Err what happend to the DSD firmware updates for ND* range?
Posted by: feeling_zen on 01 June 2015
Wasn't this supposedly in beta in early April (with good results at Naim according to one thread) with an intended release of mid May?
Does anyone have any more recent insight on this?
Fair enough - but if we are talking software development on top of the current hardware platforms for the most part in this thread - then surely that is different? Is not the risk here concerns about whether, justified or not, not being able to execute through hardware limitations etc ?
Perhaps it is this that causes uncertainty and frustration that we see posted by several forum members. If I am honest I think I tend to fall in this camp as well.
Simon
Was just about to reply but Simon got in first. No one would expect Naim to disclose what they are developing hardware wise.
We are talking about adding functionality to existing firmware/software. Especially when others in the market place already have this functionality implemented. So far i have not read any response to explain this
Was just about to reply but Simon got in first. No one would expect Naim to disclose what they are developing hardware wise.
We are talking about adding functionality to existing firmware/software. Especially when others in the market place already have this functionality implemented. So far i have not read any response to explain this
Hi,
As I have said may many times on here, Naim Company policy is that no-one from Naim is to discuss anything that is being worked on, developed, planned etc. until such time as an official announcement is made by our PR & Marketing department ...
This may be frustrating to you and may seem archaic or over zealous but it is there to be a definitive and very clear rule that all Naim employees must adhere to. Anyone that breaks that rule does so at their own risk and without the permission of Naim and would be in breach of contract.
I will give out as much information as I can but I do have to remain within that rule as does anyone else.
Phil
Fair enough - but if we are talking software development on top of the current hardware platforms for the most part in this thread - then surely that is different? Is not the risk here concerns about whether, justified or not, not being able to execute through hardware limitations etc ?
Perhaps it is this that causes uncertainty and frustration that we see posted by several forum members. If I am honest I think I tend to fall in this camp as well.
Simon
I don't disagree with a road map of software developments, indeed I've raised in in the many other threads on this subject but announcing hardware development would be just daft.
Was just about to reply but Simon got in first. No one would expect Naim to disclose what they are developing hardware wise.
We are talking about adding functionality to existing firmware/software. Especially when others in the market place already have this functionality implemented. So far i have not read any response to explain this
Hi,
As I have said may many times on here, Naim Company policy is that no-one from Naim is to discuss anything that is being worked on, developed, planned etc. until such time as an official announcement is made by our PR & Marketing department ...
This may be frustrating to you and may seem archaic or over zealous but it is there to be a definitive and very clear rule that all Naim employees must adhere to. Anyone that breaks that rule does so at their own risk and without the permission of Naim and would be in breach of contract.
I will give out as much information as I can but I do have to remain within that rule as does anyone else.
Phil
Hi Phil
Appreciate your response and fully understand 100% why you yourself cannot supply us information. I'm in no way having a dig at you.
But Naim must see that many of us are feeling this frustration, and are struggling to understand this stance. If Naim are worried about getting egg on their face if they fail to implement something or miss a deadline then that is fair enough.
I am just trying to find a rational reason
Graeme
Just out of interest I have downloaded and tried the 'kinsky' software from linn.
Is this the actual software they use for their kit, or is it an opensource thing a ma bob?
Just out of interest I have downloaded and tried the 'kinsky' software from linn.
Is this the actual software they use for their kit, or is it an opensource thing a ma bob?
Don't know wether it open source, but it's an older controller, Linn's latest is Kazoo that I use
I believe its open source as it could be used to control the Auralic Aries i had on loan
I got a new (to me) streamer last weekend which came with pre-spotify firmware on it. I'd like to update it, but dont want to do that only to find that the new firmware drops the next day and I have to do it all over again.
A bit less involved than others' points, but mildly frustrating nonetheless.
Interestingly, on thinking about the way this thread has gone, there seems to have been some confusion between implementation of changes to the on-line streaming functionality (changes to the front-end streaming processor code) and changes to support DSD (changes to both the front-end streaming and SHARC processor code).
