Digital Audio Debacle

Posted by: ThatsNotMyNaim on 26 October 2016

Hello all,

I bought a new system in April (with little knowledge of this type of level) and have been on a difficult and tedious learning curve since. But learnt much. Partly thanks to helpful people on this forum. I know most of my system isn't Naim but people here know their stuff. The other forums are full of left field ideas.

I wanted to write this up for any new starters out there. So they don't make the same silly errors.

What I bought:

Chord 2Qute, Naim Nait XS2, Proac 118. With Chord Silver Plus USB cable, Chord Rumour 2 speaker cables.

My setup:

iMac Audivarna Apple Lossy files > Chord Silver Plus USB > Chord 2 Qute > Chord Chameleon RCA RCA > Nait Xs2 > Chord Rumour 2 single wire > Proac 118. Atacama Moseco stands > Atacama Eris rack.

What I thought:

I demoed only at the dealer. First bad move. When I got it all delivered and setup, I was distinctly underwhelmed in many ways. I couldn't fathom how you could pay 4K out and have such distinctly average sound with a bit of an annoying edge. I noticed the music sounded hugely clinical and cold. Sharp and aggravating. Not like the dealers.

The first issue I noticed was a big mains hum. Which I narrowed down to the switch Mode power supply that came with the Chord 2Qute. I bought a TP PSU to replace it which calmed the sound down massively. And removed the mains hum. Sound was much calmer, more involving and bigger. Felt like a good move. I was positive all this PSU malarkey was the answer. 

But I still wasn't happy so I started buying all my music on CD and converting to WAV. This provided an improvement to fullness but the sound was still lacking.

Like a fool, I Went through various speaker cables Rumour, Odyseey, Epic, TQB, Black Rhodium, Nac A5. Compared the Rumour all sounded thinner, I now realise this as Rumour being boomy rather than acoustically full and rich (which the system wasn't at the time). For the time being I went with the Odyssey as it was more open and didn't make the room boom. It also made it easier to determine what effects other element changes would have going forward. But this wasn't an answer. TQ cables made the problem worse... but not because they aren't great cables. I could hear how good they were in terms of transparency but the sound was dire and ear bleeding. They just showed it all up horribly. 

I got some great advice from the very helpful and eternally pleasant Nigel Finn at Chord Company. He suggested spinning the room around which helped massively. I couldn't of done this with the Rumour cables as the boom in the new position was so crazy. So I bought some used Odyssey 2 as mentioned and this controlled the bass much better. Staggeringly so. By the way in the middle of this Nigel recommended a Shawline RCA RCA to replace the Chameleon. This was like a system upgrade. I joke not. Clarity and cohesion were remarkable.

Still not content, and not being able to put my finger on it, I then moved on to thinking about various different caps thinking this would solve my issue. Like my Xs2 was to blame for sharpness and forwardness. The sibilance was driving me nuts. Like a cap, FC,TC,HC would be a silver bullet. Even thinking ahead to Supernaits!

Randomly at this point I tried a few difference amps. Just to check this wasn't that an Xs2 issue. I quickly came back to Naim after Musical Fidelity, Sonneteer Alabaster, Classe Sigma demos. Missing the Naim swing.

Then I threw caution to the wind with a Flat Cap XS. This was actually a really nice addition. But I didn't want to pay the money for it feeling it was overpriced, circa £1000, And also my underlying issue was still there. So it went back. Also it was close to supernait upgrade territory. So no sense in it unless I'd heard a SN2. I then ordered a TP TC after much debate. This, I thought was another revelation, seemingly solving all my issues. Toning down the glare and the digital tizz. Smoothing the sound a lot. So I kept the TP TC for a month or so. It did change the sound though. My girlfriend commented unhappily about the change. But to me the tizz was dimmed a little and sound warmer. So I was partly happier.

Again I still wasn't content. It was only at this point that I started looking into isolation of the iMac / USB ports / optical etc. And also audio grade music store servers/players. Reading about things like Melco N1A, Innuos Zenith and other smaller things like Intona, Regen, Micro Rendu etc. I spoke to my dealer who told me about the Innuos Zen Mini and how good it was. But was looking a bit higher up the ladder. I then saw Innuos' Zenith flagship which has only recently been released. I emailed Innuos and they had one dropped to my dealer in a matter of days. This was a gobsmack moment in terms of sound quality improvement. I had lined up a Melco N1A to come for demo too. But the distributor forgot to send the demo. By this point I had already been blown away by the practicality, ease of use, service and sound of the Zenith that I had agreed a price Andy pick up date two days later - along with my new Hugo. So I cancelled the late delivery of the Melco and went with my gut.

