Digital Audio Debacle

Posted by: ThatsNotMyNaim on 26 October 2016

Hello all,

I bought a new system in April (with little knowledge of this type of level) and have been on a difficult and tedious learning curve since. But learnt much. Partly thanks to helpful people on this forum. I know most of my system isn't Naim but people here know their stuff. The other forums are full of left field ideas.

I wanted to write this up for any new starters out there. So they don't make the same silly errors.

What I bought:

Chord 2Qute, Naim Nait XS2, Proac 118. With Chord Silver Plus USB cable, Chord Rumour 2 speaker cables.

My setup:

iMac Audivarna Apple Lossy files > Chord Silver Plus USB > Chord 2 Qute > Chord Chameleon RCA RCA > Nait Xs2 > Chord Rumour 2 single wire > Proac 118. Atacama Moseco stands > Atacama Eris rack.

What I thought:

I demoed only at the dealer. First bad move. When I got it all delivered and setup, I was distinctly underwhelmed in many ways. I couldn't fathom how you could pay 4K out and have such distinctly average sound with a bit of an annoying edge. I noticed the music sounded hugely clinical and cold. Sharp and aggravating. Not like the dealers.

The first issue I noticed was a big mains hum. Which I narrowed down to the switch Mode power supply that came with the Chord 2Qute. I bought a TP PSU to replace it which calmed the sound down massively. And removed the mains hum. Sound was much calmer, more involving and bigger. Felt like a good move. I was positive all this PSU malarkey was the answer. 

But I still wasn't happy so I started buying all my music on CD and converting to WAV. This provided an improvement to fullness but the sound was still lacking.

Like a fool, I Went through various speaker cables Rumour, Odyseey, Epic, TQB, Black Rhodium, Nac A5. Compared the Rumour all sounded thinner, I now realise this as Rumour being boomy rather than acoustically full and rich (which the system wasn't at the time). For the time being I went with the Odyssey as it was more open and didn't make the room boom. It also made it easier to determine what effects other element changes would have going forward. But this wasn't an answer. TQ cables made the problem worse... but not because they aren't great cables. I could hear how good they were in terms of transparency but the sound was dire and ear bleeding. They just showed it all up horribly. 

I got some great advice from the very helpful and eternally pleasant Nigel Finn at Chord Company. He suggested spinning the room around which helped massively. I couldn't of done this with the Rumour cables as the boom in the new position was so crazy. So I bought some used Odyssey 2 as mentioned and this controlled the bass much better. Staggeringly so. By the way in the middle of this Nigel recommended a Shawline RCA RCA to replace the Chameleon. This was like a system upgrade. I joke not. Clarity and cohesion were remarkable.

Still not content, and not being able to put my finger on it, I then moved on to thinking about various different caps thinking this would solve my issue. Like my Xs2 was to blame for sharpness and forwardness. The sibilance was driving me nuts. Like a cap, FC,TC,HC would be a silver bullet. Even thinking ahead to Supernaits!

Randomly at this point I tried a few difference amps. Just to check this wasn't that an Xs2 issue. I quickly came back to Naim after Musical Fidelity, Sonneteer Alabaster, Classe Sigma demos. Missing the Naim swing.

Then I threw caution to the wind with a Flat Cap XS. This was actually a really nice addition. But I didn't want to pay the money for it feeling it was overpriced, circa £1000, And also my underlying issue was still there. So it went back. Also it was close to supernait upgrade territory. So no sense in it unless I'd heard a SN2. I then ordered a TP TC after much debate. This, I thought was another revelation, seemingly solving all my issues. Toning down the glare and the digital tizz. Smoothing the sound a lot. So I kept the TP TC for a month or so. It did change the sound though. My girlfriend commented unhappily about the change. But to me the tizz was dimmed a little and sound warmer. So I was partly happier.

Again I still wasn't content. It was only at this point that I started looking into isolation of the iMac / USB ports / optical etc. And also audio grade music store servers/players. Reading about things like Melco N1A, Innuos Zenith and other smaller things like Intona, Regen, Micro Rendu etc. I spoke to my dealer who told me about the Innuos Zen Mini and how good it was. But was looking a bit higher up the ladder. I then saw Innuos' Zenith flagship which has only recently been released. I emailed Innuos and they had one dropped to my dealer in a matter of days. This was a gobsmack moment in terms of sound quality improvement. I had lined up a Melco N1A to come for demo too. But the distributor forgot to send the demo. By this point I had already been blown away by the practicality, ease of use, service and sound of the Zenith that I had agreed a price Andy pick up date two days later - along with my new Hugo. So I cancelled the late delivery of the Melco and went with my gut.

