NDX, NDX+DAC, UQ and ADS2

Posted by: Julian H on 05 April 2011

Yesterday, David [mrclick] and I travelled to that well known Leicester based emporium to have our LP12s looked at. Mine was a minor anaesthetic-free operation of a new Akiva and David’s deck had some much needed open heart surgery. We both took the opportunity to have the new Dynamik [or Dynamo as David calls it] PS upgrade for the Radikal.

 

Anyway, enough of the analogue  stuff.

 

I had arranged with Peter to have a good listen to some of the current streaming kit. So, dutifully, his digital expert in the shop, Phil, had set a nice demo for me. Unfortunately, he is off on his holidays this week so I was keenly attended to by Tom instead, who went through the whole set-up at the shop with me including recommending ideal home networking solutions and showing me how to use various apps on iPAD for remote control.

 

The remit was that I am looking for a streaming source for my study but wanted to check out how far this “new” technology had come for potential main system use in the future. Previously Peter had lent me a Rega DAC at home for a few weeks, streaming from my iMac. As reported in an earlier thread, this combo left me completely cold. I have also been lent the UnitiQute by John [fixedwheel] for a few weeks and I thought that was something special so, there was some definite promise in this new technology for me!

 

In the demo room we were partnering the sources with the Linn Akurate Pre/Power combo [don’t ask the model numbers, I haven’t a clue] and Kudos C30’s.

 

I chose two tracks from the shops ready ripped [FLAC] music “store”, on a RipNAS, Led Zep’s Whole Lotta Love and Goldfrapp, Shiny and Warm, being representative of a large chunk of my listening.

 

First up was the ADS2. I listened to the tracks a few times in full on this to acclimatise myself to the system. At this point in proceedings I was completely struck by the sheer resolution and quality this box was providing. Playing at a far higher level than I could believe at the price [£4.5k?]. Stunning!

 

Next was the NDX+DAC combo [£5.3k inc interconnect?]. The thing that struck me was it sounded like a pukka Naim component. Immediately engaging, really my kind of thing, and pretty much what I had hoped for given my previous positive experiences of the UnitiQute. I was quite surprised about this though because in the past I have been quite vocal about my feelings towards the DAC. The negative about this combo is the completely inferior resolution revealing nature to the main competition, the ADS2 in comparison. As a vinyl head, I couldn’t live with the ADS2 but respect its qualities. I could live [love?] the NDX+DAC combo.

 

The drop in performance when removing the DAC from the NDX is quite marked, moving it even further away from the Linn piece. It all goes a bit soft, undynamic, less well resolved and looses a bit of “swing” in comparison. It’s a shame that Naim do not make a DAC free head unit to partner the DAC, I guess that’s another item thatSalisburyare working on…?

 

Finally was the Cutie. And Cute it is too. Running it as a source in the system, after a few minutes to get used to it, all the good memories came back and I remember why I liked it. It still does the fun factor very well even alongside the more superior components. I guess the difference between the bare NDX and the Qute is similar to the difference between the NDX+DAC and bare NDX.

 

In summary, I will probably end up with a Qute for the study [with my N-Sats] and have gained confidence about having a serious digital source in the future for the main rig. As regards the NDX+DAC vs the Linn ADS2, I would not like to predict what anyone else would choose but I would say, either piece is a super source but with different presentation and neither should be discounted for “brand preference” reasons. Only buy with your ears!

 

Cheers, Julian

 

Ps – Radikal Dynamik…., wow

Posted on: 05 April 2011 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by Julian H:

It’s a shame that Naim do not make a DAC free head unit to partner the DAC,

That would be the UnitiServe (although I would LOVE a UnitiStream, without ripping or serving)

 

Nice write up Julian, thanks.

 

-Patrick

Posted on: 05 April 2011 by Plinko
Why didn't you try the Unitiqute streaming to the dac?
Posted on: 05 April 2011 by Julian H

Hi Plinko

 

Because UQ plus DAC it is not something I would do at home.

 

Cheers

Posted on: 06 April 2011 by Rockingdoc

A very good review. Thanks.