After about two weeks, I decided, for a laugh, to take the TPTC off of the Nait Xs2, and whereas before I couldn't bare the bare Xs2 amp, i found the TC actually changed the Naim sound in a way I didn't really like. It was much fresher without and and more musical. With a more solid image and heavier bass. Girlfriend much happier too. However this could only happen due to the ultra low noise and features of the Innuos Zenith. Putting the mac back in meant meltdown again. I was cap free and loving my Xs2 bare for first time.

Having been through the mill, I had to still try the Melco N1A, because of the rave reviews and the cheaper price. So I went back to the distributor and got one sent out. Assuming it was going to trump the Innuos Zenith (Direct USB vs Direct USB) . First 8 tracks and my gut feeling was; "The Melco is not as involving as the Innuos Zenith, no way". But I did further listening and my feeling changed briefly with faster tracks. Feeling like the Melco was tighter in some way with a tighter, harder beat but less depth. After extensive listening I came to the clear conclusion that the Melco was smoother, but clearly much less dynamic. Actually being coloured quite a lot to sound smoother. Like I was losing a lot of the music. Limiting the dynamic range quite obviously. The soundstage was much smaller on the Melco. So I kept the Innuos Zenith and since I see and hear that it's gainining great support in the hifi world.

I also faffed around with various other little boxes during this period. At one point I bought a Gustard U12 SPDIF convertor. Tried this on the iMac and Zenith. The iMac route was clearly sub standard. So I gave up on that completely. However at first I found the U12 USB to Optical conversion into my Hugo from the Zenith to be more pleasing. Finding it smoother and with more natural flow. But I felt like something was missing. After speaking to a couple of people in the know, they talked to me about how optical is limited in it's application and that it might well provide for a slightly diffuse sound, alluding to being softer and more organic. But that it would come at the expense of dynamics and involvement. Indeed it did. One chap here, even used the word "strangles the music" into the Hugo when he tested. Switching back to USB from the Zenith to the Hugo clarified this. So the Gustard went off for resale. I did tried Coax but for me this felt a bit rapier than USB. I tried this on the Melco too. Again Melco direct USB was better than the Gustard in the chain. But the Zenith infinitely more impressive than all other setups. I did try substituting the Mac for  MacBook Pro at one point running on batteries but this made little difference. Just sounding quieter.

Other things tried, included jitterbugs. Couldn't even get that to carry a signal. Maybe faulty.

Lastly I ordered an Uptone Regen, and a TP 7/2 to try again with the iMac and the Zenith. Same again on the iMac, sounded flawed. So gave up on that. Switching to the Regen using two short USB cables into the Zenith > Hugo chain. Now this took things to a really dynamically new level. Loads of verve and flow. Quite brilliant. However... big BUT time... I sat listening to this over a few hours one night and found my ears getting achy. Like my ear drums were being pressed. Even when turned down the voices were aggravating my ears. I wouldn't say it was a harsh sound. Quite smooth. But something just sounded a tad forward and incisive. Quite subtle but enough for fatigue to occur over an hour or so.

I took the Regen and the TP PSU out of the chain, going back to the Innuos Zenith direct over USB short cable into the Hugo and the sound flowed still but without the forwardness and ear jarring edge. Now the music plays on a lovely level. Without the glare / accentuation that the Regen seemed to add.

So that brings me to:

Innuos Zenith > Short stock USB > Hugo > Chord Shawline RCA > Nait XS2 > Chord Odyssey > Proac 118.

I now find this to be a very nice system. I am tempted to put the Flat Cap Xs back into this now as I think that'd make a great addition to the system now it's hash free, but I want to hear a SN2. I would like a little less obvious detail to be honest. But this is now slight preference level of thinking rather than fundamental problems with noise and digitalness. Much progress in little time. I feel now I can enjoy experimenting with different DACs, amps and speakers at leisure.

The reason I wanted to share this is I am sure others will go on this journey. Spending vast amounts of cash trying this, that and the other won't get you there fast. My recommendation to others would be to avoid all of this (pcs/macs of any type) and listen to a good CD player first off with a good amp and a good pair of speakers. This should be the point of reference for any newbie. Then see if you can find something to store your digital music that at least matches that. Or if you are trying to solve things about your sound at the DAC/analogue stage of your system, look at your computer isolation first. Unless you fancy smashing a MacMini up, I'd go so far as to say, don't bother with computers that aren't designed for hifi. 

