To pre-amp or not to pre-amp
Posted by: Will99 on 17 March 2016
Current system :- Synology NAS -> Mac Mini running Audirvana -> DAC-V1 -> NAP 300 (waiting to be DR'd) -> Spendor A9. I only listen to digital sources.
Upgrade Option 1 :- Adding 282 or 252 and Supercap, and changing the DAC-V1 for a Hugo (not the TT version)
Upgrade Option 2 :- Don't add a pre-amp, and invest budget in top quality DAC instead (eg. Chord Hugo TT, or even Chord DAVE)
I definitely want remote volume control - and not via using the Audirvana + volume control.
Now I know that home audition is the way to decide, and I will do that. Also there are other options such as adding a proper streamer etc. but these are the two options I have identified as my next steps. I guess at the heart of this choice is the improvements realised by adding an analogue (Naim) pre-amp against spending more money on a better DAC and using the digital pre-amp in the DAC. So that is what I would be interested to hear your views on. I know when I was auditioning my amp purchase that there are improvements in using a proper pre-amp - eg. the 282/SC/250.2 was better than using a 250.2 alone, however I preferred 300 alone to 282/SC/250.2 (and couldn't at the time afford a pre-amp and a NAP300).