Posted on: 06 April 2011 by Plinko
Originally Posted by Julian H:




       




         class="quotedText">



       



Hi Plinko







Because UQ plus DAC it is not something I would do at home.







Cheers










I thought maybe something you might want to try since one can use it as a streamer only.  You hinted at a dac free partner, which obviously would cost less than a ndx so thought may e UQ would be an option (yes, i know UQ has a dac but it also has ethernet).  Not sure who is going to pay for a $3k+ streamer...i guess there might be a market (who knows) but i couldn't see such a product helping ndx sales.







I read another comment here where dac was positioned as a minor upgrade to the ndx whereas power supplies were indicated as better upgrade.  Lots of diff opinions!







Thanks for the comments on the ndx, ads, and dac.  Does help me because there are no dealers near me who will stock anything.







Posted on: 06 April 2011 by kev 1966

Good write up Mr H

 

 

Posted on: 06 April 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by Julian H:

The negative about this combo is the completely inferior resolution revealing nature to the main competition, the ADS2 in comparison. As a vinyl head, I couldn’t live with the ADS2 but respect its qualities. 

Hi, Julian. I have performed multiple tests of USB->nDAC/XPS against KDS and I could not find a track or a musical moment where KDS was better or worse in resolution. They render the music differently but both suggest the same soundstage and transparency and the same amount of microdetails. I believe both gears went down to the extremely low jitter in digital domain and very high dynamic range in analogue output stage which eventually makes no difference between them in sheer hi-fi terms.

 

I'm surprised you didn't try NDX/nDAC with XPS or 555PS -- which I believe is easily available with Peter -- to see what the the top Naim streaming solution can deliver. The external PS reduces the noise and pronounces the details and takes nDAC in absolutely different league. The high margin of improvement is easily expected given such a moderate size of built-in PS.

Posted on: 06 April 2011 by Julian H
Originally Posted by AMA:
Originally Posted by Julian H:

The negative about this combo is the completely inferior resolution revealing nature to the main competition, the ADS2 in comparison. As a vinyl head, I couldn’t live with the ADS2 but respect its qualities. 

Hi, Julian. I have performed multiple tests of USB->nDAC/XPS against KDS and I could not find a track or a musical moment where KDS was better or worse in resolution. They render the music differently but both suggest the same soundstage and transparency and the same amount of microdetails. I believe both gears went down to the extremely low jitter in digital domain and very high dynamic range in analogue output stage which eventually makes no difference between them in sheer hi-fi terms.

 

I'm surprised you didn't try NDX/nDAC with XPS or 555PS -- which I believe is easily available with Peter -- to see what the the top Naim streaming solution can deliver. The external PS reduces the noise and pronounces the details and takes nDAC in absolutely different league. The high margin of improvement is easily expected given such a moderate size of built-in PS.

I too have heard USB [and Mac/Hiface] into DAC [in a different but very capable active system] and it does sound more akin to the type of sound from the Linn ADS's, I agree. But to me, those DAC fronted combos are pretty much unengaging, no boogie if you know what I mean, just sterile "sound" playback. In fact, I have found with nDAC, all computer / USB sources pretty banal, preferring transport based source instead.

 

Regards power supplies and things, for me, this solution would need to be low box count. I already have 7 boxes just to play records [excluding the record player itself]. If Linn can do ADS2 performance in a single box, I reckon Naim should be able to with their kit. IMO, hifi should be moving to a place where the quality of playback is not restricted by by the amount of rack space one has. I don't want my lounge to look even more like a hifi dealers showroom than it already does.

 

This is the top Linn digital system as far as I know, maybe not my personal goal but only 2 boxes ...

 

that is the future IMO.

Posted on: 07 April 2011 by Rockingdoc

You will only see that kind of minimalism from Naim if they move to digital power supplies throughout. That really would be the end of the world as we know it.

Posted on: 07 April 2011 by AMA

Julian, I have listened for exactly the system you pictured and it was shockingly far from the way I like the music should be rendered. It was very transparent and spacious but at the same time it was slow and relaxed -- you're just getting asleep with it. Smooth jazz is OK, the organ and chamber music, choirs are all OK, female vocals are good as well. So I do understand so many people may like it -- including me when listening a sleepy Linn samplers    But I much prefer the ARC with Kharma doing the same music which was much more bulky and massive comparing to a slim Linn setup.

