Do the rich deserve to get ripped off because they are rich?
Posted by: rodwsmith on 30 August 2014
A 'new' wine (Champagne) has entered the market. Or is trying to.
The London-based 'brand' (which in itself tells much) has been touting itself to all and sundry at the Monaco Yacht Show (a reasonable idea for placement given what they are doing, but it does expose that some of the claims on their website are merely aspirations) and I was asked for my opinion on it by three different people, so I did some digging.
I blogged about it here: http://www.rivierawineacademy.com/blog.php
In essence, it's a €30 wine in an 'octane-fuelled' Carbon Fibre bottle, for €595.
Fine.
But what they are claiming on their website is that is is a really good wine (well, they could hardly claim otherwise), and in the process exposing just a pile of ill-informed marketing nonsense, including a very unfortunate mis-spelling.
Maybe anyone who ends up buying this deserves all they get. But I find it genuinely sad that people who fall for this kind of nonsense may then - justifiably - come to the conclusion that all expensive Marques are similarly just style (or not) over substance.
Krug, DP, Salon, Cristal et al are expensive because they have proved themselves over many years in terms of quality and style, and because they are the respective producers' best wines.
They come in fancy packaging because they are expensive, not the other way around.
I'm sure there is a hi-fi parallel here, or indeed with a lot of prestigious, premium products.