UPnP Server Recommendation

Posted by: The Meerkat on 29 June 2013

I am pulling my hair out (What's left of it!) with the Twonky UpnP server, that is built into my Qnap NAS. I have just bought the ND5 XS and am running it with my Supernait, I'm quite happy with the sound.

Originally, I had the UnitiServe SSD, and used that as the UPnp server. Yes, I know, why did I get rid? Perhaps I shouldn't have, if I'd known the problems with Twonky...Missing metadata, wrong metadata, track listing all over the place and missing albums!

 

I have read so many threads about Twonky tree change, tags & tagging, but I think one has to know what they're doing, to carry this out correctly, and I'm not very good that kind of thing. Also, and more importantly, I am a Mac user, which totally limits the type of software that I'm able install on my iMac, so I can't have dbpoweramp.

 

I have looked at a few options...A new Asset NAS server, but it's double the price of a Qnap (£450). A small form factor, low power PC with Asset UPnP server installed. The later was a suggestion by Phil Harris (Naim Support) on a previous thread.

 

I am the proud owner of some fantastic Naim HiFi. But the Twonky UpnP server is stopping the ND5 XS from doing it's job.

 

Please can someone suggest a much better alternative to Twonky.

 

Many thanks 

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by SteveH

I suggest you try installing MinimServer on your QNAP.  My experimentations seem to indicate it works well.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by ragman
Originally Posted by SteveH:

I suggest you try installing MinimServer on your QNAP.  My experimentations seem to indicate it works well.

I'm a Fan of not Running the dlna Server ON the NAS.

in this Case the use Of JRiver is Fine.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by RaceTripper

I have a QNAP 219P-II. I gave up on using Twonky. In addition to my ND5 XS I also have a Squeezebox Touch, so I now run the Logitech Media Server with the UPnP plugin on my QNAP. All my files are FLAC and it works great for streaming to both devices.

 

Dean

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by The Meerkat

I was going to put P.S. after my post...

 

The UnitiServe is a great server, as well as a great ripper. All the metadata is spot on! But, retaining it just for it's Server duties is an expensive way of doing it? Unless of course, connecting the UnitiServe to the ND5 XS, would be technically better? It would be down to my ears I guess.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by Jack

If you ripped all your CDs with the US then your files won't have any metadata embedded and you will have a problem with whatever server you use (other than Naim). You need to get the metadata correct within the files to get consistent results. I rip to WAV with dbpoweramp and did have problems with Twonky on my QNAP  but I suspect that was more down to WAV than anything else. I moved to a small laptop configured with Asset and pointing at the QNAP where all the msuic is ripped - has worked a treat for well over a year!

 

Others have reported that Twonky works fine particularly with FLAC files. 

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by Gordon McGlade
Originally Posted by Jack:

 

Others have reported that Twonky works fine particularly with FLAC files. 

Except when browsing by Folder when using FLAC files....track listing is alphabetical and NOT how the artists laid the album out.....not good at all.

 

Gordon

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by RaceTripper
Originally Posted by Gordon McGlade:
Originally Posted by Jack:

 

Others have reported that Twonky works fine particularly with FLAC files. 

Except when browsing by Folder when using FLAC files....track listing is alphabetical and NOT how the artists laid the album out.....not good at all.

 

Gordon

Exactly. Nothing like listening to an opera in alphabetical order. 

 

There is a fix, but it involves hacking the XML configuration files, and if it's running on QNAP that means getting comfortable with enabling ssh, opening a session and using vi to edit the files. I went through that exercise but Twonky is too flakey anyway, so I abandoned it altogether. 

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by DaveBk

I gave Twonky on my QNAP about 5 mins to prove itself and it failed miserably... Never enabled it since that day and moved on to Asset which is hugely superior. 

 

Asset needs a small windows server, but it's very flexible and in my opinion the best uPnP server out there.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by Jasonf
Originally Posted by The Meerkat:

I was going to put P.S. after my post...

 

The UnitiServe is a great server, as well as a great ripper. All the metadata is spot on! But, retaining it just for it's Server duties is an expensive way of doing it? Unless of course, connecting the UnitiServe to the ND5 XS, would be technically better? It would be down to my ears I guess.

Hi Meerkat,

 

Yes, the U-Serve is a simple server solution that works, I use an HDD with my ND5, although only WiFi connected at the moment. In a year it has been faultless and the proprietary Naim software is also faultless in serving up the WAV files that were ripped on it.

 

With regard to the cost, yes it's more expensive than other solutions, but you know that it will work and that it is robust and has a very good tech service from Naim. My attitude is that one requires the best server solution for ones music one that is reliable and tuned to provide the best possible sq with your streamer and with a five year warranty and tech support for the duration of the units life, you are also guaranteed a certain peace of mind.

 

If your files were originally ripped on the U-Serve, maybe its worth considering it again.

