What BluRay Have You Just Watched?

Posted by: Mr Underhill on 11 July 2011

Why bother with a new thread?

 

Often I will buy the DVD rather than the BR, but sometimes the difference is more than just a minor improvement in picture quality.

 

I bought the BR of El Cid. This is a great film, but one with a truly sub-standard 4:3 DVD. The BluRay is so much better.

 

If, like me, you love this film then it well worth the money with a 2.35:1 print and 5.1 DTS-HD soundtrack.

 

I haven't got to the 2nd disc of extras, but these are never of that much consequence to me - it is the Main feature that counts, and this is so much better than the DVD.

 

M

Posted on: 12 July 2011 by tonym

Good topic Mr Underhill! I quite agree that BluRay, when properly encoded, can be a huge improvement over standard DVD in both picture and sound quality but some of the former aren't a lot different from the DVDs & a couple (Ghostbusters is an example) look worse because the extra definition serves to emphasise defects in the original recordings.

 

SWMBO's a huge Lord of The Rings fan so we recently bought a copy of the director's cut box set on BluRay. The original DVDs were excellent quality anyway but the BluRay versions are just magnificent! Given that you get 15 discs (they've still spread one film across two discs unfortunately!) in an extremely attractive presentation box, the price is a bit of a bargain IMO.

Posted on: 12 July 2011 by naim_nymph

Personally i don't think format type is really what's important.

 

I'd far rather watch a good film, documentary, serial, or whatever on a old VHS tape than something crap on blue-ray, and lets face it, there is plenty of crap new films around today on blue-ray.

 

dvd and blue-ray may as well be lumped in together, and rather like the 'what are you listening to' topic that includes anything from vinyl - cd - download - tape - radio - etc

 

Being inclusive just seems far friendlier imho  

 

Debs

Posted on: 12 July 2011 by tonym

I'm sure we all agree that, as with music, the content's the thing. But also as with music, the quality of the reproduction adds considerably to the enjoyment.

Posted on: 13 July 2011 by rackkit

A bit off topic but i don't know if you guys have an Asda supermarket near to you? If so, i noticed they had a decent range of Bluray films in at £7 each. Long overdue if they want the format to take off.

Posted on: 13 July 2011 by Mr Underhill

naim_nymph

 

The hope, for me, is that as people find BRs that they think offer a substantial advantage over the DVD I can replace my current discs.

 

I have no intention of doing this wholesale.

 

M

Posted on: 20 July 2011 by rackkit

Started watching 'Invictus' but having problems coping with Morgan Freeman trying to do a South African accent. It's almost as bad as Leonardo DiCaprio's in 'Blood Diamond'.

 

Why can't the producers just use a good actor who's native to the country & give some fresh talent a break?

Posted on: 25 July 2011 by 2roomsor1

Iron Man 2 - very enjoyable. needed some crazy comic action.

 

will have to grow up some day. 

Posted on: 26 July 2011 by mudwolf

Memoirs of a Geisha.   I thought it was fascinating and  beautiful.  And at the end you can get your man....

Posted on: 28 July 2011 by Vaughn3D
Ferris Bueller's Day Off - I watched it tonight on blu, it holds up really well, doesnt seem dated and they did a great job on the bluray. Next is Fast Times at Ridgemont High.
Posted on: 05 September 2011 by Rico

District 9.  almost as funny as the first time I saw it, at the cinema.

Posted on: 15 September 2011 by tonym

 

Recorded in 2003 and their last gig of a tour. I've owned the standard DVD for a while and it's my very favourite live concert recording. I was debating about whether it was worth lashing out on the BluRay version because the DVD's picture quality and the excellence of the editing is first class. However, the dts soundtrack, whilst also generally exceptional, for some reason suffered from a lip-sync problem during their last song (and you can guess what that was, complete with extra verse).

 

Well, the BluRay's just superb. Picture quality is fabulous and the HD surround really captures the acoustic of the venue (minus lip-sync problem).

 

The band go through their classic numbers plus some more recent numbers and like all great bands they make it look so easy. The extras include a very amusing interview with Gary Brooker, who tells us the band do have a set playlist, but never use it; he decides on what they're going to play next on the spur of the moment & the others just follow on.

 

a classic band at the top of their game. Highly recommended, even if you don't know their music beyond A Whiter Shade of Pale.

 

Posted on: 15 September 2011 by EJS

Star Wars I - The Phantom Menace


Sharp visuals don't make this movie any better, but it does look and sound spectacular in blu-ray.

Posted on: 16 September 2011 by Mr Underhill

EJS

 

I doubt I'll bother. Bought the original VHS, then the widescreen VHS, the original DVDs, ........