After about two weeks, I decided, for a laugh, to take the TPTC off of the Nait Xs2, and whereas before I couldn't bare the bare Xs2 amp, i found the TC actually changed the Naim sound in a way I didn't really like. It was much fresher without and and more musical. With a more solid image and heavier bass. Girlfriend much happier too. However this could only happen due to the ultra low noise and features of the Innuos Zenith. Putting the mac back in meant meltdown again. I was cap free and loving my Xs2 bare for first time.

Having been through the mill, I had to still try the Melco N1A, because of the rave reviews and the cheaper price. So I went back to the distributor and got one sent out. Assuming it was going to trump the Innuos Zenith (Direct USB vs Direct USB) . First 8 tracks and my gut feeling was; "The Melco is not as involving as the Innuos Zenith, no way". But I did further listening and my feeling changed briefly with faster tracks. Feeling like the Melco was tighter in some way with a tighter, harder beat but less depth. After extensive listening I came to the clear conclusion that the Melco was smoother, but clearly much less dynamic. Actually being coloured quite a lot to sound smoother. Like I was losing a lot of the music. Limiting the dynamic range quite obviously. The soundstage was much smaller on the Melco. So I kept the Innuos Zenith and since I see and hear that it's gainining great support in the hifi world.

I also faffed around with various other little boxes during this period. At one point I bought a Gustard U12 SPDIF convertor. Tried this on the iMac and Zenith. The iMac route was clearly sub standard. So I gave up on that completely. However at first I found the U12 USB to Optical conversion into my Hugo from the Zenith to be more pleasing. Finding it smoother and with more natural flow. But I felt like something was missing. After speaking to a couple of people in the know, they talked to me about how optical is limited in it's application and that it might well provide for a slightly diffuse sound, alluding to being softer and more organic. But that it would come at the expense of dynamics and involvement. Indeed it did. One chap here, even used the word "strangles the music" into the Hugo when he tested. Switching back to USB from the Zenith to the Hugo clarified this. So the Gustard went off for resale. I did tried Coax but for me this felt a bit rapier than USB. I tried this on the Melco too. Again Melco direct USB was better than the Gustard in the chain. But the Zenith infinitely more impressive than all other setups. I did try substituting the Mac for  MacBook Pro at one point running on batteries but this made little difference. Just sounding quieter.

Other things tried, included jitterbugs. Couldn't even get that to carry a signal. Maybe faulty.

Lastly I ordered an Uptone Regen, and a TP 7/2 to try again with the iMac and the Zenith. Same again on the iMac, sounded flawed. So gave up on that. Switching to the Regen using two short USB cables into the Zenith > Hugo chain. Now this took things to a really dynamically new level. Loads of verve and flow. Quite brilliant. However... big BUT time... I sat listening to this over a few hours one night and found my ears getting achy. Like my ear drums were being pressed. Even when turned down the voices were aggravating my ears. I wouldn't say it was a harsh sound. Quite smooth. But something just sounded a tad forward and incisive. Quite subtle but enough for fatigue to occur over an hour or so.

I took the Regen and the TP PSU out of the chain, going back to the Innuos Zenith direct over USB short cable into the Hugo and the sound flowed still but without the forwardness and ear jarring edge. Now the music plays on a lovely level. Without the glare / accentuation that the Regen seemed to add.

So that brings me to:

Innuos Zenith > Short stock USB > Hugo > Chord Shawline RCA > Nait XS2 > Chord Odyssey > Proac 118.

I now find this to be a very nice system. I am tempted to put the Flat Cap Xs back into this now as I think that'd make a great addition to the system now it's hash free, but I want to hear a SN2. I would like a little less obvious detail to be honest. But this is now slight preference level of thinking rather than fundamental problems with noise and digitalness. Much progress in little time. I feel now I can enjoy experimenting with different DACs, amps and speakers at leisure.

