New Synology NAS

Posted by: oscarskeeper on 23 September 2015

Morning all

 

I need a new 2-bay NAS and I will get a Synology as I have had one before and liked it.

 

I am however a little confused. Looking at the specs, it seems to me that the 215j has the better spec, but it seems to be a lot cheaper than the 214. They are for use with WD Red drives.

 

Have I missed something (very possible) and can anyone comment on which would be the better bet for use with a NDS? Equally, should I be looking to pay a bit more and get another one (has to be a 2-bay though)?

 

Thanks in advance! 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by hungryhalibut

I still use a 213j and it trundles along happily, serving up music via Minim. Assuming the 215j is simply this year's version of the 213j, it will be fine with the NDS. Install Minim, set it to convert to WAV and you'll be off.  

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Bart

Not sure why you think that 215J has better specs -- the processor in the 214 is faster and more powerful (quad core).  That seems to be the significant difference -- the 214 has much more CPU power.

 

But for serving music the J should be "good enough." 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by David Hendon

The 215J is a nice white colour and while not looking exactly in place in a domestic environment, it doesn't look too out of place. But at the end of the day I bought that because I could get it with two WD Red 3 TB drives already fitted for a reasonably good price.....

 

i'm just using it for backup, so the performance was not a major consideration.

 

best

 

David

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Bart
Originally Posted by David Hendon:

The 215J is a nice white colour and while not looking exactly in place in a domestic environment, it doesn't look too out of place.

Depends on the decor, n'est pas?

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by David Hendon
Originally Posted by Bart:
Originally Posted by David Hendon:

The 215J is a nice white colour and while not looking exactly in place in a domestic environment, it doesn't look too out of place.

Depends on the decor, n'est pas?

That is a fair point I agree.  Just shows my prejudice for things that look clean and bright and non-technical.  Although the flashing blue lights are hard to ignore, they do make a change from the flashing green lights on the Netgear switches all around the house.

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Mike-B
Originally Posted by David Hendon:
Originally Posted by Bart:
Originally Posted by David Hendon:

The 215J is a nice white colour and while not looking exactly in place in a domestic environment, it doesn't look too out of place.

Depends on the decor, n'est pas?

That is a fair point I agree.  Just shows my prejudice for things that look clean and bright and non-technical.  Although the flashing blue lights are hard to ignore, they do make a change from the flashing green lights on the Netgear switches all around the house.

Ahh ... yeh but ....

my 214 is matt black & it has mellow yellow & leaf glade green flashing lights,  but flashing anything is a big NO-NO in my living rooms & it lives in a closed door cabinet.    

 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Bart

Mike, I agree.  In my living room (you Brits say "parlour"), I have no flashing lights and the hi fi rack is all Naim black boxes on Fraim.  This provides a tranquil setting to listen to music, free of flashing lights and whirring hard drives.  I spent a few hundred dollars (you Brits say "quid"   ) running ethernet cable in the walls so that I could re-locate the nas and UnitiServe and switch, etc., to a far-away room.

 

In that far-away room, looks matter much less.  A white nas is fine with me.

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by hungryhalibut

They may have said parlour in 1910, but we say sitting room or living room. Some people also say lounge, but that is a more downmarket term. 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by David Hendon

Well I have my NAS in my study so its white case and blue lights don't intrude on the listening experience in my sitting room. I think my great grandmother may have had a parlour possibly but definitely no digital audio in those days, or even audio come to that!

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Kiwi cat
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

They may have said parlour in 1910, but we say sitting room or living room. Some people also say lounge, but that is a more downmarket term. 

I think that parlours were a room where the dead family members were laid out for viewing in the old days. In the early 20th century they were renamed "living rooms" to decrease the connotation with death. I kid you not.

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by dayjay
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

They may have said parlour in 1910, but we say sitting room or living room. Some people also say lounge, but that is a more downmarket term. 

+1, I do believe my nan had a parlour, it was a second living room with all the posh furniture in that no one ever used. Not a word I've ever heard anyone under the age of 70 use though apart from Ray Parlour who I think was a footballer 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by aht

According to my dictionary, one meaning of "parlor" (parlour) is " a room in a monastery or convent set aside for conversation."  Make sense--derived from French "parler," etc.

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by dayjay
Originally Posted by aht:

According to my dictionary, one meaning of "parlor" (parlour) is " a room in a monastery or convent set aside for conversation."  Make sense--derived from French "parler," etc.

Yes, makes sense, whenever we went into my nan's we used to have a conversation about why she had a parlour

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Mike-B
Originally Posted by Bart:

Mike, I agree.  In my living room (you Brits say "parlour")  .

Living room - room - a singular room to live in - oh how common.

I said living rooms sir,  I have rooms for dinning, withdrawing, study & all manner of social & domestic functions.

In polite circles, parlour is a room for receiving guests, however thanks to the riff raff in the western colonies it carries an innuendo of public houses & places of entertainment  .........  I believe the colonials call them  bordello's   ........... 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by KRM
Originally Posted by dayjay:
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

They may have said parlour in 1910, but we say sitting room or living room. Some people also say lounge, but that is a more downmarket term. 

+1, I do believe my nan had a parlour, it was a second living room with all the posh furniture in that no one ever used. Not a word I've ever heard anyone under the age of 70 use though apart from Ray Parlour who I think was a footballer 

My aunt and uncle had the same thing - a posh room that nobody ever went in. They had a tiny house so it wasn't the best use of space.

 

Ray Parlour was indeed a footballer - ooh ah Ray Parlour!

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by David Hendon

Two peoples separated by a common language, as George Bernard Shaw apparently didn't actually say, but joined by a common Naim maybe....

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by hungryhalibut
Originally Posted by Mike-B:
Originally Posted by Bart:

Mike, I agree.  In my living room (you Brits say "parlour")  .

Living room - room - a singular room to live in - oh how common.

I said living rooms sir,  I have rooms for dinning, withdrawing, study & all manner of social & domestic functions.

In polite circles, parlour is a room for receiving guests, however thanks to the riff raff in the western colonies it carries an innuendo of public houses & places of entertainment  .........  I believe the colonials call them  bordello's   ........... 

I suspect they call them bordellos, but certainly not bordello's, unless they are colonial grocers. 

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by Mike-B
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:
 

I suspect they call them bordellos, but certainly not bordello's, unless they are colonial grocers. 

   

Posted on: 23 September 2015 by hungryhalibut

I thought you'd appreciate that!