Tuner Nat 05 versus Nat 05 XS

Posted by: PTCM on 03 September 2016

I understand this has been discussed before, and yet the topic was closed.  For that reason, I am restarting this discussion on Nat 05 Tuner.

I recently bought a used Nat 05 Tuner, and I have been extremely happy about it because it has exceeded my expectation big time.  I never thought radio can sound this good.  That said, I am curious to know how much better the Nat 05 XS is.

It's always not possible to accurately quantify outperformance given hardware combination variations, but can someone who own both please give me an estimate?  Other things being constant,  if Nat 05 is a "7" on a scale from 1 to 10. 

Nat 05 XS / HC = ?

Nat 05 XS / SC = ?

many thanks in advance.

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by The Strat (Fender)
rjstaines posted:

All I want to know is when are they going to add a DAB module into the NAT05XS and make it a truly versatile radio ? 

I'd buy one tomorrow.

 

Almost makes it a ND5XS?

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by rjstaines
The Strat (Fender) posted:
rjstaines posted:

All I want to know is when are they going to add a DAB module into the NAT05XS and make it a truly versatile radio ? 

I'd buy one tomorrow.

 

Almost makes it a ND5XS?

Don't you just hate duplication though, Strat?     A radio is a radio is a radio...and it receives radio broadcasts... brilliantly.... and when you hand over your hard earned, you want to be paying for a radio and not a bunch of other stuff you already have covered (well at least I do).

Multi-function devices are fine, if that's what you want, but lots of folk want units that are dedicated, optimised and priced to do a particular thing...brilliantly.  So the ND5XS with FM/DAB module has its place, the NACN-272 has its place, but the NACxxx preamps and NAPxxx main amps do a specific and complete job... the NAT05 on the other hand just 'ain't a complete radio.

There will be those who propose that the qulity of DAB, being so far below FM, all but eliminates it from the classification of  'radio', and therefor suggest the NAT05 is a complete radio... but I disagree.   I listen to HD music and I listen to MP3 music on my system, my MP3 collection 'completes' my whole music collection for me.  Quantity over quality... in fact there's a place for all of it, and the same's true of radio  (in my opinion    ), so DAB belongs in the same chasis as FM... please Naim.

Roger

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by The Strat (Fender)

I agree but if what I wanted to listen wasn't available on FM then I would for the internet over DAB.  In fact I wonder if a laptop and cheap DAC would suffice          

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by Mike-B

It's all beginning to point in the direction of all broadcast & streaming mediums being received on 272'like front ends with home audio.  I see radio tuners as we know them being consigned to the dust of history:     FM moves over for DAB+, & yes it will be DAB+ (in UK) one day (think £) ,  & the best quality source for public broadcast services on home audio will be internet radio. 

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by dayjay

When I had my little Qute I used to use FM which was suprisingly good, and also internet radio which wasn't as good but had some good content but dab was unlistenable for me. Having dab available on my nat05xs would not be a bonus for me because I wouldn't use it. 

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by PTCM

Finally found a used 01 tuner but price is around twice vs. 02.  Judging from the price,  seems to reflect 03 very behind 02/01 obviously.  

My question is US$2k too much for 01? That is more than a 05 XS.

Anyone one own both 01 and 05 XS can comment?  

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by Alfa4life
rjstaines posted:

All I want to know is when are they going to add a DAB module into the NAT05XS and make it a truly versatile radio ? 

I'd buy one tomorrow.

 

+1 and how about sneaking in internet radio as well

Posted on: 10 September 2016 by The Strat (Fender)
Alfa4life posted:
rjstaines posted:

All I want to know is when are they going to add a DAB module into the NAT05XS and make it a truly versatile radio ? 

I'd buy one tomorrow.

 

+1 and how about sneaking in internet radio as well

Yes but then it's everything but an ND5XS 

Posted on: 11 September 2016 by Simon-in-Suffolk
dayjay posted:

When I had my little Qute I used to use FM which was suprisingly good, and also internet radio which wasn't as good but had some good content but dab was unlistenable for me. Having dab available on my nat05xs would not be a bonus for me because I wouldn't use it. 

Yes I enjoy FM.. With the best audio coming from my 03.. with it sounding smooth and natural, albeit with no remote, and it does drift ever so, ever so slightly.. probably needs a service.