 

I bought a new set a few years ago, mainly as they also contained the original three films, as originally presented. BUT they were non-anamorphic with the stereo soundtrack.

 

Now if they were to produce a set of the original three films in HiDef, with a decent soundtrack, and JUST cleaned up SFX that would tempt me.

 

I HATE the changes to 'A New Hope'. Not the upgraded special effects, but the need Lucas felt to have Hans Solo shoot second in the bar scene, for instance.

 

The prequels all had interesting moments but didn't float my boat, a real missed opportunity; although I am sure GL can console himself with the enormous amount of money they made!

 

Don't suppose the digitally removed Jar Jar Binks did they?

 

M

Posted on: 16 September 2011 by EJS
Originally Posted by Mr Underhill:

EJS

 

I doubt I'll bother. Bought the original VHS, then the widescreen VHS, the original DVDs, ........

 

I bought a new set a few years ago, mainly as they also contained the original three films, as originally presented. BUT they were non-anamorphic with the stereo soundtrack.

 

Now if they were to produce a set of the original three films in HiDef, with a decent soundtrack, and JUST cleaned up SFX that would tempt me.

 

I HATE the changes to 'A New Hope'. Not the upgraded special effects, but the need Lucas felt to have Hans Solo shoot second in the bar scene, for instance.

 

The prequels all had interesting moments but didn't float my boat, a real missed opportunity; although I am sure GL can console himself with the enormous amount of money they made!

 

Don't suppose the digitally removed Jar Jar Binks did they?

 

M

M,

 

I completely understand. This round there are yet more edits, but Anakin ('Ani') in both incarnations and Jar-Jar still irritate so as you say, a missed opportunity. The choice is between the superior original in bad shape, or the flawed reissue with great sound and visuals. I too hope that one day there will be a hires version of the original, but that is unlikely to happen.

 

Cheers, EJ

Posted on: 17 September 2011 by Geoff C
The Lord Of The Rings Extended Editions.

Wow !

I have the DVD versions of these but the Blu-Ray's are so much better, even the sound is tremendous through the naim system !
Posted on: 17 September 2011 by Vaughn3D
Watched Thor last night, it was really bad.
Posted on: 18 September 2011 by EJS

Star Wars II: Attack of the Clones


Same as above: sharp visuals don't make this movie any better, but it does look and sound spectacular in blu-ray. To which I'd like to add that the movie works slightly better because it can now be seen as the kick-off for the - generally excellent - 'The Clone Wars' cartoon series.

 

EJ

Posted on: 19 September 2011 by Occean

I am currently working my way through the new LOTR Bluray and Star Wars Bluray - finding both spectacular and well worth a watch, esp if you are a fan. All that money I blew (threw away?!?) on my OPPO 83SE has finally make complete sense, the DTS - MA  sound track is truely outstanding on LOTR.

 

New Hope has certainly not looked better and I am a fan of the development/changes.

 

Posted on: 19 September 2011 by aht

Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, yecch.

 

There is brand new Citizen Kane out with super-resolution mastering for BluRay, a composite of three different prints (camera negative destroyed in fire).  Also a relatively new Taxi Driver at the same resolution.

 

In my experience, the BluRays often don't look much better because the underlying resolution hasn't changed.  Not so with these releases.

Posted on: 20 September 2011 by tonym
Originally Posted by Occean:

I am currently working my way through the new LOTR Bluray and Star Wars Bluray - finding both spectacular and well worth a watch, esp if you are a fan. All that money I blew (threw away?!?) on my OPPO 83SE has finally make complete sense, the DTS - MA  sound track is truely outstanding on LOTR.

 

New Hope has certainly not looked better and I am a fan of the development/changes.

 

 

With you on all Mr Occean. It really shows what BluRay's capable of.

Posted on: 20 September 2011 by Geoff C
aht

Your comment re SW and LOTR and then the films you do like reminds of a TV comedy sketch where someone says 'we only watch David Attenborough'...
Posted on: 20 September 2011 by aht

geoff,

 

If it makes you feel better, I can't stand David Attenborough either.  Actually he shares certain qualities with Lord of the Rings:  he's pretentious and goes on forever and ever...

 

Posted on: 20 September 2011 by BigH47

OOOOOH get you. 

Posted on: 22 September 2011 by Geoff C
aht

To each his own !

The Citizen Kane BluRay sounds worthy of investigation, so will checkout some reviews online before purchasing.
Posted on: 22 September 2011 by aht

Geoff,

 

Agreed, we all have different tastes.  Sorry if I was a bit brash in expressing mine.

 

There is an excellent review of the Citizen Kane disk online at Slate Magazine by Fred Kaplan.  He is my favorite jazz reviewer, so I took the plunge on his recommendation.