touch of tongue-in-cheek and good humour.

 

Cheers

 

Don

I occasionally nurture the notion that in the flesh, Parry is a mild-mannered, cuddly sort of chap. Who knows.

Your notion is spot on Kevin, spooky !

 

Cheers

 

Don

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Cbr600:
Before my time on the forum, but words like "flesh" , "stallion" and "flame throwing" sound like the basis for a good porn movie !

Ah, that was the OLD forum, before Hoopless and ruthless moderators.....

 

Cheers

 

Don

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by TomK

Something strange has definitely happened. I was checking for Stu's last post and there's nothing there from him at all. Has there been another falling out?

Posted on: 09 January 2013 by Clay Bingham
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Originally Posted by Don Atkinson:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
 
 

Such is the nature of the "personalities" people project on internet forums. I occasionally nurture the notion that in the flesh, Parry is a mild-mannered, cuddly sort of chap. Who knows.

Kevin

 

There was a picture of Mick on one of the forums years ago and truth be told, mild mannered and cuddly was just how he looked. Many of his posts over the years have also been softer and more thought provoking than I've noticed of late. Nowadays the retired dark side of Mick enjoys getting a rise out of people. Nevertheless, I still can enjoy his occasional bomb throwing posts.

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Derek Wright

If you want a reason for the turnover in contributors take a look at this thread, then cut out all the repeated, quoted comments.The amount of original new comment is a very small percentage of the thread.

 

The old team did not need to be reminded of what had been posted a few inches higher on the screen.

 

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Dustysox

Fair point Derek,

 

However, I do it to  point to who ever I am replying to. 

 

As I have pointed out I welcome new members, new experiences new ideas etc. I just wondered what had happened to members who no longer post who have been on the forum for a long time. I know that I post a lot less on an audio/video forum because my interest in all things 5.1 has reduced considerably.

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Derek Wright

point it to who you are replying to - personal discussion is not the objective of a forum, use email if that is what you need to do.

or use the name  eg

Dustysox  - I disagree with you etc etc -

 

no need to repeat the whole of the post or the previous string of posts

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Cbr600

Derek,

   i understand your position, however i must also support Dustysox, as often members may take some time between visits to the site and it is not always clear when reading a thread "sequentially" who the comment is referring to.

 

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Derek Wright

as if it really matters to the absolute person - the discussions are about  topics that are greater than each person, each response should be directed to  the discussion not the individual

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by GraemeH
Originally Posted by Derek Wright:

as if it really matters to the absolute person - the discussions are about  topics that are greater than each person, each response should be directed to  the discussion not the individual

I agree.....(sorry, couldn't resist). G

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Derek Wright:

as if it really matters to the absolute person - the discussions are about  topics that are greater than each person, each response should be directed to  the discussion not the individual

Sorry, but why?

 

[This is a serious question by the way]

 

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Cbr600
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Originally Posted by Derek Wright:

as if it really matters to the absolute person - the discussions are about  topics that are greater than each person, each response should be directed to  the discussion not the individual

Sorry, but why?

 

[This is a serious question by the way]

 

surely there are valid arguments to state that its both. The topic will be enriched by a wide section of inputs, but individual views should also be considered / challenged / agreed with

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Hook
Originally Posted by Cbr600:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
Originally Posted by Derek Wright:

as if it really matters to the absolute person - the discussions are about  topics that are greater than each person, each response should be directed to  the discussion not the individual

Sorry, but why?

 

[This is a serious question by the way]

 

surely there are valid arguments to state that its both. The topic will be enriched by a wide section of inputs, but individual views should also be considered / challenged / agreed with

 

Whenever I read a post, I do take into account who the poster is.  Over time, I think we learn that most members have their own set of biases, and it is in that context that their posts should be read.

 

However, if one is in disagreement, I think it is more polite to challenge the post rather than the poster. There is no good reason, IMO, for making a debate personal.

 

On the topic Dusty raises in this thread, I too miss many of the members who no longer post (or post only infrequently), but I do find the influx of new members interesting!  Like some others, I have not been posting a lot lately. Not entirely sure why, but on several recent occasions I've composed longish posts only to hit Cancel instead of Submit.  Might have something to do with reaching a nice plateau with my setup, and losing a bit of interest in either promoting or defending the choices I've made.  But I think has even more to do with seeing other, more knowledgeable members, offering up the same opinions I would...only more succinctly!  ;-)

 

ATB.

 

Hook

 

PS - Thank you Dusty for your kind words in another thread -- they were much appreciated!

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Cbr600

Hook,

   i certainly concur with you, it should never be personal.

 

I have noticed a few recent threads that have become personalised and it detracts from the forum (and i am sure the comments were not intended to offend)

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Cbr600:

Hook,

   i certainly concur with you, it should never be personal.

 

I have noticed a few recent threads that have become personalised and it detracts from the forum (and i am sure the comments were not intended to offend)

Hi Paul

 

I can see what you and Derek and Hook are saying but it is in fact actually quite difficult NOT to be personal on an internet forum. We are at all times all personally and individually responsible for what we say, whether it's at home, at work, on the street, in print or on the internet

 

When a member of this forum, for example, spreads calumnies about a whole group of people or a profession, without a scrap of evidence for their assertions, then they need to be held personally accountable. I would expect nothing less myself if I did that sort of thing. If some people think that's "being personal" then so be it. I think too many people attempt to cover their tracks by crying wolf and complaining about "not being personal" or "addressing the thread not the person".

 

Anything that's gratuitously offensive or really personally insulting usually gets pulled anyway so I don't see what the problem is.

 

I guess the point I'm trying to make in a slightly prolix fashion is, we must all take responsibility for what we do or say.

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Kevin-W

Also, if there were no personal spats or if no-one indulged in the odd bit of insult hurling, wouldn't get terribly dull round here?

 

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Cbr600
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

Also, if there were no personal spats or if no-one indulged in the odd bit of insult hurling, wouldn't get terribly dull round here?

 

Agreed kevin

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Hook
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

Also, if there were no personal spats or if no-one indulged in the odd bit of insult hurling, wouldn't get terribly dull round here?

 

 

Well, having just just called Frank Abela a "barnacle bottomed rapscallion" in another thread, it may seem slightly hypocritical for me to argue this point, but yes...

 

...I do think we can have spirited debates without it becoming personal.  It is more satisfying, I feel, to point out the logical flaws in someone else's opinion, than it is to simply call them a worm-riddled bilge swiller for having the thoughts in the first place. The biggest win is actually bringing someone else around to your own way of thinking. That's how you win friends and influence others.  But that can never happen when it becomes personal.

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Cbr600

Just keep your barnacles to yourself !

Posted on: 10 January 2013 by Kevin-W
 
Originally Posted by Hook:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

Also, if there were no personal spats or if no-one indulged in the odd bit of insult hurling, wouldn't get terribly dull round here?

 

 

Well, having just just called Frank Abela a "barnacle bottomed rapscallion" in another thread, it may seem slightly hypocritical for me to argue this point, but yes...

 

...I do think we can have spirited debates without it becoming personal.  It is more satisfying, I feel, to point out the logical flaws in someone else's opinion, than it is to simply call them a worm-riddled bilge swiller for having the thoughts in the first place. The biggest win is actually bringing someone else around to your own way of thinking. That's how you win friends and influence others.  But that can never happen when it becomes personal.

Rapscallion-y Frank's barnacled bottom...

 

That is something I'm not sure I want to know about...

 

Have you ever seen it?