So called 'HD' lossy internet radio can be OK from the BBC but is usually poor compared to equivalent FM broadcasts sounding sterile and synthetic in comparison and also runs into broadcast rights issues for local content (at least in Suffolk) such as sports commentaries and so is suspended for some local programming with a loop saying the content is only authorised for FM broadcast or similar ...Also  I just wish BBC Radio 6 was broadcast on FM.. It's such a waste.

DAB has improved if I am honest, but IMO has to be listened through a low to mid fi system only .. the average kitchen or car radio is ok... anything more resolving just sounds so unattractive especially for music.. even in the car DAB music is often borderline unless very low volume and background... and those DAB dropouts can make it so tedious .. but I have noticed that varies significantly on which region of the country I am in.. East Anglia (exc Norwich area) especially towards the North Sea and forests is genereally poor.

However one benefit of DAB over DAB+, is that the MP2 based codecs of DAB are more tolerant of transcoding, IE encoding already lossy material like MP3 or AAC. Therefore DAB+ is typically only going to sound better at medium to higher bandwidths genereally with lossless source data.... again this will only be apparent on more resolving audio equipment.

But yes I'd support a Naim NAT06 that had FM and DAB/DAB+/DMB decoder ... that perhaps could put station art/info/info streams  on the updated Naim app display. I'd be inclined to leave web radio to the streamers... VHF signals (as used by FM and DAB/DAB+) and Ethernet encoding frequencies and harmonics  are not happy bed fellows...

Simon

 

Posted on: 11 September 2016 by John Bailey

A NAT06 would be nice... but we should be grateful that Naim keep a tuner in the catalogue at all... most competitors have abandoned FM radio entirely. 

I use a NAT03 and I love it but would like to go to a NAT05XS - just a bit concerned that I would gain convenience and aesthetic matching in the rack but lose 'something' the NAT03 has. 

Posted on: 11 September 2016 by Ron Toolsie
PTCM posted:

Finally found a used 01 tuner but price is around twice vs. 02.  Judging from the price,  seems to reflect 03 very behind 02/01 obviously.  

My question is US$2k too much for 01? That is more than a 05 XS.

Anyone one own both 01 and 05 XS can comment?  

$2k?? Well, when it comes to classic legacy Naim gear (I'm thinking Nait 1 and to a lesser extent the Aro) it is standard practice that an item that may be decades old sells for more than it did new. Bear in mind that the 01 last retailed for circa 3.5k$, so the 2k is maybe 60% of the last known price-making it probably better value for money than the Nait 1, especially since the Nait1 can readily be bettered by a 42.5/110 that can be had for around the same price-while there's NOTHING in the Naim tuner line that even comes close to the 01.  To come to think of it, 2k may not buy a better tuner even outside the Naim line. 

So, with one enormous provision, the 01 could be very good VFM even at 2k. And that would be the quality of the local broadcasts-for those will determine whether the 01 is your best source or your worst source. This cannot be stressed too much. If your airwaves are decent then it would be worth having the output boards and the MPX boards recapped given the possible age of the 01. The power supply probably is still good-or at least mine is for a circa 1998 model, while recapping the boards gave a mild improvement. 

Also, do not be shy about putting your very best interconnect on it as well as the latest Snaic (the older grey ones did not extract the most from the 01)...the serious NAT-heads have spent more on its interconnect than they did on the tuner itself, and for a good reason. 

A few years ago it was possible to snap up a used 01 for circa $1000, but those days are long over....just like getting an Nait1 for $150. You are paying a premium for not only the quality, but its scarcity. And if you wait another year or three, the price in all likelyhood will make the 2k today look like a steal. An 05XS with a Hicap would cost considerably more than 2k and perform at a much lower level. 

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by PTCM

For Nat 01 tuner, is CB supposed to be worth more ?  If yes, how much in % terms?

olive looks much better to me , but some say the sound quality is the other way around...

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by Richard Dane

Probably the other way around.  The CB NAT01 has an achilles heel with its FL display, which can fade and eventually disappear completely.  Naim was able to replace this up until only 6 or 7 years ago, but eventually all spare stocks at the factory were used up.  Also, the NAPST PSU arrangement was simplified and improved with the Olive version (it dropped options to also power mooted AM and TV units).  The Olive NAT01 also had the option late in life (and indeed, an option available even after production ceased) of a special version of the XPS2 power supply called the XPS-T which took performance to another level again over the standard unit.  Not many were made or sold - it wasn't even officially listed - but there are some out there, you may get lucky.

