Statement statement.
Posted by: BigH47 on 16 October 2015
Finally got to listen to Statement last night 15th at the Brighton Audio T NAIM event.
Usual caveats a Hotel Room, very many people and a restaurant the othe side of a not very sound proof room divider.
Doug, Steve and the guy from Focal struggled to convey their messages to the rear (where we were). You would have thought a mike and amp kit might be included in the travel kit maybe?
Format was Basic?? system 272/250 streamed music from HD into Focal Sopras.
Various substitutions made SL interconnects and DR versions of 250/300/500 were made and finally SL speaker cable on the last system.
Second half was Satement time with NDS 555PSU and the huge Focal Grand something or others, monstrous things size and looks IMO.
Explanations of Focal Sopra's constuction points. Steve Sells short chat about Statement. Then various tracks played.
From my point of view it was an interesting show, no way would this substitute for a real demo. DR versions of 300 and 500 sounded sterile lost the edge boogie or what ever. In film terms sharper picture less colour.
One thing that happens in these sort of rooms is as the system gets better the room gets more active and bass starts to overtake the room. I stood up and moved a little further forward to the side for the second half. It was obvious that Statement was doing some great things , even if most of the music was some sound engineers sound demos. I had heard 3 maybe 4 pieces previously. Slowly building tracks stopped "improvements" made and then the track goes on into the more complicated bits. One piece of Classical I had heard before was included. There was something in the treble area in Statement dem that I didn't like but couldn't put my ears on it.
Any conclusions? In that room withthat music very hard , but SL Din - XLRs did shine and the 500 "old" sounded preferable to the DR'd one. Is Statement worth 3 times a 552/500 that is for any potential purchasers to decide, fortunately not a decision I'll ever have to make, I suspect.
I can only assume that Statement doesn't play rock music, it wouldn't hurt to have some music that more than 4 or 5 people in the room had heard of. If you have lesser know music you are learning the song and not necessarily able to say if its better or you just know it a little bit better.
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by Bart
I attended a demo at my local dealer, and was able to select the music myself. That definitely helped me get an understanding of Statement and all it can do. For me, listening to tracks I've heard many times lets me pick out what's new and what's good and what isn't 
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by The Strat (Fender)
Big H. I'm stunned that you found the 300 DR sterile. I heard it only recently and I thought exactly the opposite.
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by ken c
not sure i would ever reach firm comparative conclusions from a show dem. there have been many occasions where a similar system to mine (at this time) was played and it sounded worse than my equivalent system at home.
on the other hand, i cant be too dismissive about show dems since i recall being extremely impressed by a Nait/Kan/LP12 system at a Heathrow show in late 70's...
but i have never understood why go ahead with such demos when the room is not symphathetic -- i guess its nice to see the folks behind the design -- its quite interesting (and can be vefy fruitful) to chat with naim staff, if the opportunity arises -- and of course meeting fellow naim users and sharing views and records.
when i listened to Statement S1 @ Grahams house, even though his listening room is very different from mine -- somehow i got to appreciate what this pre-amp was doing within a few seconds of the 1st record we played. in other words, seems i didnt need to adjust to the room...
ah well...
enjoy
ken
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by analogmusic
when DR versions of amps were compared like 300 to 300 DR, which speaker cables were on the respective amps
NACA 5 or SL?
Maybe the amps needed more time to warm up?
Mains issue?
Noisy SMPS nearby?
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by FangfossFlyer
" DR versions of 300 and 500 sounded sterile lost the edge boogie or what ever. In film terms sharper picture less colour"
What can I say but.... interesting!
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by Darke Bear
I found Statement demo with the big Focal speakers was hard in the high frequencies to what I prefer - if Statement did that to the system I would not have liked it.
In my system the S1 Pre makes the 552 high frequency performance sound rather poor in comparison. The S1 Pre has a beautiful 'tube-like' high frequency rendition that is in a different league from the 552.
But the Big Focals did not let that through when I herd them - but the smaller Focal were much better, and the most recent Focal models I heard a few weeks ago I would even be able to enjoy, so there seems to be progress with Naim's input to the previous Focal 'sound' from what I heard.
DB.
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by The Strat (Fender)
DB - you were at Ipswich too! I wonder what the Sopra 3 will bring to the party?!
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by Rattlesnaic
The Big Focal Utopias did have a very hard spitty treble which ruined the Statement demo they were a step backwards on the smaller sopras in my view.
I thought the DR versions were clearly better than the old with cleaner bass, lower noise and sweeter treble.
The SL cables seemed to be a bigger upgrade than the power amps though.
Wish we could of had some more normal music rather than the sound effect type stuff
Posted on: 16 October 2015 by Claus-Thoegersen
The focal one of the big models, I heard at Naim in april also ruined the statement demo. Really anoying and hard to understand whyFocal would find the voicing of the speakers to be good that way.
If newer models are voiced differently something good has come out of the Naim Focal cooperation.
Claus
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by Geko
Yep. I thought the big Focals were a step back. I personally would have liked to have heard the Sopras with the Statement. I thought these had loads more character compared to its larger brother, which I thought sounded pretty sterile.