Computer audio is a fecking nightmare to put it bluntly. Many of you here supercharge Mac Minis and the likes with great success. But to get a quicker idea of natural and well proportioned sound a CD player or a Naim (or other) streamer with a NAS into a Naim amp would save you a lot of pain. It's easy to cut corners thinking you can do it cheaper but ultimately you'll realise it's a waste of time and you could of go there quicker. Some people have success with little boxes, I don't deny that. But a proper music server with audio grade internals has been a revelation for me. The company Innuos are second to none for support too, quite amazing service and communication on many levels. Naim like. I know this should be obvious to many, but I came into this blind and didn't even know what an NDX was or did. That!s how new I am talking. Having only recently been able to afford to do this after buying my first house. 

Finally, I recently tried an NDX between the Zenith and the Hugo and I could tell no difference to SQ to using the Zenith direct. I fact the Zenith might just have the edge. Subjective. (Also tried a CD5Xs). Both more 'Naim' sounding maybe. But not much in it. But these three combos are a long way from everything else I have tried. If I was starting from scratch I would of invested my money in the NDX / NAS  with less in the speakers and the amp. Or bought a music server as a start point. I started in the wrong place with dacs and amps. I realise that now. I have no regrets on the Zenith versus NDX/CD player. It's fantastic. The very front of the system makes such a huge difference to ensuring you get a natural reflection of the recording.

Lastly, I recently invested in some acoustic panels, after putting it off for a long time. Should of done that a long time ago too. Incredible what a few panels and a couple of bass traps do to the solidity, cleanliness and refinement of audio quality. Much more enjoyable without the echoes, which at first I 'couldn't hear'. I know what reflected audio sounds like now alright.

Anyway, I hope this helps. I appreciate it's a lot to do with system/room/taste relevance but I would of loved to komen all this 6 Monti's ago. Now I can try out other dacs, amps, speakers with confidence that the front end is clean and tidy. 

Oh, and if You think people are being excessive here with their suggestions of expensive solutions. They're not. You really do get what you pay for. Naim/quality stuff, just tends to work! 

 

Cheers

Adam

 

 

Posted on: 26 October 2016 by Brubacca

Wow.  Glad you are happy with your system.  Quite the journey.

Posted on: 26 October 2016 by NickSeattle

A reliable CD player can well earn its keep, simply as a reference.  Handy when you don't want to wait for ripping.

Glad you are in a happy place.

Nick

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim

Thanks, me too!

Just to add, I went through MANY USB cables - cheap and dear. Most a waste of time. Preferring short 15cm stock cables.I tried: AQ Forest/Cinn, Chord Silver Plus, Curious Hugo link 0.8m, Supra 2.0, Black Dragon, various cheaper cables (Inc Lindy) and so on... All sounded 'different/strange' vs a cheap short USB cable. Be careful on USB cables! I'm told the Chord Sig at around £400 is very good, but given the track record, I'm put off expensive USB cables for now. I know understand that USB cables sound different potentially down to the amount of noise they carry varying. I tried some different optical cables too but these all changed the sound again but couldn't match the USB connection. I was dead against USB at one point. One thing is for sure, SHORT cables sound much more even keeled and natural regardless of price. The Curious USB is on it's way back to Australia. It did add dimension and a smoothness as advertised. But for me it felt forward.

The only thing I didn't do in the end was the Micro Rendu (My brain is still ticking but it's time to say enough is enough). With such good sound coming with the Zenith > Hugo combo over USB. It just felt like a hurdle too far. Heard lots of good things about other bits and bobs which ultimately turned out flawed.

Good CD player / Good purpose built music server or NDX and NAS into AMP (Or DAC). The rest is was a chore.

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by james n

A bit harsh to blame Computer Audio for all your problems - From your comprehensive write up, it looks like you had a lot more issues to deal with (room problems and the system not sounding as you'd heard it first at the dealers) so lots of sticking plasters were applied to get the system working well rather than getting the fundamentals right first. 

It doesn't matter how you front the system (Vinyl, CD, Streaming), getting the basics right to start with still applies.

Anyway glad you seem to have got yourself sorted so enjoy your system 

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
james n posted:

A bit harsh to blame Computer Audio for all your problems - From your comprehensive write up, it looks like you had a lot more issues to deal with (room problems and the system not sounding as you'd heard it first at the dealers) so lots of sticking plasters were applied to get the system working well rather than getting the fundamentals right first. 