Given that the SHARC is in the real-time audio stream (and the front end isn't) I would be very surprised if the two functions are implemented in the same processor (Phil are you able to confirm this?). I'm also aware that there is absolutely no way that Naim are near the capacity limit in the SHARC (the 'smallest' one currently made has 0.5Mbit RAM and 1Mbit EEROM on chip (N.B. that's Mbit not Mbyte).
I don't know what the front end (Streaming board) processor is, and thus I have no idea of it's capacity or capability or the difficulty of it's programming model. (Phil, are your permitted to enlighten us?)
I would also say that after some of the unexpected issues arising in the last release, then if I were involved in this release I'd implement more thorough testing, and delay it's release if other unexpected things occurred. These test cycles can often take a lot of time. The reason for the delay could well be one of quality assurance, and I personally don't mind that.
Right now, the staff concerned will be putting themselves under a lot of pressure to get it right, and get it out there; they will hate these uncertainties and delays as much as we do (been there, done that).
Cheers HH, will do.
It would be nice if this forum had a little less sanctimony. There is a clouded area between support of existing products and development of new products. Roadmaps can fall in either camp, but I doubt whether anyone is asking for Naim to divulge *COMMERCIAL CONFIDENTIALITY*, although when it suits, they do not seem to have a problem announcing a product 6 months or more before you can actually get your hands on it. Racking up pre-orders seems to be the name of the game, creating a level of anticipation. Many companies do this.
What bothers me is maybe more in the arena of support for existing products, especially in the distributed audio area. Many argue that you buy a product knowing it's capability, of course, that's a given isn't it How many here would totally decline their streamer being brought up to the capabilities of similar products already offering those features, even if they didn't use it / them. A huge pat on the back all round and collectively on Naim's back, we all congratulate ourselves on that being one of the reasons we buy Naim. What a company! British as well! Yayy! (oops, sorry .. americanism creeping in).
Naim make great shakes on supporting all (or most) of their products for years and years. Again a major reason why people buy Naim. And generally they do a great job on their hardware, particularly amps and power supplies. We won't mention AV, but to me the jury is out on distributed audio. Great leaps were taken in the early days, hardware that embraced the medium without pushing any boundaries too far. You could tell that they were learning along the way, just as we were. A decision somewhere along the lines was made regarding Naim servers, and I worry slightly about Naim streamers now too. Someone has seemed to miss the fact that web services is the next big thing, like it or not, adopt it or not in personal choice terms, it is here to stay in one way or another. The companies that own the media see lifetime revenue, what's not to like from their POV.
Naim have certainly struck me now as a company that makes the software fit the hardware, rather than the other way round. They are getting caught out time and time again now with what appears to be a difficulty to bring new features to their hardware, and one has to question is this software or hardware related or both. Really? Difficulty? Well yes, that can be the only explanation *IMV* for this tardiness.
There may well be *COMMERCIAL* reasons why lossless streaming hasn't arrived onto Naim units, frankly I am not interested, that's *BUSINESS*, their business. What I don't buy is that leaving everybody else to find their place or niche in web streaming, if a company like Qobuz/Spotify/Tidal/Deezer go down, then move to another. That's *BUSINESS*. It should be simple, an agreement and a change of code in the firmware. Or have more than one service available, even better. Unless you have tied yourself up in knots with either software or firmware, or have hardware limitations somewhere? Built to fit the hardware, rather than built to be expansive and available to changes that might need to happen quickly, with hardware ready to accept those changes.
I am not an engineer, so I have no idea really what it takes to introduce DSD and lossless streaming to a unit. All I see is a difficulty to deliver this on my NDS (and by default, all the other streamers except Muso perhaps). I have seen for a while that Naim servers have gone as far as they are prepared to go with them. I do wonder if the current streamer range have hit a similar fate.