 

And I (obviously) much prefer my modest LP12/282/HC/250.2/Katana. Katana's ceramic drivers are very stiff and Naim grips over them like a bulldog -- resulting in razor sharp transients across the full frequency range which makes music so much more natural -- as if the orchestra is sitting right in front of me. When I get THAT level of enjoyment I really don't care about the number of boxes on my rack.

 

I know I'm poisoned by Naim. But as long as the other audiophile get trapped into the Naim house sound the multibox concept will justify the price and the inconvenience. And I think that other manufacturers will also move towards external bulky power supplies ready to swipe the high current (like MSB or ASR) and that is the future IMO.

Posted on: 07 April 2011 by Orfeo
Good post Julian. I'd love to have a PoV even with a NDX+ Psu audition but this is quite interesting even BkkB
Posted on: 08 April 2011 by james n

You will only see that kind of minimalism from Naim if they move to digital power supplies throughout. That really would be the end of the world as we know it.

 

Not really - i hope Naim are working on a solution that is more green yet doesn't compromise SQ and doesn't need to be powered continuously without going off song. It's the way the world is going. The simplicity of the Linn system appeals (although its hiding away a number of power amps within the speakers)..A brace of growing green logos, left permanently powered, with the space and cabling requirements just doesn't do it for me now.  

 

Interesting write up Julian. It sounds like Naim have done a good job with the NDX.

 

Cheers

 

James

Posted on: 08 April 2011 by Razor

Being green was fashionable a few years ago. Most people have now moved on.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by totemphile
Originally Posted by Razor:

Being green was fashionable a few years ago. Most people have now moved on.

Are you for real? That really is the most stupidest comment I have heard in a very long time. If anything it is exactly the opposite, the only way we can survive as a species on this planet is to learn how to manage and consume our resources in a sustainable way. The nuclear disaster that has been unfolding at Fukushima in front of the worlds eyes merely underlines one of the pressing issues we are facing, the importance of us moving on to renewable energy forms.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Tog
We can't keep raiding the cookie jar and expect that it will always contain cookies. At least Naim components are built to last - I would like to see a case-less upgrade programme where internals can be upgraded - without changing the casework. Nap 200 to 250 change the parts that matter. Tog
Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Mr Underhill
Originally Posted by totemphile:
Originally Posted by Razor:

Being green was fashionable a few years ago. Most people have now moved on.

Are you for real? That really is the most stupidest comment I have heard in a very long time. If anything it is exactly the opposite, the only way we can survive as a species on this planet is to learn how to manage and consume our resources in a sustainable way. The nuclear disaster that has been unfolding at Fukushima in front of the worlds eyes merely underlines one of the pressing issues we are facing, the importance of us moving on to renewable energy forms.

+1

 

M

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by dk2

+2

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Julian H

Well said Tog

 

Razor

 

You would do well to read this ...

 

 

I love the Naim sound but I believe Linn have stolen the march on Naim in the technology stakes. Sure, the Linn presentation from the ADS2 is not exactly what I am after but when you look at the level it plays at for such a simple solution one has to start asking questions of Naim. Swallowing the upgrade spiel aside, it has nothing going for it for the punter except lots of unsightly boxes, Fraim, electrricity, embodied energy and money.

 

Naim need to invest in the future, NOW.

 

Julian

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by Julian H:

I love the Naim sound but I believe Linn have stolen the march on Naim in the technology stakes. Sure, the Linn presentation from the ADS2 is not exactly what I am after but when you look at the level it plays at for such a simple solution one has to start asking questions of Naim. 

Julian, I wonder why do we focus on this now? Wasn't it the same when people were raving about CD555 against Linn CD12 and the very same words have been used on the both forums?

You say Linn presentation is still far from your liking (as well as mine) -- but isn't it the KEY element for what we pay for? The reference of the "level" it plays does not work for me --- my nDAC/XPS is surely retrieving the same amount of details as KDS and creates the same wide/deep soundstage. So what is this "level" in KDS/ADS which makes Naim ashamed? 