The reason I wanted to share this is I am sure others will go on this journey. Spending vast amounts of cash trying this, that and the other won't get you there fast. My recommendation to others would be to avoid all of this (pcs/macs of any type) and listen to a good CD player first off with a good amp and a good pair of speakers. This should be the point of reference for any newbie. Then see if you can find something to store your digital music that at least matches that. Or if you are trying to solve things about your sound at the DAC/analogue stage of your system, look at your computer isolation first. Unless you fancy smashing a MacMini up, I'd go so far as to say, don't bother with computers that aren't designed for hifi. 

Computer audio is a fecking nightmare to put it bluntly. Many of you here supercharge Mac Minis and the likes with great success. But to get a quicker idea of natural and well proportioned sound a CD player or a Naim (or other) streamer with a NAS into a Naim amp would save you a lot of pain. It's easy to cut corners thinking you can do it cheaper but ultimately you'll realise it's a waste of time and you could of go there quicker. Some people have success with little boxes, I don't deny that. But a proper music server with audio grade internals has been a revelation for me. The company Innuos are second to none for support too, quite amazing service and communication on many levels. Naim like. I know this should be obvious to many, but I came into this blind and didn't even know what an NDX was or did. That!s how new I am talking. Having only recently been able to afford to do this after buying my first house. 

Finally, I recently tried an NDX between the Zenith and the Hugo and I could tell no difference to SQ to using the Zenith direct. I fact the Zenith might just have the edge. Subjective. (Also tried a CD5Xs). Both more 'Naim' sounding maybe. But not much in it. But these three combos are a long way from everything else I have tried. If I was starting from scratch I would of invested my money in the NDX / NAS  with less in the speakers and the amp. Or bought a music server as a start point. I started in the wrong place with dacs and amps. I realise that now. I have no regrets on the Zenith versus NDX/CD player. It's fantastic. The very front of the system makes such a huge difference to ensuring you get a natural reflection of the recording.

Lastly, I recently invested in some acoustic panels, after putting it off for a long time. Should of done that a long time ago too. Incredible what a few panels and a couple of bass traps do to the solidity, cleanliness and refinement of audio quality. Much more enjoyable without the echoes, which at first I 'couldn't hear'. I know what reflected audio sounds like now alright.

Anyway, I hope this helps. I appreciate it's a lot to do with system/room/taste relevance but I would of loved to komen all this 6 Monti's ago. Now I can try out other dacs, amps, speakers with confidence that the front end is clean and tidy. 

Oh, and if You think people are being excessive here with their suggestions of expensive solutions. They're not. You really do get what you pay for. Naim/quality stuff, just tends to work! 

 

Cheers

Adam

 

 

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Halloween Man

I had 2qute and there was no noticable hum from power so as huge and simon have said either socket or 2qute power needs checking as a priority.

sn2 is a superb amp. i actually traded mine in for a sugden hoping to remove the strong top end from my system at the recommendation of the sugden dealer. boy were they wrong. the sugden was a superb amp too only it could not drive my speakers, pmc 20.23, as well as the sn2 did. it did add a little 'clarity' but bottom end was gone and the strong top end was still there. the dealer knew my speakers well and didnt think that was problem. i wanted my sn2 back but they had sold it on! i realised trying different speakers that the strong top end was coming from the tweeters on the 20.23 speakers. that was were my ears were having an issue. all along it was the speaker tweeters and balanance, not the amp. with the sugden i was limited to which speakers i could use as they can only seem to drive small sensitive speakers well. i needed now to change my amp and speakers and that is when i decided to try atc active speakers, scm40a. now pmc 20.23 are fantastic speakers, very transparent and revealing, monitor like, it's just that i found them a little forward for my taste. very unforgiving on too many tracks. the atc a similar in presentation but seem more lifelike and better balanced than the pmc, forgiving and great sounding on just about everything. i kept them. being active they also remind me a little of that 'clarity' the sugden brought but without any of the drawbacks of limited bass. for me, the perfect speaker and partner for hugo tt.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Halloween Man

saying all that, your Proac 118 are likely to be a good match for sugden but just be aware speaker choice in future may be limited with a sugden. try before you trade in your naim.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Patu

Quite a journey in only six months if I understood correctly. Good to hear you have found a combination that works for you. 

