Source First ? Really?
Posted by: The Dude on 12 October 2016
I have a...Naim Uniti with latest board,Spendor A6s, NACA 5 & recent upgrade from a Nap 150 x to an ex Naim employee Olive 250 with a 250.2 case...
Sounds simply sublime;weighty,detailed and very easy on the ear...however whilst I recognise the source first argument such a statement is currently questioned (perhaps/surely/perversly?) by the fact that Naim developed the Statement rather than a source?
So we currently have the principle Naim amplification costing a significant factor more than any source they produce!
I anticipate members adopting a critical view on the status of my system (which of course is their prerogative) however all I can say is that it sounds lovely despite its perceived incongruity...

