World Trade Center Building 7 - controlled demolition
Posted by: CFMF on 03 June 2014
This report confirms that WTC Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, contrary to the US government's official claim that it was brought down by fire...
BBM
Well I'm back again after a brief holiday, and I've got an interesting article for you folks about nanothermite found in 4 dust samples collected on, or shortly after 9/11/2001. It makes for some good reading while sipping your tea...
Enjoy
Yawn. A million tonne building collapses following a fire and thermite residue is found - hold the front page.
I would be astonished if evidence of thermite was not found.
Good for you Lionel. You can go back to sleep now.
Yawn ...
For you , George, the situation is the opposite. You need to wake up! Obviously, Lionel gets it, but you don't seem to be able.
I just am grateful to live in the UK rather than the USA. There are many caricatures of primitive countries where crazy things happen, and political conspiracies abound, possibly correctly. Sometimes I think the USA demonstrates that it is among the most primitive nations on Earth, even after more than two hundred years of freeing itself from the sane and moderating influence of colonisation by the UK.
I believe the USA would be a better place if it were a province of that ever so nice country, Canada.
ATB from George
For you , George, the situation is the opposite. You need to wake up! Obviously, Lionel gets it, but you don't seem to be able.
If you think I was agreeing with yet another controlled demolition fantasy, you do not get me at all.
Well I'm back again after a brief holiday, and...
please go back on vacation to Disneyland ASAP, there's a Goofy outfit needs filling If you are interested.
The "willyloman.wordpress.co let's write some fiction" website is the best you can come up with. LMAO!
What a joke. Try again...
Dear CFMF,
Who done it?
G
I think you know it, but you won't let yourself believe it...
Have you ever heard of the Downing Street Memo?
The Downing Street Memo :: What is it?
Now, there's a big hint for you.
You're a pretty bright fellow, so put the rest together for yourself. While you're at it, you should also educate yourself on the Cheney Energy Task Force, Peak Oil, and Iraqi oil reserves.
I just am grateful to live in the UK rather than the USA. There are many caricatures of primitive countries where crazy things happen, and political conspiracies abound, possibly correctly.
Are you saying that conspiracy theories are not popular in the UK? So nobody over there reads the Mirror, The Sun, or the Daily Star?
Sometimes I think the USA demonstrates that it is among the most primitive nations on Earth, even after more than two hundred years of freeing itself from the sane and moderating influence of colonisation by the UK.
Really? No doubt we have our fair share of primitives. In fact, many of them came here on the Mayflower.
Funny, but I was under the impression that George III suffered from recurrent, and eventually permanent, mental illness!
I believe the USA would be a better place if it were a province of that ever so nice country, Canada.
Yes, Canada is very nice country, and I have a few Canadian friends. I wonder if any of them are neighbors of CFMF? Come to think of it, why is CFMF -- a resident of Canada -- so interested in 9/11 conspiracy theories? And why, if his avatar is CFMF, does he sign his posts with BBM?? Is he a US ex-pat, on the run from the CIA? Could we have ourselves a conspiracy theory within a conspiracy theory?
ATB from George
One of your most unusual posts yet George! But it made me smile, so please keep up the good work!
ATB.
Hook
G
I think you know it, but you won't let yourself believe it...
Have you ever heard of the Downing Street Memo?
Now, there's a big hint for you.
You're a pretty bright fellow, so put the rest together for yourself.
Dear CFMF,
I really do have no idea at all!
Wildly guessing I'd suppose that it might be a Secret Security agency such as the KGB, CIA or Mosad.
But if they demolished the WTC 7, then something went wrong, because they got the wrong building!
And somehow I doubt if the aeroplane high-jackers themselves were agents of any Secret Security Agency! Or would ever co-operate with any such to help increase the possibility of an anti-Islamic atmosphere in the USA.
The whole thing just does not ring true.
Dear Hook,
Mine was a strange post in reply to a strange poster. I do have my doubts about the USA, which would certainly have progressed better under British rule for at least one more century. After all the UK abolished slavery long before the USA thought it might be a good idea!
I do tend to avoid the boulevard press in the UK as it is full of tripe!
ATB from George
G
Read the link and educate yourself man!
Stop playing dumb...
I have to say that the crux of the issue of a cover up comes down to who might have done it, why and how?
I still have no idea who did it, I still have no idea how it could be achieved without someone [or many people], noticing. And I have no idea why it would be done.
Add to that the wrong building seems to have been demolished and I am left wondering whatever is being suggested especially concerning motive.
I remain astonished at acts of terrorism in general - horrifying and pointless as the initial aeroplane attacks seem to have been - but it is easy to see the USA and the UK as natural subjects for religious extremists who resent the position of these countries as significant World influences. I suspect that both countries are even more likely to be significant targets since the invasion of Iraq in the Second Iraq War instigated by George Bush the Younger [or those who were the power behind the throne] and ably backed up by Tony Blair in the UK. There is a very good reason why many in the UK would recognise Tony B-liar as being the same man, Tony Blair. He utters an un-ending stream of untruths!
