Where has the NDX into Hugo thread gone? (PostScript)

Posted by: Simon-in-Suffolk on 20 June 2014

Richard, you locked the other thread so I couldn't respond to you there.. I am just taking this opportunity to say thanks for the update and confirming the thread wasn't withdrawn because of the extensive discussion of a non Naim product.

Simon

 

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by Kemills1

Oh, I agree with you about itunes/mac. I've tried to embrace new technology in the form of NAS drives, networks, streamers apps etc. But my system consists of a streamer, dac, integrated amp and speakers. And the dac is one box too many.

As for the Hugo not having a place in a main system, perhaps your dealer friend would be more comfortable if the Hugo was in a bigger box. ☺

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by PhilP
Originally Posted by Kemills1:

 

As for the Hugo not having a place in a main system, perhaps your dealer friend would be more comfortable if the Hugo was in a bigger box. ☺

For 'bigger' read 'a lot more expensive'

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by PhilP
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:
Originally Posted by PhilP

Amusingly my dealer friend says that Hugos make great headphone amps but they don't have a place in main systems...

 

 

Luckily my dealer sells 500 Series systems, NDSs and Hugo's (quite a lot of them apparently) - and they definitely appreciate what the Hugo offers to many lovers of recorded music - but isn't it great to have a choice?

Yes! and the best system I've heard recently had a CD555 as the source.

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by Steve J
Originally Posted by dayjay:
Originally Posted by PhilP:

Yes but iTunes/Mac/Audirvana (which has a very poor user interface in my opinion)/NAS is not always that simple...

 

Amusingly my dealer friend who may conceivably be same one as Steve J's () says that Hugos make great headphone amps but they don't have a place in main Hi-Fi systems... 

He needs his bumps feeling then in my view 

Not the same dealer. The iTunes will be dumped soon for the new Audirvana when Yosemite is released but I've had no problems with iTunes. For hi res files I drag them to the desk top and play directly through AV. Works a treat. No software issues unlike the streamers used by some of you guys, and no network issues either.  Each to their own.

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by garyi

These threads are like wak-a-mole

 

Haha

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by PhilP
Originally Posted by garyi:

These threads are like wak-a-mole

 

Haha

 

 

I was playing that game with my son just this morning There's an amusing variation on Southwold pier called 'whack a banker'. 

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by PhilP
Originally Posted by Steve J:
... iTunes will be dumped soon for the new Audirvana when Yosemite is released but I've had no problems with iTunes. For hi res files I drag them to the desk top and play directly through AV. Works a treat. No software issues unlike the streamers used by some of you guys, and no network issues either.  Each to their own.

 

I agree that Audirvana 2.0 looks promising but there were plenty of bugs in the initial release and I will wait until at least the 2.1 release before I try it. Actually, I'm waiting to see what spec the new Mac Mini will have -it's rumoured to be launched this month - before deciding whether to go that way rather than continuing with a streamer.

 

I've been lucky in that I have really had no issues with my network even when streaming hi-res files via wi-fi.  

 

Posted on: 14 October 2014 by Jan-Erik Nordoen
Originally Posted by Kemills1:

It does beg the question, what's the point of professional reviews?  

 

The reviewer gets to spend far more time with a component than is allowed by a dealer's loan, unless you have a very accommodating dealer. This is an advantage because the reviewer can listen from a wider range of mental states, and - hopefully - find some consistencies. In most cases, he will also have been exposed to a wider range of products than the consumer.

 

It seems clear to me now, that the rest of the system has a major influence on the perceived performance of a piece of equipment under review independent of any personal preference/bias a reviewer may have. 

 

Which is why the reviewer must always state what the associated equipment was. We all have personal preferences and biases, and the diligent reviewer will purposely expose himself to components that he may have disregarded, or may have been biased against, and confront these biases. Case in point, I was expecting very little from the Creek 50CD CD player section, figuring that it was merely a *convenience* option. As it turned out, I couldn't stop listening to CDs on this machine (and I'm a streaming convert). In some ways I preferred it to the UnitiServe feeding the 50CD's DAC section.

 

Either way, we've both found something that works for us and at the end of the day, that's what counts...

 

Exactly.

 

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by Steve J
Originally Posted by PhilP:
Originally Posted by Steve J:
... iTunes will be dumped soon for the new Audirvana when Yosemite is released but I've had no problems with iTunes. For hi res files I drag them to the desk top and play directly through AV. Works a treat. No software issues unlike the streamers used by some of you guys, and no network issues either.  Each to their own.

 

I agree that Audirvana 2.0 looks promising but there were plenty of bugs in the initial release and I will wait until at least the 2.1 release before I try it. Actually, I'm waiting to see what spec the new Mac Mini will have -it's rumoured to be launched this month - before deciding whether to go that way rather than continuing with a streamer.

 

I've been lucky in that I have really had no issues with my network even when streaming hi-res files via wi-fi.  

 

Apparently it was designed around Yosemite which is why I'm waiting. 

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by hungryhalibut

Slap a Spice Girl was always my favourite of this genre. Sadly no longer available.

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by james n

You could be Mac 'n' Dac again Allen 

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by phosphocreatine
Originally Posted by AllenB:

Dealers aside, any real world experience of the Hugo up against (or with) the NDS?

 

Ohh and Dusty, I ask out of pure curiosity, and with no axe to grind on any apps 

 

(P.S. I would do the comparison myself, but where I live, I would have to buy a Hugo!!!)

Hi AllenB !

 

Just a little consideration: you have a wonderful and very expensive all Naim system that can only be dreamt of by many forumers. In this system your source is worth about 10k Euros excluding the PSU: Do you really think that a device that cost a fraction of this price is able to be as good as your NDS ? Because if this is the case, Naim is really fooling all his costumers ! This doesn't necessary mean that high prices is equal to high quality, but I think that a rule of "good sense" (when we speak about reputable companies) would imply to confront products in almost a comparable price range.

