DAC-V1 after firmware update, what is happening?

Posted by: SongStream on 04 December 2015

Erm....why does my DAC-V1 sound so different after the firmware update?  It's not all in my head, I am sure it's not.  I thought the update was purely to provide DSD support and a couple of other 'features', and I haven't even tried any DSD since I installed the update yesterday evening, but ever since installing when playing PCM in various bit-depths and sample rates, I am consistently struck by a richer and more organic (sorry, don't know how else to describe it) sound.  Which is great, my Proacs are loving it, giving a more believable and less hi-fi performance.  Not to say my system was bad in this regard before by any means, but it is now different, and luckily I think preferable.  A little smoother at the very top end and more clearly defined particularly in the mid and lower-mid-range.  But I also think the bass is tighter and more agile.  Is this possible, and, well, how?  Any other V1 owners hearing this type of thing?

 

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by Rattlesnaic

Yes it sounds superb and us Beta testers have been enjoying it since early September

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by Brilliant

hearing is believing - but the improvement is stated here with certainty by Naim:

"..Firmware update 4.11.8 (Naim DAC) and 1.16 (DAC-V1) will enable single and double rate DSD playback to existing and new DAC and DAC-V1 owners. This update has required significant optimisation of the core DSP code which has also improved sound quality.."

https://www.naimaudio.com/news...-available-naim-dacs

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by SongStream
Rattlesnaic posted:

Yes it sounds superb and us Beta testers have been enjoying it since early September

Interesting.  Are there release notes for this type of thing?  I can't find anything, and did not realise that firmware updates would directly affect SQ in this way.  I would have been more cautious if I'd known, I was happy with sound quality, just curious to try a DSD file as I've never heard one.  It's worked out OK, I seem to be preferring the sound post update, but that need not necessarily be the case. The difference the update has made to PCM playback was completely unexpected.

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by Jude2012
SongStream posted:
Rattlesnaic posted:

Yes it sounds superb and us Beta testers have been enjoying it since early September

Interesting.  Are there release notes for this type of thing?  I can't find anything, and did not realise that firmware updates would directly affect SQ in this way.  I would have been more cautious if I'd known, I was happy with sound quality, just curious to try a DSD file as I've never heard one.  It's worked out OK, I seem to be preferring the sound post update, but that need not necessarily be the case. The difference the update has made to PCM playback was completely unexpected.

As per Brilliant's post

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by SongStream
Brilliant posted:

hearing is believing - but the improvement is stated here with certainty by Naim:

"..Firmware update 4.11.8 (Naim DAC) and 1.16 (DAC-V1) will enable single and double rate DSD playback to existing and new DAC and DAC-V1 owners. This update has required significant optimisation of the core DSP code which has also improved sound quality.."

https://www.naimaudio.com/news...-available-naim-dacs

Ha, that's the bit of info I'd missed then.  Thanks for that, clearly been looking in the wrong places for info.  In terms of the sound quality, their statement is not wrong.  Well done, Naim.  It sounds great.  

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by Brilliant
Jude2012 posted:
SongStream posted:
Rattlesnaic posted:

Yes it sounds superb and us Beta testers have been enjoying it since early September

Interesting.  Are there release notes for this type of thing?  I can't find anything, and did not realise that firmware updates would directly affect SQ in this way.  I would have been more cautious if I'd known, I was happy with sound quality, just curious to try a DSD file as I've never heard one.  It's worked out OK, I seem to be preferring the sound post update, but that need not necessarily be the case. The difference the update has made to PCM playback was completely unexpected.

As per Brilliant's post

SongStream posted:
Brilliant posted:

hearing is believing - but the improvement is stated here with certainty by Naim:

"..Firmware update 4.11.8 (Naim DAC) and 1.16 (DAC-V1) will enable single and double rate DSD playback to existing and new DAC and DAC-V1 owners. This update has required significant optimisation of the core DSP code which has also improved sound quality.."

https://www.naimaudio.com/news...-available-naim-dacs

Ha, that's the bit of info I'd missed then.  Thanks for that, clearly been looking in the wrong places for info.  In terms of the sound quality, their statement is not wrong.  Well done, Naim.  It sounds great.  