If the truth is really sinister then the truth will not emerge in my lifetime in any way that is proven.
ATB from George
Dear Hook,
Mine was a strange post in reply to a strange poster. I do have my doubts about the USA, which would certainly have progressed better under British rule for at least one more century. After all the UK abolished slavery long before the USA thought it might be a good idea!
I do tend to avoid the boulevard press in the UK as it is full of tripe!
ATB from George
Hi George -
The British Slave Trade Act of 1807 made it illegal for British ships to carry slaves between Africa, the West Indies and America. In addition, ship owners were unable to purchase insurance on vessels carrying slaves. But slavery in the West Indies continued until 1838, when a British compensation scheme of £20m was paid by parliament to slave owners. Of course, the former slaves got nothing.
From 1807 until the start of the American Civil War, Britain maintained its dominant textile industry by importing 80% of their cotton from the southern slave states of America.
Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, and by the time the Civil War ended in 1865, 750,000 Americans had died to free the slaves and preserve the Union. Technically speaking, Britain remained neutral during the war. But recall it was a British shipyard, John Laird and Sons, that built two warships for the Confederacy, including the CSS Alabama.
My point is that while yes, Britain did effectively end slavery 25 years before the US did, your country still continued to blatantly profit from trade with the US slave states. In view of this, I don't think it is possible for you to take the moral high ground with regards to the history of slavery.
Recall also that, in the 100+ years prior to abolition in 1807, it was primarily British ships that brought African slaves to the new world...in the millions.
ATB.
Hook
Shouldn't call it slavery any more. It's 'controlled demolition of liberty'. And actually the whole thing was an elaborate plot. By the French*.
There are many websites to prove this, you only need to search.
*probably.
Buildings don't collapse in on themselves due to fire.
Well they do, actually.
Don,
I am very serious. What are your professional credentials, Don? Are you qualified to debate this issue with professionals from a variety of engineering disciplines?
If you are qualified, then that's one thing, and you are entitled to a professional opinion. If not, then...
BBM
Kindly list your professional engineering qualifications.
I have none, but I do possess common sense - much like Don and most other people here. I also vaguely familiar with explosives.
What I do take comfort in, though, is that there are many, many professionals who also are skeptical of the so called "official" 911 story. One group that I like to follow regarding this matter is the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Here's a link to there website, and keep in mind that these dudes are very serious...
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
So, make of what you will, and all that...
Peace
BBM
They have been comprehensively rubbished, debunked and discredited.
https://www.metabunk.org/threa...ion-hypothesis.1727/
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/...eory_a_decade_later/
etc.
AS has been said, this issue was raised and destroyed a year or two ago,.
I studied Electrical Engineering at SAIT and graduated with a 3.93 GPA.
The point I am trying to make is that there are many professional engineers, from a wide variety of disciplines, who question the official story. Doesn't that raise an eyebrow for you?
BBM
I studied Electrical Engineering at SAIT and graduated with a 3.93 GPA.
The point I am trying to make is that there are many professional engineers, from a wide variety of disciplines, who question the official story. Doesn't that raise an eyebrow for you?
BBM
No.
Last may, the whole WTC conspiracy theory was comprehensively nuked. I posted a huge number of detailed rebuttals, including over 90 referenced sources.
The response of the conspiracists was to resort to ad hom, which is of course the last resort of those who realise they've lost the argument.
https://forums.naimaudio.com/to...-just-rubbish?page=1
I can't believe that there is still a large group of intelligent , educated people out there who seriously believe that the destruction of WTC was some vast conspiracy by the US government ??? It's an insult to the memory the poor souls who perished in that horrible attack on 9/11, perpetrated by religious terrorist thugs who want to destroy our free society and bring modern society back to the dark ages. All of these ridiculous, conspiracy theories do is empower extremist lunatics and theocratic despots , who thrive in this internet age of paranoia , misinformation, violent propaganda and lies that infects the mind of usually rational thinkers. These ridiculous, dangerous theories so readily available at our fingertips , perpetuate the growing paranoia , irrational thought and tabloid mentality within an ever increasingly gullible , often educated ,mainstream western society who passively accept and believe every ounce of BS they read on the internet. Not long ago I had a conversation with a very well educated female lawyer from Arizona who informed me with great conviction and hostility that Obama was really a Muslim who was secretly planning on converting all of America in too Islam ????Just an example of the nonsense available on the internet that more and more once rational, well educated people are willing to accept as the truth. Disturbing.
Ain't that the truth?
All you need do is take a look at Dolly Parton, if you don't believe in a conspiracy of some sorts. I tell you, them Druids are turning in their graves. I wonder if she found the Grail?
Yep, they are all out in their droves.
According to the 'press', Dolly has recieved the biggest crowds at Glasto...and they are all conspiracy theorists.
Jason.