You could've saved some money though if you have considered acoustics first. Also there's no mention about the speakers, which could be a bad match with your system and cause sibilance and other problems. Have you tried any other speakers? Back in the days I've also struggled with sibilance. It's always a mismatch between components in your system. With revealing speakers you need front end which smooths things out little bit and vice versa. 

Why I opened the thread though is my evergrowing interest in digital audio and especially computer audio. How to squeeze that final performance out of your source. I've used PC as my main source for 15 years now and never really got into a world of high end CD-players or Vinyl. I recently did my first test comparing two different USB cables, Chord Silver Plus (this I've used for years now) against TeddyPardo's USB cable, which I bought out of interest since I use TP U2S USB-bridge between my PC and Naim DAC. To my surprise, there was a clear difference in SQ, in favor of Chord. It felt like TP added some noise and put a veil over the sound of my system, sucked out some excitement out of the sound. I think the construction of the cable was quite poor. It was very thin and probably had bad insulation. I need 4-5m long runs of the cable to reach my equipment from my PC so maybe it picked some noise on the way or something?

After that I've been slightly concerned about connecting my hifi setup to PC through USB since there's clearly something going on there which can affect the SQ. Well yesterday, after careful consideration and many hours spent reading reviews and forums about different methods for USB isolation, I bought Intona USB Isolator (industrial version) to solve the problem of computer being connected to rest of the equipment. It completely isolates PC from rest of the equipment and has gotten quite a positive reviews. The Isolator should arrive next week. I also use AQ JitterBug but have read that it's useless with Intona. It's been quite useless this far also though, I hear very little if no improvement at all with it. 

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Halloween Man

The Intona USB does indeed look interesting, could be the answer to usb on the hugo. Try it with a battery powered laptop for full benefit.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Patu
Halloween Man posted:

The Intona USB does indeed look interesting, could be the answer to usb on the hugo. Try it with a battery powered laptop for full benefit.

Unfortunately I don't have a laptop at hand. Well I do for work, but I use desktop PC at home and it works as my music server also.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
Halloween Man posted:

The Intona USB does indeed look interesting, could be the answer to usb on the hugo. Try it with a battery powered laptop for full benefit.

A couple of told me that it changes the sound unfavourable... but you know what they say... try for yourself.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim

Interested to know if Uniti Core > Hugo would be as goos as Uniti Core > NDX > Hugo. Or perhaps no Hugo. Although as I said there is something moving about the Hugo which I haven't found elsewhere yet.

TT is a luxury at the moment. If I decide against SN2 then the cash might go on the TT. Or other.

Would like to hear Metrum NOS and Ayre Dacs. but £££.

 

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim

A few people have mentioned dealer. 

My dealer has been very good to me on loan demos, time and prices. I paid about 1k less than the overall prices on the 2Qute/XS2/Proacs as a bundle. Very unpushy. 

But I agree maybe the passion for getting a system completely right could be better/more insightful. But busy chap with lots of other things on.

My dealer did tell me for instance that the Hugo was exactly the same as the 2Qute. Which I found to be completely inaccurate on listening. Immediate obvious difference.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Halloween Man
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:
Halloween Man posted:

The Intona USB does indeed look interesting, could be the answer to usb on the hugo. Try it with a battery powered laptop for full benefit.

A couple of told me that it changes the sound unfavourable... but you know what they say... try for yourself.

Oh. If it really does offer galvanic isolation from the source USB and keep the data stream bit perfect I would expect it  to sound great. The argument for optical still stands so u have to ask yourself why bother?

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by Patu
Halloween Man posted:
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:
Halloween Man posted:

The Intona USB does indeed look interesting, could be the answer to usb on the hugo. Try it with a battery powered laptop for full benefit.

A couple of told me that it changes the sound unfavourable... but you know what they say... try for yourself.

Oh. If it really does offer galvanic isolation from the source USB and keep the data stream bit perfect I would expect it  to sound great. The argument for optical still stands so u have to ask yourself why bother?