It doesn't matter how you front the system (Vinyl, CD, Streaming), getting the basics right to start with still applies.

Anyway glad you seem to have got yourself sorted so enjoy your system 

Cheers. There were a few factors. But the room stuff didn't solve the main issues. This was definitely down to noise in the system. Lots of sibilance and screetching to the sound that made me wince. With a cold, empty and clinical sound. This was 95% solved by a proper music server/NDX or CD input. 

An imac, a borrowed "non-fiddled with" mac mini, a macbook pro and pc latop all caused the same issues with no other variables. Even with little boxes between they dont get close to quality sound.

As I said. Computer audio can be done be done well, judging but the success of others here (depending on your expectations of natural). But there 's a much easier way to get to amazing. Just costs more! 

 

 

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by JamesN

Hi Adam,

I had the same issue as you with pc to 2qute via USB and found it very harsh, so I swapped the DAC for a Hugo and added the Gustard U12. Combined with a decent Optical cable for noise isolation, I couldn't be happier with the sound now.

I don't recognise strangled sound at all with this setup. It now seems very natural and expressive, and much nicer than my old Naim CDP.

Im glad you've found a solution that works for you, but I think that computer audio can sound marvellous too.

James

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim

Hi James. Maybe the optical cables of choice wern't ideal. The VDH cable opened things up but was too smooth. Then getting the USB cable right into the Gustatd sonically and positionally was what ultimately put me back to USB direct.

But glad you have your sound running snoothly! cheers

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by MarkMcK79

TL;DR

Where was your dealer?

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Bert Schurink

Wow what a story, thanks for sharing. It's clear that the audio journey which sometimes needs some help from a good dealer to avoid that one is falling in obvious traps. I think the computer audio aspect is not completely fair. As you have also been faced with normal audio challenges. But you have a point the computer audio road has more parameter which can be  optimized or degrading the overall performance in the case of wrong choices. 

With regards to your remarks on the Melco. I have to say that I have other experiences. But it's also a topic of waiting until you have a burn in of a device. Most devices aren't at that best from the beginning.

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
Bert Schurink posted:

Wow what a story, thanks for sharing. It's clear that the audio journey which sometimes needs some help from a good dealer to avoid that one is falling in obvious traps. I think the computer audio aspect is not completely fair. As you have also been faced with normal audio challenges. But you have a point the computer audio road has more parameter which can be  optimized or degrading the overall performance in the case of wrong choices. 

With regards to your remarks on the Melco. I have to say that I have other experiences. But it's also a topic of waiting until you have a burn in of a device. Most devices aren't at that best from the beginning.

It's been a challenge that's for sure. But it's easier from here.

Strange the server thing. Should just offer a clean signal at the end of the day. Both servers had even time burn-in in the end but there was a noticeably smaller soundstage on the Melco. Dynamically violins and strings just had a lot less life. Less ambience. There's a wholesomeness about the Zenith. The Melco definitely felt much less involving to me but I could see how preferentially this might differ from person to person. It did feel faster but after listen to the same tracks on a fee different setups it was the odd one out for me. I think the SSD and multilevel PSU of the Innuos helps. So much more going on.

If I hadn't heard the Zenith, I would of been very impressed with the Melco, so maybe the 600 quid saving is worthwhile.

Very close. Especially if you are using amps and dac equipment of epic proportion and scale. It wouldn't matter so much then perhaps.

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Halloween Man

whoever 'in the know' said an optical cable will strangle the sound of a hugo dac, is limited, or sound diffuse, has an odd opinion of it given that the designer of hugo, Rob Watts, has repeatedly said it offers the best sound quality for Hugo. i know who's opinion and ears i would trust.

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by dayjay

"I know who's opinion and ears i would trust."  Me too, and in my system it is most definitely mine!  I prefered the Hugo with USB/Regen/Jitterbug over optical regardless of what Rob may say but then he hasn't heard it in my system and may have different tastes and as I have my own ears I really don't need him to make the decision.   I'm glad the OP has found a set up that works for him, sounds like he's been a little unlucky on the journey but it's the destination that matters.

Like Reply (0 Likes)

Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Bowers
Halloween Man posted:

whoever 'in the know' said an optical cable will strangle the sound of a hugo dac, is limited, or sound diffuse, has an odd opinion of it given that the designer of hugo, Rob Watts, has repeatedly said it offers the best sound quality for Hugo. i know who's opinion and ears i would trust.

