Naim should take Apple's approach....

Posted by: Tony2011 on 05 February 2016

Interesting that some IPhone 6 users were left with an unusable handset after having them  repaired or "serviced" by non apple authorised  people. 

 It would be funny if that happened to your beloved Naim gear. Lesson to you all: use an authorised repairer/dealer!

http://www.theguardian.com/mon...s-third-party-repair

Posted on: 05 February 2016 by Gianluigi Mazzorana

I have a 5s and the touch screen works randomly so it works when it wants to.

I'm keeping it like that......

Posted on: 05 February 2016 by BigH47

I'm assuming the 5s is the same? Is it only a problem if the fingerprint  thingy is activated?

Posted on: 05 February 2016 by Gianluigi Mazzorana

Just wanted to say that i'll not send it back to Apple as i'm not sure competent people would take care of it. I've already lost a faulty Motorola and a Nokia sending them back to "mummy".

Btw i checked all settings with a couple of friends that own a 5s and they are correct.

Posted on: 07 February 2016 by Eloise

The "solution" is to find someone who will swap the screen while transferring the old home button / fingerprint sensor to the new display.  It's more time consuming but any good repairer should do it for you.

This isn't guaranteed to prevent problems, but is less likely to cause issues.

Posted on: 07 February 2016 by joerand

Fingerprint security - what an oxymoron. Your phone is, after all, covered in your fingerprints. Lose your smartphone to the right kind of thief and he can simply lift the security key (your fingerprint) from the device itself. What accounts with remembered passwords will he have access to then?

Passwords, credit cards, PINS, and smart devices can be replaced. Once you've submitted your fingerprint for recognition, your unique biometric identifier is subject to hacking. If compromised, it becomes obsolete in perpetuity.

I realize my response is a bit hyperbolic with regard to the current i-phone issue, and you've got nine other fingerprints available. Still, I'd never involve my biometrics with something as simple as logon, etc. Are four keystrokes really that much an inconvenience?

Posted on: 08 February 2016 by Graham Clarke
joerand posted:

Fingerprint security - what an oxymoron. Your phone is, after all, covered in your fingerprints. Lose your smartphone to the right kind of thief and he can simply lift the security key (your fingerprint) from the device itself. What accounts with remembered passwords will he have access to then?

Passwords, credit cards, PINS, and smart devices can be replaced. Once you've submitted your fingerprint for recognition, your unique biometric identifier is subject to hacking. If compromised, it becomes obsolete in perpetuity.

I realize my response is a bit hyperbolic with regard to the current i-phone issue, and you've got nine other fingerprints available. Still, I'd never involve my biometrics with something as simple as logon, etc. Are four keystrokes really that much an inconvenience?

Joe,

The sad fact is that most people use really obvious, guessable PINs (1111, 1234 etc) which in my eyes isn't any more secure. 

A determined hacker may be able to lift your fingerprint and unlock the device but that's a very small percentage of the population.  Pretty much anyone can randomly try some PIN combinations.

Posted on: 08 February 2016 by Jude2012
Graham Clarke posted:
joerand posted:

Fingerprint security - what an oxymoron. Your phone is, after all, covered in your fingerprints. Lose your smartphone to the right kind of thief and he can simply lift the security key (your fingerprint) from the device itself. What accounts with remembered passwords will he have access to then?

Passwords, credit cards, PINS, and smart devices can be replaced. Once you've submitted your fingerprint for recognition, your unique biometric identifier is subject to hacking. If compromised, it becomes obsolete in perpetuity.

I realize my response is a bit hyperbolic with regard to the current i-phone issue, and you've got nine other fingerprints available. Still, I'd never involve my biometrics with something as simple as logon, etc. Are four keystrokes really that much an inconvenience?

Joe,

The sad fact is that most people use really obvious, guessable PINs (1111, 1234 etc) which in my eyes isn't any more secure. 

A determined hacker may be able to lift your fingerprint and unlock the device but that's a very small percentage of the population.  Pretty much anyone can randomly try some PIN combinations.

+1.

The fingerprint needs to come from an actual finger.

So, the ability to lift a print off a surface and re create it on someone else 's finger is pretty diffcult.  Also, the biometric data is strongly encrypted and stays on the device   I.e. Not trsamitted or stored elsewhere.

Loads of articles on the web, dating back three years ago when the tech was first intro'd.

Of course, if really concerned, a toe print is the way to go 

Posted on: 08 February 2016 by Gianluigi Mazzorana
Eloise posted:

The "solution" is to find someone who will swap the screen while transferring the old home button / fingerprint sensor to the new display.  It's more time consuming but any good repairer should do it for you.

This isn't guaranteed to prevent problems, but is less likely to cause issues.

 

Thanks!

But i live in the middle of nowhere here and it would be like giving your Naims to an electrician (with respect) for recapping and so on. Problem is with the screen. I can access the main menu with my fingers on the lower button but when i try to write  a message simply the keyboard does not work. So i have to get back to home menu and try again till it starts working again........ And it never fell. Thanks anyway!