And I do get left wondering where has all that joined-up thinking gone
So just to end, and where I started, explain to current server / streamer owners what they have in store for bringing those new features, be it software updates or hardware upgrades, should not take this long (we are talking when the Muso was released here, not just a few weeks). That is more support related to me, not giving away secrets of future products. Leaving it completely open-ended suggests issues to me, that's where things have changed.
Allan, I've always read your posts with interest, although not necessarily agreed with all of them. May I however say that this is to my mind an exceptionally fair, balanced and perceptive posting.
I am also surprised at the degree to which Naim seem reluctant to disclose likely future improvements for existing hardware and software. There does indeed come a point at which this inevitably raises questions in a potential buyers mind about the degree to which a potential (expensive) purchase might be at risk of becoming "forgotten".
In one sense, I've already been caught out on this, having purchased an HDX. I bought mine second-hand 5 years ago and it's run faultlessly ever since despite having ripped 1500 cds and run constantly all that time. In truth, I don't really feel hard done by and I'm happy that had value for it. However, I agree that it does appear that development of the HDX and the server range has long since ground to a halt.
This being so, I'm currently dithering on whether or not to go NDS or Klimax DS and for the 1st time leaning more towards the Linn option. This isn't just the fact that the KDS is one box, etc etc, but the fact that Linn keep moving it forward. This doesn't seem to be the case with the NDS.
Given that the latest greatest thing now appears to the 272, it's difficult not to wonder whether this is in fact where Naim are moving and, as a result, what I should be holding out for is a 572 or some such thing.
It's months. It always is. The year in which a particular month falls may vary too. But you won't end up with something that has been rushed of imposes a compromise on musical performance. That just doesn't happen.
Hi,
Software development on the servers hasn't finished - the last software update for servers was December 2014 adding new lookup providers.
We aren't looking at putting streaming services such as Spotify / Tidal / Qobuz etc. on servers as that is not their intended use - they are CD rippers and UPnP servers. Internet radio was added some time ago to give Internet Radio to NaimNet installations and also to UPnP devices that themselves didn't support Internet Radio.
Phil
It's months. It always is. The year in which a particular month falls may vary too. But you won't end up with something that has been rushed of imposes a compromise on musical performance. That just doesn't happen.
Harry, I'm sorry but i cannot agree with that. If something is released with bugs then its because it has not been properly tested, and in my mind been rushed. I'd also say that for me at least one firmware update compromised the musical performance, as i said for me.
Hi,
Software development on the servers hasn't finished - the last software update for servers was December 2014 adding new lookup providers.
We aren't looking at putting streaming services such as Spotify / Tidal / Qobuz etc. on servers as that is not their intended use - they are CD rippers and UPnP servers. Internet radio was added some time ago to give Internet Radio to NaimNet installations and also to UPnP devices that themselves didn't support Internet Radio.
Phil
Sorry, probably didn't make that very clear - it was the lack of Spotify etc I was referring to - no issues with what has been provided.
They may be servers/rippers, but they are also very good at feeding a DAC. This was, in my understanding (which may very well not have been all it should have been!) one of the original purposes for the HDX, such as when it plus nDAC/555 was Naim's best streaming source. It is this purpose that seems to have fallen by the wayside.
No software company avoids bugs. Not a single one, including the really big boys. Bugs are an annoying but unavoidable fact of life If you believ eotherwise you are naive, misguided or both.
And their have been no compromises to the essential elements of musical performance in my experience, which I gather from your posts is actually more encompassing than your own.. Compromise on your enjoyment of the experience perhaps but not the essentials of the actual SQ.
Fondest regards
Andy
They may be servers/rippers, but they are also very good at feeding a DAC. This was, in my understanding (which may very well not have been all it should have been!) one of the original purposes for the HDX, such as when it plus nDAC/555 was Naim's best streaming source. It is this purpose that seems to have fallen by the wayside.
The HDX was designed to be a Hard Disc player / CD player replacement - not a streaming audio source component ...
The streamers are the streaming audio sources...