Really - well done Naim!

B.

Posted on: 04 December 2015 by Mortalcoil

I agree with the above mentioned. 

I am also finding the tone to be a tad richer and well placed.  Instrument seperation seems more precise as well as natural.

Overall I feel this update was a true success.  I have also had a chance to try out the DSD in 64k and 128k.....works as advertised.

Nice feature to have allthough not totally necessary, good addition to the package though.

Said it once before in another thread and will say it again, Kudos to all those who participated in the beta testing and bravo to the chaps at Naim for a wonderful update to an already superb piece of kit.

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by mat

So does DSD sound better than PCM? Is it worth experimenting with?

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Mike-B
mat posted:

So does DSD sound better than PCM? Is it worth experimenting with?

YES - I've been playing DSD as a streamer (NDX) beta tester for quite a while 
So whilst I say yes, its a yes but ........ Most DSD is niche area stuff & the artist and/or studio is particularly focused on best possible quality SQ from the studio to end product.  This is probably 80% of why DSD recording sound better than PCM rather than DSD as a format per se.
DSD will initially sound quieter than PCM in most cases,  as I understand it its because it can't be noise shaped as can PCM & it means you need to up the volume to get the low level detail & that means the loud & dynamic levels are ........  loud & dynamic.
Its is harder to find DSD copy & especially so with run of the mill popular material - http://www.findhdmusic.com/alb...ch/?q=&fmt_dsd=1 - is a good place to find more or less everything that there is.    
It can be expensive compared to PCM,  but don't let that put you of,  I have found HighResAudio (a German www) a great place for competive pricing & one of the best DSD selections.  
Also - to experiment - look around on www for free sample tracks
Posted on: 05 December 2015 by mat

Thanks Mike, I'll give it a whirl. I've just done the update and first impressions are good. The music seems to be more engaging and there is more space around the instruments. This is only with 10 minutes listening though. I'll need to live with it for a while before I know for sure!

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Jude2012

Well after participating in the beta testing and listening to v1.16, last night and this afternoon, all I can say is that my system is sounding just amazing, can't analyse it into a specific aspect., it just sounds right.  

Perhaps it's because I am listening to enjoy than for testing or casually, but it does seem like a bigger upgrade/change than I previously perceived it to be.

I am also amazed that the GB1i is able to convey the change upstream.

Well done Nam 

 

Jude

 

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Janus

Same here, a very nice improvement. Radio Paradise (through digital in Sonos) and Roon (USB) sound just right.

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Andrius

What a good news! For me V1 already sounded amazing, and today I hear it just became even better. So as I understand, you need to install new Windows driver first and then update V1 firmware?

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Jude2012

Andrius,

If the instructions that are downloadable from the link in @Brilliant's post doesn't make sense, it is better get in touch with Naim Customer Services (unless you get a reply from @Brilliant or someone who uses Windows with their V1 (I use Mac)).

I think you'll like update 

Jude

 

 

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Andrius

Update success ! I guess long listening session awaits

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by Brilliant
Andrius posted:

What a good news! For me V1 already sounded amazing, and today I hear it just became even better. So as I understand, you need to install new Windows driver first and then update V1 firmware?

Yes - Install V2.0.0.0 following the pdf instruction in the zip file

https://www.naimaudio.com/news...-available-naim-dacs

Run the 44.1/24 Bit Perfect test

Import the v1.16 firmware wav file into your player - setting the player to 24 bit output and update- all per ref manual, now included in the zip file!

Enjoy

B

Edit - for DSD playback you will need to refer to your player's instruction for the DoP stream output settings

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by SongStream

Well, very pleased I've been able to listen to a lot of music today, and am really impressed with the sound quality enhancement the firmware update has brought.  It's just so inexplicably right somehow.  There are hifi-speak differences I can easily detect, but I am rubbish at explaining such things, so won't bother, but the overall effect is increasing my enjoyment of all types of music a lot.  In fact, I'd say it's like all hifi-type noise has been stripped away leaving nothing but the sound of the music itself.  I realise that's quite a claim, but something remarkable has been achieved here.  Whether the difference is as big on the nDAC I don't know, on another thread there are those (well, at least one) who claim to hear no difference.  This may also be true among some DAC-V1 owners.  I am sure systems will vary in their revealing qualities, and of course people use the DAC-V1 in lots of different ways, as a pre-amp, headphone amp, or as in my case a line out DAC, so perhaps in some configurations the difference could be less pronounced.  For me though, and after many hours of listening now, the improvement is beyond doubt and significant.