Hi HM,

Think the forum members are very clear on what they hear and which combination they prefer.

Many of us will respect Rob Watts being an outstanding audio engineer, but we might have different opinions on SQ.

Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately) , there is no absolute truth on SQ and we can only trust our own hearing system.

Peter

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Halloween Man

im not sure. i read this sounds better than that quite often and rarely read after some careful ab blind listening we picked out and preferred b every time.

just look at all the devices the op has read about, purchased, and been disappointed with. if he just took the advice of the designer (very refreshing that a manufacturer even allows this information to be public) then he would have saved an awful lot of effort and money.

i have been mocked on this forum before for stating rob watts this or rob watts that but i for one greatly appreciate the time he takes to answer questions on forums and with a great deal of honesty. he saved me an awful lot of time and money and has improved my listening experience no end.

im not saying what he says is the be all and end all but it is a good place to start.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Halloween Man

regen and jitterbug will only reduce usb and mains noise not eliminate them like optical. chord's own measurenents show that source jitter will measure almost identical for usb, coax, and optical with hugo. there is no evidence whatsoever that suggests usb offers better sq than optical with hugo.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Huge

OK, a few points both to look at and for experience (both for yourself and others on this forum)…

If the system didn’t show mains hum at the dealers, but did in your home and that was caused by the 2Qute SMPS, then most likely one of two things applies:
1  Your mains wiring is suspect (the socket into which you plugged the SMPS may have a suspect earth – you should get this checked)
2  The SPMS may be faulty

It’s unfortunate that you got distracted by the ‘dramatic’ improvements claims for speaker cables – the improvements can be ‘dramatic’ but only in the ‘tweaking’ sense.  Perhaps we who are making such claims should accept that we may be open to misleading people.  Interconnects on the other hand can make a much bigger difference, but primarily in small signal terms rather than overall balance.  Again we should remember to emphasise the limitations of improvements for such tweakery.

The point about room layout, resonances and reflections is a major point and something that gets too little attention.  It’s something with which all dealers should become familiar to save massive problems for their clients.  Did you take up the offer of installation form a Naim Dealer?  Was it offered?

Silibance usually indicates that the speakers aren’t a good match for your listening tastes and/or the room is much to reflective somewhere in the low to mid HF region.

As you found isolation of noise and artefacts from computer systems is key to analogue music reproduction.  I hope that reading many threads in “Streaming Audio” alerted you to this.  Sadly you didn’t spot that there are two connections from a computer to an audio system, the signal AND the mains.  This led you to concentrate on tweaking the signal path only and not fixing the problem of mains interference from the computer.  Again you seem to have expected massive changes from tweakery solutions rather than the fundamentals.

Then you went the other way… Instead of the NAS / UPnP / Streamer route, you’d chosen the computer / USB DAC route, and that lead you down the route of dedicated audiophile computers (Innos and Melco): relatively expensive solutions.  Perhaps stopping to consider a NAS / UPnP / USB Streamer such as a Micro Rendu to front the 2Qute would have given as good results for ½ the cost – if you had asked here I’m sure someone would have suggested it.  Picking peoples brains here is very often worthwhile (and sometimes triggers quite astonishing level of disagreement!)

Finally, you went back to the main problem and the first successful part of your solution:  After getting a major gain by rearranging the room you realised that speaker room interaction is very important.  You then completed that by changing the room reflections (although you took the most expensive way of doing it).

 

Now can I suggest actually measuring the acoustics of your room (e.g. REW + a microphone such as a miniDSP UMIK-1) so that you can actually sort out your room properly rather than just by guesswork?  And then you can really optimise all that expensive stuff!

But it's good that you've discovered you can ask, and get help form people with experience!

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by andarkian

I very much applaud your efforts to get the  best out of your new system as well as overcoming all the interconnect hurdles. As I have only silence from the systems that exist in my house, I struggle with the concepts of interference. Most noise comes from the Synology 212j  now very obsolete NAS.

My wins are measured, as yesterday, when listening to the Beach Boys Good Vibrations for probably  the 1,000th  time since it came out in 1966, and never having looked up the lyrics on-line, I picked up clearly the line, "I love the colourful clothes you wear!" for the first time. As the hardware I used was my AV amp and was delivered via Spotify, I have to credit the remastering of the originals for the increased clarity, and that is hugely significant, at least to me, in music reproduction.

