'Supergroups' that Worked.....and those that didn't....?

Posted by: GraemeH on 09 March 2013

Listening to the Travelling Wilburrys today reminded me what a successful union they were.

 

Which other 'Supergroups' made from individual 'Star' performers worked....and which didn't?. G

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by BigH47

Cream, ELP worked.

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by graham55

Blind Faith didn't.

 

Crosby Stills Nash & Young were always better when Neil Young was in the band.

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by Andrew Porter

Most recently I thought that SuperHeavy worked well?

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by Bert Schurink

Transatlantic Worked

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by MDS

Agree with BigH, both ELP and Cream worked.  Blind Faith did not.

 

MDS 

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by graham55

I enjoyed Them Crooked Vultures, and the 2LP set is even better than the CD. 

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by fatcat

I quite liked Oasis.

 

Didn't like the Three Tenors.

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by graham55

Oasis would never qualify, before or since, as a Supergroup,

 

They were shite, though.

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by fatcat
Originally Posted by graham55:

Oasis would never qualify, before or since, as a Supergroup,

 

They were shite, though.

Mary Hopkin is shite. Are you joking. One on the best folk singers Britain has produced. 

Posted on: 09 March 2013 by osprey
Asia - do they count? "Poisonous synthesizers, progressive-scale ambitions, pop melodies. The Eighties at their worst-o-best!".
Posted on: 10 March 2013 by The Strat (Fender)

Cream were great for the most part - Bad Company were great on their first album and live. In terms of the prog end - yawn but i'm minded towards some King Crimson - do they  count?

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by Adam Meredith
Originally Posted by MDS:

...... Cream worked.  Blind Faith did not.

........ and I listen to Blind Faith an awful lot more than Cream.

 

Nowt so queer as folk (The Albion Band)

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by The Strat (Fender)

I agree Adam. Blind Faith were in part where Eric wanted to Cream to end up i.e. Steve Winwood in the band but Steve wasn't inclined to step into the cauldron that was Baker/Bruce!!!

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by Steve J

I think Blind Faith are not as revered as Cream solely for the fact they weren't around for long but their album is superb.

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by FangfossFlyer

As regards Blind Faith I believe Steve was keen to play with Eric and vica versa.

 

it was Ginger who forced himself in as Steve was keen but Eric, how shall I say it, was not so keen.

 

Around this time Jimi Hendrix was playing with Steve and some of his Traffic mates.  

 

Mitch is reported to have said that Jimi wanted Steve in his post Experience band....now that would have been a supergroup!

 

Richard

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by Ron Toolsie

Supergroups that were lesser than the sum of the parts of couse should include:

Asia

The Firm

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by Steve J

Totally agree Ron. Also didn't Stevie Winwood and others from Traffic play some part on Jimi's Electric Ladyland album?

Posted on: 10 March 2013 by FangfossFlyer

Yeah, Steve played Voodo Chile with Jimi on Electric Ladyland with Mitch and Jack Cassidy.

 

i have seen Steve play it on his recent tours a few times and also with Eric.

 

Also Dave Mason and Chris Wood, both of Traffic, are on various Hendrix live albums.

 

Only guy from the 60's Traffic I have not heard play with Hendrix is Jim Capaldi...unless anyone knows different?

 

Richard

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by Ron Toolsie

For a supergroup fail try the G3 (Malsteem, Satriani and Vai) version of Red House. All inflections of the original are lost under a welter of 300 bpm thin toned guitar shred. I have seen people in a redneck bar do better versions. 

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by Salmon Dave
Originally Posted by graham55:

 

Crosby Stills Nash & Young were always better when Neil Young was in the band.

Don't agree. Though Young played with them live from the outset, the first CSN LP is a gem and Deja Vu is half-crap.

 

Manassas was a low-key supergroup and initially quite brilliant.

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by Steve J

I agree with you Dave about the CSN/CSNY studio albums but when they played together live they did gel well, especially on the electric sets. I've always felt the studio albums were largely made up of individual tracks of the individual member that sound very similar to tracks on their solo albums' e.g. 'Helpless' would have sounded right at home on 'After The Gold Rush' etc. Apart from the harmonies they were a group of individuals. I love the music though.

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by Richard Dane
Originally Posted by Salmon Dave:
Originally Posted by graham55:

 

Crosby Stills Nash & Young were always better when Neil Young was in the band.

Don't agree. Though Young played with them live from the outset, the first CSN LP is a gem and Deja Vu is half-crap.

 

Manassas was a low-key supergroup and initially quite brilliant.

 

And yet...  CSN (the album) is another gem. 

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by Wugged Woy
Originally Posted by The Strat (Fender):

 Bad Company were great on their first album and live.

Strat,

 

Didn't you mean to type - "Unlike most Bad Company fans, who feel they were great on their first or maybe second albums, I believe they actually got it right with their brilliant third, Run With............ "

There, now that seems to read MUCH BETTER  

Posted on: 11 March 2013 by osprey
CSN might quite rightly be called a gem but it is a bit bold to call Deja Vu crap (even half).
Posted on: 11 March 2013 by GraemeH
Originally Posted by osprey:
 it is a bit bold to call Deja Vu crap (even half).

I'm sure I read that before somewhere. G