Sn2 + hc dr + ndx vs. N272 + nap200dr

Posted by: Jumping Jack on 28 November 2015

Any advice on what would be better?

 

I currently have a Sn2 with HiCap dr and Ndx but have the opportunity to get a N272 + nap200dr for an interesting price. How would these compare?

I also use a Superline, so I would have to keep the hicap dr to power it if I go for the n272 option.

Speakers are pmc fact.8.

Posted on: 28 November 2015 by hungryhalibut

I have a 272, XPS DR and 250 DR and it's absolutely wonderful. But if I had the system you have there is no way I'd swap, and certainly not for a 272, 200 DR. One system may be a bit better than the other, but neither is overwhelmingly better. If you want to do anything, get an XPS DR for your NDX, otherwise do nothing. 

Posted on: 28 November 2015 by J Saville

I would go for a 282 instead, as you already have an NDX I feel it would be a backward step getting a 272. Particularly as you don't have an XPS, as this PSU turns the 272 into a 'quiet room' by taking the internal transformer out of the loop.

 

The 282 will be better suited to turntable use as well, as it can also power the Superline. And you have a hicap DR, so you could pick up a used 200 non-DR (the DR only really impacts the pre-amp power output on a 200 so you wouldn't be gaining anything having a DR one). 

Posted on: 28 November 2015 by marcusman
Originally Posted by J Saville:

I would go for a 282 instead, as you already have an NDX I feel it would be a backward step getting a 272. Particularly as you don't have an XPS, as this PSU turns the 272 into a 'quiet room' by taking the internal transformer out of the loop.

 

The 282 will be better suited to turntable use as well, as it can also power the Superline. And you have a hicap DR, so you could pick up a used 200 non-DR (the DR only really impacts the pre-amp power output on a 200 so you wouldn't be gaining anything having a DR one). 

Hypothetically, would upgrading from a XS-2+nd5xs+hcdr to a Nap200dr+n272 make more sense?  I'm torn between this combo or the outlined above sn2 combo. 

Posted on: 28 November 2015 by feeling_zen
I would add some other considerations to the mix:

Is box count a factor? Y or N and if Yes, what is that limit?
Where are you planning to go with the system in the future?

As you are using Fact 8, a 200 is not going to do them justice with a speaker that revealing. Just my opinion but if I was looking to balance out a system up to the level of Fact 8, I would be thinking about an XPS on the NDX (or even an NDS), a 282 (but probably a 252) and a 250 (or a 300). That is all a different level of expense I know but ... Fact 8. Why hold them back?
Posted on: 28 November 2015 by Felix H

A very nice system you have there already! You'll probably take HH's advice for now?

 

If going to separates from a Sn2 I'd want the preamp in a "quiet room" and preferably powered with a DR psu, as J Saville suggested. Below 252 I'd also want to keep that hcdr on the SLine, as it is quite a bit better than powering from a 282.

Posted on: 29 November 2015 by Jumping Jack
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

I have a 272, XPS DR and 250 DR and it's absolutely wonderful. But if I had the system you have there is no way I'd swap, and certainly not for a 272, 200 DR. One system may be a bit better than the other, but neither is overwhelmingly better. If you want to do anything, get an XPS DR for your NDX, otherwise do nothing. 

Solid advice HH, and exactly what I suspected.

 

Box count does matter, as I can only accommodate three layers of equipment...

I'm not actively looking to upgrade, since I'm quite satisfied with the sound as it is. So I'l happily stick to what I've got!

 

Thanks to all for your advice,

 

J.J.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on: 29 November 2015 by ChrisSU
I agree, stick with what you've got. If you do decide to upgrade I think J Savile's suggestion of a 282 is a good one.
Posted on: 29 November 2015 by Stefan Vogt

... or rather, in due course, to the 282's successor, which is undoubtedly in the making at naim headquarters...

S.

Posted on: 29 November 2015 by Jumping Jack

No can do, as I only have room for three layers (one of which is preserved for the phono-stage and the other for the digital source, in my case the ndx)...

Posted on: 29 November 2015 by Mayor West

Perhaps an unoriginal response, but have you heard a Chord Hugo or 2Qute? Might be worth adding one to the NDX if space is an issue.

Posted on: 29 November 2015 by GraemeH
Originally Posted by Mayor West:

Perhaps an unoriginal response, but have you heard a Chord Hugo or 2Qute? Might be worth adding one to the NDX if space is an issue.

The Fact 8's would thank you for that. 

 

G

Posted on: 02 December 2015 by catalinmetal
Originally Posted by J Saville:

so you could pick up a used 200 non-DR (the DR only really impacts the pre-amp power output on a 200 so you wouldn't be gaining anything having a DR one). 

WRONG!

have you test this, or you just saying from reading on the net...?

i have tested nonDR 200 vs DR 200 and there is a significant difference, in favour of the DR version. and since it was tested into a 172, the PSU inside was not used so the difference EXISTS at the amp level! please don't post missleading information here on the forum if you had not tried the particular piece!

Posted on: 02 December 2015 by catalinmetal
Originally Posted by feeling_zen:
I would add some other considerations to the mix:

Is box count a factor? Y or N and if Yes, what is that limit?
Where are you planning to go with the system in the future?

As you are using Fact 8, a 200 is not going to do them justice with a speaker that revealing. Just my opinion but if I was looking to balance out a system up to the level of Fact 8, I would be thinking about an XPS on the NDX (or even an NDS), a 282 (but probably a 252) and a 250 (or a 300). That is all a different level of expense I know but ... Fact 8. Why hold them back?

do not disregard the new 200DR as far as driving capabilities would go. i have tested it on really serious speakers, and it seems really ready to drive tricky loads speakers... but of course, a home demo is recommended, nevertheless...

Posted on: 02 December 2015 by catalinmetal
Originally Posted by marcusman:
Originally Posted by J Saville:
 

Hypothetically, would upgrading from a XS-2+nd5xs+hcdr to a Nap200dr+n272 make more sense?  I'm torn between this combo or the outlined above sn2 combo. 

yes, it will be a consistent upgrade. at least that's what i think...

Posted on: 02 December 2015 by marcusman
Originally Posted by catalinmetal:
Originally Posted by marcusman:
Originally Posted by J Saville:
 

Hypothetically, would upgrading from a XS-2+nd5xs+hcdr to a Nap200dr+n272 make more sense?  I'm torn between this combo or the outlined above sn2 combo. 

yes, it will be a consistent upgrade. at least that's what i think...

Thanks Catalinmetal

Posted on: 02 December 2015 by ChrisSU
Originally Posted by catalinmetal:

       
Originally Posted by J Saville:

so you could pick up a used 200 non-DR (the DR only really impacts the pre-amp power output on a 200 so you wouldn't be gaining anything having a DR one). 

WRONG!

have you test this, or you just saying from reading on the net...?

i have tested nonDR 200 vs DR 200 and there is a significant difference, in favour of the DR version. and since it was tested into a 172, the PSU inside was not used so the difference EXISTS at the amp level! please don't post missleading information here on the forum if you had not tried the particular piece!


       
I haven't had the chance to compare the 200DR vs non-DR, but Naim do say on their website that there are other changes to the circuitry in the 200DR. The wording is buried in the product description rather than prominently displayed in the marketing blurb. Then again, you might find the bargain prices on non-DR 200s and 250s irresistable........