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by The Strat (Fender)

A certain member of this forum who lives near where they make very good pies has such a PSU on his NAT.  No chance then of buying and an XPS and asking Salisbury to adapt?

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by Tabby cat
Ron Toolsie posted:
PTCM posted:

Finally found a used 01 tuner but price is around twice vs. 02.  Judging from the price,  seems to reflect 03 very behind 02/01 obviously.  

My question is US$2k too much for 01? That is more than a 05 XS.

Anyone one own both 01 and 05 XS can comment?  

$2k?? Well, when it comes to classic legacy Naim gear (I'm thinking Nait 1 and to a lesser extent the Aro) it is standard practice that an item that may be decades old sells for more than it did new. Bear in mind that the 01 last retailed for circa 3.5k$, so the 2k is maybe 60% of the last known price-making it probably better value for money than the Nait 1, especially since the Nait1 can readily be bettered by a 42.5/110 that can be had for around the same price-while there's NOTHING in the Naim tuner line that even comes close to the 01.  To come to think of it, 2k may not buy a better tuner even outside the Naim line. 

 

Ron,

Totally agree with you on the 01.I have had mine for 25 years and it still thrills me with the programs it captures.Its got such a rich unprocessed sort of sound and it just delivers month after month,year after year.Absolutely no simbilance on speech and excellent soundstage imaging

.I am dreading the FM switch off it will be like losing an old friend

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by Richard Dane
The Strat (Fender) posted:

A certain member of this forum who lives near where they make very good pies has such a PSU on his NAT.  No chance then of buying and an XPS and asking Salisbury to adapt?

I'm pretty sure it has to be built as an XPS-T from scratch.  I'm not sure whether Naim still offer it, but I guess if your really want one then there's no harm in asking.

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by PTCM

Thanks to everyone's input.  "The CB NAT01 has an achilles heel with its FL display, which can fade and eventually disappear completely." < this is a critical piece of information.

After serious consideration on the pros and cons, US$2K is overpriced for 01 tuner in my opinion and not proceeding for sure. 

 

Posted on: 12 September 2016 by davidf

I had a CB 01 from late 1980s which I bought at the time for about $1800 US (it was used-  I seem to recall I bought it in mid 1990s).  About 10 yrs ago when NANA existed I had it rebuilt and converted to basically a new Olive 01 ( it had to be sent back to Naim in England to be done).  It also cost about $1800 US.  Had both the 01 and PS done and basically had a brand new 01.  I have been using it ever since-

It is my most used source.  I use it in an all olive system.  My other source is CDS 2.   I would not ever sell it even for double the price. I use it with a dedicated roof antenna.  david

Posted on: 21 September 2016 by PTCM

I found another 01 with serial no. 35xxx that comes with a NA PST (is this like a HICAP specifically made for 01 only?) .  Is that a Olive? Would this version have problem like CB that the display will eventually fade away completely?

 

Thanks

Posted on: 21 September 2016 by Richard Dane

That's from '87 so an early one - not Olive unless it has had a cosmetic update at the factory.  Again, unless the display has been updated, it's the old FL display prone to fading with time.

The NAPST is a dedicated power supply just for the NAT01.  The original "chrome-bumper" NAPST had additional taps for a mooted AM tuner and a TV tuner that never made it to fruition.

Posted on: 21 September 2016 by PTCM
Richard Dane posted:

That's from '87 so an early one - not Olive unless it has had a cosmetic update at the factory.  Again, unless the display has been updated, it's the old FL display prone to fading with time.

The NAPST is a dedicated power supply just for the NAT01.  The original "chrome-bumper" NAPST had additional taps for a mooted AM tuner and a TV tuner that never made it to fruition.

Richard, how about NAT 02 olive with serial no. 132xxx? Does it use that FL display that would fade away completely?

Many thanks in advance.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on: 21 September 2016 by Christopher_M

https://www.naimaudio.com/product-history

Tuners are at the bottom of the page.

C.

Posted on: 22 September 2016 by PTCM

Thanks for the product history link.

My no.1 concern is whether NAT 02 olive version's display would fade away completely like the NAT 01 CB?

Posted on: 22 September 2016 by james n

No it's LED not like the VF display in the first generation so will be fine. The 02 is a great tuner and i enjoyed mine whilst i had it (itch i had to scratch, always wanted a Naim shoebox tuner)

Posted on: 22 September 2016 by PTCM

I know this is not a very scientific question but if a NAT 01 is a 9 on a scale from 1 to 10.  Would 02 be as good as 7.5?