NAS Solution - QNAP ????

Posted by: too old to rock on 09 April 2013

I am looking to update my NAS solution.

Initially the main function will be to backup my HDX and the home network laptops/PC's.

However in the longer term I want a NAS that will be able to stream my music in its own right.

Maybe one day NDS plus NAS will take the place of the HDX. I am looking for reliability/flexibility and speed. In that respect I am considering either QNAP TS-419P 11  OR QNAP TS-412. 

The QNAP's satisfies UPnP duties with built in Twonky.

Any comments in favour or against the QNAP's please.

Also will probably populate with 4 x 2 tb drives - any suggestions there for performance/reliability. 

 

Many Tks Too Old To Rock

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by garyi

How do you mean stream itself?

 

They do that anyhow.

 

If you mean hook it directly to a hifi that won't work, plus they are very noisy.

 

QNAPs are OK.

 

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by too old to rock
Originally Posted by garyi:

How do you mean stream itself?

 

They do that anyhow.

 

If you mean hook it directly to a hifi that won't work, plus they are very noisy.

 

QNAPs are OK.

 

sorry not clear..... for now mainly backup duties but in time will use as remote store for HDX as internal disk becomes full - possibly to serve music to NDS.  Not worried about noise as not in listening room.

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by ameden

Hi

 

2TB drives - would recommend WD Reds, designed for NAS applications...and reasonable VFM

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by PinkHamster

QNAPs are very good and reliable products. I have a 119TS in operation since 3 years without any problems. I also use it as a PC backup and server. But I have disable the preinstalled Twonky and installed Logitech Media Server via a QPCK instead. I will not change anything until it goes belly up. But that will be quite some years from now, I guess. Actually I have never heard any reports of QNAPs dying, nor of any other of the major NAS brands for that matter.

Thumbs up for QNAP!

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by Iver van de Zand

Dear,

 

I have a QNAP 219 for almost 2 years and it appears to be a very reliable and stable NAS. There is sufficient documentation and support via QNAP's website. I also notice that update or firmware are made available in a regular base.

 

also in myfriends network, quite some QNAPs circulate all with positive experiences.

 

Iver

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by intothevoid

I have a TS-409U and a TS-412U (the rack mount versions) and I would have no reservations recommending them. The power supply on the 409 packed up after 5 years continuous use, and QNAP took it back and repaired it for £30 plus shipping and turned it around within a week. Very happy.

 

Also, the forum is very helpful.

 

WD Reds would be my disk of choice if buying today, and QNAP do publish a compatibility list which they keep updated.

 

only downside for me is that I don't think much of TMS (Twonky). When I started using it at first I thought it was ok but there are better servers out there. I'm using Serviio and Asset for different duties at the moment.

 

HTH

 

steve

 

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by DaveBk

I run a TS-459 Pro and it's been rock solid for over a year with 4 1Tb datacentre quality drives in RAID 5 configuration. I dont like Twonky, so I run Asset on a separate Win7 server. 

 

QNAPs are good...

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by too old to rock

Thanks for all replies felt from my research QNAP was good solution nice to have it confirmed.  Also thought WD Red the way to go as basically designed for SOHO NAS situation.  Will prob go for the 419 , whilst faster processor and add memory useful the USB 3.0 connections should provide reasonably fast external backup.

Posted on: 09 April 2013 by garyi

For my money a hp proliant n40l with open media vault, faster and super. And cheaper

Posted on: 12 April 2013 by Tylercoupe
Unless you are going to get rid of the HDX,I would just disable Twonky on the NAS and set up NAS as the file location for your music. I have found my HDX as UPnP server to sound better than other options and better than the using HDX with internal drive which was how my first HDX was configured. I have an HDX SSD and Qnap 559 pro2 in each of my homes. The Qnap units auto replicate so when I rip a new album at one home...it automatically copies the file at the other one. I have 4 Qutes, NDS, ND5xs, dCS Vivaldi stack, ARC Ref DAC all using the HDXs as UPnP server throughout a few different systemsand have been very happy. The Qnaps have been going for over 2 years with no issues
Posted on: 13 April 2013 by too old to rock
Originally Posted by Tylercoupe:
Unless you are going to get rid of the HDX,I would just disable Twonky on the NAS and set up NAS as the file location for your music. I have found my HDX as UPnP server to sound better than other options and better than the using HDX with internal drive which was how my first HDX was configured. I have an HDX SSD and Qnap 559 pro2 in each of my homes. The Qnap units auto replicate so when I rip a new album at one home...it automatically copies the file at the other one. I have 4 Qutes, NDS, ND5xs, dCS Vivaldi stack, ARC Ref DAC all using the HDXs as UPnP server throughout a few different systemsand have been very happy. The Qnaps have been going for over 2 years with no issues

Thanks for this Tylercoupe, I am perhaps trying to look too far into the future with my NAS solution. For now I have a 2TB HDX  on which the music is ripped. Now we have the option to also store downloads on the HDX HD this is serving all the music at present into a 1 room system with Supernait/HiCap DR.

Will later this year expand this to our garden room office either with Uniti 2 or Superuniti.

My forward planning re NAS is trying to give myself maximum option when the HDX disc becomes full which at present rate of expansion would be in around 2 years time.

Option would be to upgrade HDX internal storage as guess by then Naim will have managed to source a reliable HD or larger capacity. Or to investigate converting the HDX to SSD (not sure if this option exists) with NAs becoming the music store (from reliability point of view would not want to trust the internal HD on the HDX in the very long term and use in combination with NAS as remote store as eventually the internal HD will fail)

My other option would be to remove the HDX from the equation and replace with NDS using the NAS as the UPNP server.  Problem is from my research seems Twonky is universally slated on the forum but as the NAS is Linux based you cant install something like Asset onto QNAPS. I want to keep the box count down and don't really want HDX plus PS/NDS.  Probably I'm guilty of overthinking this one and should just consider the QNAP for it backup and media streaming capabilities. In 2/3 years time there may be an even better Naim DAC that I could partner with HDX SSD (upgrade) DAC plus second HiCap DR which would give me as much of an upgrade as NDS would offer( especially as I have no plans to replace the Supernait)

Posted on: 13 April 2013 by Harry

We've been running a 410 for a couple of years. No complaints at all.

Posted on: 13 April 2013 by robert-

WD red hdd..