 

I'm much more about music rather than brand-name. If Linn builds a component which betters Naim (in my values) I shall buy it no matter of cost implied (I'm actually using LP12 which IS better than my Naim source). I remember I was soooo disappointed with KDS vs nDAC/XPS demo as I was pre-heated and really captured with KDS concept, simplicity, build quality, size, outfit. I have already imagined it in black finish on the top of my rack. But I'm playing guitar and I'm listening guitar and nDAC/XPS makes it so much better .... Sorry.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Julian H

Why the focus now? Well, I love all the 500 series kit [particularly NAC and NAP] but things move on and having a rack full of boxes is getting less and less appealing to me, for numerous reasons, reinforced by seeing a single Linn box sitting so unnassuming on the next shelf along. Starting another new rack full of boxes for digital is a big definite no no. It has to be a one box solution and I am not even sure where I am going to put that!

 

Have you actually listened to the combination of kit I am comparing on this thread?

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by Julian H:

 

 Have you actually listened to the combination of kit I am comparing on this thread?

No, I have only listened for ADS-1, KDS and nDAC.

I have chimed in only because I saw your frustration on multi-box arrangements of Naim streamers -- which is not a big deal IMHO.

 

Let's get this down to the two-box streamer solution: say NDX+ 555PS.

You may ask a question -- is it possible to get the same quality sound with slim single-box solution?

The answer is: in some sonic departments you can, in others you can not. All musical elements which consume high energy transients will not play natural on small PS -- this is just a physical law. You have to juice energy form the wall outlet, accumulate it and keep it ready to swipe at any moment. That's what external massive PS can do better than Linn Dynamik PS.

And that's exactly what I hear with KDS - spacious, precise, but slow and relaxed.

 

I have Logitech Transporter -- excellent one-slim-box streamer. The sound through the analogue is close to ADS  -- and the same slow and relaxed. Now I use it as a digital streamer into my nDAC/XPS and enjoy the life. Naim DAC is much weightier in this regard. My Troika/Stageline/HiCap is also weightier.

 

So if you want to go for streamers and don't care about sonic character you are a lucky guy -- just go for ADS2. But if you prefer Naim energetic presentation then you better keep up with multi-box arrangement. Possibly wait until NDS+555PS will show up. Looking into the other brands with PRAT will not change the case: Wadia, dCS, Esoteric, MSB, MBL -- they are all bulky multi-box solutions.

 

Meanwhile the science and technology are moving on. Possibly the new nano-technologies will make a breakthrough in energy accumulation so that we shall see mini-capacitors with giant capacity. Then one can really build up a slim PS with high current output. But I'm not going to compromise my daily musical enjoyment while physicists are cooking the new electronics.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Geoff P

One comment:

 

Julian listened through a Linn system. IME inserting an ADS into an otherwise Naim system ( in my case 500/552) does not take the famous Naim PRaT away in the way that posts here comment.

I heard an NDX bare and on an XPS2 ( 282/2250.2 into Ovator S400s). Neither configuration set me alight. Since these are at roughly the same price point as the ADS2 this is a fair comparison.

If you are going to start adding NDACs and 555PS in then you have to compare against the KDS. There I disagree with AMA. A KDS in a NAIM system is a wonderful thing. and will be hard for Naim to beat.

 

regards

Geoff 

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by Julian H

Hi Geoff

 

Hope you are enjoying yourself.

 

Of course, home demo is the only way and I have already had the offer.

 

AMA

 

You may be right, the design of the circuitry does need these power supplies to run optimally. However, if the circuit was re-designed it may not. Its all moot, I only want a one box source solution.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by Julian H:

 I only want a one box source solution.

With this condition I'm afraid KDS (or ADS2) is the only option.

Posted on: 09 April 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by Geoff P:

There I disagree with AMA. A KDS in a NAIM system is a wonderful thing. and will be hard for Naim to beat.

 

regards

Geoff 

Hi, Geoff. Did you try KDS vs nDAC/XPS in A/B session?

 

I did it in Naim system. KDS is softer (which is especially pleasant on the old Red Books) but very relaxed, especially the bass is blurred and lowered comparing to the punchy nDAC/XPS.

 

Am I alone to hear this