 

Best regards

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by Steve J

Technology move fast in the computer world. The Hugo will be superseded at some stage soon and be considered old technology in the same way that a lot of us feel Naim's DAC technology has dropped behind now. So, comparing kit of differing value can save you a lot of money when something like the Hugo comes along. Hopefully Naim will respond and develop a super DAC to keep everyone on here happy.

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by phosphocreatine
Originally Posted by Mr Frog:

I'm using ND5XS through an active ATC system and was thinking of either adding the dedicated external PSU (XP5XS) or Naim nDAC to upgrade the sound performance.

 

However, the Chord Hugo appears to be the most obvious choice at the moment and may sound much better than adding the external PSU or the nDAC - which probably needs an external PSU to sound at its best and with a premium cost outlay.

 

All things considered, perhaps the Hugo (albeit I need to demo one and hear for myself) is the most cost effective solution to upgrade the sound to a higher level in my system.

 

I welcome any thoughts on the Hugo v's external PSU from any current Hugo users?

Hi Frog !

after upgrading my system with better speakers, I demoded the Hugo against the XP5 XS PSU for my ND5 XS and I had no doubts: Hugo was more detailed but the bass authority and the air that added the PSU to my Naim streamer brought me to discard the dac you mentioned.

 

Best regards

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by phosphocreatine
Originally Posted by Steve J:

Technology move fast in the computer world. The Hugo will be superseded at some stage soon and be considered old technology in the same way that a lot of us feel Naim's DAC technology has dropped behind now. So, comparing kit of differing value can save you a lot of money when something like the Hugo comes along. Hopefully Naim will respond and develop a super DAC to keep everyone on here happy.

Technology doesn't necessary mean a better sq ! A hi-fi device is not like a PC where a quicker chip is game changing. Achieving a good, warm and not annoying sound is an equilibrium of many components that depends only in minimal part of how advanced the dac chip is. I believe that this rule can apply also in a "digital" music world.

I could be with you if you are speaking of confronting different technologies: the classical example is the CD vs. music stored in lossless files: a 15k priced CD player can have a worser sq than a 1k priced streamer because the CD has a mechanical spinning system that affects sq.

In the case of the NDS and the Hugo we are speaking about the same technology base.

 

Take care

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by George J

Well I guess the DAC V1 is not today's bleeding edge! But I still love mine, and would commend anyone wanting a USB and SPIDF DAC to audition it. I am sure it is just as good as the day it came out nearly two years ago! In other words, just right.

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by phosphocreatine

+1 George !

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by George J

I will add that neither my MAC Mini nor the V1 has missed a beat in the whole time. 

 

Okay my BT Homehub 3 was a bit flaky, but my new HH 5 with optical BB has been 100 per cent for two months, so that iTunes Radio is now such that I can be certain of no fault during a nice concert on Hires Radio Three for example.

 

But on iTunes music [AIFF at CD standard] files this is a simple to use and bug-free way to enjoy Hard Disc stored music, and it has no apparent flaw for my ears even after this nearly two years. An ace model that simply does what it says on the as well as or even better than any digital device I know even including superb CD players. 

 

It has no analogue inputs, but I last used an analogue source three years ago, and not looking back with rose tinted glassed, though the Mono Leak Troughline I had for Radio was really fine. But, this is better, especially since the Broadband upgrade.

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by dayjay

As long as you have something that works for you what does it matter what else is available and what others think? If it does the job for you its all good. I'm happy with my Hugo which I think is a bargain and a real step up for me but I'm sure I'd be just as happy with other options if I'd bought them first. Its all good if it lets you enjoy the music, enjoy

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by George J

Dear Dayjay,

 

I had the unmissable chance to have a good listen to some of my music with NDS, 552, S800s driven actively with three amps!

 

I returned home and my modest arrangement had not been ruined by that! Of course it was in a much larger space, and was perhaps a little more detailed, but nothing major.

 

Sometimes we are lucky to really find our replay sweet-spot in the cost versus performance of things!

 

Then we get lazy and stop hunting for something to remove a niggle.

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by phosphocreatine

I fully agree with you dayjay. I have sometimes the impression that some people cling to a device seeing it as the solution of all the problems of the world and forget the "big picture". I wouldn't be surprised if somebody at some point is going to sustain that Hugo, connected to the espresso machine, is able to enhance also the quality of his coffee

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by hungryhalibut
So you're saying that it doesn't?
Posted on: 15 October 2014 by George J

I find my V1 enhances Taylor's Rich Italian ground coffee!

 

Prove me wrong!

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by dayjay
Originally Posted by phosphocreatine:

I fully agree with you dayjay. I have sometimes the impression that some people cling to a device seeing it as the solution of all the problems of the world and forget the "big picture". I wouldn't be surprised if somebody at some point is going to sustain that Hugo, connected to the espresso machine, is able to enhance also the quality of his coffee

To be fair I have noticed a profound improvement in my coffee since I got the Hugo 

Posted on: 15 October 2014 by dayjay
Originally Posted by George J:

Dear Dayjay,

 

I had the unmissable chance to have a good listen to some of my music with NDS, 552, S800s driven actively with three amps!

 

I returned home and my modest arrangement had not been ruined by that! Of course it was in a much larger space, and was perhaps a little more detailed, but nothing major.

 

Sometimes we are lucky to really find our replay sweet-spot in the cost versus performance of things!

 

Then we get lazy and stop hunting for something to remove a niggle.

 

ATB from George

I guess that's what its all about George