NDX Tuner?

Posted by: Simon-in-Suffolk on 16 May 2011

Now that more and more people are enjoying their NDXs, I'd be interested to hear on reports of the FM tuner.. How does it compare with a standalone tuner? (assuming fed with a good external aerial).

Thanks for any comments....

Simon
Posted on: 17 May 2011 by DQ

Good reminder that I need to plug the co-axial cable in. Have been too busy exploring existing music and internet based radio to have a good listen yet.

Posted on: 17 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Hi, thanks, do let me know how you get on. By the lack of responses I guess the tuner is not a common option ...

Simon

Posted on: 17 May 2011 by PureHifi
Mine arrives in a week or two, after I install a suitable aerial I will be in a position to comment....however the FM modual was an add on for a better WAF, I am not particulary interested in FM so anything will do as far as I am concerned.
Posted on: 23 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Hi DQ, any comments yet on the tuner?

Simon

Posted on: 23 May 2011 by Woods Scot

The internet radio option is very good. Have not used the tuner yet as, well, the internet radio option offers so much more. 

 

I did have a NAt05 prior and favour the NDX thusfar

 

Scot

Posted on: 23 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Thanks Scott, no it's the FM tuner I am after. I use radio (analogue) a lot. The BBC FM stations offer fantastic quality with  low compression especially R3 and sometimes R2 with a lovely organic lifelike feeling with a stero image that can fill the room beautifully, especially sessions and concerts. iMO the mastering  and subsequent sound can be better on FM for live or session work  than CD with a good tuner and antenna.

Internet radio is good and fun but not sonically in the same league, hence my query on the FM tuner.

I agree with DAB, a complete disappointment sonically and Internet streaming/radio offers a better solution for that.

Simon

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by naimUnT
Correct me if O am wrong but isn't the writing on the wall Forres BBC's termination of analog radio? Had the NDX on audition and the Internet streaming is much better than my Squeezebox powered by a custom made Paul Hynes' PSU! I was very impressed with the NDX and although it did nit come with the FM option, I have no doubt that the Naim engineers would have ensured nothing less than an excellent source!
Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Hi - as part of Digital Britain'srevision. I understood the plans for the ceasing of nation wide FM channels had been shelved for the time being.

 

I would not be suprised however if we start to see in a few years the phasing out of generation 1 DAB  for DAB+ which is used more on the Conteinent and uses more recent higher qulaity and robust codecs such as AA3 and AA3+ which have better error correcetoin compared to the old fasioned DAB's MP2 codec , which is a must IMO if Digital Radio is to start to replace FM for cars etc.

 

Until the sound qulaity issue is resolved with DAB I can't see FM going anywher. Just google DAB & Poor Sound Quality. To use current parlence that combination 'trends' quite hightly.

 

Simon

 

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Red Rooster
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:
Thanks Scott, no it's the FM tuner I am after. I use radio (analogue) a lot. The BBC FM stations offer fantastic quality with  low compression especially R3 and sometimes R2 with a lovely organic lifelike feeling with a stero image that can fill the room beautifully, especially sessions and concerts. iMO the mastering  and subsequent sound can be better on FM for live or session work  than CD with a good tuner and antenna.
Internet radio is good and fun but not sonically in the same league, hence my query on the FM tuner.
I agree with DAB, a complete disappointment sonically and Internet streaming/radio offers a better solution for that.
Simon

Hi Simon,

 

The new BBC radio 3 transmissions on the internet are really very very good and there are loads of great stations to choose from now as well. I was so impressed I sold my NAT02.

 

Happy listening

 

RR

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Hi RR,

Yes there are some good stations at high bit rate mp3, but it all sounds like it is coming from an iPod connected to a DAC etc - . Good but not that good, ie a little cardboard like / lifeless - to my ears anyway.

 

I currently use a Cyrus FMX with Belden mains cable with Eichamnn RCAs and  a 5 element Yagi with folded dipole  at 35 feet with no obstructions and with good quality braid with 75 ohm feeder, and it is awesome and quite spooky/un nerving with radio plays sometimes, who needs DD 5.1 surround sound ;-)  

I am kind of hoping being a Naim the NDX FM tuner is on apar with this, so I could rationalise the boxes but your comment is starting to casue me a nagging doubt. The NDX I have lined up for home audition this weekend has no Tuner ...

 

Simon

 

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Peter_RN

Hi Simon

 

I’m surprised that your original question has not been answered as the tuner would be an essential should I buy an NDX. Why have they not added a tuner card into the HDX, there must surely be plenty of room in the SSD version?

 

Anyway, just thought I would say that I have been using a Qute since launch and find that the FM tuner provides very respectable reception for us. Personally I am not interested in the Dab/iRadio sections. I don’t know if it is the same card in the NDX as in the Qute but even if it is, it is capable of fine sound.

 

Re: switching off FM……I have read in the last couple of weeks a worrying piece that suggests that they are backtracking somewhat on leaving FM on, pushing Dab again. Can’t remember which site I was reading now though.

 

Peter

 

 

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Peter

 

Well in this part of the world in most locations you need a good outside antenna to get any decent DAB signal so I think if they want to switch or remove the national stations from FM  there would have to be a mjoar investment in transmitters - and no one has the money. Also there is the question of lack of mutiplex space for local stations iand here in East Anglia inteference from the continental multiplexes

 

Simon

 

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by aysil

I think the reason why the original question was not answered is that those who know to appreciate the sound quality of FM would prefer a dedicated tuner device. This is my case at least, until I am convinced that the FM module in NDX is of comparable quality.

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by DQ
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:
Hi, thanks, do let me know how you get on. By the lack of responses I guess the tuner is not a common option ...
Simon

Simon,

 

My apologies - I have been slammed at work and have not had enough time to do anything other than swipe the ipad and play a tune. It will probably be another 10 days or so before I get to it.