When I first got my U2S USB-bridge, I thought that it made my system sound too revealing. I was even shipping it back at one point. It took me few weeks to get used to. Then I did some comparison with my old bridge (Stello U3) and noticed the clear difference. U3 is powered throgh USB when U2S has built in PSU. That makes a huge difference between two devices which are quite similar otherwise, even the same XMOS chip. U2S still uses the USB power for some functions so I expect similar improvements with Intona, though maybe not that big.

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by james n
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:

 

Would like to hear Metrum NOS and Ayre Dacs. but £££.

 

The Original Octave (Mk1) is a cracker - it does like an up sampled signal though (and is S/PDIF only). Ran one off my old NDX for a while and really enjoyed it. Probably completely different to the Chord but a lot of fun. Worth keeping an eye out in the usual places as these sometimes come up for sale

 

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim
james n posted:
ThatsNotMyNaim posted:

 

Would like to hear Metrum NOS and Ayre Dacs. but £££.

 

The Original Octave (Mk1) is a cracker - it does like an up sampled signal though (and is S/PDIF only). Ran one off my old NDX for a while and really enjoyed it. Probably completely different to the Chord but a lot of fun. Worth keeping an eye out in the usual places as these sometimes come up for sale

 

Hi James, how does the general Metrum sound differ from Chord?

Cheers

Adam

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by james n

Hi Adam - i've not heard the latest Chord DAC's so can't really offer a comparison. From what others describe of the Chord's, I'd say the Metrum is not as revealing but it does boogie nicely and is a very enjoyable listen. 

James

Posted on: 29 October 2016 by ThatsNotMyNaim

Apologies. But thanks for info on the Metrum. Dutch, geloof ik (I believe)...

They do know how to party!

Posted on: 03 November 2016 by Patu

So I received the Intona USB Isolator yesterday. As my Intona is used, there's no need for burn-in. I plugged it in and it works straight out of the box with my XMOS based USB bridge. You can find my equipment chain in my profile. 

First impression about the sound quality is clarity. Everything sounds clearer and better defined. It's easier to separate different instruments from the sound. I guess it really cleans the crap out of +5v line and makes the background blacker which makes this audible difference. My ATC's are very revealing so it's quite easy to tell the difference. Intona solves the final part of isolation between PC and my hifi-setup. I recently bought a 5m power cord for my TV to plug it in a different power outlet than my Naim. The TV is connected to PC with HDMI so I didn't want any loops there either. There's only the USB-connection now which is properly isolated.

Posted on: 03 November 2016 by Halloween Man

Sounds promising Patu. For a few quid I think it may be worth you trying a Tripp Lite U023-003 USB cable - the ferrite chokes on it might give you a helping hand. I've found it to be a terrific USB cable for digital audio. You might find it actually sounds better than the Chord USB cable you have.

Posted on: 05 November 2016 by james n
Patu posted:

So I received the Intona USB Isolator yesterday. As my Intona is used, there's no need for burn-in. I plugged it in and it works straight out of the box with my XMOS based USB bridge. You can find my equipment chain in my profile. 

First impression about the sound quality is clarity. Everything sounds clearer and better defined. It's easier to separate different instruments from the sound. I guess it really cleans the crap out of +5v line and makes the background blacker which makes this audible difference. My ATC's are very revealing so it's quite easy to tell the difference. Intona solves the final part of isolation between PC and my hifi-setup. I recently bought a 5m power cord for my TV to plug it in a different power outlet than my Naim. The TV is connected to PC with HDMI so I didn't want any loops there either. There's only the USB-connection now which is properly isolated.

Good news - glad it's working well for you Patu. 

James

 

Posted on: 06 November 2016 by Patu
Halloween Man posted:

Sounds promising Patu. For a few quid I think it may be worth you trying a Tripp Lite U023-003 USB cable - the ferrite chokes on it might give you a helping hand. I've found it to be a terrific USB cable for digital audio. You might find it actually sounds better than the Chord USB cable you have.

I googled about ferrite chokes and found positive and negative feedback about them. Maybe I won't go that route right now. 

I did some testing between different player software for Windows though. Ended up finding clear differences between the sound quality between them. I posted a new thread about it here: 

https://forums.naimaudio.com/to...tions-for-windows-10

 

Posted on: 06 November 2016 by Huge

Ferrites are really cheap - you might as well try them.

I find the ones from Würth Elektronik (available from CPC Farnell) are the best.