 

For me, it is worth every penny...so far

 

Jason.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by The Meerkat

Wow, some really good replies to my post. Thank you

 

Jack...Yes I did rip all of the CDs with the Unitiserve, but I also have about 12 albums in Hi Res FLAC. If I am going to have the same problem, irrelevant of what server I purchase, then it would be a total waste of money. The Asset idea on another computer sounds good, but means it has to be left on. I don't think Asset would work if the computer was switched off, or even in sleep mode? With regards to Twonky and FLAC, I downloaded some Hi Res FLAC files yesterday, and Twonky would only display them in alphabetical order!  Not the proper track listing.

 

Gordon...You're right, only alphabetically.

 

Race Tripper...Yes, far too flakey

 

Davebk...Asset sounds like one of the best...apart from the Naim one

 

Jasonf...Yes, with me personally the Naim server is faultless. Right now, I have disabled the Twonky server on the Qnap, and using the server via the Unitiserve. It displays the metadata 100% correctly!! And as you say, 5 years guarantee & back up, which includes this great forum! Perhaps it's time to withdraw my for sale advert!

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by PhilP

Another vote for MinimServer.  Excellent in terms of features and functionality and the user guide is very good. It took me less than 15 mins to be up and running on a ReadyNAS Duo V2 and so far I' ve had no problems at all.

 

Total cost for 2x1tb NAS plus free (donation) s/w was £166.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by pcstockton

JRiver.  There is no better.

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by RaceTripper
Originally Posted by pcstockton:

JRiver.  There is no better.

Doesn't run on NAS does it?

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by T38.45

+1 for MinimServer- I love folder browsing!

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by RaceTripper:
Originally Posted by pcstockton:

JRiver.  There is no better.

Doesn't run on NAS does it?

No it does not.

 

going off of the OP's option of "A small form factor, low power PC with Asset UPnP server installed. The later was a suggestion by Phil Harris (Naim Support) on a previous thread."

Posted on: 29 June 2013 by ragman

Think there are two Good reasons Not to Run the upnp Server Software directly on the NAS

1. It is Not the Sense of a NAS to Run a Lot of other Software than the NAS Software Itself

so If you want the Data Storage. (Doesn't mean you shouldn't do backup's)

2. There is no dlna Server Software Running on a NAS that is competitiv to e.g. JRiver. Especially for tagging

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by RaceTripper
Originally Posted by ragman:

Think there are two Good reasons Not to Run the upnp Server Software directly on the NAS

1. It is Not the Sense of a NAS to Run a Lot of other Software than the NAS Software Itself

so If you want the Data Storage. (Doesn't mean you shouldn't do backup's)

2. There is no dlna Server Software Running on a NAS that is competitiv to e.g. JRiver. Especially for tagging

Who says it's not the sense of an NAS to run software? I disagree. The NAS runs on Linux. There's no reason not to run software on it, if you have the processor and memory to support what you want to do. In my case, I bought an NAS to offload all streaming duties (service and storage) away from my desktop computer, which I use for other things. It runs LMS just fine.

 

I tried JRiver for Mac a couple months ago. What a disaster. I has a very, very, very long way to go before it resembles a proper, usable Mac app. I wonder if they will even bother to make it a real OS X application It didn't look like it.

 

For tagging I use Metadatics, which works just fine for me so far.

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by The Meerkat

The fact is, I think I have really stuffed up! I have just bought the ND5 XS, with the intention of selling my UnitiServe SSD. The reason being, all my CDs have now been ripped and stored on my Qnap NAS. The ND5 XS is meant to have a better DAC than my Supernait, (Not as good of course, as the nDAC) it also has Internet radio.

I simply thought that I could use the Twonky UPnP server on my Qnap NAS, to replace the UPnP server of the UnitiServe SSD. How wrong I was!! The metadata is all over the place, unlike the server on the UnitiServe, which is 100% fantastic !

 

I can't remember which thread it was on, but someone suggested that the UnitiServe rips CDs in such a way, that there is not a single UPnP server that will read the WAV files correctly, and present the metadata like Naim does...True or false?

 

Surely I can't pair my UnitiServe with the ND5 XS just because of the UnitiServe's server?

 

I have just parted with £1975 for the ND5XS, please tell me that there is a rescue plan...

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by Simon-in-Suffolk

+1 for Asset; I have found it the best out there including Unitiserve, albeit Asset does require you to sort a mini windows server. Asset is not open source.

MiniDLNA is not bad, albeit simple menu structures..  I run mine on a Raspberry Pi nano server for mp3 and other lossy files.. So I don't 'pollute' my quality files database running on Asset. MiniDLNA is open source so you can make your own mods if you are that way inclined...(albeit the source code contains quite a mixture of styles)

 

Minimserver is not bad, but AFAIK the author has not agreed which form of wav metadata to support yet.. And it's not open source.