DR's had a wonderful darkness which I think must be attributed to the total absence of any noise floor or distortion - I didn't notice any loss of boogie factor.
I also thought the music selection was really rather good. I've since purchased a couple of the demo'd albums.
My overall conclusion was that the more you spend the more the scale and quality of the sound increases until you reach a reasonable representation of live music. And the Statement definitely gets you the closest.
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by Ravenswood10
Shame they didn't wheel out their own Ovator S800s...now that would have been interesting.
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by J.N.
It is very difficult for Naim to demonstrate the efficacy of their Statement amps at demos. The chosen music and loudspeakers not to individual taste; plus a poor acoustic environment, can easily be big turn-offs.
I am fortunate to have heard the S1 pre-amp in the systems of two friends, and as a 552 owner I really really hate it - because I can't afford one!
The Statement amps are quite wonderful.
John.
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by Edouard
John,
Don't fancy the Statement! Be happy with your LP12/555/552/500/Titan system, it's quite wonderful! 
Amitiés,
Edouard
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by b_lund
DBL, SL2, NBL
those were the days
I feel sorry for Naim staff need to use Focallies, bet they have at least IBL in their wardrope
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by Chris Dolan
… or maybe some Kudos speakers 
Posted on: 17 October 2015 by J.N.
Originally Posted by Edouard:
John,
Don't fancy the Statement! Be happy with your LP12/555/552/500/Titan system, it's quite wonderful! 
Amitiés,
Edouard
Hello Edouard,
Good to hear from you. I am indeed very happy with my system. I hope you and the family are all well and enjoying life.
John.
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by J.N.:
It is very difficult for Naim to demonstrate the efficacy of their Statement amps at demos. The chosen music and loudspeakers not to individual taste; plus a poor acoustic environment, can easily be big turn-offs.
I am fortunate to have heard the S1 pre-amp in the systems of two friends, and as a 552 owner I really really hate it - because I can't afford one!
The Statement amps are quite wonderful.
John.
Your system's not exactly shabby, John 
I've just ordered NAP 300DRs (maybe that should be NAP900 as I need 3?), so that will be an interesting change. Suspect a revisit will be in order...
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by hungryhalibut
If the difference over the 300 is anything like that between the 250DR and the 250.2, you are in for a real treat. Three treats in fact.
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by Chris Dolan
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
I've just ordered NAP 300DRs (maybe that should be NAP900 as I need 3?), so that will be an interesting change. Suspect a revisit will be in order...
Congratulations Graham.
I take they are new NAP300DRs rather than commissioning the upgrade - which I assume also means that the world will be even more awash with NAP300s
Were you not even tempted by one NAP500DR?
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:
If the difference over the 300 is anything like that between the 250DR and the 250.2, you are in for a real treat. Three treats in fact.
Hopefully!
No wonky active system here 
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by Chris Dolan:
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
I've just ordered NAP 300DRs (maybe that should be NAP900 as I need 3?), so that will be an interesting change. Suspect a revisit will be in order...
Congratulations Graham.
I take they are new NAP300DRs rather than commissioning the upgrade - which I assume also means that the world will be even more awash with NAP300s
Were you not even tempted by one NAP500DR?
Chris,
No, I wasn't. I like the speed and presentation that you only get from active systems.
When you hear people talk about comparing a single 500 passive (ignore DR for now) vs. three 300s active I don't think it is an accurate comparison. A 500 will better a 300 but the comparison is really with/without the passive XO in the speakers, which is why I favour 300s without XO to 500 with.
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by J.N.
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
Your system's not exactly shabby, John 
I've just ordered NAP 300DRs (maybe that should be NAP900 as I need 3?), so that will be an interesting change. Suspect a revisit will be in order...
Thanks Graham,
The Super Lumina loom (now pretty much run-in) has put a delicious icing on the cake. You're in for a real treat with three DR 300's.
Best wishes to you and Debbie.
John.
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by BigH47
I would like to re-iterate that I wouldn't buy on the strength of a hotel room dem.
They were just observations of that particular dem.
I am glad that others have said the same about the Huge Focals treble, as we had listened to the New Sopras it would have been good to have heard them on the end of Statement and then change to the big Focals.
Posted on: 18 October 2015 by Name
Hi BigH47,
Having demoed and actually going to the extent of buying and owning a DR power supply, I concluded I could not enjoy the dr effect.
So much so I returned my dr supply and replaced it with the non dr equivalent for the very reasons you described.
Posted on: 19 October 2015 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Frank F:
Other forumites have also expressed the same conclusions to me via e-mail.
It is a pity that Naim do not use their trued and tested loudspeakers at these events and make sure that the events deliver what they expect - or maybe they did??
FF
I think we all know that Naim are no longer masters of their success. The use of Focal speakers has been forced upon them by Focal and the venture capitalists. Whilst this is a pity IMHO, its not a disaster since nobody expects even a half-decent sound at a hifi show in any circumstance.
The good news appears to be that the more recent offerings from Focal are an improvement and, more importantly, a good dealer will be able to provide proper demonstrations with superb speakers from manufacturers other than Focal.