Reply referred to the Administrator?
Posted by: The Meerkat on 27 December 2014
Hi everyone...Not sure what forum this should be on. If it's wrong, I'm sure Richard will move it. 
I have several posts running at the moment, on the various Naim Forums. Last night, I replied back to someone on the 'Streaming Audio' forum, only to receive a mesage back from the Administrators, indicating that my message was being checked before being published. Not sure why this was? There was nothing in the short reply that broke any forum rules. I later received an email from Naim, telling me the reply had now been published.
Can anyone enlighten me please?
Thanks
Posted on: 27 December 2014 by hungryhalibut
There are certain words, generally referring to alternative power supplies, which trigger a referral to the naughty stair, while Richard decides if your bottom needs smacking. One learns these words, and how to refer to things tangentially, so as to avoid said chair.
Posted on: 27 December 2014 by ewemon
Happens to me a fair amount even when I am not posting anything that should trigger it. Frustrates the hell out of me.
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Chris Dolan
It's just happened to me on another Padded Cell topic - I'm struggling to understand why based on the words used.
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Christopher_M
To be fair, many do find the word 'Arch*r' offensive, even if copied and pasted.
C.
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Sloop John B
Joe C0cker
Scun7horpe
are 2 my posts have fallen foul with.
SJB
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Chris Dolan
To be fair, many do find the word 'Arch*r' offensive, even if copied and pasted
Especially it would seem when used in conjunction with Jeffrey
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Chris Dolan
My post today in the What book are you reading right now? thread recently appeared from its referral but without the relevant cover picture showing.
Surprisingly I could edit it - so I tried to replace the picture - but it's gone off to Admin again 
It is a triller but I did not think that it was partciularly subversive 
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Christopher_M
Could it be that the gateway software recognises the word C h i l d (of the author's surname) in the cover image?
C.
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by winkyincanada
Why would the word "child" be an issue?
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Chris Dolan
Chris - that was a post from last week. I have finished that one.
I have had an email saying the post today was approved but the cover photo of "I Am Pilgrim" was not there. Perhaps a copyright issue??
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Christopher_M
Posted on: 28 December 2014 by Richard Dane
Images (and their URLs) sometimes get caught out in the filters. Note that any image link that I can't clearly see, I bin as a matter of policy.
Posted on: 02 January 2015 by joerand
And what the hell happened to my Taylor Swift topic?
Vanished into the ether.
Can I at least post a brilliant pic of her in lederhosen?
.jpg)