 

Simon

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by RaceTripper
Originally Posted by The Meerkat:

The fact is, I think I have really stuffed up! I have just bought the ND5 XS, with the intention of selling my UnitiServe SSD. The reason being, all my CDs have now been ripped and stored on my Qnap NAS. The ND5 XS is meant to have a better DAC than my Supernait, (Not as good of course, as the nDAC) it also has Internet radio.

I simply thought that I could use the Twonky UPnP server on my Qnap NAS, to replace the UPnP server of the UnitiServe SSD. How wrong I was!! The metadata is all over the place, unlike the server on the UnitiServe, which is 100% fantastic !

 

I can't remember which thread it was on, but someone suggested that the UnitiServe rips CDs in such a way, that there is not a single UPnP server that will read the WAV files correctly, and present the metadata like Naim does...True or false?

 

Surely I can't pair my UnitiServe with the ND5 XS just because of the UnitiServe's server?

 

I have just parted with £1975 for the ND5XS, please tell me that there is a rescue plan...

 

I feel your pain. Personally, I think getting the whole Naim streaming thing working with my ND5 XS has been 10x more painful, frustrating and aggravating than the whole rest of my system combined.

 

If I were doing it all over again, I would just get another Squeezebox Touch with a nice DAC and call it a day. The SBT is easy-peasy and has everything I use the ND5 XS for. Ten minutes of setup and it's ready to go. Very non-fussy.

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by Jack

You are correct, you have a problem if you are expecting a non-Naim server to be able to read he metadata for the files you have ripped. You can of course edit those files and add the metadata required which will allow non-Naim servers to serve up the files correctly. This could be a big task if you have a large collection ripped.

 

How about keeping the US and returning/exchanging the ND5XS for the nDAC?

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by ragman
Originally Posted by RaceTripper:
Originally Posted by ragman:

Think there are two Good reasons Not to Run the upnp Server Software directly on the NAS

1. It is Not the Sense of a NAS to Run a Lot of other Software than the NAS Software Itself

so If you want the Data Storage. (Doesn't mean you shouldn't do backup's)

2. There is no dlna Server Software Running on a NAS that is competitiv to e.g. JRiver. Especially for tagging

Who says it's not the sense of an NAS to run software? I disagree. The NAS runs on Linux. There's no reason not to run software on it, if you have the processor and memory to support what you want to do. In my case, I bought an NAS to offload all streaming duties (service and storage) away from my desktop computer, which I use for other things. It runs LMS just fine.

 

I tried JRiver for Mac a couple months ago. What a disaster. I has a very, very, very long way to go before it resembles a proper, usable Mac app. I wonder if they will even bother to make it a real OS X application It didn't look like it.

 

For tagging I use Metadatics, which works just fine for me so far.

Every Software has the potential to make the system less stable and could be a "door" for attaks.

 

Didn't know the JRiver Mac Version, Just tested the Win Version.

The possibility to creat different upnp server with this software, filter and full degree of freedom to create you one meta files (such as opus Number for classical) is top.

 No doubt that tagging classical music is ofter a mess.

 

Anysuggestions from you side to a upnp server for different NAS Systems?

E.g. freenas, unRaid ...?

 

Or maybe Raspery Pi?

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by Jumping Jack

I use Logitech Media Server on my nas (synology ds212+), rip cd's with dbpoweramp and use mp3tag to fix any faulty tags...Works like a charm to me.

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by The Meerkat

Jack...

 

You have confirmed my worse nightmare! Your suggestion of returning the ND5 XS and getting a DAC is a good idea. However, I have had the unit for 5 days now, so it would be considered 2nd hand. I had no idea that any other server, other than a Naim server, would be unable to read the ripped WAV files. Perhaps that should be explained better, to a novice like me.

 

I don't have a problem re ripping all my CDs, but I am a Mac user, getting JRiver or dbpoweramp to work flawlessly on a Mac is a nightmare. 

 

On Friday, I downloaded a HiRes album from Linn, in FLAC format. The sound was amazing, but the stupid Twonky server put the tracks in alphabetical order, not the proper track list! So not only can't it read the Unitiserve rips, it can't read FLAC downloads either.

Posted on: 30 June 2013 by Jasonf
Originally Posted by Jack:

You are correct, you have a problem if you are expecting a non-Naim server to be able to read he metadata for the files you have ripped. You can of course edit those files and add the metadata required which will allow non-Naim servers to serve up the files correctly. This could be a big task if you have a large collection ripped.

 

How about keeping the US and returning/exchanging the ND5XS for the nDAC?

It seems the less faffing with trying to get different server hardware/software to talk to each other in a sensible manner the better.


At this point Meerkat, I would go with Jack's suggestion, clean and simple.

 

Jason