Still haven't tried DSD, too busy having fun listening to my local and Qobuz streamed PCM material, but I will try and give that a go tomorrow at some point.....maybe.  

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by thijazi

Haven't had the chance to update my V1 yet (travelling), but will be able to tomorrow for sure. Curious though, I understand that V1 will now support 64 ad 128bit DSD, how does that relate to the MHz rating of the DSD? for instance on this website below I have a choice of 2.8, 5.6 and 11.2 MHz for the DSD files, I've never used any DSD in my system and will be downloading some to sample the difference between FLAC and DSD on my system.

 

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by karlosTT

Hi Thijazi,

To your Qn above, all DSD is 1 bit.  The 64 and 128 refers to the number of times greater the sample rate is (compared to red book CD).  So 44.1khz x 64 = 2.8 mhz  etc

Posted on: 05 December 2015 by thijazi

Got it... So the limit is 5.6MHz for the Naim DAC-V1 then.

Posted on: 06 December 2015 by Jude2012

Just wondering whether anyone has been able to compare the V1 and NDAC , both with the latest firmware ?

Posted on: 06 December 2015 by Andrius

Today installed DSD/asio plugins in foobar2000. DSD64 working just fine, but trying DSD128 i get "Unrecoverable playback error: Sample rate of 44100 Hz not supported by this device" any ideas why?...

Posted on: 06 December 2015 by Mortalcoil
Andrius posted:

Today installed DSD/asio plugins in foobar2000. DSD64 working just fine, but trying DSD128 i get "Unrecoverable playback error: Sample rate of 44100 Hz not supported by this device" any ideas why?...

Not that I'm a Foobar2000 afficianado but from the sounds of it seems like a Foobar setting is not jiving with playback.

Make sure V1 properties (in playback devices)  are set to output 44.1 and that Foobar Hz settings are set to match the V1 output.

Posted on: 07 December 2015 by Foot tapper
Jude2012 posted:

Well after ... listening to v1.16, last night and this afternoon, all I can say is that my system is sounding just amazing, can't analyse it into a specific aspect., it just sounds right.  

 

Well done Nam 

 Jude

 

This just about sums it up for me too.  The new firmware loaded on the second attempt, then passed the BitPerfect test with no errors on the first attempt (I replay music using itunes with the BitPerfect app on a 2011 mac mini).

This little system sounded simply excellent, musical, foot tapping and immersive with v1.5 firmware.  Now with v1.16 installed it just sounds right, more right than I thought was possible for a music system at this price point.

Very, very happy indeed.  
Thank you, FT

Posted on: 10 December 2015 by Andrius
Andrius posted:

Today installed DSD/asio plugins in foobar2000. DSD64 working just fine, but trying DSD128 i get "Unrecoverable playback error: Sample rate of 44100 Hz not supported by this device" any ideas why?...

Update: this new firmware update is pure awesomeness! I was very satisfied with the old one, but now probably over-satisfied (and that would be very close to the truth)  I'm experiencing nearly same changes in playback quality, as other forum members already mentioned here. What surprised me most is DSD playback though. I am not sure if this is unique/different mastering or DSD merits, but Cat Stevens' "Tea for the Tillerman" and M. Jackson's "Thriller" DSD version sounded "best I ever heard on my system".  Thank you NAIM for this early x-mas present

Still not fixed Foobar2000 problem when trying to play DSD128, whilst DSD64 plays fine, even though I followed Foobar2000 setup guide found in NAIM website. When tried both DSD64 and DSD128 in jRiver, had no problems at all. At least I know It's a Foobar2000 issue...