Good net-work player?
Posted by: hifinerdwannabe on 03 February 2011
I need a good net-work player source or one to fit either with the naim dac or am considering the new Naim NDX network player. However I would need a net-work player with a remote control where you can also see the songs at the control since I will not always face the network player when I listen through ear phones. Is there an option of a remote with a touch screen or similar from where you can see and monitor the songs? If not, is there a good alternative of music server or one that I might be able to combine with the naim dac, or is there an app for iPhone for instance that you can monitor the NDX from?
Has anyone compared the NDX with its internal DAC to the Naim DAC? Is the Naim DAC much better? Right now I have a Squeeze box classic but I would guess that the NDX will sound much better than the SB + Naim DAC – Anyone has experience in this?
The net-work player will go together with an XS and Neat Motive SE2 speakers. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Sorry about the many questions - hope they will make sense
Best wishes,
Peter
there's the Squeezebox Touch with a good touch screen display, and the Olive Media streamer. They have very different prices, though.
I have heard the NDX a few times, first streaming via CAT cable from an HDX, then streaming from a UnitiServe. For what I can tell of the sound of a media player, it appeared to work very well.
M.
realhifi,
perhaps I meant to sound different, my remark is partly unintentional.. :-) The first time I heard the NDX was at the TopAudio in Milano, where it streamed from an HDX. Now, since the HDX is a complete machine that can be connected to an amp with a HiLine, thus constituting a hi-end source, I thought that the inclusion of the NDX - via CAT cable, something which I still need time to get accustomed to - was meant to show its capacity not to sound worse than the HDX, that is to be a hi-end product. I'd say that the NDX is meant to be the best media player available; only, I hadn't the chance to compare it to the bare HDX. When I hear it in a friend's store, in Merate, not far from where I live, it streams from a UnitiServe into 282/250/HC/Ovators 400; I can only say that to my ears, familiar with CDX2/202/200 - upwards, it sounded like excellent Naim gear usually sounds.
Max
Now, when used as standalone source (analog out), I don't expect the SB Touch to be close to the NDX...
However, it would be interesting to see how SB touch + nDAC performs versus the NDX...to be tested!
As Max sais, the Transporter is definitely a top-notch streamer, both as transport (dig out) or as standalone (analog out). Unfortunately is out of production...
Are there any other options out there of transporters that don't cost as much as e.g. the transporter - that could be a good fit the the n-dac?
Time ago, I tested the SB touch against the Tranporter, both connected to the NDAC in a 282-250 system...the Transporter was still better, but the Touch was not modded yet, and it was connected to the DAC with a cheap optical cable (while the transporter with a DC1). I'd do the test again, but anyhow, for the price the Touch offers a very decent digital signal and a very nice user interface. Highly recommended, IMO.
Best wishes,
Peter
I for one don't really understand the logic of spending a lot on a streaming device that includes a DAC (like the transporter or NDX) and then spending a bunch more on a DAC that's just a little better. Seems like splitting the functions...streaming files to a digital output and a DAC is a better approach. Or go with a combination like the NDX, transporter, Linn DS, and be done with it.
I guess I also don't understand why you would use something like a CD5XS as a simple transport feeding an external DAC. Surely you can get good transport for much less than a mid level Naim cd player.
Or am I missing something?
Must say that the modded SB touch seems an interesting and cheap canditate too. I just don't get it how it works with the touch screen - it doesn't seem as if you can you carry it around as a remote controll to to sit in you couch and use the touch screen from there except for with the remote. But then what's the point with a touch screen if you have to walk to your stereo rack every thime you want to change song through the touch screen?
- the basic remote provided (if you are close enough to see the screen)
- the Controller, a logitech remote with screen, similar to a classic ipod in term of functioning
- an iphone/ipod touch
You will need the very basic remote that comes with the SB Touch, or, if you cannot see what is on the screen from your preferred listening position, use either an iPhone/iTouch/ipad(?) (with iPeng on it) or another remote with a screen on it (the Duet controller or another such device).
If you use a remote with a screen, it means that you will be able to turn off the Touchscreen entirely and harvest the improved SQ that comes with it. This according to conventional wisdom on the subject.
I agree that Naim should release something like an NDX without the Dac so that people who have invested in a quality (Naim) Dac will be able to use the streaming functionality of the NDX. But it may turn out that the NDX will be so good that the need for an external DAC is nil ...
Best wishes,
Peter
Alright, Matpip just beat me to it ...
They have completely different production/marketing infrastructure. These are two different businesses.
Naim will hardly go for SB Touch type devices. Audiophile systems is an essentially small-scale business where every element is granted with fanatical care. The price "per box" is high but the quality is way above the stock products.
Asking Naim to produce cheap digital streamers is the same as asking Ferary to produce something similar to VW Golf in red finish.
quote:Asking Naim to produce cheap digital streamers is the same as asking Ferary to produce something similar to VW Golf in red finish.
It doesn't have to be a cheap streamer, but just a streamer without a DAC or amp (and preferably with SAMBA connectivity ) for the nDAC owners.
-
aleg
Both do what you ask for.
If you can forget about built-in DACs then Transporter is the reference quality streamer.
I've tested it against UnityServe both through nDAC and sonic-wise they were absolutely identical.
I'd love to see Bryston GUI and operational comfort in live -- could be a good upgrade to my Transporter.
On the other hand with iPeng on iPhone/iPad Logitech range is very difficult to beat.
Thank you for your suggestions.
I see this Bryston being recommended regularly but it is extremely limited in function.
According to the Bryston factsheets it has only one function
Even though I don't like superfluous features, this is a bit to meager for me, it needs to be a network player at least.quote:"The Bryston BDP-1’s single function is to play high-resolution digital music files from any USB storage device"
-
aleg
It can be configured in various ways, and you may add one analogue input (so it may double as a pre-amp):
netPlayer + cdPlayer + DAC (w. dsp)
netPlayer + DAC (w. dsp)
cdPlayer + DAC (w. dsp)
DAC (w. dsp)
I wonder if any of our German members will have had a chance to listen to one of these?
Best wishes,
Peter
Would you say that the Logitech's interface through iPhone is better than Naim's interface through the app n-Stream? Is it a huge sq difference between the n-dac and transporter?