Seasick Steve - no real surprise there then?

Posted by: dave marshall on 04 October 2016

It seems that Steve's back story is not quite what we've been led to believe..................don't really matter.

Blatantly cut and pasted from another website.

https://www.theguardian.com/mu...ian-ramblin-man-book

Oh well.  

Posted on: 04 October 2016 by james n

I read that article the other day - still good music but not quite as authentic as first thought 

Posted on: 04 October 2016 by dave marshall

What does crack me up though, is the writer's sense of outrage and disappointment at having been "duped".

"Pop is all about self-invention, but there’s something uncomfortable about Steve’s version of it."

Get over yourself mate. 

Posted on: 04 October 2016 by hungryhalibut

I didn't get that from the article at all, which I read when it was published. I thought it was very balanced and well written. It does seem that Steve is something of a con merchant, unlike 'proper' busking types such as the wonderful Ted Hawkins, who really did have a hard time, rather than working as a session musician and pretending to be something he wasn't. 

Posted on: 08 October 2016 by Mike Hughes

I'm with Dave. A writer trying to make a story into something it isn't. You can go back to Leadbelly to find outrageous deceptions as to authenticity. 

Pethaps the author ought to read "Faking It: the quest for authenticity in popular music" by Hugh Barker. It's not perfect but it certainly nails the fact that authenticity as a conceit is an old concept. I particularly liked its nailing of Neil Young et al.

Posted on: 09 October 2016 by Eloise

I'll still enjoy him at the SSE Arena next Friday...