This is not a criticism as I have been using my current system, an Onkyo AV amp, as a compromise until I found a satisfactory solution that does not encompass lots of additional black boxes and works in conjunction with the AV system, even if in itself it might be another compromise. Hopefully, the first part of the solution will arrive in the next few weeks and then the speakers when I can pluck up the courage to tell the wife. Oh, and the interconnects.

 

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Bart
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:

. . .

Apple Lossy files

. . .

 

 

Did you try that original system with LOSSLESS files?  If not, you may have wholly unnecessarily complicated your journey to good sound.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Mayor West

A very interesting and topsy turvy journey but glad you found a solution in the end. Interesting that you lost the Gustard in the end because I thought you were smitten! 

I don't think computer audio is inherently bad but I know that it isn't perfect. It just provides a reasonable compromise and fits well with my lifestyle without the additional expense of having to buy a dedicated renderer. At least it's something I can maybe look forward to upgrading to further down the line. 

Halloween Man, although I don't claim to be in the know, I may be the offender who stated that optical strangled the music for me via a Gustard U12. I came to this conclusion after a few days listening which was to my surprise, and as a result, I went back to USB into Hugo. Don't get me wrong, optical was pleasant, but it just didn't excite me. 

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Halloween Man

well sound quality is subjective, one may prefer optical, one may find it too warm/smooth and prefer what usb brings. whatever suits your taste. in the end as long as you are happy with your sound quality and can enjoy the music is all that matters.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Mayor West

It is indeed. Like I say, I was surprised at the findings, especially considering it's Rob Watts preference, but like you say... each to their own :-) 

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
Bart posted:
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:

. . .

Apple Lossy files

. . .

 

 

Did you try that original system with LOSSLESS files?  If not, you may have wholly unnecessarily complicated your journey to good sound.

Yes indeed I did. I may be stupid... that's a stupidity hurdle too far, even for me!

WAVs were one of the first thing I brought in. 

 

Uniti Core soon? maybe one last fling? i'm probably going to get a CD player. i quite like changing the disc. not sure all this ipad lark is for me.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
Mayor West posted:

A very interesting and topsy turvy journey but glad you found a solution in the end. Interesting that you lost the Gustard in the end because I thought you were smitten! 

I don't think computer audio is inherently bad but I know that it isn't perfect. It just provides a reasonable compromise and fits well with my lifestyle without the additional expense of having to buy a dedicated renderer. At least it's something I can maybe look forward to upgrading to further down the line. 

Halloween Man, although I don't claim to be in the know, I may be the offender who stated that optical strangled the music for me via a Gustard U12. I came to this conclusion after a few days listening which was to my surprise, and as a result, I went back to USB into Hugo. Don't get me wrong, optical was pleasant, but it just didn't excite me. 

When I am wrong, I am happy to admit. 

Like I say, it's all been a learning curve.

I did like the softness of the Gustard. But then listening back to other tracks I felt the dynamics were lost versus USB. actually everything feels very nice over usb now from the Zenith. innuos just released a low latency mode which takes the Zenith up another notch in flow. delightful company to deal with.

You know I've actually exceeded my expectations now a little, although I can't help but think I need to upgrade my amp... SN2. Need a little more refinement now. A teeny little grain remains but this might even be recordings. I have a Sugden lined up... god knows what that'll bring. i might not be posting here again! or maybe I will. I think the smoothness might appeal... but also not. just a hunch. once I've ticked th Sugden box, I am done. SN2/NDX/Uniti Core. Game over. 

But at least I can try in confidence now.

Posted on: 28 October 2016 by Jan-Erik Nordoen

 The only part of a computer that should touch your audio system is a USB key. Into any one of the Naim DACs.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Simon-in-Suffolk

I do wonder, as one or two others have asked, where your dealer was with all this.. that is part of their role, especially with Naim. As James said, you need the basics right before you go anywhere near sources or so called computer audio.. all these sources are going to do is accentuate issues in yourdownstream system. Simplicity is usually the answer.

As Huge said, if your Chord SMPS caused your system to hum, there is a fault in your mains distribution or SMPS itself. This needs investigating... Chord Electronics do not recommend using 3rd party PSUs.. just like Naim... an important consideration when it comes to warranties etc.

Glad iyou are happier.. but I have a nagging doubt  the underlying issue might still be there, and it's nothing to do with 'digital audio'  and you have simply masked it with cables and other gadgets etc...