 

Cheers

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Claus-Thoegersen

Hi,

 

I have a Squeezebox receiver just to stream radio and some mp3's from my computer. I stream bbc radio4 a lot, since my cable company decided in their infinat wisdom that the radio listeners whom they do not care about anyway, suddenly without warning did not need bbc radio4!

Obviously a Receiver with analog out streaming whatever bitrate 128 or 64 bit has nothing to do with sound quality, and for Radio4 I can live with that since it is not music anyway.

 

I saw the  anouncement of the 300 kbps Naim radio on the hifi forum. 

I am sending my system up to my dealer, actually they are coming down and driving it up there, anyway I hope that my  cd s3 will not be coming back! There are a few potential buyers we  just have to convince them that an upgrade from x2 and spsx to my s 3 for much lower than a new cost, is an offer they cannot refuse!

 

I will replace it with an NS01 and  Ndac, wich should give me access to the Naim Radio in the near future as it is stated on the hifi forum. If it is just half as good as I expect my Harmon Cardon fm/dab tuner will find another permanent home for sure!

 b

Posted on: 24 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Claus, hence my love of FM... it doesn't have to be music!!! Radio4 has some superb radio plays and dramas and often creatively use the stero image. Works very  well on FM if you have a good quality well engineered  tuner, a complete miss on DAB, and I am yet to hear an  Internet radio version of radio 4 that sounds much better than a higher quality tele conference phone, hardly hifi..
Simon
Posted on: 25 May 2011 by Red Rooster
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Hi RR,

Yes there are some good stations at high bit rate mp3, but it all sounds like it is coming from an iPod connected to a DAC etc - . Good but not that good, ie a little cardboard like / lifeless - to my ears anyway.

 

I currently use a Cyrus FMX with Belden mains cable with Eichamnn RCAs and  a 5 element Yagi with folded dipole  at 35 feet with no obstructions and with good quality braid with 75 ohm feeder, and it is awesome and quite spooky/un nerving with radio plays sometimes, who needs DD 5.1 surround sound ;-)  

I am kind of hoping being a Naim the NDX FM tuner is on apar with this, so I could rationalise the boxes but your comment is starting to casue me a nagging doubt. The NDX I have lined up for home audition this weekend has no Tuner ...

 

Simon

 

Hi Simon,

 

I have to say it's not my experience. I have done a direct comparison on R3 on NAT02 and Akurate DS sourced R3 via my 252/SC/300 and cardboard is not a word I use to describe it. FM is better but not by that much and I now listen to Radio far more than I ever did. I loved my NAT02 for 20 years and parted with deep emotion but times move on.

 

 

If you like FM, get an NAT02. It's brilliant and you will fall in love straight away. MILES better than a Cyrus FM but they are a bit rare to find.

 

Best of luck

 

RR

Posted on: 25 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Hi interested in your comments in the FMX and the Nat02. The FMX was a very special design and at the time I bought it it excelled other tuners I listened to, but I didn't listen to Nat02. I don't think Cyrus have bettered that design since, so would be interested on your feedback on the Nat02.
The three intermediate frequency stages really get to grip to remove image distortion and increase selectivity and the front end is reassuringly not too sensitive so as to keep the IMD down, hence the need for a good aerial. I think Naim share this design attribute on their standalone tuners. IMO this is where so many consumer tuners get it wrong, they compensate for poor antennas  and have a front end that is too sensitive and causes overloading and reduces dynamic range by increasing the noise level of the FM signal, and here the physics is interesting, with noise on the frequency modulated carrier starting to look  like jitter on a digital bit stream. It's a small world..  :-)
Posted on: 25 May 2011 by likesmusic

Simon - there are a couple of good BBC articles here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/rad...the_proms_afte.shtml and here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbc...h_quality_audio.html about what happens to the BBC signal for a live prom.Seems to me the HD stream might avoid some of the compression and manipulation the FM stream is subject to, at least in the case of the proms. And much of the FM distribution chain is digital.

Posted on: 25 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Likes music,
Thanks, yes I was aware that distribution for FM was mostly digital, in fact I thought it was all of it.
Thanks for the articles, specifically FM Radio 3

Radio 3 FM is bandwidth-limited to 15 kHz, with DC filtering applied. The FM signal has dynamic range compression applied via an Optimod processor. The signal is NICAM encoded at 676kbps and fed to the FM transmitters via the BBC's distribution network. No further bandwidth limiting is applied.

That is a pretty impressive spec, and helps explain why it sounds so good...

Simon
Posted on: 26 May 2011 by likesmusic

I think we should be pushing for the distribution of the digital feed before any compression, bandwidth limiting, NICAM encoding or similar jiggery pokery! There's plenty of digital bandwidth on the planet now. 

Posted on: 26 May 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Likes music, yes apart from over my ADSL connection ;-)
Posted on: 28 June 2011 by andrew mcmullins

Hiya

 

I have just got my NDX - and it is still quite new.

 

I am comparing it - very unfairly - with my NAT-01.

 

Everything else is the same but the sound is not close.

 

I flicked on radio 3 and it lacks the atmosphere - the "hair stick up on the back of your neck" quality of the 01.  Music sounds compressed and the quiet background doesnt sound so quiet.  I have only ever had one tuner so apologies but I have nothing else to compare it to.

Posted on: 28 June 2011 by aysil

Yes very unfair comparison!

Posted on: 28 June 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Andrew

 

Thanks - yes I have decided to leave the NDX tuner for now and stick with my Cyrus FMX - again another amazing sounding tuner especially with R3 and R2 - but a few rungs down from the NAT-01 I'm sure.

However I am tempted to try a NAT-01  ;-)

 

Simon