Best Regards
Phil
Just when are Naim going to realise that the bakers' dozen sanctimonious 'members'' on thiis forum are actually really really important. It's an absolute disgrace. I demand that their demands are met in full, immediately, if not sooner.
If Naim think that all these sound quality upgrades to existing products, and new products at the very top, bottom and middle are good enough in todays world they are sadly deluded. And don't think that just because these software enhancements are free (and come without advertising on them or surreptitious add-ons) we'll wait any longer. And even though sound quality doesn't really get much better beyond 24/48 doesn't excuse this total lack of regular updates. I want more bits! How can I possibly enjoy my music when there is grass on the other side of the fence and I don't know what colour it is. Better than great is just not good enough. I move that we all descend on Salisbury this weekend and demand our teddys back.
What do you mean they shut at weekends? This is a 24/7 world, Mr Blair told me so. Oh right they could be open weekends and deliver everything immediately if they doubled the price of everything......... Okay then. Salisbury first thing Monday morning and we don't move till we get satisfaction. I have an extra deckchair, thermos and blanket for anyone else joining me.
Then I'm going down to see VW, Sony, Nikon, Juwel, Tag Heuer, John Lewis, Timberland, Marks and Spencer, SpeedyHen, HMV and all the rest of those companies who have taken my money and don't bother giving me so much as a Christmas card.
Oooh that was enjoyable. Now I have plenty of time on my hands I can come on here and have a good laugh at the narcissistic regularly . No that could be unkind. Not their fault they're so far up their own rectums they don't know when they are well off.
All the best
Andy
They may be servers/rippers, but they are also very good at feeding a DAC. This was, in my understanding (which may very well not have been all it should have been!) one of the original purposes for the HDX, such as when it plus nDAC/555 was Naim's best streaming source. It is this purpose that seems to have fallen by the wayside.
The HDX was designed to be a Hard Disc player / CD player replacement - not a streaming audio source component ...
The streamers are the streaming audio sources...
Best Regards
Phil
When I bought my HDX I could have bought the NDX but did not because I wanted the ripper and player in the same box.
At that time the NDX did not feature streaming (non Upnp) sources either. I don't think I accept your analysis Phil.
My Sonos - which pre-dated both - has been actively developed to include these services whereas Naim have decided not to be so generous.
A little bit of trust and customer loyalty has been lost I'm afraid.
Ive done an upgrade . . . followed by upgrading again (to a beta version) . . . one right after the other. Each one takes perhaps 10 minutes at most? Do the upgrade and get in practice is the right advice!
It's months. It always is. The year in which a particular month falls may vary too. But you won't end up with something that has been rushed of imposes a compromise on musical performance. That just doesn't happen.
Harry, I'm sorry but i cannot agree with that. If something is released with bugs then its because it has not been properly tested, and in my mind been rushed. I'd also say that for me at least one firmware update compromised the musical performance, as i said for me.
OK. Perhaps I was being a little generous. Yeah, there's been the odd bug that irritated but didn't stop the music flowing. No streamer update has squashed the music for me. Changed it sure. And not always to my preferred balance. But never to the point that I couldn't enjoy it any more.
What I should have said more succinctly is that Naim don't rush, everything takes longer and they *strive* to get it absolutely right and not compromise the musical performance. If in doubt about if something you'd like is weeks, months or years away, if nothing has been announced or hinted it's probably going to be months or years.
I bought my NDS for what it could do. Not for what it might some day do or didn't do. But we all come from different directions for different reasons, as is our wont.
No software company avoids bugs. Not a single one, including the really big boys. Bugs are an annoying but unavoidable fact of life If you believ eotherwise you are naive, misguided or both.
And their have been no compromises to the essential elements of musical performance in my experience, which I gather from your posts is actually more encompassing than your own.. Compromise on your enjoyment of the experience perhaps but not the essentials of the actual SQ.
Fondest regards
Andy
Thank you Andy for putting me right. There was i thinking i new more about my experiences than yourself. I truly must be Naive. Rest assured i will in future ask you before making any assumptions about experiences I believe i encounter.
Graeme